Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Atlas of ACE2 gene expression in mammals reveals novel insights in transmisson of SARS-Cov-2

Kun Sun, Liuqi Gu, Li Ma, Yunfeng Duan
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.30.015644
Kun Sun
1Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen 518055, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sunkun@szbl.ac.cn duanyunfeng@hybiotec.org.cn
Liuqi Gu
2Beijing Huayuan Academy of Biotechnology, Beijing 100192, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li Ma
1Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen 518055, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yunfeng Duan
2Beijing Huayuan Academy of Biotechnology, Beijing 100192, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sunkun@szbl.ac.cn duanyunfeng@hybiotec.org.cn
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background COVID-19 has become a worldwide pandemic. It is caused by a novel coronavirus named SARS-CoV-2 with elusive origin. SARS-CoV-2 infects mammalian cells by binding to ACE2, a transmembrane protein. Therefore, the conservation of ACE2 and its expression pattern across mammalian species, which are yet to be comprehensively investigated, may provide valuable insights into tracing potential hosts of SARS-CoV-2.

Methods We analyzed gene conservation of ACE2 across mammals and collected more than 140 transcriptome datasets from human and common mammalian species, including presumed hosts of SARS-CoV-2 and other animals in close contact with humans. In order to enable comparisons across species and tissues, we used a unified pipeline to quantify and normalize ACE2 expression levels.

Results We first found high conservation of ACE2 genes among common mammals at both DNA and peptide levels, suggesting that a broad range of mammalian species can potentially be the hosts of SARS-CoV-2. Next, we showed that high level of ACE2 expression in certain human tissues is consistent with clinical symptoms of COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, we observed that ACE2 expressed in a species-specific manner in the mammals examined. Notably, high expression in skin and eyes in cat and dog suggested that these animals may play roles in transmitting SARS-CoV-2 to humans.

Conclusions Through building the first atlas of ACE2 expression in pets and livestock, we identified species and tissues susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, yielding novel insights into the viral transmission.

Introduction

In December 2019, outbreak of a novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), a severe respiratory disease, and since spread rapidly throughout the country. A worldwide pandemic soon followed, with over 600,000 COVID-19 cases reported across 190 countries and territories by end of March 2020 and the number continues to rise sharply. After taking strong quarantine measures and national-wide lockdowns, the number of confirmed diagnoses is rapidly declining in China since February 2020. However, the endemic epicenter had since shifted to Italy and later to the United States. COVID-19 is becoming a global challenge to public health and continues to gather close attention.

The culprit of this pandemic is a new coronavirus named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)1, which belongs to the same beta coronavirus family as SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, the other two viruses that caused outbreaks in the past two decades2. Among myriad biological questions to be answered regarding SARS-CoV-2, one that is crucial and has intrigued much interest is the host origin and its mode of transmission to humans. SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV are closely related, and both invade human cells via attaching their S proteins to a host transmembrane protein called angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as the entry point3. Using transcriptome data, some studies analyzed spatial expression patterns of ACE2 in various tissues and cell types of the human body, and reported that the receptor gene is indeed expressed in the lungs4–6. The connections between ACE2 expression and viral infection are further supported by cases from the United States, which confirmed for the first time the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in both the upper respiratory tract and stool sample of COVID-19 patients7.

Some studies have suggested that the original host of SARS-CoV-2 may be bats2. However, in the case of COVID-19, the outbreak occurred in winter when bats were under hibernation, making them unlikely to be the direct source of human infection. Hence, SARS-CoV-2 was likely transmitted to humans through some small carnivores like civet, the intermediate host of SARS-CoV. Recent studies have pointed to pangolins as the natural host of the virus, while minks being the possible intermediate host8–10. Virus tracing has thus been continuously carried out and attracted much attention. The mystery remains as which wild animals are definitive and intermediate hosts of the new coronavirus, and virus tracing has been continuously carried out and attracted much attention. Furthermore, is it possible that some of the animals living in close proximity to humans may also be susceptible to the virus and could potentially become additional hosts to SARS-CoV-2 hence further facilitating its transmission?

