Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

The role of startle fluctuation and non-response startle reflex in tracking amygdala dynamics

Mengting Liu, Rachel C. Amey, Adam Magerman, Matthew Scott, Chad E. Forbes
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.12.903526
Mengting Liu
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mliu@psych.udel.edu
Rachel C. Amey
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam Magerman
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Scott
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chad E. Forbes
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The startle reflex is considered a sensitive defensive reaction to potential threats that manifests as a unique eye blink-like pattern in the EMG. Eye blink EMG has a bell-shaped potential when startle probes are elicited, that strongly corresponds to amygdala activity. Considering how amygdala activity fluctuates over time in response to emotional and self-threatening stimuli, observing startle eyeblink size fluctuation over time could provide a cost-effective, convenient, and less resource intensive means for examining amygdala activity over time. Yet based on current standards in the literature, often startle evoked eye blink EMG values do not exhibit activity 3SDs from the mean eyeblink response, thus these trials are typically excluded from startle analyses. It stands to reason, however, that these trials may still index amygdala activity in a meaningful way. Through investigating the association between startle eyeblink amplitude, corresponding ERP amplitude, and underlying neural activity, the current study provides evidence that startle amplitudes exhibit a linear relationship with proxies for amygdala activity, e.g., N100 amplitudes and regions heavily interconnected with the amygdala. Specifically, the startle reflex correlates to large amount of brain regions in N100 time window in addition to the N100 amplitude. Thus, both valid and otherwise traditionally non-valid startle reflex responses appear to index amygdala activity and should be included accordingly. This approach could help salvage large amounts of meaningful data traditionally excluded from studies interested in amygdala responses to various stimuli over time.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 13, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The role of startle fluctuation and non-response startle reflex in tracking amygdala dynamics
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The role of startle fluctuation and non-response startle reflex in tracking amygdala dynamics
Mengting Liu, Rachel C. Amey, Adam Magerman, Matthew Scott, Chad E. Forbes
bioRxiv 2020.01.12.903526; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.12.903526
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The role of startle fluctuation and non-response startle reflex in tracking amygdala dynamics
Mengting Liu, Rachel C. Amey, Adam Magerman, Matthew Scott, Chad E. Forbes
bioRxiv 2020.01.12.903526; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.12.903526

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4231)
  • Biochemistry (9123)
  • Bioengineering (6769)
  • Bioinformatics (23971)
  • Biophysics (12110)
  • Cancer Biology (9511)
  • Cell Biology (13754)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7623)
  • Ecology (11678)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15495)
  • Genetics (10633)
  • Genomics (14312)
  • Immunology (9474)
  • Microbiology (22825)
  • Molecular Biology (9087)
  • Neuroscience (48922)
  • Paleontology (355)
  • Pathology (1480)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2566)
  • Physiology (3842)
  • Plant Biology (8322)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1468)
  • Synthetic Biology (2295)
  • Systems Biology (6183)
  • Zoology (1299)