Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

No Vergence Size Constancy

View ORCID ProfilePaul Linton
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961649
Paul Linton
Centre for Applied Vision Research, City, University of London, Northampton Square, Clerkenwell, London EC1V 0HB
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Paul Linton
  • For correspondence: paul@linton.vision
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Vergence (the angular rotation of the eyes) is thought to provide essential distance information for size constancy (perceiving an object as having a constant physical size). Evidence for this comes from the fact that a target with a constant retinal size appears to shrink as the rotation of the eyes increases (indicating that the target has reduced in distance). This reduction in perceived size is supposed to maintain a constant perception of physical size in natural viewing conditions by cancelling out the increasing size of the retinal image as an object moves closer. Whilst this hypothesis has been extensively tested over the last 200 years, it has always been tested in the presence of confounding cues such as a changing retinal image or cognitive cues to distance. Testing members of the public with normal vision, we control for these confounding cues and find no evidence of vergence size constancy.

Statement of Relevance This work has important implications for the neural basis of size constancy and for multisensory integration. First, leading work on the neural basis of size constancy cannot differentiate between recurrent processes in V1 (based on triangulation cues, such as vergence) and top-down processing (based on pictorial cues). Since our work challenges the existence of vergence size constancy, and therefore much of the basis of the recurrent processing account, our work indicates that top-down processing is likely to have a much more important role in size constancy than previously thought. Second, vergence size constancy is thought to be largely responsible for the apparent integration of the retinal image with proprioceptive distance information from the hand in the Taylor illusion (an afterimage of the hand viewed in darkness appears to shrink as the observer’s hand is moved closer). This explanation for the Taylor illusion is challenged, and a cognitive account proposed instead.

Footnotes

  • https://osf.io/5nwaz/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 25, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
No Vergence Size Constancy
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
No Vergence Size Constancy
Paul Linton
bioRxiv 2020.02.23.961649; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961649
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
No Vergence Size Constancy
Paul Linton
bioRxiv 2020.02.23.961649; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.23.961649

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4113)
  • Biochemistry (8815)
  • Bioengineering (6519)
  • Bioinformatics (23462)
  • Biophysics (11789)
  • Cancer Biology (9209)
  • Cell Biology (13322)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7436)
  • Ecology (11409)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15150)
  • Genetics (10436)
  • Genomics (14043)
  • Immunology (9171)
  • Microbiology (22154)
  • Molecular Biology (8812)
  • Neuroscience (47569)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1428)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2491)
  • Physiology (3730)
  • Plant Biology (8080)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1437)
  • Synthetic Biology (2221)
  • Systems Biology (6037)
  • Zoology (1253)