Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Rational arbitration between statistics and rules in human sequence processing

View ORCID ProfileMaxime Maheu, View ORCID ProfileFlorent Meyniel, View ORCID ProfileStanislas Dehaene
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.06.937706
Maxime Maheu
1Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA DRF/JOLIOT, INSERM, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin centre, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
2Université de Paris, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Maxime Maheu
  • For correspondence: maheu.mp@gmail.com
Florent Meyniel
1Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA DRF/JOLIOT, INSERM, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin centre, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Florent Meyniel
Stanislas Dehaene
1Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA DRF/JOLIOT, INSERM, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin centre, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
3Collège de France, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stanislas Dehaene
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Detecting and learning temporal regularities is essential to accurately predict the future. A long-standing debate in cognitive science concerns the existence of a dissociation, in humans, between two systems, one for handling statistical regularities governing the probabilities of individual items and their transitions, and another for handling deterministic rules. Here, to address this issue, we used finger tracking to continuously monitor the online build-up of evidence, confidence, false alarms and changes-of-mind during sequence processing. All these aspects of behaviour conformed tightly to a hierarchical Bayesian inference model with distinct hypothesis spaces for statistics and rules, yet linked by a single probabilistic currency. Alternative models based either on a single statistical mechanism or on two non-commensurable systems were rejected. Our results indicate that a hierarchical Bayesian inference mechanism, capable of operating over distinct hypothesis spaces for statistics and rules, underlies the human capability for sequence processing.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • ↵† These authors share senior authorship.

  • We addressed potentiel concern regarding the possibility that results could be explained by another model, a single-system model with appropriate priors: (1) we now explain better in the main text the alternative models we have previously considered and which are relevant to this question, and (2) we added a new series of models that explores all possible combinations of priors. Also, we now frame our research question within the context of sequence processing generally, and not specifically in the context of sequence learning (which often refers to a narrower type of cognitive process and of behavioural task). Finally, we now cite important antecedent works that were missing and now relate our work to prior research on artificial grammar learning, human perception of randomness, memory decay characterizing human sequence processing, human discretization of continuous features in humans, and the role of repetitions in auditory processing. The revisions include: - the substantial modification of 2 main figures, - the addition of 5 new extended data figures, - a new supplementary note, - several new citations, - an improvement of the readability of the manuscript. - the correction of a mistake in the code which moved the change-point one observation later for some analyses.

  • https://github.com/maheump/Emergence

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 26, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rational arbitration between statistics and rules in human sequence processing
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Rational arbitration between statistics and rules in human sequence processing
Maxime Maheu, Florent Meyniel, Stanislas Dehaene
bioRxiv 2020.02.06.937706; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.06.937706
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Rational arbitration between statistics and rules in human sequence processing
Maxime Maheu, Florent Meyniel, Stanislas Dehaene
bioRxiv 2020.02.06.937706; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.06.937706

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3476)
  • Biochemistry (7313)
  • Bioengineering (5288)
  • Bioinformatics (20170)
  • Biophysics (9966)
  • Cancer Biology (7693)
  • Cell Biology (11242)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6409)
  • Ecology (9907)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13260)
  • Genetics (9345)
  • Genomics (12541)
  • Immunology (7664)
  • Microbiology (18918)
  • Molecular Biology (7411)
  • Neuroscience (40844)
  • Paleontology (298)
  • Pathology (1224)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2124)
  • Physiology (3137)
  • Plant Biology (6832)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1268)
  • Synthetic Biology (1890)
  • Systems Biology (5294)
  • Zoology (1083)