Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Digestive parameters during gestation of Holstein heifers

Jéssica Marcela Vieira Pereira, Marcos Inácio Marcondes, View ORCID ProfileSebastião de Campos Valadares Filho, Joel Caton, Anna Luiza Lacerda Sguizzato, View ORCID ProfileAlex Lopes Silva, Julia Travassos da Silva, Valber Carlos Lima Moraes, Lucas Faria Gomes, View ORCID ProfilePolyana Pizzi Rotta
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.20.050773
Jéssica Marcela Vieira Pereira
1Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcos Inácio Marcondes
1Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastião de Campos Valadares Filho
1Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sebastião de Campos Valadares Filho
Joel Caton
2Department of Animal Science, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Luiza Lacerda Sguizzato
1Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex Lopes Silva
3Department of Animal Production, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alex Lopes Silva
Julia Travassos da Silva
1Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valber Carlos Lima Moraes
1Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucas Faria Gomes
1Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Polyana Pizzi Rotta
1Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Polyana Pizzi Rotta
  • For correspondence: polyana.rotta@ufv.br
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Our objective was to estimate nutrient intake, ruminal flow, total apparent and ruminal digestibility, rates of passage and digestion, ruminal and omasal pH, blood metabolite concentrations, and body measurements during gestation of Holstein heifers. Eleven pregnant Holstein heifers, 8 of which fitted with a rumen cannula (450 ± 27.6 kg of body weight and 20 ± 3.5 months of initial age) were used. All heifers received the same diet composed of corn silage, soybean meal, corn meal, minerals and vitamins, with a corn silage:concentrate ratio of 50:50 (on a dry matter basis), aiming an average daily gain of approximately 1.0 kg. The sampling periods were established according to the days of gestation: 145, 200, and 255 with a duration of 10 days per period. Total fecal samples were collected to estimate dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, and neutral detergent fiber digestibility. Blood samples were collected to analyze metabolites (non-esterified fatty acids, β-hydroxybutyrate, urea, and glucose). Data were analyzed as a repeated measurements scheme, using MIXED procedure, with differences declared when P < 0.05. Dry matter intake expressed in kg/day increased from d-145 to d-200, and remaining stable until d-255 of gestation. The same results were observed for organic matter and crude protein intake, increasing 15.0 and 35.8% respectively. In contrast, when dry matter intake was evaluated as % body weight, we observed a decrease of 16.7% from d-200 to d-255. Days of gestation did not influence ruminal flow of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, and neutral detergent fiber. We observed an increase in the ruminal digestibility of neutral detergent fiber by 20.5%. The apparent total-tract digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, and crude protein changed over days of gestation, with an increase of 11.9, 8.5, and 9.8%, respectively, when comparing d-145 with d-200. The rate of digestion of neutral detergent fiber increased from 2.0 to 3.5% h-1. Glucose levels decreased, while β-hydroxybutirate and non-esterified fatty acids increased from d-145 to d-255. In conclusion, our results demonstrate a reduction in dry matter intake in % body weight due to pregnancy. It also shows an increase in total apparent digestibility through gestation, which imply a greater efficiency of use of nutrients by pregnant animals. Thus, further research is still needed to consolidate such results and to elucidate the mechanism about nutrient usage during the final third of gestation in heifers.

Introduction

According to the Hoffman [1], heifers should have the first parturition with at least 94% of their mature body weight, considering the fetal weight. Thus, their nutritional plan requires strategies to maintain constant and satisfactory gains until the end of gestation [2]. According to Mohd [3] the advances in reproduction were superior to the nutritional advances of heifers, producing precocious animals that may present low milk yield in the first lactation.

Literature lacks information on digestive aspects of ruminal flow, intake, passage and digestion rates of pregnant replacement heifers. However, several studies addressing nutrient fluxes of non-pregnant lactating animals are found in the literature [4, 5]. Eventually, mathematical models were developed to increase feed efficiency and to estimate rates of passage, digestion, and to estimate outflow of rumen digesta [6, 7, 8], however even these models were not developed or evaluated with pregnant heifers.

