Abstract
Fear is adaptive when the level of the response rapidly scales to degree of threat. Using a discrimination procedure consisting of danger, uncertainty and safety cues, we have found rapid fear scaling (within two seconds of cue presentation) in male rats. Here we examined a possible role for the nucleus accumbens core (NAcc) in the acquisition and expression of fear scaling. In experiment 1, male Long Evans rats received bilateral sham or neurotoxic NAcc lesions, recovered and underwent fear discrimination. NAcc-lesioned rats were generally impaired in scaling fear to degree of threat, and specifically impaired in rapid uncertainty-safety discrimination. In experiment 2, male Long Evans rats received NAcc transduction with halorhodopsin or a control fluorophore. After fear scaling was established, the NAcc was illuminated during cue or control periods. NAcc-halorhodopsin rats receiving cue illumination were specifically impaired in rapid uncertainty-safety discrimination. The results reveal a general role for the NAcc in scaling fear to degree of threat, and a specific role in rapid discrimination of uncertain threat and safety.
Significance Statement Rapidly discriminating cues for threat and safety is essential for survival and impaired threat-safety discrimination is a hallmark of stress and anxiety disorders. In two experiments, we induced nucleus accumbens core (NAcc) dysfunction in rats receiving fear discrimination consisting of cues for danger, uncertainty and safety. Permanent NAcc dysfunction, via neurotoxic lesion, generally disrupted the ability to scale fear to degree of threat, and specifically impaired one component of scaling: rapid discrimination of uncertain threat and safety. Reversible NAcc dysfunction, via optogenetic inhibition, specifically impaired rapid discrimination of uncertain threat and safety. The results reveal that the NAcc is essential to scale fear to degree of threat, and is a plausible source of dysfunction in stress and anxiety disorders.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
1) Adding a plot for individual data points for baseline nose poking (Figure 1). 2) Complete reorganization of Figure 2, including addition of individual discrimination plots. 3) Making and adding Figure 4, session x session suppression ratio data for YFP and Halo rats receiving the two different orders of cue and ITI stimulation. 4) Expanded results, including a justification for examining our difference score in Figure 5.
