Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Genetic similarity and facial cues for kin recognition in humans

View ORCID ProfileNicole S. Torosin, Joshua Ward, View ORCID ProfileAdrian V. Bell, Leslie A. Knapp
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.06.028134
Nicole S. Torosin
1Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, 84112
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nicole S. Torosin
  • For correspondence: nicole.torosin@rutgers.edu
Joshua Ward
2Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adrian V. Bell
1Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, 84112
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Adrian V. Bell
Leslie A. Knapp
1Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, 84112
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Kin recognition is essential to the evolution of human cooperation, social organization, and altruistic behavior. However, the genetic underpinnings of kin recognition have been largely understudied. Facial resemblance is an important relatedness cue for humans and more closely related individuals are generally thought to share greater facial similarity. To evaluate the relationship between perceived self-resemblance and genetic similarity among biologically related and unrelated females, we administered facial self-recognition surveys to twenty-three sets of related females and genotyped three different genetic systems, human leukocyte antigens (HLA), neutral nuclear microsatellites and mitochondrial haplogroups, for each individual. Using these data, we examined the relationship between visual kin recognition and genetic similarity. We found that pairs of individuals identified as visually more similar had greater HLA allelic sharing when compared to less facially similar participants. We did not find the same relationship for microsatellite and mitochondrial similarity, suggesting that HLA allelic similarity increases the probability of perceived self-resemblance in humans while other genetic markers do not. Our results demonstrate that some genetic markers, such as HLA-DRB, may have significant influence on phenotype and that large scale surveys of HLA and facial feature morphology will yield valuable insight into the evolutionary biology of genotype-phenotype relationships and kin recognition.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 07, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genetic similarity and facial cues for kin recognition in humans
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Genetic similarity and facial cues for kin recognition in humans
Nicole S. Torosin, Joshua Ward, Adrian V. Bell, Leslie A. Knapp
bioRxiv 2020.04.06.028134; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.06.028134
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Genetic similarity and facial cues for kin recognition in humans
Nicole S. Torosin, Joshua Ward, Adrian V. Bell, Leslie A. Knapp
bioRxiv 2020.04.06.028134; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.06.028134

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Evolutionary Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3602)
  • Biochemistry (7567)
  • Bioengineering (5522)
  • Bioinformatics (20782)
  • Biophysics (10325)
  • Cancer Biology (7978)
  • Cell Biology (11635)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6602)
  • Ecology (10200)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13611)
  • Genetics (9539)
  • Genomics (12844)
  • Immunology (7919)
  • Microbiology (19538)
  • Molecular Biology (7657)
  • Neuroscience (42081)
  • Paleontology (308)
  • Pathology (1257)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2201)
  • Physiology (3267)
  • Plant Biology (7038)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1294)
  • Synthetic Biology (1951)
  • Systems Biology (5426)
  • Zoology (1116)