Abstract
The current paradigm states that inflammatory pain passively resolves following the cessation of inflammation. Yet, in a substantial proportion of patients with inflammatory diseases, resolution of inflammation is not sufficient to resolve pain, resulting in chronic pain. Mechanistic insight as to how inflammatory pain is resolved is lacking. Here we show that macrophages actively control resolution of inflammatory pain remotely from the site of inflammation by transferring mitochondria to sensory neurons. During resolution of inflammatory pain in mice, M2-like macrophages infiltrate the dorsal root ganglia that contain the somata of sensory neurons, concurrent with the recovery of oxidative phosphorylation in sensory neurons. The resolution of pain and the transfer of mitochondria requires expression of CD200 Receptor (CD200R) on macrophages and the non-canonical CD200R-ligand iSec1 on sensory neurons. Our data reveal a novel mechanism for active resolution of inflammatory pain and suggests a new direction for treatment of chronic pain.
Introduction
Pain and pain hypersensitivity (hyperalgesia) are functional features of inflammation that serve to protect the tissue from further damage. At the site of inflammation, immune cells and inflammatory mediators, such as IL-1β, TNF, and bradykinin, sensitize and activate sensory neurons, which cause pain and hyperalgesia1,2. While the initiation of inflammatory pain is relatively well understood3,4, the mechanisms of inflammatory pain resolution are less well characterized. Resolution of inflammatory pain is often considered to be the direct result of waning of inflammation. However, in a substantial proportion of patients with inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, spontaneous or treatment-induced resolution of inflammation does not reduce pain5–9. Basic discovery research to understand mechanisms of endogenous pain-resolution may help us understand how chronic pain develops when resolution pathways fail10.
Macrophages are one of the most plastic cells of the immune system and are well known for their ability to induce tissue healing and resolution of inflammation11. Macrophages are strongly imprinted by their tissue of residence12,13. Peripheral nervous tissue shapes resident macrophages to have unique features compared to microglia and/or macrophages outside the nervous system14–16. After nerve damage, monocyte-derived macrophages engraft nervous tissue14, are skewed by sensory neurons into an M1-like phenotype17, and accumulate in the DRG to initiate and maintain neuropathic pain18. Thus, nervous tissue macrophages contribute to neuropathic pain. However, because macrophages can contribute to tissue healing and resolution of inflammation, we here set out to better understand the endogenous mechanisms for resolution of inflammatory pain and the role of macrophages in this process, using transient inflammatory pain models.
Results
We injected carrageenan into the hind paw of mice (intraplantar; i.pl.) as a model for transient inflammatory pain (Supplemental data fig. 1A)19. Treated mice displayed signs of pain, such as allodynia/hyperalgesia as assessed by the von Frey and Hargreaves tests, and postural changes measured with dynamic weight bearing. Carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia resolved within ~3-4 days (Figs. 1A and supplemental data fig. 1B). We analysed the cellular composition of lumbar (L3-L5) dorsal root ganglia (DRG) which contain the somata of sensory neurons innervating the hind paw and observed an accumulation of macrophages. Macrophage numbers peaked at day 3 and returned to baseline levels after resolution of inflammatory hyperalgesia (Fig. 1B/C, supplemental data figs. 1C/D, and supplemental data movies 1 and 2). Infiltration of macrophages was specific to the DRG that innervate the inflamed paw, and was not observed at the contralateral side (supplemental data fig. 1D). In contrast, during the entire course of inflammatory hyperalgesia, T cells, B cells or other CD45+ immune cell numbers in the DRG did not change significantly (Figs. 1B and supplemental data fig. 1C). To address the function of these macrophages in pain resolution, we selectively depleted monocytes and macrophages by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of diphtheria toxin (DT) in Lysmcre x Csf1rLsL-DTR mice20 (from here on referred to as ‘MMdtr’, supplemental data fig. 2). DT administration depleted monocytes and macrophages in the DRG but did not affect the number and morphology of microglia in spinal cord (Supplemental data Figs. 2G-J). The induction and magnitude of carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia in these mice was normal. However, MMdtr mice failed to resolve inflammatory mechanical hyperalgesia (Fig. 1D), thermal hyperalgesia (Supplemental data fig. 3A) and postural changes related to inflammatory pain for at least six days (Fig. 1E) in both male and female mice (Fig. 1F). Similarly, MMdtr mice failed to resolve Complete Freund’s Adjuvant (CFA)-induced transient inflammatory hyperalgesia for at least 12 days (Fig. 1G, and supplemental data fig. 3B).
