Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Adaptive evolution of olfactory degeneration in recently flightless insects

View ORCID ProfileStefanie Neupert, View ORCID ProfileGraham A. McCulloch, View ORCID ProfileBrodie J. Foster, View ORCID ProfileJonathan M. Waters, View ORCID ProfilePaul Szyszka
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.10.035311
Stefanie Neupert
1University of Otago, Department of Zoology, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stefanie Neupert
Graham A. McCulloch
1University of Otago, Department of Zoology, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Graham A. McCulloch
Brodie J. Foster
1University of Otago, Department of Zoology, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Brodie J. Foster
Jonathan M. Waters
1University of Otago, Department of Zoology, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jonathan M. Waters
Paul Szyszka
1University of Otago, Department of Zoology, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Paul Szyszka
  • For correspondence: paul.szyszka@otago.ac.nz
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Fast-moving animals need fast-acting sensory systems. Flying insects have thus evolved exceptionally quick visual (1) and olfactory processing ability (2). For example, flighted insects can track the temporal structure of turbulent odor plumes at rates above 100 Hz (3). The evolutionary lability of such sensory systems, however, remains unknown. We test for rapid evolutionary shifts in olfactory processing speed associated with flight loss, through neurobiological comparisons of sympatric flighted versus flightless lineages within a wing-polymorphic stonefly species. Our analyses of sensory responses reveal that recently-evolved flightless lineages have substantially degraded olfactory acuity. By comparing flighted versus flightless ecotypes with similar genetic backgrounds (4), we eliminate other confounding factors that might have affected the evolution of their olfactory reception mechanisms. Our detection of different patterns of degraded olfactory sensitivity and speed in independently wing-reduced lineages highlights parallel evolution of sensory degeneration. These reductions in sensory ability also echo the rapid vestigialization of wings themselves (4, 5), and represent a neurobiological parallel to the convergent phenotypic shifts seen under sharp selective gradients in other systems (e.g. parallel loss of vision in diverse cave fauna (6)). Our study provides the first direct evidence for the hypothesis that flight poses a selective pressure on the speed of olfactory receptor neurons. Our findings also emphasize the energetic costs of rapid olfaction, and the key role of natural selection in shaping dramatic neurobiological shifts.

Significance Statement Flying insects move fast and have therefore evolved exceptionally quick-acting sensory systems. The speed with which such neurobiological shifts can evolve, however, remains unclear. Under the ‘use it or lose it’ hypothesis, loss of flight should lead to degradation of this fast sensory processing ability. We test for evolutionary reductions in olfactory acuity linked to flight loss, through neurobiological comparisons of flightless versus flighted lineages within a wing-polymorphic insect. Our analyses reveal that newly wing-reduced populations have substantially degraded olfactory acuity, with parallel reductions in this sensory ability detected in independently flightless lineages. These findings reveal that flight poses strong selective pressure for rapid olfaction, and highlight the potential of natural selection in rapidly shaping adaptive shifts in animal sensory systems.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 10, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Adaptive evolution of olfactory degeneration in recently flightless insects
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Adaptive evolution of olfactory degeneration in recently flightless insects
Stefanie Neupert, Graham A. McCulloch, Brodie J. Foster, Jonathan M. Waters, Paul Szyszka
bioRxiv 2020.04.10.035311; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.10.035311
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Adaptive evolution of olfactory degeneration in recently flightless insects
Stefanie Neupert, Graham A. McCulloch, Brodie J. Foster, Jonathan M. Waters, Paul Szyszka
bioRxiv 2020.04.10.035311; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.10.035311

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2633)
  • Biochemistry (5220)
  • Bioengineering (3643)
  • Bioinformatics (15706)
  • Biophysics (7210)
  • Cancer Biology (5590)
  • Cell Biology (8039)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4731)
  • Ecology (7458)
  • Epidemiology (2059)
  • Evolutionary Biology (10518)
  • Genetics (7695)
  • Genomics (10079)
  • Immunology (5144)
  • Microbiology (13819)
  • Molecular Biology (5350)
  • Neuroscience (30570)
  • Paleontology (211)
  • Pathology (870)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1519)
  • Physiology (2233)
  • Plant Biology (4980)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1036)
  • Synthetic Biology (1379)
  • Systems Biology (4129)
  • Zoology (802)