Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

phyloregion: R package for biogeographic regionalization and spatial conservation

View ORCID ProfileBarnabas H. Daru, Piyal Karunarathne, View ORCID ProfileKlaus Schliep
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.12.945691
Barnabas H. Daru
1Department of Life Science, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, 78412 TX, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Barnabas H. Daru
  • For correspondence: barnabas.daru@tamucc.edu
Piyal Karunarathne
1Department of Life Science, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, 78412 TX, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Klaus Schliep
2Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston MA 02125, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Klaus Schliep
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Summary

  1. Biogeographical regionalization is the classification of regions in terms of their biotas and is key to understanding biodiversity patterns across the world. Previously, it was only possible to perform analysis of biogeographic regionalization on small datasets, often using tools that are difficult to replicate.

  2. Here, we present phyloregion, a package for the analysis of biogeographic regionalization and spatial conservation in the R computing environment, tailored for mega phylogenies and macroecological datasets of ever-increasing size and complexity.

  3. Compared to available packages, phyloregion is three to four orders of magnitude faster and memory efficient for cluster analysis, determining optimal number of clusters, evolutionary distinctiveness of regions, as well as analysis of more standard conservation measures of phylogenetic diversity, phylogenetic endemism, and evolutionary distinctiveness and global endangerment.

  4. A case study of zoogeographic regionalization for 9574 species of squamate reptiles (amphisbaenians, lizards, and snakes) across the globe, reveals their evolutionary affinities, using visualization tools that allow rapid identification of patterns and underlying processes with user-friendly colours–for example– indicating the levels of differentiation of the taxa in different regions.

  5. Ultimately, phyloregion would facilitate rapid biogeographic analyses that accommodates the ongoing mass-production of species occurrence records and phylogenetic datasets at any scale and for any taxonomic group into completely reproducible R workflows.

Footnotes

  • https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.tdz08kpw6

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 13, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
phyloregion: R package for biogeographic regionalization and spatial conservation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
phyloregion: R package for biogeographic regionalization and spatial conservation
Barnabas H. Daru, Piyal Karunarathne, Klaus Schliep
bioRxiv 2020.02.12.945691; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.12.945691
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
phyloregion: R package for biogeographic regionalization and spatial conservation
Barnabas H. Daru, Piyal Karunarathne, Klaus Schliep
bioRxiv 2020.02.12.945691; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.12.945691

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioinformatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2238)
  • Biochemistry (4306)
  • Bioengineering (2963)
  • Bioinformatics (13494)
  • Biophysics (5966)
  • Cancer Biology (4640)
  • Cell Biology (6649)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (3942)
  • Ecology (6244)
  • Epidemiology (2053)
  • Evolutionary Biology (9191)
  • Genetics (6888)
  • Genomics (8810)
  • Immunology (3924)
  • Microbiology (11300)
  • Molecular Biology (4465)
  • Neuroscience (25659)
  • Paleontology (183)
  • Pathology (722)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1212)
  • Physiology (1783)
  • Plant Biology (4005)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (893)
  • Synthetic Biology (1194)
  • Systems Biology (3631)
  • Zoology (654)