To directly target monocytes to the DRG21, we intrathecally (i.t.) injected wildtype (WT) bone-marrow-derived CD115+ monocytes into MMdtr mice (Supplemental data fig. 4A), which reconstituted macrophages in the ipsilateral DRG (Supplemental data fig. 4B). Within hours, i.t. injection of WT monocytes sustainably rescued the defective resolution of hyperalgesia in MMdtr mice (Fig. 2A and supplemental data fig. 4C). The pain-resolving capacity of monocytes was independent of their origin (bone marrow or spleen; supplemental data fig. 4C-E) or Ly6C expression (‘classical’ Ly6C+ or ‘non-classical’ Ly6C-; supplemental data figs. 4F-H). These data show that monocytes are essential to resolve inflammatory pain and sufficient when specifically grafted into the DRG.
Macrophages that reside in peripheral nerve tissue are different from microglia and non-nervous residing macrophages16,22. It was shown that after nerve injury, monocyte-derived macrophages engraft in the pool of resident peripheral nervous system macrophages14, and are programmed by vesicles secreted by sensory neuron17. We determined whether monocytes/macrophages that infiltrate the DRG during inflammatory pain, had an inflammatory (‘M1’) - or resolution (‘M2’)-like phenotype. At day 3, the number of CD206+ M2-like or tissuerepair macrophages23,24 was increased in the DRG, whereas the number of iNOS+ M1-like or inflammatory macrophages did not significantly change (Fig. 2B). Consistent with the dominant presence of CD206+ macrophages, i.t. injection of bone-marrow derived macrophages (from here on referred to as ‘macrophages’) differentiated in vitro with IL-4 (‘M2’) rescued resolution of hyperalgesia in MMdtr mice. In contrast, inflammatory macrophages differentiated with LPS and IFNγ (‘M1’) induced a transient hyperalgesia in the saline treated paws and were incapable of resolving inflammatory hyperalgesia in the carrageenan treated paws (Figs. 2C and supplemental data fig. 4I). Macrophages resolved pain through a pathway independent of neuronal IL10 receptor (IL10R) signalling because Nav1.8CreIl10rflox mice, which are deficient for the IL10 receptor in pain-sensing sensory neurons that mediate inflammatory hyperalgesia25, recovered normally (Supplemental data fig. 4J).
Metabolically, M2 macrophages depend on oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos), while M1 macrophages are glycolytic (Supplemental data fig. 5)26. Neurons have a very high metabolic demand27. We previously demonstrated that a deficiency in mitochondrial function in sensory neurons prevents the resolution of inflammatory pain21. Moreover, in chronic pain neuronal mitochondrial functions, such as OxPhos and Ca2+ buffering, are impaired28,29. Indeed, oxygen consumption in DRG neurons was reduced during the peak of inflammatory pain and resolved at day 3 (Fig. 3A). Therefore, we posited that to resolve inflammatory pain, sensory neurons have to re-establish OxPhos by restoring a functional mitochondrial pool. Given that after ischemic stroke neurons can take up mitochondria released by adjacent astrocytes30, we hypothesized that during pain resolution monocytes/macrophages aid neurons by supplying new mitochondria.
We stained mitochondria from macrophages with MitoTracker Deep Red (MTDR) that binds covalently to mitochondrial proteins31 and co-cultured live macrophages, or an equivalent volume of sonicated macrophages, with the neuronal cell line Neuro2a (N2A). After 2 hours, macrophage-derived MTDR+-mitochondria were detectable in N2A cells by flow cytometry and image stream (Supplemental data figs. 6A/B). Macrophages transduced with mitochondria-targeted DsRed (mitoDsRed) also transferred mitochondria to primary sensory neurons upon co-culture in vitro, excluding that the signal was due to MTDR leak from macrophages to neurons (Supplemental data fig. 6C). Transfer of mitochondria from macrophages to neurons also occurred in vivo. During the resolution of pain, we detected a significantly higher percentage of MitoDentra2 positive sensory neurons in the lumbar ipsilateral DRG of LysMCre-MitoDendra2flox mice compared to the contralateral DRG (Figs. 3B/C). In contrast, MitoDendra2flox mice or LysMCre-GFPflox mice did not have any MitoDendra2 or GFP positive neurons (Supplemental data fig. 6D), suggesting that monocytes/macrophages transfer mitochondrial content to neurons during resolution of inflammatory pain. In addition, i.t. injection of MTDR-labelled macrophages in MMdtr mice at day 6 after carrageenan injection increased the MTDR intensity in sensory neurons of mice with persisting inflammatory hyperalgesia (Figs. 3D/E), but not in control treated mice or in WT mice that had resolved inflammatory hyperalgesia. Injection of sonicated MTDR-labelled macrophages did not result in accumulation of MTDR in sensory neurons (Fig. 3D), confirming mitochondrial transfer to sensory neurons. Using flow cytometry, we found that macrophages released CD45+ extracellular vesicles that stained positive for macrophage plasma membrane proteins, such as MHC class II, CD11b and CD200 Receptor 1 (CD200R), and the mitochondrial dye MTDR (Supplemental data fig. 7A/B). In line with the MTDR staining in vesicles, in the supernatant of MitoDendra2+ macrophages we detected CD45+MitoDentra2+ vesicles (Supplemental data fig. 7C). The vesicles had a broad range in size (Supplemental data fig. 7D).