In attempt to address these questions, in this study we focused on the ACE2 gene, the host receptor of SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses, and used quantitative data from various mammalian species to infer their susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Since SARS-CoV-2 invade both bat and human cells via ACE2, we reasoned that if animals have ACE2 proteins similar to human, they could also become the targets of SARS-CoV-2, we thus evaluated the conservation of ACE2 gene across mammals. We further investigated ACE2 expression in various tissues among human and common mammals. In particular, we included species that live in close proximity with humans, i.e., pets and livestock. Our analyses identified potential species susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 and yielded novel insights into virus tracing and transmission, which may further contribute to the prevention and control of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Reference genomes and gene annotations

A total of 12 mammalian species were investigated in this study: Homo sapiens (human), Mus musculus (mouse), Rhinolophus sinicus (Chinese rufous horseshoe bat), Manis javanica (pangolin), Felis catus (cat), Canis lupus familiaris (dog), Mustela putorius furo (ferret), Mesocricetus auratus (hamster), Bos taurus (cow), Sus scrofa (pig), Oryctolagus cuniculus (rabbit), and Capra hircus (goat). Among these mammals, bats and pangolins are presumed candidates of definitive and intermediate hosts of SARS-CoV-2, respectively2,11; cats, dogs, ferrets and hamsters are common pets; cows, pigs, rabbits and goats are common livestock. Latest versions of reference genomes and RefSeq gene annotations12 for these species were downloaded from NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information)13. Detailed information was described in Table S1 in Supplementary data.

Transcriptome data collection

Transcriptome data for various mammalian tissues generated from 142 RNA-seq experiments (whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing) was collected from publicly available sources. Briefly, human data was from the GTEx (Genotype-Tissue Expression) project14, ENCODE (ENCyclopedia Of DNA Elements) project15, and Frausto et al.16; bat data was from Dong et al.17; pangolin data was from Ma et al.18 and Mohamed Yusoff et al.19; cat data was from 99 Lives Cat Genome Sequencing Initiative project; dog data was from Hoeppner et al.20, Lindblad-Toh et al.21 and Sudharsan et al.22; ferret and rabbit data was from Chen et al.23; hamster and goat data was from Fushan et al.24; cow data was from Merkin et al.25; and pig data was from Summers et al.26. Detailed information on accession numbers and tissues for each species was listed in Table S2 in Supplementary data.

Transcriptome data analysis

All the transcriptome data was analyzed using a unified pipeline. Briefly, raw RNA-seq reads were first preprocessed to trim sequencing adapters and low-quality cycles using Ktrim software27 with default parameters; the preprocessed reads were then aligned to corresponding reference genomes using STAR software28 with default parameters. Key statistics during preprocessing and alignment was present in Table S2 in Supplementary data. The vast majority (141/142) of the samples had more than 10 million uniquely mapped reads (median: 27.8 million), indicating sufficient sequencing depths for reliable gene expression quantifications29, which was performed using featureCounts30 software with default parameters against RefSeq gene annotations12. Considering that the reference genomes and gene annotations for most of the species included in this study are far from complete, in order to avoid potential biases of the conventional FPKM (Fragments per Kilobase Million) values, we used ACTB (Actin Beta) gene from each RNA-seq experiment to normalize ACE2 expression for appropriate comparisons across species and tissue types. ACTB is a housekeeping gene that is abundantly and stably expressed in most cell types, and is commonly used as an internal control for gene expression normalizations31. In addition, ACTB gene is also conserved in all the species investigated in this study. The following formula was used to calculate normalized ACE2 expression: Embedded Image We used 10000 as a scale factor here because ACE2 was typically expressed at much lower levels than ACTB. Meanwhile, since data from the GTEx project was provided as preprocessed values, these GTEx values were used directly in the above formula in lieu of number of mapped reads and gene length.