Data regarding nutrition of dairy cattle during gestation are focused on lactating dairy cows and are scarce for heifers [2, 9, 10]. It is well known that dry matter intake decreases during the final third of gestation due to the greater size of the gravid uterus and the increased estrogen concentration [11, 12]. This decrease in dry matter intake may reach up to 50% in the last 2 months of gestation in dairy cows [12]. However, it is not known whether dry matter intake in heifers present a similar decrease since they are still growing; such information would be of great use to improve management practices in pregnant heifers.

The hypothesis of this study was that the digestive parameters of pregnant heifers would be different from data in the literature for pregnant cows and would also be not altered during pregnancy. Thus, the objectives of this study were to estimate ruminal flow, total and partial digestibility of dry matter and diet constituents, intake, passage and digestion rates, ruminal and omasal pH, blood metabolite concentrations, and body measurements during gestation in Holstein heifers.

Materials and methods

Animals and management

All procedures were previously approved by the Animal Ethics and Welfare Committee of the Federal University of Viçosa according to protocol number 020-2016. Eleven pregnant Holstein heifers, 8 of them fitted with a rumen cannula, with a mean body weight of 450 ± 27.6 kg and mean initial age of 20 ± 3.5 months were used in this experiment. The sampling periods were established according to the days of gestation: 145, 200, and 255 ± 4.45, with duration of 10 days for each period. The animals were allocated to individual stalls of 10 m2. Prior to the start of the experiment, heifers underwent a 30-day adaptation period to experimental facilities and conditions. Heifers received the same diet (Table 1) for an average daily gain of 0.98 ± 0.30 kg/day, according to NRC (2001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1. Ingredients and chemical composition of feed used in the experimental diet.

The roughage:concentrate ratio was 50:50 (dry matter basis) and was delivered daily at 0700 and 1500 h. Animals were allowed 5% of orts on fresh basis. Once a week, corn silage was sampled and dried in a ventilated oven at 55°C for 72 h to adjust the diet dry matter content.

Intake and digestibility trial

Dry matter intake was daily measured by weighing offered and refused feedstuffs. To estimate nutrients digestibility, total feces were collected from all heifers for 3 consecutive days in first period: 145-148 days of gestation, second period: 200-203 days of gestation, and third period 255-258 days of gestation. After 24 h of collection, the total feces were weighed and approximately 250 g was oven-dried (55°C for 72 h). After each collection period, a proportional sample was composed using samples and data from the 3 days of fecal collection, based on fecal dry matter production of each day. Then, feces and feed samples were ground using a mill (Willye, model TE-680, TECNAL, Brazil) with a 1- and 2-mm sieves and stored for further chemical analyses.

Omasal and ruminal sampling

A continuous infusion of 5 g/day of Co-EDTA (0.7 g cobalt/day) from the 1st to the 6th day of collection was performed during each period (first period: 145-150 days of gestation, second period: 200-205 days of gestation, and third period 255-260 days of gestation) using 2 peristaltic pumps (model BP-600.4, Colombo, Paraná, Brazil). A total of 8 samples per animal were collected from the omasum at a 9-h interval for 3 days; sampling times were 0200, 0500, 0800, 1100, 1400, 1700, 2000, and 2300 h. The technique, that was developed by Huhtanen [13] and adapted by Leão [14], was used for sampling of the omasal digesta, where approximately 250 mL of digesta was used for a bacterial isolate and 500 mL was used for the ruminal flow estimation [15]. The samples were stored in plastic containers at -20 °C for further analysis.

At the end of each experimental period, samples of omasal digesta were thawed at room temperature and one composite was created per animal, following the recommendations of Rotta [15]. Thus, 4 L were obtained to estimate the omasal flow, which was filtered using a 100 μm nylon filter with an open area of 44% (Sefar Nytex 100/44; Sefar, Thal, Switzerland), thereby obtaining two phases: liquid particles and solid particles. Thus, the double marker system technique was used to estimate the digesta omasal flow, using cobalt and indigestible neutral detergent fiber as markers. All samples were stored in plastic containers and kept at -80° C for further lyophilization (LP510; Liobras, São Paulo, Brazil). After lyophilization, samples were milled at 2- and 1-mm sieves mills (Willye, model TE-048, TECNAL, Brazil).

Ruminal contents were sampled during the same times as omasal sampling, resulting in nine samples. Samples were manually collected at the liquid-solid interface of the rumen, filtered through a 100 μm nylon filter (Sefar Nitex; Sefar, Thal, Switzerland; porosity of 50 μm), and were subjected to pH measurement by using a digital potentiometer (pH-221, Lutron Electronics, Taiwan).

