Abstract
We study the structural ensembles of human chromosomes across different cell types. Using computer simulations, we generate cell-specific 3D chromosomal structures and compare them to recently published chromatin structures obtained through microscopy. We demonstrate using a combination of machine learning and polymer physics simulations that epigenetic information can be used to predict the structural ensembles of multiple human cell lines. The chromosomal structures obtained in silico are quantitatively consistent with those obtained through microscopy as well as DNA-DNA proximity ligation assays. Theory predicts that chromosome structures are fluid and can only be described by an ensemble, which is consistent with the observation that chromosomes exhibit no unique fold. Nevertheless, our analysis of both structures from simulation and microscopy reveals that short segments of chromatin make transitions between a closed conformation and an open dumbbell conformation. This conformational transition appears to be consistent with a two-state process with an effective free energy cost of about four times the effective information theoretic temperature. Finally, we study the conformational changes associated with the switching of genomic compartments observed in human cell lines. Genetically identical but epigenetically distinct cell types appear to rearrange their respective structural ensembles to expose segments of transcriptionally active chromatin, belonging to the A genomic compartment, towards the surface of the chromosome, while inactive segments, belonging to the B compartment, move to the interior. The formation of genomic compartments resembles hydrophobic collapse in protein folding, with the aggregation of denser and predominantly inactive chromatin driving the positioning of active chromatin toward the surface of individual chromosomal territories.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
Figure 2E was added to show the positioning of the genes. The experimental 3D structures examined in this manuscript (of Bintu et al, Science, 2018) were erroneously referred to as obtained via "super-resolution microscopy". The manuscript has been corrected to reflect that those structures were obtained using diffraction-limited methods. Several additional typos were fixed, including "Genonic" -> "Genomic" in Figures 1 and S1. The introduction text was reorganized. The Supporting Information was appended at the end of the manuscript file.
