Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

A way to break bones? The weight of intuitiveness

View ORCID ProfileD. Vettese, View ORCID ProfileT. Stavrova, View ORCID ProfileA. Borel, View ORCID ProfileJ. Marin, View ORCID ProfileM.-H. Moncel, View ORCID ProfileM. Arzarello, View ORCID ProfileC. Daujeard
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.31.011320
D. Vettese
1Histoire Naturelle de l’Homme Préhistorique (HNHP, UMR 7194), Sorbonne Universités, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle (MNHN), Homme et Environnement, CNRS, Institut de Paléontologie Humaine, Paris, France
2Università degli Studi di Ferrara, Dipartimento degli Studi Umanistici, Sezione di Scienze Preistoriche e Antropologiche, Corso Ercole I d’Este 32, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D. Vettese
  • For correspondence: delphine.vettese@mnhn.fr
T. Stavrova
1Histoire Naturelle de l’Homme Préhistorique (HNHP, UMR 7194), Sorbonne Universités, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle (MNHN), Homme et Environnement, CNRS, Institut de Paléontologie Humaine, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T. Stavrova
A. Borel
1Histoire Naturelle de l’Homme Préhistorique (HNHP, UMR 7194), Sorbonne Universités, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle (MNHN), Homme et Environnement, CNRS, Institut de Paléontologie Humaine, Paris, France
3Institute of Archaeological Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University, Múzeum krt. 4/b, 1088 Budapest, Hungary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Borel
J. Marin
1Histoire Naturelle de l’Homme Préhistorique (HNHP, UMR 7194), Sorbonne Universités, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle (MNHN), Homme et Environnement, CNRS, Institut de Paléontologie Humaine, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Marin
M.-H. Moncel
1Histoire Naturelle de l’Homme Préhistorique (HNHP, UMR 7194), Sorbonne Universités, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle (MNHN), Homme et Environnement, CNRS, Institut de Paléontologie Humaine, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.-H. Moncel
M. Arzarello
2Università degli Studi di Ferrara, Dipartimento degli Studi Umanistici, Sezione di Scienze Preistoriche e Antropologiche, Corso Ercole I d’Este 32, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Arzarello
C. Daujeard
1Histoire Naturelle de l’Homme Préhistorique (HNHP, UMR 7194), Sorbonne Universités, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle (MNHN), Homme et Environnement, CNRS, Institut de Paléontologie Humaine, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C. Daujeard
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

During the Middle Paleolithic period, bone marrow extraction was an essential source of fat nutrients for hunter-gatherers especially throughout cold and dry seasons. This is attested by the recurrent findings of percussion marks in osteological material from anthropized archaeological levels. Among them some showed indicators that the marrow extraction process was part of a butchery cultural practice, meaning that the inflicted fracturing gestures and techniques were recurrent, standardized and counter-intuitive i.e. culturally influenced. In order to assess the weight of the counter-intuitive factor in the percussion mark pattern distribution, we carried out an experiment that by contrast focuses on the intuitive approach of fracturing bones to extract marrow, involving individual without experience in this activity.

We wanted to evaluate the influence of bone morphology and the individuals’ behaviour on the distribution of percussion marks. Twelve experimenters broke 120 limb bones, a series of 10 bones per individual. During the experiment, information concerning the fracture of the bones as well as individual behaviour was collected and was subsequently compared to data from the laboratory study of the remains. Then, we applied an innovative GIS (Geographic Information System) method to analyze the distribution of percussion marks to highlight recurrent patterns. Results show that in spite of all the variables there is a high similarity in the distribution of percussion marks which we consider as intuitive patterns. The factor influenced the distribution for the humerus, radius-ulna and tibia series is the bone morphology, while for the femur series individual behaviour seems to have more weight in the distribution. To go further in the subject we need to compare the intuitive models with the distributions of percussion marks registered in fossil assemblages. Thus, it would be possible to propose new hypotheses on butchering practices based on the results presented in this work.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • Trajanka Stavrova: stavrovatrajanka{at}gmail.com, Antony Borel: antony.borel{at}mnhn.fr, Juan Marin: juan.marin.hernando{at}gmail.com, Marie-Hélène Moncel: marie-helene.moncel{at}mnhn.fr, Marta Arzarello: marta.arzarello{at}unife.it, Camille Daujeard: camille.daujeard{at}mnhn.fr

  • Abstract reduced the number of words; Term: volunteer substituted by individual; Captions of figures and tables updated; Lines 118-119: Additional information; Lines 292-297 revised; Lines 342-344 revised; Figure 4 and 5 are now Figure 4 and SI 10-13; Lines 724-726 and 732-734: additional sentences; References updated; Supplemental files updated.

  • https://protocols.io/view/an-archaological-experiment-focused-on-the-intuiti-bb6airae.html

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 27, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A way to break bones? The weight of intuitiveness
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A way to break bones? The weight of intuitiveness
D. Vettese, T. Stavrova, A. Borel, J. Marin, M.-H. Moncel, M. Arzarello, C. Daujeard
bioRxiv 2020.03.31.011320; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.31.011320
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A way to break bones? The weight of intuitiveness
D. Vettese, T. Stavrova, A. Borel, J. Marin, M.-H. Moncel, M. Arzarello, C. Daujeard
bioRxiv 2020.03.31.011320; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.31.011320

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Paleontology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4381)
  • Biochemistry (9581)
  • Bioengineering (7087)
  • Bioinformatics (24845)
  • Biophysics (12598)
  • Cancer Biology (9952)
  • Cell Biology (14348)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7945)
  • Ecology (12103)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15985)
  • Genetics (10921)
  • Genomics (14736)
  • Immunology (9869)
  • Microbiology (23647)
  • Molecular Biology (9477)
  • Neuroscience (50839)
  • Paleontology (369)
  • Pathology (1539)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2681)
  • Physiology (4013)
  • Plant Biology (8655)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1508)
  • Synthetic Biology (2391)
  • Systems Biology (6427)
  • Zoology (1346)