Abstract
Learning to avoid threats often occurs through indirect experiences, for example, by observing the behavior of others. Most previous research on observational learning has used pre-recorded stimuli to induce learning. Here, we aimed to enhance the ecological validity of the learning situation by inviting two friends to serve as the ‘observer’ and ‘demonstrator’, respectively. The observer watched their friend performing a differential fear-conditioning task in real time. During the task, one conditioned stimulus (CS+) was associated with an electric shock (unconditioned stimulus, US) to the forearm of the demonstrator. Another stimulus (CS-) was always safe. Following the learning phase, the observer was presented with the CS+ and CS-, but without receiving any shocks. As an index of learning, we measured their skin conductance and fear-potentiated startle responses. While the US applied to the demonstrator robustly elicited strong skin conductance responses in the observers during the learning phase, subsequent differential skin conductance responses of the observers (to CSs presented directly) were dependent on declarative knowledge of the CS+/US contingency. Contingency-aware observers also showed elevated fear-potentiated startle responses during both CS+ and CS-compared to intertrial intervals. Learning efficiency was lower than in previous studies. We conclude that observational fear learning involves two separable components: an automatic, non-specific emotional reaction to the response of the demonstrator (serving as a social US) and learning to predict stimulus contingency (CS+/US pairing). Ecological modifications proposed in the article mirror analogous rodent studies on vicarious fear conditioning.
Footnotes
The manuscript was preprinted on bioRxiv (doi: 10.1101/2020.01.29.924720). Preliminary results of described experiments were presented at Neuronus 2018 conference and SPSAN 2018 summer school. Data collection and analysis were sponsored by National Science Centre grant 2015/19/B/HS6/02209. Ewelina Knapska was supported by European Research Council Starting Grant (H 415148). We have no conflicts of interests to disclose.
Results section updated to include confidence intervals; data sharing section added; author note extended; minor formatting changes to meet APA requirements.
↵1 Prior to article publication, project visibility will be set to private. Please use the view-only link: https://osf.io/d3wxn/?view_only=ad87fa2e0076487c92c905f3be933720