Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Mucin 4 Protects Female Mice from Coronavirus Pathogenesis

Jessica A. Plante, Kenneth S. Plante, Lisa E. Gralinski, Anne Beall, Martin T. Ferris, Daniel Bottomly, Richard Green, Shannon K. McWeeney, Mark T. Heise, Ralph S. Baric, View ORCID ProfileVineet D. Menachery
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.19.957118
Jessica A. Plante
aDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth S. Plante
bDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa E. Gralinski
aDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Beall
aDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin T. Ferris
bDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Bottomly
cOregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Green
dDepartment of Immunology and the Center for Innate Immunity and Disease, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shannon K. McWeeney
cOregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark T. Heise
bDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
eDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ralph S. Baric
aDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Rbaric@email.unc.edu vimenach@utmb.edu
Vineet D. Menachery
aDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
fDeptartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vineet D. Menachery
  • For correspondence: Rbaric@email.unc.edu vimenach@utmb.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Using incipient lines of the Collaborative Cross (CC), a murine genetic reference population, we previously identified a quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with low SARS-CoV titer. In this study, we integrated sequence information and RNA expression of genes within the QTL to identify mucin 4 (Muc4) as a high priority candidate for controlling SARS-CoV titer in the lung. To test this hypothesis, we infected Muc4-/- mice and found that female, but not male, Muc4-/- mice developed more weight loss and disease following infection with SARS-CoV. Female Muc4-/- mice also had more difficulty breathing despite reduced lung pathology; however, no change in viral titers was observed. Comparing across viral families, studies with chikungunya virus, a mosquito-borne arthralgic virus, suggests that Muc4’s impact on viral pathogenesis may be widespread. Although not confirming the original titer QTL, our data identifies a role for Muc4 in the SARS-CoV disease and viral pathogenesis.

Importance Given the recent emergence of SARS-CoV-2, this work suggest that Muc4 expression plays a protective role in female mice not conserved in male mice following SARS-CoV infection. With the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak continuing, treatments that modulate or enhance Muc4 activity may provide an avenue for treatment and improved outcomes. In addition, the work highlights the importance of studying host factors including host genetics and biological sex as key parameters influencing infection and disease outcomes.

Introduction

Most viral infections present with an array of symptoms following human infection, ranging from asymptomatic to self-limiting, chronic, and sometimes fatal disease. Some of this diversity is mediated by age, sex, and other comorbidities, but these demographics do not account for all of the variability in disease outcomes. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and candidate gene studies have established a number of genes associated with human susceptibility to infectious diseases, but are limited by the large populations required to detect genetic effects and by existing knowledge gaps (Fellay et al., 2007; Ge et al., 2009; Lindesmith et al., 2003; López et al., 2010). Furthermore, during outbreak settings there is often limited access to clinical samples from infected humans. Thus, host susceptibility allele identification is oftentimes heavily compromised by situational expediency and new approaches are needed to identify alleles that regulate emerging virus pathogenesis.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome virus (SARS-CoV) is a respiratory pathogen that first emerged in the Guangdong Province of China in November 2002, and rapidly spread to 28 countries, resulting in over 8,000 cases with a 10% case fatality ratio. The subsequent emergence of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and the discovery of several other related “pre-epidemic” bat coronaviruses that seem poised for sudden emergence emphasize the need for a comprehensive understanding of how highly pathogenic human coronaviruses, such as SARS-CoV, interact with their hosts to regulate disease severity (Coleman and Frieman, 2013; Menachery et al., 2015b; Menachery et al., 2016). The importance of these early predictions was demonstrated by the ongoing outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 (Gorbalenya et al., 2020; Gralinski and Menachery, 2020), which has caused 45,171 confirmed cases and 1,115 deaths as of February 12, 2020 (World Health Organization, 2020).

We have developed a model of CoV infection in the genetically diverse Collaborative Cross (CC) population (Churchill et al., 2004; Collaborative Cross Consortium, 2012). This model allows us to assess the impact of host genetic variation on CoV disease, such as in the context of SARS-CoV pathogenesis (Gralinski et al., 2015). The CC panel contains mouse lines derived from a funnel breeding scheme of eight founder strains, including 5 traditional lab strains and 3 wild-derived strains (Churchill et al., 2004; Collaborative Cross Consortium, 2012; UNC Systems Genetics Core Facility, 2012). This population takes advantage of naturally-occurring genetic polymorphisms to capture approximately 90% of the common genetic diversity within Mus musculus, and that diversity is distributed evenly throughout the genome, with elevated minor allele frequencies compared to standard natural populations (Aylor et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2009; Yang et al., 2011). Our initial screen within an incompletely inbred set of CC mice (the preCC screen) (Gralinski et al., 2015), along with an F2 screen utilizing a highly resistant and highly susceptible CC mouse line (Gralinski et al., 2017), identified nine quantitative trait loci (QTLs) impacting SARS-CoV disease. Among these QTLs was locus HrS2 on chromosome 16, which was identified as modulating SARS-CoV titer levels in the lung (Gralinski et al., 2015).

Here, we narrow the HrS2 locus to a priority candidate gene, mucin 4 (Muc4), via the integration of sequence data from the CC founders (Keane et al., 2011) and RNA expression results from our preCC experiment. Low expression of Muc4 in mice containing the PWK/PhJ allele corresponded with the low SARS-CoV titer associated with the QTL located at locus HrS2. We subsequently examined infection of mice lacking Muc4, predicting reduced viral load. However, our findings suggest that while Muc4 does not regulate SARS-CoV titer, it does have broad activity attenuating the pathogenic impact of viral infections.

Results

Selection of Muc4 as a SARS-CoV disease associated gene

In earlier studies, incipient CC lines were used to identify four QTLs associated with SARS-CoV phenotypes in female mice, one of which was mapped on the basis viral titer in the lung at four DPI (Gralinski et al., 2015). A subsequent study utilizing both male and female F2 mice derived from a highly susceptible and highly resistant CC mouse line identified five more SARS-CoV-associated QTLs, three of which were mapped at least partially on the basis of viral titer (Gralinski et al., 2017). Located on chromosome 16 from nucleotides 31,583,769-36,719,997, the pre-CC QTL accounted for 22% of the variation in viral titer, which ranged from over 108 PFU/lobe to below the limit of detection (102 PFU/lobe). The F2 QTLs, by comparison, were located on chromosomes 18, 7, and 12 and explained 12.9%, 12.3%, and 5.4%, respectively, of the observed variation in titers from high 102 to low 107 PFU/lobe. Thus, while SARS-CoV titer in the lung is clearly influenced by multiple host genetic factors, the preCC QTL on chromosome 16 was chosen for candidate gene selection and validation. Analysis of allele effects revealed that the founder PWK/PhJ was the main driver of low SARS-CoV titer in the lung (Fig. 1A), and PWK/PhJ also had lower titers than any other founder strain at four DPI (Gralinski et al., 2015). We therefore used private SNPs or In/Dels found in PWK/PhJ to reduce the potential targets in the QTL to seven ncRNAs and 74 genes for downstream analysis.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 1.