We hypothesized that the mitochondria-containing vesicles released by macrophages were sufficient to resolve pain. Indeed, i.t. administration of mitochondria-containing extracellular vesicles isolated from macrophage supernatant rapidly but transiently resolved inflammatory hyperalgesia in MMdtr mice. However, injection of sonicated extracellular vesicles did not affect hyperalgesia (Fig. 3F, supplemental data fig. 7E). Taken together, this suggests that functional mitochondria, but not their individual components, are sufficient to resolve pain. Furthermore, monocytes that have distressed mitochondria and significantly reduced mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content due to a heterozygous deletion of the Transcription Factor A/Tfam32 failed to resolve inflammatory hyperalgesia in MMdtr mice (Supplemental data figs. 8A/B). Finally, we obtained artificial vesicles containing mitochondria from macrophage cell bodies (MitoAV). MitoAV stained positive for macrophage plasma membrane markers and MTDR and had active OxPhos (Supplemental data figs. 8C and 11B). I.t. injection of MitoAV rapidly but transiently resolved inflammatory hyperalgesia in MMdtr mice (Fig. 3G and supplemental data fig. 8D). In contrast, MitoAV in which oxidative phosphorylation was blocked by complex III inhibitor myxothiazol33 failed to resolve hyperalgesia (Fig. 3G and supplemental data fig. 8D). Thus, to resolve inflammatory pain, macrophages transfer vesicles containing mitochondria that are functional in their oxidative phosphorylation capacity.
For efficient transfer of mitochondria, we hypothesized that docking of extracellular vesicles to sensory neurons requires receptor-ligand interactions. Macrophages, predominantly those with an M2 phenotype34, and macrophages-derived extracellular vesicles expressed CD200R (Fig Supplemental data fig. 7A), while neurons are known to express its ligand CD200 (ref. 35). In line with this reasoning, Cd200r-/- mice completely failed to resolve inflammatory hyperalgesia, which persisted for at least 16 days (Fig. 4A and Supplemental data fig. 9A). Place-preference conditioning with the fast-working analgesic gabapentin36, a drug that relieves neuropathic and inflammatory pain37,38, confirmed ongoing spontaneous pain in Cd200r-/- mice for at least 2 weeks after carrageenan injection (Fig. 4B, supplemental data fig. 9B). Of note, acute inflammation and the resolution of inflammation at the site of carrageenan injection in Cd200r-/- mice did not differ from that of WT mice (Figs. 4C and 4D). This further supports the role of CD200R in the resolution of acute inflammatory pain and prevention of chronic pain.
I.t. injection of Cd200r-/- monocytes did not resolve inflammatory hyperalgesia in MMdtr mice (Figs 5A, supplemental data fig. 10A). Consistent with these data, WT monocytes or macrophages did resolve persisting inflammatory hyperalgesia in Cd200r-/- mice, whereas injection of additional Cd200r-/- monocytes or macrophages did not (Fig. 5B; supplemental data fig. 10B). These data indicate an intrinsic defect in the pain-resolution capacity of Cd200r-/- monocytes and macrophages independent from effects of macrophages at the site of local inflammation.