Results

Conservation of ACE2 gene in mammals

We first examined the conservation of ACE2 across mammalian species. A snapshot obtained from the UCSC genome browser32 was shown in Figure 1A, which demonstrated high conservation of ACE2 gene’s exons in DNA level. Next we examined the conservation of ACE2 at the peptide level by searching the UniProt database33 for ACE2 protein sequences in mammals. We limited the analysis to species listed in Methods (plus rats) and discarded duplicate records as well as records with abnormally short sequences (< 300 amino acids), leaving 24 ACE2 protein sequences for subsequent analyses. Pairwise alignment results showed that 23 non-human ACE2 proteins share high level of similarity to the human ACE2 protein, with the identity scores ranging from 78.6% to 85.2% and a median score of 81.9%. Notably, for the two virus-binding hotspots (i.e., the 31th and 353th amino acid)34, all the mammals except mice and rats share the same amino acids to the human ACE2 protein (Table S3 in Supplementary data). Surprisingly, in contrast to conventional phylogenetic tree generated using genomic data, the phylogenetic tree based on the ACE2 proteins showed that, cats and dogs were the species closest to human instead of mice among the mammals included in this analysis (Figure 1B). Taken together, the conservation analysis showed that ACE2 gene was highly conserved among common mammals at both DNA and peptide levels, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 can potentially bind to ACE2 proteins in these mammals with high affinity2.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Conservation analysis of ACE2 gene. (A) Snapshot from the UCSC genome browser showing the DNA level conservation of ACE2 gene. Note that horse was removed due to lack of pair-wise alignment data. (B) Phylogenetic tree based on mammal ACE2 protein sequences from UniProt database. The top panel in (A) is RefSeq annotation of ACE2 gene in human (which contains two isoforms), the middle panel is conservation scores among 100 vertebrates, higher values denote higher levels of conservation), and the best-in-genome pairwise alignments among 42 mammals are plotted in the bottom panel. For (B), the protein accession number in UniProt were shown in parentheses and some species has multiple records.

Expression profile of ACE2 gene in human tissues

We then profiled the expression patterns of ACE2 gene in human tissues. Data from the GTEx project showed that ACE2 was expressed in various tissues, including testis, intestines, heart, kidney, and pancreas (Figure 2A). It was worth noting that our normalized ACE2 expression pattern was similar to the original version obtained from the GTEx portal (Figure S1 in Supplementary data), except that our analysis highlighted the heart as the tissue with 3rd highest ACE2 expression.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2.

Expression of ACE2 gene in human tissues. Data was collected from (A) GTEx project, (B) corneal tissues, epidermal keratinocytes, lung fibroblasts. Replicate experiments for tissues in panel B were available and were shown as multiple bars.

We also collected transcriptome data from tissues that were not in the GTEx datasets, including cornea, epidermal keratinocytes, and lung fibroblasts. These tissues are frequently exposed to the air. ACE2 gene was expressed in corneal epithelial cells (Figure 2B), suggesting that the eye could be vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infections. In contrast, ACE2 was not expressed in epidermal keratinocytes nor lung fibroblasts, which was consistent with the above analysis based on GTEx data. This result was also consistent with a previous report based on single-cell RNA-seq data that ACE2 was only expressed in the alveolar type 2 (AT2) cells in lungs35.

Expression pattern of ACE2 gene in mice

Mouse is the most widely used model species in biomedical studies, including those related to SARS-CoV-2. We extracted the expression data of murine Ace2 gene from Tabula Muris project36, which investigated various murine tissues using single-cell RNA-seq experiments. Murine Ace2 gene was expressed in kidney, heart, intestine, and pancreas (Figures 3 and S1 in Supplementary data), a pattern similar to human (Figure 2A). However, murine Ace2 gene was not expressed in any cell types in lungs, while expressed in tongue and skin (Figure 3B). The data also suggested that ACE2 gene expression pattern could be species-specific among mammals. In particular, lung-related symptoms may not be expected when infecting SARS-CoV-2 to normal mice.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 3.

Expression of ACE2 in murine tissues. Data was obtained from the Tabula Muris project. (A) Expression in all cells isolated using FACS protocol (left) and corresponding tissue origin of these cells (right). Note that the cells were clustered using t-SNE (t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding) algorithm based on their transcriptome. (B) Expression in lung tissue.

Expression patterns of ACE2 gene in other mammals

Bats and pangolins are hypothesized to be the definitive and intermediate hosts of SARS-Cov-22. We profiled the expression of ACE2 in various tissues in Chinese rufous horseshoe bats and Malayan pangolins. ACE2 gene was highly expressed in most tissues examined in both bats and in pangolin, including those frequently exposed to the air, e.g., lungs in bats and tongue in pangolins (Figure 4).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 4.

Expression of ACE2 gene in (A) bat and (B) pangolin tissues. Two datasets for pangolin tissues were collected and labelled with different colors. Replicate experiments for some tissues were available and were shown as multiple bars.