On the 7 th day of collection of each experimental period, total rumen emptying was carried out 4 h after feeding to estimate the rate of passage and digestion [16]. After removal of all ruminal contents, the digesta was weighed and filtered in a double layer of cheesecloth for separation of solid and liquid fractions, which were then weighed and sampled. After sampling, the digesta was reconstituted and returned to the rumen of the respective animals. On the 9 th day, the entire rumen emptying procedure was repeated before morning feeding. The collected samples were lyophilized and ground in a knife mill with 1 mm sieve (Willye, model TE-680, TECNAL, Brazil). Thus, composite samples of the dried solid and liquid fractions after emptying the rumen were obtained and were based on the dry weight of each sample.

Biometric Measurements

At the end of each experimental period (first period: 154 days of gestation, second period: 209 days of gestation, and third period 264 days of gestation), body weight, withers height, croup height, body length, and thoracic perimeter were measured while the animals were kept in a standing position within the chute.

Blood measurements

Blood samples were collected on the 10 th day of each period. The samples were collected via jugular venipuncture by using vacuum tubes with clot activator and gel for serum separation (BD Vacutainer® SST® II Advance®, São Paulo, Brazil) in order to quantify urea, nonesterified fatty acids, and β-hidroxibutirate; an extra tube with EDTA and sodium fluoride (BD Vacutainer® Fluorinated/EDTA, São Paulo, Brazil) was used to quantity plasma concentration of glucose. After the collection, samples were centrifuged at 3600 × g for 20 min, and serum and plasma were immediately frozen at - 20°C until further analysis.

Bioclin® kits were used to quantity urea (K056) and glucose (K082), nonesterified fatty acids, and β-hidroxibutirate were analyzed by using Randox® kits (FA115 and RB1007, Antrim, United Kingdom). All mentioned analyses were conducted using an automated biochemical analyzer (Mindray, BS200E, Shenzhen, China).

Laboratory analysis and calculations

Samples of omasal digesta, feces, feed, and ruminal emptying were analyzed for dry matter, organic matter, and nitrogen ([17]; method 934.01 for dry matter, 930.05 for organic matter, and 981.10 for nitrogen, respectively). The ether extract analysis was performed according to AOAC recommendations ([18]; method 945.16). The neutral detergent fiber was analyzed, without the addition of sodium sulphite, but with the addition of detergent thermostable alpha amylase ([19]; INCT-CA method F-001/1). Ash correction was performed in the neutral detergent fiber residues ([19]; method 942.05). Indigestible neutral detergent fiber was estimated according with Valente [20], in triplicate for omasal digesta (particle phase), fecal samples, and rumen emptying samples. Non-fibrous carbohydrates were calculated according to Van Soest [21], with no correction for urea.

The total-tract apparent digestibility was calculated as: Embedded Image where x (kg/day) and y (kg/day) are the intake and the output in feces of each component, respectively.

Ruminal digestibility coefficients were estimated by measuring the difference between the rate of nutrient intake and the flow of the nutrients through the rumen. The calculation of intestinal digestibility was estimated by the concentration of nutrients in omasal digesta and feces. The flow of the omasal digesta was estimated through the reconstitution of digesta technique [22] using the double marker system. Cobalt was used as the liquid phase marker and the indigestible neutral detergent fiber as the particle phase marker. The reconstitution factor was calculated based on the concentrations of the markers during the different phases of the digesta [23].

The rates of ingestion (ki), passage (kp), and digestion (kd) were calculated using the pool-and-flux method [16], according to the following models: Embedded Image

Where, ki = ingestion rate of feed fractions (%/h); intake = feed intake (kg/h); rumen pool = amount of total rumen dry matter (kg); kp = passage rate of feed fractions (%/h); rumen flow = amount of dry matter or nutrients in the omasum (kg/h); kd = digestion rate of diet fractions (%/h).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed as a repeated measurements scheme using the SAS MIXED procedure (SAS Institute Inc., version 9.4) according to the statistical model: Embedded Image where Yijk = dependent variable, μ is the overall mean, DGi = fixed effect of days of gestation, δ ij the random error with mean of 0 and a variance σ 2 δ, the variance between the days of gestation is equal covariance between repeated measures within animals and εijk is the model error with a mean of 0 and a variance of τ2. Days of gestation was considered as repeated measures, and data from ruminal and omasal pH measurements were also included in the statistical model as time-repeated measures (split-plot of DG). The fixed time effects and the interaction between time and days of gestation were tested by using the appropriate covariance structure. The following covariance matrices were tested: components of variance, composite symmetry, heterogeneous composite symmetry, and first order heterogeneous auto-regression. The selection of the covariance matrix was based on the Akaike-corrected criterion, and the composite symmetry matrix was chosen. Results are presented as least squared means and their standard error of the mean. Differences were declared when P < 0.05.

