Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

The Influence of bioRχiv on PLOS ONE’s Peer-Review and Acceptance Time

View ORCID ProfileHiroyuki Tsunoda, Yuan Sun, Masaki Nishizawa, Xiaomin Liu, View ORCID ProfileKou Amano
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.28.920546
Hiroyuki Tsunoda
1Tsurumi University, Yokohama, Japan,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hiroyuki Tsunoda
  • For correspondence: hi.tsunoda@gmail.com tsunoda-h@tsurumi-u.ac.jp
Yuan Sun
2National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: yuan@nii.ac.jp
Masaki Nishizawa
3National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nisizawa@nii.ac.jp
Xiaomin Liu
4National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: liuxm@mail.las.ac.cn
Kou Amano
5National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, Japan,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kou Amano
  • For correspondence: AMANO.Kou@nims.go.jp
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

This study examines the relation between acceptance times in preprint publishing and journal publishing. Specifically, we investigated the association between a paper’s posting time to bioRχiv, a preprints server, and journal articles’ peer-review and acceptance time for PLOS ONE. So far, of the total papers published in 1,626 academic journals, the average publication rate of those posted in bioRχiv is 40.67%. Meanwhile, PLOS ONE was the journal that published more papers. Analysis of peer-review and acceptance time of papers published in journals via preprints showed the time these papers are posted in relation to these intervals. The median of the peer-review and acceptance time of the journal submission date that was later than the date of first posting to bioRχiv was 110.00 days, and in the reverse case, it was 139.50 days. Posting to the preprint server before journal submission shows a better order than vice versa. This study provides us a good understanding of the peer-review process. It also gives us good insights into optimizing this process, which would then facilitate paper publication and knowledge dissemination.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 14, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Influence of bioRχiv on PLOS ONE’s Peer-Review and Acceptance Time
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The Influence of bioRχiv on PLOS ONE’s Peer-Review and Acceptance Time
Hiroyuki Tsunoda, Yuan Sun, Masaki Nishizawa, Xiaomin Liu, Kou Amano
bioRxiv 2020.01.28.920546; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.28.920546
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The Influence of bioRχiv on PLOS ONE’s Peer-Review and Acceptance Time
Hiroyuki Tsunoda, Yuan Sun, Masaki Nishizawa, Xiaomin Liu, Kou Amano
bioRxiv 2020.01.28.920546; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.28.920546

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Scientific Communication and Education
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4232)
  • Biochemistry (9128)
  • Bioengineering (6774)
  • Bioinformatics (23989)
  • Biophysics (12117)
  • Cancer Biology (9523)
  • Cell Biology (13772)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7627)
  • Ecology (11686)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15505)
  • Genetics (10638)
  • Genomics (14322)
  • Immunology (9479)
  • Microbiology (22832)
  • Molecular Biology (9089)
  • Neuroscience (48962)
  • Paleontology (355)
  • Pathology (1480)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2568)
  • Physiology (3844)
  • Plant Biology (8327)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1471)
  • Synthetic Biology (2296)
  • Systems Biology (6187)
  • Zoology (1300)