Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Minimal structural elements required for midline repulsive signaling and regulation of Drosophila Robo1

Haley E. Brown, View ORCID ProfileTimothy A. Evans
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.30.016766
Haley E. Brown
1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
2Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy A. Evans
1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Timothy A. Evans
  • For correspondence: evanst@uark.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The Roundabout (Robo) family of axon guidance receptors has a conserved ectodomain arrangement of five immunoglobulin-like (Ig) domains plus three fibronectin (Fn) repeats. Based on the strong evolutionary conservation of this domain structure among Robo receptors, as well as in vitro structural and domain-domain interaction studies of Robo family members, this ectodomain arrangement is predicted to be important for Robo receptor signaling in response to Slit ligands. Here, we define the minimal ectodomain structure required for Slit binding and midline repulsive signaling in vivo by Drosophila Robo1. We find that the majority of the Robo1 ectodomain is dispensable for both Slit binding and repulsive signaling. We show that a significant level of midline repulsive signaling activity is retained when all Robo1 ectodomain elements apart from Ig1 are deleted, and that the combination of Ig1 plus one additional ectodomain element (Ig2, Ig5, or Fn3) is sufficient to restore midline repulsion to wild type levels. Further, we find that deleting four out of five Robo1 Ig domains (ΔIg2-5) does not affect negative regulation of Robo1 by Commissureless (Comm) or Robo2, while variants lacking all three fibronectin repeats (ΔFn1-3 and ΔIg2-Fn3) are insensitive to regulation by both Comm and Robo2, signifying a novel regulatory role for Robo1’s Fn repeats. Our results provide an in vivo perspective on the importance of the conserved 5+3 ectodomain structure of Robo receptors, and suggest that specific biochemical properties and/or ectodomain structural conformations observed in vitro for domains other than Ig1 may have limited significance for in vivo signaling in the context of midline repulsion.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 24, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Minimal structural elements required for midline repulsive signaling and regulation of Drosophila Robo1
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Minimal structural elements required for midline repulsive signaling and regulation of Drosophila Robo1
Haley E. Brown, Timothy A. Evans
bioRxiv 2020.03.30.016766; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.30.016766
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Minimal structural elements required for midline repulsive signaling and regulation of Drosophila Robo1
Haley E. Brown, Timothy A. Evans
bioRxiv 2020.03.30.016766; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.30.016766

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Developmental Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2430)
  • Biochemistry (4791)
  • Bioengineering (3332)
  • Bioinformatics (14677)
  • Biophysics (6639)
  • Cancer Biology (5168)
  • Cell Biology (7428)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4365)
  • Ecology (6873)
  • Epidemiology (2057)
  • Evolutionary Biology (9919)
  • Genetics (7346)
  • Genomics (9527)
  • Immunology (4554)
  • Microbiology (12684)
  • Molecular Biology (4945)
  • Neuroscience (28329)
  • Paleontology (199)
  • Pathology (808)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1391)
  • Physiology (2024)
  • Plant Biology (4498)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (977)
  • Synthetic Biology (1299)
  • Systems Biology (3914)
  • Zoology (726)