ABSTRACT
Proteomics, as a high-throughput technology, has been developed with the aim of investigating the maximum number of proteins in cells. However, protein discovery and data generation vary in depth and coverage when different technical strategies are used. In this study, four different sample preparation, and peptide or protein fractionation, methods were applied to identify and quantify proteins from log-phase yeast lysate: sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE); gas phase fractionation (GPF); filter-aided sample preparation (FASP)- GPF; and FASP-high pH reversed phase fractionation (HpH). Fractionated samples were initially analyzed and compared using nanoflow liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) employing data dependent acquisition on a linear ion trap instrument. The number of fractions and replicates was adjusted so that each experiment used a similar amount of mass spectrometric instrument time, approximately 16 hours. A second set of experiments was performed using a Q Exactive Orbitrap instrument, comparing FASP-GPF, SDS-PAGE and FASP-HpH. Compared with results from the linear ion trap mass spectrometer, the use of a Q Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer enabled a small increase in protein identifications using SDS-PAGE and FASP-GPF methods, and a large increase using FASP-HpH. A big advantage of using the higher resolution instrument found in this study was the substantially increased peptide identifications which enhance the proteome coverage. A total of 1035, 1357 and 2134 proteins were separately identified by FASP-GPF, SDS-PAGE and FASP-HpH. Combining results from the Orbitrap experiments, there were a total of 2269 proteins found, with 94% of them identified using the FASP-HpH method. Therefore, the FASP-HpH method is the optimal choice among these approaches when using a high resolution spectrometer, when applied to this type of sample.