Selection of Muc4 as a candidate gene from the preCC screen of SARS-CoV lung titer. (A) SARS-CoV lung titer at four DPI in preCC mice that were homozygous for one of the eight indicated founder strains at genotype marker nearest to the Muc4 gene. Dashed line represents the lower limit of detection for the assay. (B) Correlation values for Log10-transformed viral titers and host RNA expression values as determined by microarray in the lungs of preCC mice at four DPI with SARS-CoV. Bars correspond to individual microarray probes representing genes in the titer QTL region. Black bars indicate probes for Muc4. Grey bars indicate probes for other mucins (Muc13 and Muc20) within the QTL. Open bars represent non-mucin genes within the QTL. (C) Expression of Muc4 RNA in the CC founder lines at four DPI following either mock (open symbols) or SARS-CoV (closed symbols). Dashed lines represent the mean expression level for all founder mice.

To prioritize the list of ncRNAs and genes within the QTL, the relationship between RNA transcript levels and viral titer in the lung was examined. Sixty seven preCC mice had both microarray and titer data available, of which sixty had titers above the limit of detection (Gralinski et al., 2015). Of the 74 candidate genes, 54 had one or more probes on the microarray (Table S4) and Muc4 expression had the strongest correlation with viral titer, with five of the six Muc4 probes yielding positive correlations of 0.34-0.45 (Fig. 1B, Table S5). Using infection data from the founder mice, Muc4 RNA expression levels mimicked the allelic effects of the QTL with PWK/PhJ mice exhibiting low Muc4 RNA levels (Fig. 1C). Other potential targets included Lrrc33, Sec22a, Parp14, and Ildr1; however, these genes either have little known linkage to viral replication and the immune response (e.g., Lrrc33, Sec22a, and Ildr1) or the directionality of the correlation did not support their relationship to viral titer in the lung (Parp14). For Muc4, high levels of expression at mucosal surfaces and in various human cancers have been reported (Andrianifahanana et al., 2001; Chaturvedi et al., 2008; Kamikawa et al., 2015). In addition, Muc4 plays a role in cell and anti-apoptotic signaling (Chaturvedi et al., 2008; Funes et al., 2006; Moniaux et al., 2007). Together, the data suggest that Muc4 may play a role in viral titers at day 4 post SARS-CoV infection.

Muc4 drives sex-based difference in weight loss

To examine the role of Muc4 during SARS-CoV infection, we utilized Muc4-/- mice (Rowson-Hodel et al., 2018) which have no gross differences in behavior, overall health, size, or lung function, the latter phenotype measured by plethysmography. Muc4-/- and WT control mice were infected with SARS-CoV and examined over a four-day time course. Following infection, a significant sex-based difference in weight loss between Muc4-/- and WT mice was observed (Table S3). Female Muc4-/- and control were essentially indistinguishable through two DPI (Fig. 2A). However, infected Muc4-/- females continued to lose weight through day four, with 42% (6 of 14) meeting euthanasia requirements (≥20% weight loss) and another 42% (6 of 14) requiring increased observation (≥10% weight loss). In contrast, the WT mice held static between days two and three and began to recover by day four, with no mice meeting the requirements for euthanasia and only 13% (2 of 15) requiring increased observation by a margin of ≤0.1g. This Muc4-driven difference in weight loss was not observed in male mice following infection with SARS-CoV (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 2.

Weight loss following SARS-CoV infection. Weight loss was monitored in (A) female and (B) male Muc4-/- and WT mice. Black indicates WT mice and red indicates Muc4-/- mice. Points represent the mean, and error bars represent standard deviation. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (** = q<0.01, **** = q<0.0001).

Muc4 has minimal impact on viral load

Next, the impact of Muc4-/- on SARS-CoV viral load was measured. Lung lobes from male and female Muc4-/- and WT mice were harvested at two DPI, an acute timepoint previously associated with high SARS-CoV titer (Sheahan et al., 2008), and at four DPI, the timepoint at which the QTL on chromosome 16 was mapped (Gralinski et al., 2015). Surprisingly, despite trends for higher mean viral loads in Muc4-/- mice on day 2 and day 4, virus titers were not significantly different from WT mice at either timepoint (Fig. 3A). Similarly, despite differences in weight loss, viral titer in the lung also exhibited no sex effect (Table S3). Given the distribution of Muc4 in mucosal surfaces, viral load was further interrogated with IHC to determine whether Muc4 might impact viral tropism in a way not readily determined by the measurement of infectious virus per lobe. Upon examining SARS-CoV antigen staining, however, no significant differences in antigen distribution were noted between Muc4-/- and WT mice in either airway or parenchymal staining (Fig. 3B and 3C). Together, the results indicated that the loss of Muc4 had minimal impact on SARS-CoV viral load or distribution.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 3.

Viral titer and tropism following SARS-CoV infection. (A) viral titer in the inferior lobes of SARS-CoV infected mice at two DPI and four DPI was measured via plaque assay. SARS-CoV tropism in the (B) airway and (C) parenchyma of the left lobe at two and four DPI was measured via blind scoring following IHC staining. Black indicates WT mice and red indicates Muc4-/- mice. Points represent individual mice (close = female, open = male), the midline represents the mean, and error bars represent standard deviation. No comparisons of WT versus Muc4-/- mice achieved statistical significance after correction for multiple comparisons (q≥0.05)

Muc4-/- mice have reduced histopathological damage

Differences in lung damage were assessed using histopathological scoring of H&E stained lungs harvested at either two or four DPI. Similar to weight loss, the histopathology results demonstrated a clear and consistent sex-based phenotype. Female Muc4-/- mice had a pattern of lower pathology scores than WT mice (Fig. 4). Airway damage (denudation, debris, and inflammation) was minimally present in female Muc4-/- at day two or four post-infection (Fig. 4A-C). Similarly, other histopathology and inflammation measures had very low scores in female Muc4-/- mice as compared to female WT mice. In contrast, male Muc4-/- mice induced similar damage to male WT mice (Table S1).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 4.

Female WT and Muc4-/- mice were infected with SARS-CoV, and their left lung lobes were harvested at either two or four DPI for histopathological analysis following H&E staining. (A) Airway denudation, (B) Airway debris, (C) Airway inflammation, (D) Vascular Cuffing, (E) Edema, (F) Interstitial Inflammation, (G) Airspace Inflammation, (H) Exudate, and (I) Eosinophilia were all scored. Black indicates WT mice and red indicates Muc4-/- mice. Points represent individual mice, the midline represents the mean, and error bars represent the standard deviation. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (* = q<0.05).