Pets are the most intimate animals to humans and may thus very likely to be contracted by human COVID-19 patients or to transmit the virus to humans if they are infected. We examined ACE2 expression patterns in cats and dogs, the most popular pets worldwide, as well as ferrets and hamsters, which are also very common in China. ACE2 gene was highly expressed in various tissues in these animals, such as kidney, heart and liver (Figures 5A-5C and S2A in Supplementary data). For cats, ACE2 was also highly expressed in skin, ear tip, lungs, and retina; for dogs, ACE2 was expressed in skin and retina. This data suggested that cats and dogs may be highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, we also observed ACE2 expression in the lungs of cats and ferrets, which suggested that these animals may be more suitable for SARS-CoV-2 studies than rodent models2,37.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 5.

Expression of ACE2 in (A) cat, (B) dog, (C) ferret, (D) pig, (E) cow and (F) rabbit tissues. Three datasets for dog tissues were collected and labelled with different colors. Replicate experiments for some tissues were available and were shown as multiple bars.

Besides pets, livestock are another category of mammals that are frequently in direct contact with humans. We profiled the ACE2 expression in cows, pigs, rabbits (which can also serve as pets), and goats. In these animals, ACE2 was highly expressed in multiple tissues including kidney, liver, and heart, but not in muscles (Figures 5D-5F and S2B in Supplementary data). ACE2 was also highly expressed in the fat of pigs. The data suggested that storage of fresh or undercooked meat, especially viscera tissues, might be risky.

Discussion

We showed that ACE2 expression profile in human tissues was in agreement with clinical observations of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals. For example, ACE2 was by far most strongly expressed in testis. SARS is known to cause orchitis and destruction to male germ cells38. Similar effect from COVID-19 was speculated, but a most recent study had just provided the first direct evidence that SARS-CoV-2 infection impacts male sex hormones39. Similarly, small intestine is the tissue with the second highest level of ACE2 expression, while SARS-CoV-2 was found in stool samples of COVID-19 patients both in China and the United States7,42, even after the viral RNA decreased to undetectable level in respiratory tract43. Additionally, we found in our normalized dataset that heart tissues also had the third highest level of ACE2 expression. This observation is also in line with reports showing that COVID-19 patients complicated with cardiac diseases are subject to the highest mortality risk40,41. Together, the consistence between our results and clinical observations demonstrated that ACE2 expression is a reasonable indicator for susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Our analyses showed that mammalian ACE2 genes are highly conserved across lineages and exhibit broad expression patterns. However, tissue-specific expression profiles varied from species to species, suggesting certain mammals may be the hosts of SARS-CoV-2, i.e., carriers without significant symptoms. Compared to humans, other mammals examined in this study either don’t express ACE2 in their testes, or at a low level. On the contrary, among non-human species kidney was almost always the tissue with highest ACE2 expression. Meanwhile, it is worth noting that mouse is a common model species for many human medical studies, including COVID-19. However, we showed that in ACE2 proteins, mice and rats are the only mammals that have different amino acids in the two virus-binding hotspots from humans, which is consistent with previous in vitro virus infection experiments2. Moreover, ACE2 was barely expressed in any of the cell types in murine lungs. Thus, both observations argue against using mice as the optimal animal model for studying coronavirus related diseases.

Most notably, our analyses revealed that ACE2 expression levels are particularly high in cats and dogs. Especially in cats, expression levels in top four ACE2 expression hotspot tissues are all magnitudes higher than any other mammals examined. Intriguingly, in the ACE2 phylogenic tree, both cats and dogs are also cluster closer to humans than other mammals (Figure 1B), suggesting potentially higher affinity to coronaviruses in these pets. SARS-CoV is known to infect cats44, while SARS-CoV-2 positive cats and dogs had also been reported45,46, therefore our analyses suggest high possibility that cats and dogs can host SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, in both cats and dogs, skin had high abundant ACE2 expression, so did ear tip in cats and retina in dogs. High ACE2 expression levels in these exterior body parts makes them particularly likely to host SARS-CoV-2 and pass on to humans via skin to skin contact. Stray animals can even be more serious transmitters of coronaviruses. It is estimated that there are approximately 500 million stray dogs and similar number of stray cats worldwide47. Cats and dogs are sometimes slaughtered for meat, including a large proportion of stray ones48. Therefore, it is likely that cats and dogs may have contributed to the COVID-19 pandemic. For the least, people should also be vigilant with handling of pets in the effort of containing the spread of SARS-CoV-2.

In conclusion, in this study, we had reported the high conservation and built the first expression atlas of ACE2 gene in common mammals. Our analyses revealed species and tissues susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, thus yielding novel insights in tracing the origin and transmission of the virus.