We found no evidence for a defect in mitochondrial respiration or vesicle release in Cd200r-/- macrophages (Supplemental data figs. 11A-C) and Cd200r-/- macrophages were normal in their capacity to migrate into the DRG and had a similar phenotype to WT macrophages (Supplemental data figs. 11D-H). This suggested instead that there was a defect in mitochondrial transfer between Cd200r-/- macrophages and neurons. MTDR transferred normally from intrathecally injected MTDR-labelled macrophages to neurons from Cd200r-/- mice (Fig. 5C). In contrast, Cd200r-/- macrophages failed to transfer MTDR-labelled mitochondria to sensory neurons of Cd200r-/- mice (Fig. 5C) and extracellular vesicles isolated from Cd200r-/- macrophage culture supernatant did not resolve inflammatory hyperalgesia in MMdtr mice (Fig. 5D; supplemental data fig. 12). Thus, CD200R expression on monocytes/macrophages and their mitochondria containing extracellular vesicles is required for transfer of mitochondria to sensory neurons and for the resolution of inflammatory pain.
CD200 is the best-known ligand for CD200R and in inflammatory models, such as arthritis, Cd200-/- and Cd200r-/- mice have a similar phenotype39,40. However, in sharp contrast to Cd200r-/- mice, Cd200-/- mice completely resolved inflammatory pain with similar kinetics to WT mice (Fig. 6A; supplemental data fig. 13A). This suggests the involvement of an alternative CD200R ligand. In 2016, iSec1/Gm609 was described as a CD200R ligand expressed specifically in the gut41. We found that iSec1/Gm609 mRNA is also expressed in DRG, along with CD200 (Supplemental data figs. 13B/C). Repetitive i.t. injections of iSec1/Gm609 targeting antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ASO)42 silenced iSec1 mRNA expression in the DRG of WT mice (Fig. 6B and supplemental data fig. 13D) and partially prevented resolution of inflammatory hyperalgesia (Fig. 6C; Supplemental data fig. 13E). In Cd200-/- mice, i.t. injections of iSec1/Gm609-ASO completely prevented the resolution of hyperalgesia (Fig. 6D; supplemental data fig. 13F). Next, we injected Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) encoding iSec1 i.pl. to specifically target sensory neurons innervating the inflamed area21. Expression of iSec1/gm609 that was mutated to resist ASO treatment in sensory neurons (HSV-iSec1res, Fig. 6E) completely rescued the ability of iSec1/Gm609-ASO treated Cd200-/- mice to resolve pain, while an empty vector (HSV-e) did not (Fig. 6F; Supplemental data fig. 13G). We conclude that monocyte/macrophage expression of CD200R and sensory neuron expression of its ligand iSec1 are required for the transfer of macrophage-derived mitochondria to sensory neurons in vivo to resolve inflammatory pain.
Discussion
We identified a previously unappreciated role for macrophages which transfer mitochondria to somata of sensory neurons to resolve inflammatory pain. Previous studies showed that respiratory competent mitochondria are present in human whole blood43, and that tissue-resident cells can transfer mitochondria30,44. We now show that non-tissue resident monocytes are recruited to the DRG, acquire a M2/tissue-repair like phenotype and transfer mitochondria to sensory neurons via a CD200R:iSec1 interaction in order to resolve pain. In contrast to M2 macrophages, inflammatory M1 macrophages induced pain. Thus, a DRG-milieu that skews local macrophages towards a M1 phenotype could contribute to the development of chronic pain.45–48
Previous studies have implicated macrophages in resolution of inflammatory pain at the site of the primary inflammatory insult by secretion of IL-1049,50, or by clearance of the inflammatory agent zymozan51. We now found that macrophages are necessary to resolve pain distant from the primary inflammatory insult and restore neuronal homeostasis independent of the antiinflammatory capacities of macrophages at the site of the primary insult. Importantly, resolution of inflammatory pain was independent of IL-10 Receptor signalling in sensory neurons, excluding a direct effect of IL-10 on neurons in resolution of inflammatory pain.
Our data show that transfer of mitochondria by macrophages in the DRG is required for resolution of inflammatory pain. However, it is possible that macrophages have additional roles in other areas of the nervous system, including nerves or nerve endings. Also, we cannot exclude other cells to contribute to resolution of inflammatory pain. For example, Csf1r/LysM negative macrophages at the site of the primary inflammatory insult or satellite glial cells in the DRG that surround the soma of sensory neurons may play additional roles49–51.
CD200 has long been thought of as the only ligand for CD200R. Although previous studies implicated CD200 as a checkpoint for microglia cell activation in neuropathic pain by ligating microglial CD200R52,53, we show that Cd200-/- mice fully resolve inflammatory pain. Furthermore, we found that iSec1/gm609 is expressed in DRG neurons and we demonstrated that sensory neuron-iSec1 is required to resolve inflammatory pain. Of note, iSec1/gm609 knockdown did have a greater effect on pain resolution in Cd200-/- mice than in WT mice, suggesting that the function of these ligands is partially redundant.