Lung function altered in Muc4-/- female mice

To further evaluate damage to the lung following infection, whole body plethysmography was utilized to examine changes in pulmonary function (Fig. 5). Using only females, both WT and Muc4-/- mice were challenged with a lower dose (104 PFU) to ensure their survival over the full six day time course required to observe the onset, peak, and recovery of disordered lung function following SARS-CoV challenge in mice (Menachery et al., 2015a). Examining airway resistance (penH), the time to peak expiratory flow relative to total expiratory time (rPEF), and mid-tidal expiratory flow (EF50), all three measurements had statistically significant differences between SARS-CoV-infected and mock-infected mice within the Muc4-/- and WT groups (Supplementary Table S3). However, no Muc4-dependent differences in either penH (Fig. 5A) or rPEF (Fig. 5B) were observed following SARS-CoV infection. In contrast, while not reaching statistical significance, EF50 trended higher in the Muc4-/- mice as compared to WT mice, peaking at day three post-infection (Fig. 5C). These results show a shift in the early breathing curve in Muc4-/- mice with more rapid exhalation and more labored breathing. These findings may have been exacerbated with the original, higher dose, but that experiment was precluded by the limited survival of Muc4-/- mice. Overall, the whole body plethysmography data indicate more difficult breathing for female Muc4-/- mice relative to their WT counterparts following SARS-CoV infection.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 5.

Pulmonary function as measured by normalized (A) PenH, (B) Rpef, and (C) EF50 readings was recorded in SARS-CoV-infected female mice. Black indicates WT mice and red indicates Muc4-/- mice. Points represent the mean and error bars represent the standard deviation. Strain-based differences did not achieve statistical significance after correction for multiple comparisons (q≥0.05).

Muc4-/- mice have augmented inflammation

Changes in the cytokine and chemokine responses following infection of Muc4-/- and WT mice were evaluated at two days post infection. While not significant when adjusted for multiple comparisons (Table S3), key inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL6 had increased expression in Muc4-/- mice as compared to WT mice (Fig. 6A-C). Similarly, MIP-1α, MCP-1, and KC also had augmented expression in Muc4-/- mice (Fig. 6D-F). Notably, the increased values in Muc4-/- mice were maintained across both males and females. Together, the results indicate that Muc4-/- mice have augmented inflammatory cytokine responses relative to WT mice, which may contribute to observed differences in pathogenesis.

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 6.

Cytokine levels, including (A) IL-1β, (B) TNF-α, (C) IL-6, (D) MIP-1α, (E) MCP-1, and (F) KC, at 2 DPI in post-caval lobes of SARS-CoV-challenged mice were measured using a BioPlex assay. Black indicates WT mice and red indicates Muc4-/- mice. Points represent individual mice (close = female, open = male), the midline represents the mean, and error bars represent standard deviation. Strain-based differences did not achieve statistical significance after correction for multiple comparisons (q≥0.05).

Muc4 impacts pathogenesis for an unrelated virus

Because Muc4 modulated SARS-CoV susceptibility independent of viral replication, a cross-platform validation study was undertaken to begin assessing whether the Muc4 had widespread importance in viral pathogenesis. Chinkungunya virus (CHIKV), an alphavirus, causes inflammatory arthritis and swelling within the joints in human patients. Importantly, Muc4 has been detected in synovial sarcomas in humans, thus presenting a novel tissue environment and unrelated virus to test the impact of Muc4 (Doyle et al., 2011). Male and female WT and Muc4-/- mice were infected with CHIKV and monitored for swelling of the footpad for seven days post infection (Fig. 7). The WT mice have minimal early stage swelling, as was expected with the C57BL/6N model. In contrast, Muc4-/- mice have augmented disease early during infection, displaying a biphasic swelling pattern. At days 2-4, both male and female mice have increased footpad swelling compared to control mice. This Muc4-specific difference was not observed during the second swelling event that took place between days six and seven post-infection. Notably, while sex based differences were observed at days two and four post infection, disease was more robust in male mice, contrasting observations seen with SARS-CoV infection. In either sex, however, the loss of Muc4 resulted in augmented disease during early time points and indicates a broad role for Muc4 in viral pathogenesis.

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 7.

Footpad swelling in (A) female and (B) male mice that have been either mock-infected or infected with CHIKV. Black indicates WT mice and red indicates Muc4-/- mice. Dashed lines with open symbols indicate mock infection, and solid lines with solid symbols indicate CHIKV infection. Points represent the mean and error bars represent the standard deviation. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (* = q<0.05, ** = q<0.01).

Discussion

Screening genetically diverse mouse models provides an opportunity to identify natural variation in novel factors which drive viral disease responses. These studies can also provide therapeutic, prophylactic and molecular insights into emerging pathogens, which are difficult to study during the context of an outbreak. Here, prior phenotypic QTL analysis, bioinformatics, and RNA expression analysis were leveraged to identify Muc4 as a high priority candidate gene driving differences in SARS-CoV titer. Utilizing a Muc4 knockout mouse, a role was confirmed for the gene in augmented SARS-CoV pathogenesis. While virus titers trended higher in Muc4-/- mice at day 2 and 4, there was no statistically significant change as compared to WT control mice. However, in absolute terms the Muc4-/- mice did have a modest 62% higher titer on day two and a 51% higher titer on day four as compared to WT, and it is possible that this difference is biologically significant despite the lack of statistical significance as determined by p-value (Lytsy et al., 2018; Vyas et al., 2015). In addition, the loss of Muc4 was linked to enhanced CHIKV disease in vivo. Together, this study highlights both the utility and the challenges in transitioning from QTL hits to single-molecule studies. Our initial hypothesis for Muc4 to play a role in controlling virus replication proved incorrect, or, at the very least, substantially more complex than a simple, direct correlate; however, our exploration found a disease-interaction that played a role in pathogenesis across multiple viruses.

Outside of human GWAS studies, where recombination rates are high, it has long proven a challenge to go from a QTL to individual candidate genes (Brown et al., 1997). Even with novel bioinformatic approaches, in the absence of large genomic deletions (Ferris et al., 2013), fortuitously gene-poor regions (Gralinski et al., 2015), or previously identified functions (Gralinski et al., 2017) candidate gene identification continues to be difficult. In this manuscript, we built a framework to integrate knowledge about the preCC genome sequences and a partner microarray dataset to narrow a QTL region down to a likely candidate based on expression correlations. Muc4 exhibited strong correlation data and low expression in the relevant founder strain. Additionally, Muc4 is known to play a role in anti-apoptotic signaling (Chaturvedi et al., 2008; Funes et al., 2006; Moniaux et al., 2007), analysis of published microarray data (Jonckheere N et al., 2012) reveals that cells lacking Muc4 express lower levels of interferon-stimulated genes (Menachery VD, 2014), and the related mucin Muc1 is both anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory (Kato K et al., 2014; Li Y et al., 2010; Ueno K et al., 2008). We chose Muc4 as our priority candidate gene for follow up, with the initial hypothesis that Muc4 suppressed apoptosis and possible the interferon response, and that its absence in a Muc4-/- mouse would therefore lead to increased apoptosis and inflammation, thereby inhibiting SARS-CoV replication.