Conflict of interest

none declared.

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by Shenzhen Bay Laboratory and Beijing Huayuan Academy of Biotechnology.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Gorbalenya AE, Baker SC, Baric RS, et al. The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nature Microbiology 2020;5:536–44.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    Zhou P, Yang X-L, Wang X-G, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020;579:270–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Letko M, Marzi A, Munster V. Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor usage for SARS-CoV-2 and other lineage B betacoronaviruses. Nature Microbiology 2020;5:562–9.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    Zhang H, Kang Z, Gong H, et al. The digestive system is a potential route of 2019-nCov infection: a bioinformatics analysis based on single-cell transcriptomes. BioRxiv 2020:2020.01.30.927806.
  5. 5.
    Li M, Chen L, Xiong C, Li X. The SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 expression of maternal-fetal interface and fetal organs by single cell transcriptome study. BioRxiv 2020:2020.02.27.967760.
  6. 6.↵
    Zou X, Chen K, Zou J, Han P, Hao J, Han Z. Single-cell RNA-seq data analysis on the receptor ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different human organs vulnerable to 2019-nCoV infection. Frontiers of Medicine 2020.
  7. 7.↵
    Holshue ML, DeBolt C, Lindquist S, et al. First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States. The New England Journal of Medicine 2020;382:929–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Lam TT-Y, Shum MH-H, Zhu H-C, et al. Identification of 2019-nCoV related coronaviruses in Malayan pangolins in southern China. BioRxiv 2020:2020.02.13.945485.
  9. 9.
    Guo Q, Li M, Wang C, et al. Host and infectivity prediction of Wuhan 2019 novel coronavirus using deep learning algorithm. BioRxiv 2020:2020.01.21.914044.
  10. 10.↵
    Liu P, Jiang J-Z, Wan X-F, et al. Are pangolins the intermediate host of the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)? BioRxiv 2020:2020.02.18.954628.
  11. 11.↵
    Andersen K, Rambaut A, Lipkin W, Holmes E, Garry R. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nature Medicine 2020.
  12. 12.↵
    O’Leary NA, Wright MW, Brister JR, et al. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Research 2016;44:D733–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    NCBI Resource Coordinators. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Research 2018;46:D8–D13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    GTEx Consortium. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nature Genetics 2013;45:580–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    The ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 2012;489:57–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Frausto RF, Le DJ, Aldave AJ. Transcriptomic Analysis of Cultured Corneal Endothelial Cells as a Validation for Their Use in Cell Replacement Therapy. Cell Transplant 2016;25:1159–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    Dong D, Lei M, Hua P, et al. The Genomes of Two Bat Species with Long Constant Frequency Echolocation Calls. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2017;34:20–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    Ma JE, Jiang HY, Li LM, et al. SMRT sequencing of the full-length transcriptome of the Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica). Gene 2019;692:208–16.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    Mohamed Yusoff A, Tan TK, Hari R, et al. De novo sequencing, assembly and analysis of eight different transcriptomes from the Malayan pangolin. Scientific Reports 2016;6:28199.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    Hoeppner MP, Lundquist A, Pirun M, et al. An improved canine genome and a comprehensive catalogue of coding genes and non-coding transcripts. PLoS One 2014;9:e91172.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS, et al. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature 2005;438:803–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Sudharsan R, Beiting DP, Aguirre GD, Beltran WA. Involvement of Innate Immune System in Late Stages of Inherited Photoreceptor Degeneration. Scientific Reports 2017;7:17897.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    Chen J, Swofford R, Johnson J, et al. A quantitative framework for characterizing the evolutionary history of mammalian gene expression. Genome Research 2019;29:53–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Fushan AA, Turanov AA, Lee SG, et al. Gene expression defines natural changes in mammalian lifespan. Aging Cell 2015;14:352–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Merkin J, Russell C, Chen P, Burge CB. Evolutionary dynamics of gene and isoform regulation in Mammalian tissues. Science 2012;338:1593–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Summers KM, Bush SJ, Wu C, et al. Functional Annotation of the Transcriptome of the Pig, Sus scrofa, Based Upon Network Analysis of an RNAseq Transcriptional Atlas. Frontiers Genetics 2019;10:1355.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    Sun K. Ktrim: an extra-fast and accurate adapter- and quality-trimmer for sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2020.