Various chronic pain states, such as chemotherapy-induced pain and neuropathic pain caused by trauma or diabetes, are associated with mitochondrial defects54–57. We show here that oxidative phosphorylation is reduced during the peak of transient inflammatory pain but is restored when inflammatory hyperalgesia resolves. Hence, we postulate that resolution of inflammatory pain requires the restoration of mitochondrial homeostasis in sensory neurons and that DRG macrophages facilitate this process.
Given that the injection of isolated extracellular vesicles only transiently resolves pain, a more durable resolution of pain requires a prolonged flux of mitochondria and/or additional signals from intact macrophages. These mitochondria could replace mitochondria in neurons that have incurred mitochondrial damage. Future work should assess how exactly neuronal mitochondrial homeostasis is restored by macrophage-derived mitochondria.
Why would sensory neurons require external help to restore the integrity of their mitochondrial network? Sensory neurons face unique challenges in maintaining a functional mitochondrial network because of their exceptional architecture and their intense demand for energy to support energetically expensive processes such as resting potentials, firing action potentials and calcium signalling27,58. Stressed neurons, e.g. during inflammatory pain, turn to anabolic metabolism59. In the face of this high energy demand during stress, an energy consuming process such as rebuilding the mitochondrial network is difficult to support.
Moreover, maintaining an excess mitochondrial pool that is capable of handing the stress of inflammatory pain would come at a high fitness cost because it would require more energy intake for the organism. Thus, we propose that dispensable monocytes/macrophages supply mitochondria to stressed indispensable neurons.
Together, our data show that pain is actively resolved by an interaction between the immune and neuronal systems that is separate from the cessation of inflammation within the peripheral tissue. Novel therapeutic strategies to resolve chronic pain may focus on the restoration of mitochondrial homeostasis in neurons or on enhancing the transfer of mitochondria from macrophages.
Funding
This work has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 642720. MV, HW and LM are supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), (ALW Grants 863.14.016, 821.02.025, 016.VENI.192.053 and NWO Vici 918.15.608). NE/JP were partly funded by the Life Sciences Seed grant of the University Utrecht.
Author contributions
Conceptualization (LM, MV, NE), Methodology (NE, LM, MV, HW, RR, JP, RL), Formal Analysis (MV, NE, HW, RR, JP), Investigation (LM, NE, MN, RR, HW, MVos, WKH, MV, SV, RL), Resources (RJP), Writing original draft (MV, NE, RR), Writing reviewing and editing (MV, NE, LM, RR, JP, HW, WKH), Visualization (MV, NE, RR), Supervision (MV, HW, NE, LM, RR), Project Administration (NE, LM), Funding Acquisition (HW, MV, NE, LM).
Competing interests
Authors declare no competing interests.
Data and materials availability
All data is available in the manuscript or supplementary materials. Raw data and materials will be made available upon reasonable request. Some materials used in this manuscript are subject to Material Transfer Agreement (MTA).
Supplementary Materials
Materials and Methods
Figures S1-S13
Movies S1-S2
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank R.J. Soberman (Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School) for sharing Cd200r-/- mice; W. Muller (University of Manchester) for providing us with the LysMCre x Il10rflox mice; Dr. Geral Shadel and Dr. Zheng Wu (Salk Institute) for providing Tfam+/- bone marrow; Dr. H. Karasuyama (Tokyo Medical and Dental University) for the gm609/iSec1 expression plasmid; F. Baixauli and E. Pearce (both Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics) for MitoDendra2 expressing bone marrow; Y. Adolfs (UMC Utrecht) for assisting with lightsheet microscopy; P. Vader (UMC Utrecht) for help with particle analysis, L. van Vliet, M. Bruel, and J. Raemakers (all UMC Utrecht) for their help with the analysis of immunofluorescence pictures; B. Burgering (UMC Utrecht) and S. Kaech (Yale University) for access to the seahorse machine; R. Medzhitov (Yale University) and lab members for discussions; and M. Pascha (UMC Utrecht) for help with the macrophages cultures and setting up flow-cytometry protocols.
Footnotes
Re-orderen figures, correcte some mistakes, clarified some statements in the text and added some more information in the introduction and discussion.