Our validation utilized a Muc4-/- mouse and confirmed a role for Muc4 in protection from SARS-CoV- and CHIKV-induced disease and pathogenesis. However, we found essentially no differences in SARS-CoV viral load in the Muc4-/- mouse strain compared to WT mice. This may be due to sex (discussed more below), differences between naturally occurring SNPs impacting gene structure and expression and ablative knockouts, or the effects of overall genetic background on given gene variants (Leist et al., 2016). The SARS-CoV titer QTL on chromosome 16 was driven by the PWK/PhJ allele, which was strongly associated with lower viral titer and had low expression of Muc4. In contrast, mice with the C56BL/6J allele were associated with high titer and high expression of Muc4. Furthermore, PWK/PhJ mice encode functional variants in Muc4 that are not present in the other seven founder strains. It is therefore possible that C57BL/6 genetic background for the Muc4-/- mice, as opposed to a PWK/PhJ background, obfuscated any role for Muc4 in the regulation of viral titer; this possibility is especially relevant given that the hypothesized role of Muc4 is in the context of complex signaling pathways requiring multiple molecular partners, rather than a direct role such as the physical barrier function of mucins. Alternatively, Muc4 may simply not impact viral titer following SARS-CoV infection; this leaves the possibility that other genetic targets within the chromosome 16 QTL are responsible for limiting SARS-CoV titers at later time points. Furthermore, the existence of multiple titer-driven QTLs reaffirms that no single gene is expected to serve as the sole driver of SARS-CoV titer. Yet, despite the lack of QTL validation, these studies still identified a role for Muc4 in viral pathogenesis.

A surprising outcome from these studies was the demonstration of sex-specific and increased disease severity in Muc4-/- female mice infected with SARS-CoV. Females lacking Muc4 consistently demonstrated increased susceptibility to SARS-CoV-induced disease, while males did not. These results affirm the National Institute of Health emphasis on conducting animal studies in both male and female subjects (Clayton and Collins, 2014; National Institutes of Health, 2015). Interestingly, SARS-CoV has been reported to cause more severe disease in male mice, with the female mice deriving their resistance at least in part from estrogen signaling (Channappanavar et al., 2017). Furthermore, epidemiological data from both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 indicate that human females may be more resistant than human males (Chen et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2020; Karlberg et al., 2004; Leong et al., 2006). Estrogen increases Muc4 transcription in a tissue-specific manner (Lange et al., 2003), offering a potential mechanism as to the greater impact of Muc4’s absence in female mice. Sex effects in the context of Muc4 have also been reported in a murine model of colitis and colitis-associated colorectal cancer (Das et al., 2016). These results hint that the role of Muc4 may differ in males and females based upon factors inherent to the host, such as localization, expression levels, or interactions with hormone signaling pathways, and may be less dependent on factors that are unique to a particular disease model.

Notably, a role for Muc4 extended across two different viral pathogens. SARS-CoV infection of female Muc4-/- mice, and CHIKV infection of both male and female Muc4-/- mice, resulted in more severe disease following infection. For SARS-CoV, loss of Muc4 exacerbated weight loss and increased lethality; surprisingly, less histopathologic damage was observed in the Muc4-/- lungs following infection despite augmented inflammatory cytokines. The results suggest that the loss of Muc4 may exacerbate systemic disease and delay the repair/recovery processing in the lung following SARS-CoV infection. A similar reduction in histopathology damage was observed with MERS-CoV infection of immunocompromised rhesus macaques providing evidence for this theory (Prescott et al., 2018). Notably, footpad swelling following CHIKV infection is representative of systemic disease and is exacerbated in the absence of Muc4. Although speculative, it is possible that Muc4 functions not to modulate local viral replication, but rather to limit disseminated disease. Clearly, more studies are needed to unravel these complex interactions.

Overall, this research demonstrates that Muc4 is a novel regulator of viral pathogenesis. This study represents the first investigation of Muc4 in the context of any viral infection, and the absence of Muc4 exacerbates disease in two unrelated viruses. The SARS-CoV and CHIKV results indicate that Muc4 has a role in regulating susceptibility and may be widespread across viral pathogens. The study of mucin-driven cell signaling and its role in viral pathogenesis represents a novel avenue of research with the potential to identify new anti-viral therapeutic targets.

Materials and Methods

Infection with SARS-CoV or Chikungunya Virus

The generation of C57BL/6NTac Muc4tm1Unc mice, kindly provided by Dr. Scott Randell of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and hereafter referred to as Muc4-/- mice, was described by Rowson-Hodel et al (Rowson-Hodel et al., 2018). The C57BL/6NTac genetic background of these mice was confirmed in our hands via utilization of the MiniMUGA genotyping array (Neogen Inc, Lincoln, NE), a new genotyping array which includes diagnostic markers for the substrain origin of many inbred mouse strains. Age- and sex-matched wild-type control C57BL/6NTac mice (hereafter referred to as WT mice) were obtained from Taconic (Germantown, NY). Ten- to eleven-week-old mice were anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine (Zoetis, Kalamazoo, MI) and xylazine (Akorn Animal Health, Lake Forest, IL) and inoculated intranasally with either PBS (Gibco, Grand Island, NY), 1×104 PFU, or 1×105 PFU of recombinant mouse adapted SARS-CoV (rMA15) in a 50μl volume (Roberts et al.). Mice receiving the 1×105 PFU dose and their mock-infected counterparts were weighed daily and were euthanized at either two or four days post-infection (DPI). The inferior lobe was harvested and stored intact at −80°C in 1ml PBS with glass beads for downstream titration, and the post-caval lobe was similarly stored for downstream cytokine and chemokine analysis. The left lobe was stored at 4°C in 10% buffered paraformaldehyde (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ) for at least seven days for downstream histopathology and immunohistochemistry. Mice receiving the 1×104 PFU dose and their mock-infected counterparts were weighed daily and their lung function was assessed via whole body plethysmography with in Buxco FinePoint system (Data Sciences International, New Brighton, MN) from one day prior to infection through six DPI. All data from SARS-CoV infections is summarized in Table S1.

Seven-week-old mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (Primal Enterprises, Andrha Pradesh, India) and inoculated subcutaneously in the left rear footpad with either diluent (PBS supplemented with 1% FBS, 1mM CaCl2, and 0.5mM MgCl2) or 100 PFU of recombinant chikungunya virus (CHIKV) SL15649 in a 10μl volume (Morrison et al., 2011). Footpad size was measured and recorded daily using a caliper to measure the vertical height of the ball of the left rear foot. Mice were humanely euthanized at seven DPI. All data from CHIKV infections is summarized in Table S2.

Lung Titration

Lung samples were thawed at 37° and lysed for 60 seconds at 6,000 rpm in a MagNA Lyser (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Debris was pelleted, and lung homogenate was serially diluted 10-fold in PBS. Vero E6 cell monolayers in 6-well plates were infected with 200μl of diluted lung homogenate (10−1-10−6) for one hour at 37°C with 5% CO2. Monolayers were overlaid with a semi-solid overlay containing MEM supplemented with 2% FBS (HyClone, Logan, UT), pencicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, Grand Island, NY), and 0.8% agar (Lonza, Rockland, ME). At two DPI plates were stained with neutral red (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ) for approximately four hours and plaques were visualized with a light box.

Cytokine Analysis

Cytokine production was measured using the Bio-Plex Pro Mouse Cytokine 23-plex Assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) on the MAGPIX Multiplex Reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Lung samples were homogenized and clarified as described for the lung titration assay prior to analysis.

Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry

Formalin-fixed lobes were embedded in paraffin and 4μm sections were mounted on either Superfrost slides (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) for hematoxylin and eosin staining or on ProbeOn slides (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) for immunohistochemistry (IHC). Embedding, mounting, and hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed by the LCCC Animal Histopathology Core Facility at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

For IHC, sections were deparaffinized with xylene and rehydrated, then placed in near-boiling antigen retrieval buffer (10mM Tris base, 1mM EDTA, 0.05% Tween-20, pH 9.0) for 20 minutes. Non-specific binding was blocked with 10% normal goat serum (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 1% nonfat milk (Lab Scientific, Highlands, NJ) in TBS for two hours at room temperature. Rabbit anti-SARS-CoV nucleocapsid polyclonal antibody (PA1-41098, Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) diluted 1:2,000 in blocking buffer was allowed to bind overnight at 4°C. Slides were washed three times in TBS with 0.025% Triton X-100 (TBST) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), then incubated in 0.3% H2O2 in TBS for 15 minutes to prevent endogenous peroxidases from generating a background signal. Slides were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (ab97051, Abcam, Cambridge, MA) diluted 1:1,000 in blocking buffer for one hour in a humidity box, then washed three times in TBST. Slides were developed using the Metal Enhanced DAB Substrate Kit (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) and counterstained with Richard-Allan Scientific Modified Mayer’s Hematoxylin (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) and 0.2M lithium carbonate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) prior to rehydration and mounting. All scoring was conducted in a blinded fashion on a severity scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe).

Statistical Analysis

RNA expression levels were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test comparing PWK/PhJ to the other seven CC founder lines using Prism 7 for Windows version 7.01 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). Buxco data was transformed as previously described (Menachery et al., 2015a) Daily results for all titer-related data types (log10-transformed viral load and immunohistochemistry) and cytokine levels were analyzed by two-way ANOVA using RStudio version 1.1.383 with R version 3.2.0 (R Core Team, 2017; RStudio Team, 2015) to determine the impact of mouse strain and sex. Transformed daily Buxco results were similarly analyzed by two-way ANOVA to determine the impact of infection and mouse strain. Daily results for all pathology-related data types (histopathology, weight change, and footpad swelling) was analyzed by three-way ANOVA to determine the impact of mouse strain, sex, and infection status. When three-way ANOVA results indicated significant differences on the basis of sex (weight loss, histopathology, and footpad swelling), the strain-based differences between infected animals of a single sex were analyzed using multiple t-tests with the Benjamini and Hochberg correction for false discoveries in Prism. All graphing was done in Prism. A significance threshold of >0.05 after correction for multiple comparisons was considered significant throughout all studies. The results of all statistical analyses are summarized in Table S3.

Data Availability

All phenotypic data associated with the infection of Muc4-/- mice and their WT counterparts are summarized in Table S1 and S2. Muc4-/- mice are available upon request.

Funding

JAP, LEG, MTF, MTH and RSB were funded by NIH NIAID (U19 AI 100625, U19 AI 109761, and U54 AI 081680). KSP was funded by NIH NIAID (T32 AI 007151-36A1 and F32 AI 126730). AB was funded by NIH NIAID (T32 AI 7419-22). VDM was funded by the NIH NIA (K99 AG 049092). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Author Contributions

JAP was involved with the design of all experiments, performed all SARS-CoV mouse experiments, and prepared the manuscript. KSP and MTH designed and performed the CHIKV mouse experiments. LEG provided feedback regarding experimental design and performed SARS-CoV mouse experiments and BioPlex analysis. AB performed immunohistochemistry staining. VDM provided feedback regarding experimental design, assisted with SARS-CoV mouse experiments, and assisted substantially with the editing of the manuscript. MTF provided guidance regarding statistical analysis. MTF, DB, and SKM performed array analysis and assisted with the selection of Muc4 from the list of potential target genes. RSB scored gross pathology and immunohistochemistry and contributed to all aspects of study design, experimental design, and manuscript design and editing.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Scott H. Randell of the Department of Cell Biology and Physiology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for contributing the Muc4-/- mice, without which these studies would not have been possible.