  28. 28.↵
    Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 2013;29:15–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    Vijay N, Poelstra JW, Kunstner A, Wolf JB. Challenges and strategies in transcriptome assembly and differential gene expression quantification. A comprehensive in silico assessment of RNA-seq experiments. Molecular Ecology 2013;22:620–34.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 2014;30:923–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biology 2002;3:RESEARCH0034.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res 2002;12:996–1006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    UniProt Consortium. UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Research 2015;43:D204–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    Wan Y, Shang J, Graham R, Baric RS, Li F. Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus. Journal of virology 2020;94.
  35. 35.↵
    Zhao Y, Zhao Z, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Ma Y, W Z. Single-cell RNA expression profiling of ACE2, the putative receptor of Wuhan 2019-nCov. BioRxiv 2020.
  36. 36.↵
    Tabula Muris Consortium. Single-cell transcriptomics of 20 mouse organs creates a Tabula Muris. Nature 2018;562:367–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    Chu YK, Ali GD, Jia F, et al. The SARS-CoV ferret model in an infection-challenge study. Virology 2008;374:151–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    Xu J, Qi L, Chi X, et al. Orchitis: a complication of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Biology of reproduction 2006;74:410–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    Ma L, Xie W, Li D, et al. Effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection upon male gonadal function: A single center-based study. MedRxiv 2020:2020.03.21.20037267.
  40. 40.↵
    Hui H, Zhang Y, Yang X, et al. Clinical and radiographic features of cardiac injury in patients with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia. MedRxiv 2020:2020.02.24.20027052.
  41. 41.↵
    Liu y, Li J, liu D, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of 2019 novel coronavirus-infected patients with cardiac injury. MedRxiv 2020:2020.03.11.20030957.
  42. 42.↵
    Kujawski SA, Wong KK, Collins JP, et al. First 12 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States. MedRxiv 2020:2020.03.09.20032896.
  43. 43.↵
    Xiao F, Tang M, Zheng X, et al. Evidence for gastrointestinal infection of SARS-CoV-2. MedRxiv 2020:2020.02.17.20023721.
  44. 44.↵
    Martina BEE, Haagmans BL, Kuiken T, et al. Virology: SARS virus infection of cats and ferrets. Nature 2003;425:915.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    Dogs weakly positive to SARS-CoV-2. (Accessed Mar 29, 2020, at https://sc.news.gov.hk/TuniS/www.news.gov.hk/chi/2020/02/20200228/20200228_093205_796.html?type=ticker.)
  46. 46.↵
    Woman passes coronavirus to her cat as pet is taken ill with breathing problems, Belgium public health body says. (Accessed Mar 29, 2020, at https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11272669/coronavirus-cat-belgium/.)
  47. 47.↵
    Statistics on cats and dogs. (Accessed Mar 29, 2020, at http://www.carodog.eu/statistics-on-cats-and-dogs/.)
  48. 48.↵
    Facts about the abuse of dogs and cats in Asia. (Accessed Mar 29, 2020, at https://www.animalsasia.org/us/facts-about-the-abuse-of-dogs-and-cats-in-asia.html.)
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 31, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Atlas of ACE2 gene expression in mammals reveals novel insights in transmisson of SARS-Cov-2
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Atlas of ACE2 gene expression in mammals reveals novel insights in transmisson of SARS-Cov-2
Kun Sun, Liuqi Gu, Li Ma, Yunfeng Duan
bioRxiv 2020.03.30.015644; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.30.015644
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Atlas of ACE2 gene expression in mammals reveals novel insights in transmisson of SARS-Cov-2
Kun Sun, Liuqi Gu, Li Ma, Yunfeng Duan
bioRxiv 2020.03.30.015644; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.30.015644

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genomics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4095)
  • Biochemistry (8789)
  • Bioengineering (6494)
  • Bioinformatics (23403)
  • Biophysics (11767)
  • Cancer Biology (9172)
  • Cell Biology (13294)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7423)
  • Ecology (11391)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15123)
  • Genetics (10418)
  • Genomics (14028)
  • Immunology (9154)
  • Microbiology (22129)
  • Molecular Biology (8796)
  • Neuroscience (47464)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1423)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2486)
  • Physiology (3712)
  • Plant Biology (8069)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1433)
  • Synthetic Biology (2216)
  • Systems Biology (6022)
  • Zoology (1251)