Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Using EEG to understand how our brain elaborate information in stated choice experiments: Easy versus hard tasks in the choice of vehicles

Elisabetta Cherchi, Quoc C Vuong, Antonia Stergiou
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.29.926162
Elisabetta Cherchi
1School of Civil Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: elisabetta.cherchi@newcastle.ac.uk
Quoc C Vuong
2Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonia Stergiou
2Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

In the current study, we aim to provide preliminary evidence that complex consumer choices depends on cognitive processes and executive functions that may not be fully captured by current stated choice (SC) approaches. To address this gap, here we combine the standard SC experiment with electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings while manipulating the cognitive demands of the task. Our study is applied to the choice context of a car purchase between a petrol and an electric vehicle. Respondents were asked to fill in a stated choice experiment online and a subsample of these respondents were then invited to participate in an EEG study during which they repeated the same SC experiment while we continuously recorded EEG signals from their scalp. We then modelled people’s choice behaviours in easy and hard decisions, and compared this analysis of their choice behaviour to their EEG responses in these two conditions. Our results confirm that hard decisions lead to higher cognitive demands and larger EEG responses in electrodes on the frontal part of the scalp and these demands can lead to choices inconsistent with the compensatory assumptions.

Footnotes

  • Email: elisabetta.cherchi{at}ncl.ac.uk, Email: quoc.vuong{at}newcastle.ac.uk, Email: antonia.stergiou{at}newcastle.ac.uk

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 31, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Using EEG to understand how our brain elaborate information in stated choice experiments: Easy versus hard tasks in the choice of vehicles
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Using EEG to understand how our brain elaborate information in stated choice experiments: Easy versus hard tasks in the choice of vehicles
Elisabetta Cherchi, Quoc C Vuong, Antonia Stergiou
bioRxiv 2020.01.29.926162; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.29.926162
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Using EEG to understand how our brain elaborate information in stated choice experiments: Easy versus hard tasks in the choice of vehicles
Elisabetta Cherchi, Quoc C Vuong, Antonia Stergiou
bioRxiv 2020.01.29.926162; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.29.926162

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4838)
  • Biochemistry (10728)
  • Bioengineering (8004)
  • Bioinformatics (27166)
  • Biophysics (13930)
  • Cancer Biology (11079)
  • Cell Biology (15977)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (8756)
  • Ecology (13228)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (17306)
  • Genetics (11663)
  • Genomics (15877)
  • Immunology (10986)
  • Microbiology (25979)
  • Molecular Biology (10600)
  • Neuroscience (56311)
  • Paleontology (416)
  • Pathology (1727)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2998)
  • Physiology (4528)
  • Plant Biology (9583)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1610)
  • Synthetic Biology (2668)
  • Systems Biology (6952)
  • Zoology (1507)