References

  1. ↵
    Andrianifahanana, M., Moniaux, N., Schmied, B.M., Ringel, J., Friess, H., Hollingsworth, M.A., Buchler, M.W., Aubert, J.P., Batra, S.K., 2001. Mucin (MUC) gene expression in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis: A potential role of MUC4 as a tumor marker of diagnostic significance. Clinical Cancer Research 7, 4033–4040.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Aylor, D.L., Valdar, W., Foulds-Mathes, W., Buus, R.J., Verdugo, R.A., Baric, R.S., Ferris, M.T., Frelinger, J.A., Heise, M., Frieman, M.B., Gralinski, L.E., Bell, T.A., Didion, J.D., Hua, K., Nehrenberg, D.L., Powell, C.L., Steigerwalt, J., Xie, Y., Kelada, S.N., Collins, F.S., Yang, I.V., Schwartz, D.A., Branstetter, L.A., Chesler, E.J., Miller, D.R., Spence, J., Liu, E.Y., McMillan, L., Sarkar, A., Wang, J., Wang, W., Zhang, Q., Broman, K.W., Korstanje, R., Durrant, C., Mott, R., Iraqi, F.A., Pomp, D., Threadgill, D., de Villena, F.P., Churchill, G.A., 2011. Genetic analysis of complex traits in the emerging Collaborative Cross. Genome Res 21, 1213–1222.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. Bernacki, S.H., Nelson, A.L., Abdullah, L., Sheehan, J.K., Harris, A., Davis, C.W., Randell, S.H., 1999. Mucin gene expression during differentiation of human airway epithelia in vitro. Muc4 and muc5b are strongly induced. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 20, 595–604.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Brown, M.G., Scalzo, A.A., Matsumoto, K., Yokoyama, W.M., 1997. The natural killer gene complex: a genetic basis for understanding natural killer cell function and innate immunity. Immunol Rev 155, 53–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Channappanavar, R., Fett, C., Mack, M., Ten Eyck, P.P., Meyerholz, D.K., Perlman, S., 2017. Sex-Based Differences in Susceptibility to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection. J Immunol 198, 4046–4053.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Chaturvedi, P., Singh, A.P., Batra, S.K., 2008. Structure, evolution, and biology of the MUC4 mucin. FASEB J 22, 966–981.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Chen, N., Zhou, M., Dong, X., Qu, J., Gong, F., Han, Y., Qiu, Y., Wang, J., Liu, Y., Wei, Y., Xia, J., Yu, T., Zhang, X., Zhang, L., 2020. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet 395, 507–513.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    Churchill, G.A., Airey, D.C., Allayee, H., Angel, J.M., Attie, A.D., Beatty, J., Beavis, W.D., Belknap, J.K., Bennett, B., Berrettini, W., Bleich, A., Bogue, M., Broman, K.W., Buck, K.J., Buckler, E., Burmeister, M., Chesler, E.J., Cheverud, J.M., Clapcote, S., Cook, M.N., Cox, R.D., Crabbe, J.C., Crusio, W.E., Darvasi, A., Deschepper, C.F., Doerge, R.W., Farber, C.R., Forejt, J., Gaile, D., Garlow, S.J., Geiger, H., Gershenfeld, H., Gordon, T., Gu, J., Gu, W., de Haan, G., Hayes, N.L., Heller, C., Himmelbauer, H., Hitzemann, R., Hunter, K., Hsu, H.C., Iraqi, F.A., Ivandic, B., Jacob, H.J., Jansen, R.C., Jepsen, K.J., Johnson, D.K., Johnson, T.E., Kempermann, G., Kendziorski, C., Kotb, M., Kooy, R.F., Llamas, B., Lammert, F., Lassalle, J.M., Lowenstein, P.R., Lu, L., Lusis, A., Manly, K.F., Marcucio, R., Matthews, D., Medrano, J.F., Miller, D.R., Mittleman, G., Mock, B.A., Mogil, J.S., Montagutelli, X., Morahan, G., Morris, D.G., Mott, R., Nadeau, J.H., Nagase, H., Nowakowski, R.S., O’Hara, B.F., Osadchuk, A.V., Page, G.P., Paigen, B., Paigen, K., Palmer, A.A., Pan, H.J., Peltonen-Palotie, L., Peirce, J., Pomp, D., Pravenec, M., Prows, D.R., Qi, Z., Reeves, R.H., Roder, J., Rosen, G.D., Schadt, E.E., Schalkwyk, L.C., Seltzer, Z., Shimomura, K., Shou, S., Sillanpää, M.J., Siracusa, L.D., Snoeck, H.W., Spearow, J.L., Svenson, K., Tarantino, L.M., Threadgill, D., Toth, L.A., Valdar, W., de Villena, F.P., Warden, C., Whatley, S., Williams, R.W., Wiltshire, T., Yi, N., Zhang, D., Zhang, M., Zou, F., Consortium, C.T., 2004. The Collaborative Cross, a community resource for the genetic analysis of complex traits. Nat Genet 36, 1133–1137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Clayton, J.A., Collins, F.S., 2014. Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies. Nature 509, 282–283.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Coleman, C.M., Frieman, M.B., 2013. Emergence of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. PLoS Pathog 9, e1003595.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Collaborative Cross Consortium., 2012. The genome architecture of the Collaborative Cross mouse genetic reference population. Genetics 190, 389–401.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Das, S., Rachagani, S., Sheinin, Y., Smith, L.M., Gurumurthy, C.B., Roy, H.K., Batra, S.K., 2016. Mice deficient in Muc4 are resistant to experimental colitis and colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Oncogene 35, 2645–2654.
    OpenUrl
  13. Daugherty, M.D., Young, J.M., Kerns, J.A., Malik, H.S., 2014. Rapid evolution of PARP genes suggests a broad role for ADP-ribosylation in host-virus conflicts. PLoS Genet 10, e1004403.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Doyle, L.A., Moller, E., Dal Cin, P., Fletcher, C.D., Mertens, F., Hornick, J.L., 2011. MUC4 is a highly sensitive and specific marker for low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol 35, 733–741.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. Eckei, L., Krieg, S., Butepage, M., Lehmann, A., Gross, A., Lippok, B., Grimm, A.R., Kummerer, B.M., Rossetti, G., Luscher, B., Verheugd, P., 2017. The conserved macrodomains of the non-structural proteins of Chikungunya virus and other pathogenic positive strand RNA viruses function as mono-ADP-ribosylhydrolases. Sci Rep 7, 41746.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Fellay, J., Shianna, K.V., Ge, D., Colombo, S., Ledergerber, B., Weale, M., Zhang, K., Gumbs, C., Castagna, A., Cossarizza, A., Cozzi-Lepri, A., De Luca, A., Easterbrook, P., Francioli, P., Mallal, S., Martinez-Picado, J., Miro, J.M., Obel, N., Smith, J.P., Wyniger, J., Descombes, P., Antonarakis, S.E., Letvin, N.L., McMichael, A.J., Haynes, B.F., Telenti, A., Goldstein, D.B., 2007. A whole-genome association study of major determinants for host control of HIV-1. Science 317, 944–947.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Ferris, M.T., Aylor, D.L., Bottomly, D., Whitmore, A.C., Aicher, L.D., Bell, T.A., Bradel-Tretheway, B., Bryan, J.T., Buus, R.J., Gralinski, L.E., Haagmans, B.L., McMillan, L., Miller, D.R., Rosenzweig, E., Valdar, W., Wang, J., Churchill, G.A., Threadgill, D.W., McWeeney, S.K., Katze, M.G., Pardo-Manuel de Villena, F., Baric, R.S., Heise, M.T., 2013. Modeling host genetic regulation of influenza pathogenesis in the collaborative cross. PLoS Pathog 9, e1003196.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Funes, M., Miller, J.K., Lai, C., Carraway, K.L., Sweeney, C., 2006. The mucin muc4 potentiates neuregulin signaling by increasing the cell-surface populations of ErbB2 and ErbB3. Journal of Biological Chemistry 281, 19310–19319.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Ge, D., Fellay, J., Thompson, A.J., Simon, J.S., Shianna, K.V., Urban, T.J., Heinzen, E.L., Qiu, P., Bertelsen, A.H., Muir, A.J., Sulkowski, M., McHutchison, J.G., Goldstein, D.B., 2009. Genetic variation in IL28B predicts hepatitis C treatment-induced viral clearance. Nature 461, 399–401.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. Gipson, I.K., 2001. Mucins of the human endocervix. Front Biosci 6, D1245–1255.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. Gipson, I.K., 2004. Distribution of mucins at the ocular surface. Exp Eye Res 78, 379–388.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    Gorbalenya, A.E., Baker, S.C., Baric, R.S., de Groot, R.J., Drosten, C., Gulyaeva, A.A., Haagmans, B.L., Lauber, C., Leontovich, A.M., Neuman, B.W., Penzar, D., Perlman, S., Poon, L.L.M., Samborskiy, D., Sidorov, I.A., Sola, I., Ziebuhr, J, 2020. Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: The species and its viruses – a statement of the Coronavirus Study Group. bioRxiv 2020.02.07.937862.
  23. ↵
    Gralinski, L.E., Ferris, M.T., Aylor, D.L., Whitmore, A.C., Green, R., Frieman, M.B., Deming, D., Menachery, V.D., Miller, D.R., Buus, R.J., Bell, T.A., Churchill, G.A., Threadgill, D.W., Katze, M.G., McMillan, L., Valdar, W., Heise, M.T., Pardo-Manuel de Villena, F., Baric, R.S., 2015. Genome Wide Identification of SARS-CoV Susceptibility Loci Using the Collaborative Cross. PLoS Genet 11, e1005504.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Gralinski, L.E., Menachery, V.D., Morgan, A.P., Totura, A.L., Beall, A., Kocher, J., Plante, J., Corinne Harrison-Shostak, D., Schäfer, A., Pardo-Manuel de Villena, F., Ferris, M.T., Baric, R.S, 2017. Allelic Variation in the Toll-Like Receptor Adaptor Protein Ticam2 Contributes to SARS-Coronavirus Pathogenesis in Mice. G3 7, 1653–1663.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Gralinski, L.E., Menachery V.D., 2020. Return of the Coronavirus: 2019-nCoV. Viruses Jan 24;12(2). pii: v12020135.
    OpenUrl
  26. Grunewald, M.E., Chen, Y., Kuny, C., Maejima, T., Lease, R., Ferraris, D., Aikawa, M., Sullivan, C.S., Perlman, S., Fehr, A.R., 2019. The coronavirus macrodomain is required to prevent PARP-mediated inhibition of virus replication and enhancement of IFN expression. PLoS Pathog 15, e1007756.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Huang, C., Wang., Y., Li, X., Ren, L., Zhao, J., Hu., Y., Zhang, L., Fan, G., Xu, J., Gu, X., Cheng, Z., Yu, T., Xia, J., Wei, Y., Wu, W., Xie, X., Yin, W., Liu, M., Xiao, Y., Gao, H., Guo, L., Xie, J., Wang, G., Jiang, R., Gao, Z., Jin, Q., 2020. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan China. The Lancet 395, 497–506.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    Jonckheere, N., Skrypek, N., Merlin, J., Dessein, A.F., Dumont, P., Leteurtre, E., Harris, A., Desseyn, J.L., Susini, C., Frénois, F., Van Seuningen, I., 2012. The mucin MUC4 and its membrane partner ErbB2 regulate biological properties of human CAPAN-2 pancreatic cancer cells via different signalling pathways. PLoS One 7, e32232.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Kamikawa, Y., Kanmura, Y., Hamada, T., Yamada, N., Macha, M.A., Batra, S.K., Higashi, M., Yonezawa, S., Sugihara, K., 2015. Combination of MUC1 and MUC4 expression predicts clinical outcome in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. International Journal of Clinical Oncology 20, 298–307.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    Karlberg, J., Chong, D.S., Lai, W.Y., 2004. Do men have a higher case fatality rate of severe acute respiratory syndrome than women do? American Journal of Epidemiology 159, 229–231.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    Kato, K., Lillehoj, E.P., Kim, K.C., 2014. MUC1 regulates epithelial inflammation and apoptosis by PolyI:C through inhibition of Toll/IL-1 receptor-domain-containing adapter-inducing IFN-beta (TRIF) recruitment to Toll-like receptor 3. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 51, 446–454.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    Keane, T.M., Goodstadt, L., Danecek, P., White, M.A., Wong, K., Yalcin, B., Heger, A., Agam, A., Slater, G., Goodson, M., Furlotte, N.A., Eskin, E., Nellaker, C., Whitley, H., Cleak, J., Janowitz, D., Hernandez-Pliego, P., Edwards, A., Belgard, T.G., Oliver, P.L., McIntyre, R.E., Bhomra, A., Nicod, J., Gan, X., Yuan, W., van der Weyden, L., Steward, C.A., Bala, S., Stalker, J., Mott, R., Durbin, R., Jackson, I.J., Czechanski, A., Guerra-Assuncao, J.A., Donahue, L.R., Reinholdt, L.G., Payseur, B.A., Ponting, C.P., Birney, E., Flint, J., Adams, D.J., 2011. Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation. Nature 477, 289–294.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. Kesimer, M., Ehre, C., Burns, K.A., Davis, C.W., Sheehan, J.K., Pickles, R.J., 2013. Molecular organization of the mucins and glycocalyx underlying mucus transport over mucosal surfaces of the airways. Mucosal Immunol 6, 379–392.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. Komatsu, M., Jepson, S., Arango, M.E., Carraway, C.A.C., Carraway, K.L., 2001. Muc4/sialomucin complex, an intramembrane modulator of ErbB2/HER2/Neu, potentiates primary tumor growth and suppresses apoptosis in a xenotransplanted tumor. Oncogene 20, 461–470.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    Lange, C., Fernandez, J., Shim, D., Spurr-Michaud, S., Tisdale, A., Gipson, I.K., 2003. Mucin gene expression is not regulated by estrogen and/or progesterone in the ocular surface epithelia of mice. Exp Eye Res 77, 59–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    Leist, S.R., Kollmus, H., Hatesuer, B., Lambertz, R.L., Schughart, K., 2016. Lst1 deficiency has a minor impact on course and outcome of the host response to influenza A H1N1 infections in mice. Virology journal 13, 17.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    Leong, H.N., Earnest, A., Lim, H.H., Chin, C.F., Tan, C., Puhaindran, M.E., Tan, A., Chen, M.I., Leo, Y.S., 2006. SARS in Singapore – predictors of disease severity. Ann Acad Med Singapore 35: 326–331.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    Li, Y., Dinwiddie, D.L., Harrod, K.S., Jiang, Y., Kim, K.C., 2010. Anti-inflammatory effect of MUC1 during respiratory syncytial virus infection of lung epithelial cells in vitro. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 298, L558–563.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    Lindesmith, L., Moe, C., Marionneau, S., Ruvoen, N., Jiang, X., Lindblad, L., Stewart, P., LePendu, J., Baric, R., 2003. Human susceptibility and resistance to Norwalk virus infection. Nat Med 9, 548–553.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. Liu, B., Offner, G.D., Nunes, D.P., Oppenheim, F.G., Troxler, R.F., 1998. MUC4 is a major component of salivary mucin MG1 secreted by the human submandibular gland. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 250, 757–761.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    López, C., Saravia, C., Gomez, A., Hoebeke, J., Patarroyo, M.A., 2010. Mechanisms of genetically-based resistance to malaria. Gene 467, 1–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    Lytsy, P. 2018. P in the right place: Revisiting the evidential value of P-values. J Evid Based Med 11, 288–291.
    OpenUrl
  43. Macha, M.A., Rachagani, S., Pai, P., Gupta, S., Lydiatt, W.M., Smith, R.B., Johansson, S.L., Lele, S.M., Kakar, S.S., Farghaly, H., Lee, J.H., Meza, J., Ganti, A.K., Jain, M., Batra, S.K., 2015. MUC4 regulates cellular senescence in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma through p16/Rb pathway. Oncogene 34, 2814.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    Menachery, V.D., Eisfeld, A.J., Schäfer, A., Josset, L., Sims, A.C., Proll, S., Fan, S., Li, C., Neumann, G., Tilton, S.C., Chang, J., Gralinski, L.E., Long, C., Green, R., Williams, C.M., Weiss, J., Matzke, M.M., Webb-Robertson, B.J., Schepmoes, A.A., Shukla, A.K., Metz, T.O., Smith, R.D., Water, K.M., Katze, M.G., Kawaoka, Y., Baric, R.S., 2014. mBio 5, e01174–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Menachery, V.D., Gralinski, L.E., Baric, R.S., Ferris, M.T., 2015a. New Metrics for Evaluating Viral Respiratory Pathogenesis. PLoS One 10, e0131451.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    Menachery, V.D., Yount, B.L., Jr.., Sims, A.C., Debbink, K., Agnihothram, S.S., Gralinski, L.E., Graham, R.L., Scobey, T., Plante, J.A., Royal, S.R., Swanstrom, J., Sheahan, T.P., Pickles, R.J., Corti, D., Randell, S.H., Lanzavecchia, A., Marasco, W.A., Baric, R.S., 2016. SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113, 3048–3053.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    Menachery, V.D., Yount Jr, B.L., Debbink, K., Agnihothram, S., Gralinski, L.E., Plante, J.A., Graham, R.L., Scobey, T., Ge, X.-Y., Donaldson, E.F., Randell, S.H., Lanzavecchia, A., Marasco, W.A., Shi, Z.-L., Baric, R.S., 2015b. A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence. Nat Med advance online publication.
  48. ↵
    Moniaux, N., Chaturvedi, P., Varshney, G.C., Meza, J.L., Rodriguez-Sierra, J.F., Aubert, J.P., Batra, S.K., 2007. Human MUC4 mucin induces ultra-structural changes and tumorigenicity in pancreatic cancer cells. Br J Cancer 97, 345–357.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    Morrison, T.E., Oko, L., Montgomery, S.A., Whitmore, A.C., Lotstein, A.R., Gunn, B.M., Elmore, S.A., Heise, M.T., 2011. A mouse model of chikungunya virus-induced musculoskeletal inflammatory disease: evidence of arthritis, tenosynovitis, myositis, and persistence. Am J Pathol 178, 32–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. Mukhopadhyay, P., Lakshmanan, I., Ponnusamy, M.P., Chakraborty, S., Jain, M., Pai, P., Smith, L.M., Lele, S.M., Batra, S.K., 2013. MUC4 Overexpression Augments Cell Migration and Metastasis through EGFR Family Proteins in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells. Plos One 8.
  51. ↵
    National Institutes of Health, 2015. Consideration of Sex as a Biological Variable in NIH-funded Research.
  52. ↵
    Prescott, J., Falzarano, D., de Wit, E., Hardcastle, K., Feldmann, F., Haddock, E., Scott, D., Feldmann, H., Munster, V.J., 2018. Pathogenicity and Viral Shedding of MERS-CoV in Immunocompromised Rhesus Macaques. Front Immunol 9.
  53. ↵
    R Core Team, 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, 3.4.2 ed. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  54. Reid, C.J., Gould, S., Harris, A., 1997. Developmental expression of mucin genes in the human respiratory tract. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 17, 592–598.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. Roberts, A., Deming, D., Paddock, C.D., Cheng, A., Yount, B., Vogel, L., Herman, B.D., Sheahan, T., Heise, M., Genrich, G.L., Zaki, S.R., Baric, R., Subbarao, K., 2007. A mouse-adapted SARS-coronavirus causes disease and mortality in BALB/c mice. PLoS Pathog 3, e5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    Rowson-Hodel, A.R., Wald, J.H., Hatakeyama, J., O’Neal, W.K., Stonebraker, J.R., VanderVorst, K., Saldana, M.J., Borowsky, A.D., Sweeney, C., Carraway, K.L., 3rd, 2018. Membrane Mucin Muc4 promotes blood cell association with tumor cells and mediates efficient metastasis in a mouse model of breast cancer. Oncogene 37, 197–207.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    RStudio Team, 2015. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R, 0.99.467 ed. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA.
  58. ↵
    Sheahan, T., Morrison, T.E., Funkhouser, W., Uematsu, S., Akira, S., Baric, R.S., Heise, M.T., 2008. MyD88 is required for protection from lethal infection with a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV. PLoS Pathog 4, e1000240.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. Singh, A.P., Moniaux, N., Chauhan, S.C., Meza, J.L., Batra, S.K., 2004. Inhibition of MUC4 expression suppresses pancreatic tumor cell growth and metastasis. Cancer Research 64, 622–630.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. Tamura, Y., Higashi, M., Kitamoto, S., Yokoyama, S., Osako, M., Horinouchi, M., Shimizu, T., Tabata, M., Batra, S.K., Goto, M., Yonezawa, S., 2012. MUC4 and MUC1 Expression in Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach Correlates with Vessel Invasion and Lymph Node Metastasis: An Immunohistochemical Study of Early Gastric Cancer. Plos One 7.
  61. ↵
    Ueno, K., Koga, T., Kato, K., Golenbock, D.T., Gendler, S.J., Kai, H., Kim, K.C., 2008. MUC1 mucin is a negative regulator of toll-like receptor signaling. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 38, 263–268.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. ↵
    UNC Systems Genetics Core Facility, 2012. The Collaborative Cross Homepage. http://csbio.unc.edu/CCstatus/index.py. Accessed 30 November 2015.
  63. ↵
    Vyas, D., Balakrishnan, A., Vyas, A., 2015. The Value of the P Value. Am J Robot Surg 2, 53–56.
    OpenUrl
  64. ↵
    World Health Organization, 2020. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) – Situation Report 23. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200212-sitrep-23-ncov.pdf?sfvrsn=41e9fb78_2. Accessed 12 February 2020.
  65. ↵
    Yang, H., Bell, T.A., Churchill, G.A., Pardo-Manuel de Villena, F., 2007. On the subspecific origin of the laboratory mouse. Nat Genet 39, 1100–1107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    Yang, H., Ding, Y., Hutchins, L.N., Szatkiewicz, J., Bell, T.A., Paigen, B.J., Graber, J.H., de Villena, F.P., Churchill, G.A., 2009. A customized and versatile high-density genotyping array for the mouse. Nat Methods 6, 663–666.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. ↵
    Yang, H., Wang, J.R., Didion, J.P., Buus, R.J., Bell, T.A., Welsh, C.E., Bonhomme, F., Yu, A.H., Nachman, M.W., Pialek, J., Tucker, P., Boursot, P., McMillan, L., Churchill, G.A., de Villena, F.P., 2011. Subspecific origin and haplotype diversity in the laboratory mouse. Nat Genet 43, 648–655
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 20, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mucin 4 Protects Female Mice from Coronavirus Pathogenesis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Mucin 4 Protects Female Mice from Coronavirus Pathogenesis
Jessica A. Plante, Kenneth S. Plante, Lisa E. Gralinski, Anne Beall, Martin T. Ferris, Daniel Bottomly, Richard Green, Shannon K. McWeeney, Mark T. Heise, Ralph S. Baric, Vineet D. Menachery
bioRxiv 2020.02.19.957118; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.19.957118
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Mucin 4 Protects Female Mice from Coronavirus Pathogenesis
Jessica A. Plante, Kenneth S. Plante, Lisa E. Gralinski, Anne Beall, Martin T. Ferris, Daniel Bottomly, Richard Green, Shannon K. McWeeney, Mark T. Heise, Ralph S. Baric, Vineet D. Menachery
bioRxiv 2020.02.19.957118; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.19.957118

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Microbiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2430)
  • Biochemistry (4787)
  • Bioengineering (3330)
  • Bioinformatics (14673)
  • Biophysics (6634)
  • Cancer Biology (5168)
  • Cell Biology (7423)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4362)
  • Ecology (6873)
  • Epidemiology (2057)
  • Evolutionary Biology (9913)
  • Genetics (7344)
  • Genomics (9522)
  • Immunology (4550)
  • Microbiology (12674)
  • Molecular Biology (4942)
  • Neuroscience (28316)
  • Paleontology (199)
  • Pathology (808)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1391)
  • Physiology (2024)
  • Plant Biology (4494)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (977)
  • Synthetic Biology (1299)
  • Systems Biology (3912)
  • Zoology (725)