Results

Intake, ruminal flow and digestibility

The dry matter intake (kg/day) increased (P = 0.03) at d-200 and d-255 compared to d-145 (Table 2). As for nutrient intake, the same pattern was observed, with an increase of 14.7% (P < 0.01) for organic matter, 41.7% (P < 0.01) for crude protein, at 145 and 200 days of gestation, and for neutral detergent fiber there was no difference. Regarding to dry matter intake in % body weight (Fig 1), there was no difference (P > 0.05) between 145 to 200 days of gestation, but there was a 16.7% (P < 0.01) reduction from 200 to 255 days of gestation.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2. Intake (n = 11), ruminal outflow (n = 8), ruminal (n = 8) and apparent total-tract digestibility (n = 11) of Holstein heifers in different days of gestation.
Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig 1. Dry matter intake (% BW) in different days of gestation of Holstein heifers (number of animals = 11).

* Indicative of significance in the days of gestation (P < 0.05)

Ruminal flows of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, and neutral detergent fiber were not affected by days of gestation (Table 2). The same pattern was observed for ruminal digestibility of dry matter and organic matter, but neutral detergent fiber increased by 46.6% from 145 to 255 days of gestation (P = 0.03). The apparent total-tract digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, and crude protein was altered (P < 0.01) by days of gestation, with an increase of 11.9, 8.5, and 9.8%, respectively, when comparing the 145 and 200 days of gestation. There was no difference (Table 2) for neutral detergent fiber digestibility among days of gestation.

Digestion kinetics

Rumen pools and kinetics data are shown in Table 4. The values for dry matter ki, kp, and kd did not differ among days of gestation. The means of dry matter ki, kp, and kd were 8.0, 4.7, and 3.3 % h-1, respectively. The values for neutral detergent fiber ki and kp did not differ among days of gestation, and the means were 4.3 and 2.0 % h-1, respectively. The kd of neutral detergent fiber increased from 2.0 to 3.5 % h-1 (P = 0.01).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3. Biometric measurements in pregnant Holstein heifers (n = 11).
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 4. Digestion kinetics for Holstein heifers in different days of gestation (n = 8).

There was no difference (P > 0.05) for the ruminal pool of dry matter and neutral detergent fiber among days of gestation, thereby presenting with an average ruminal pool of 3.9 kg for dry matter and 2.3 kg for neutral detergent fiber.

Ruminal and omasal pH

There was pH interaction (P = 0.01) between collection times and days of gestation for ruminal fluid and omasal fluid (P < 0.01) (Figs 2 and 3). Values for ruminal pH increased (P < 0.01) at 0500 h from 145 to 255 days of gestation, the same pattern was observed at 1700, 2000 and 2300 h (P < 0.01) with pH values from 5.5 to 6.11, 5.6 to 5.9 and 5.6 to 6.2, respectively. The omasal pH interaction effect was present at 0500, 0800, 1100 and 1400 h. Values of pH at 0500 increased in 10.8 % from 145 to 200 days of gestation, and the pH values at 0800, 1100 and 1400 h increased 2.6%, 6.1% and 6.0% from 145 to 255 days of gestation, respectively.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2. pH of ruminal fluid in different days of gestation of Holstein heifers.

Arrows indicate the time of diet delivered at 0700 and 1500 h (number of animals = 8).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 3. pH of omasal fluid in different days of gestation of Holstein heifers.

Arrows indicate the time of diet delivered at 0700 and 1500 h (number of animals = 8).

Body measurements

The measurements of the teats were not different (P > 0.05) among the evaluated periods, however, we observed that the anterior teats were 15.1% larger than the posterior teats (Table 3). The measurements of body weight, withers height, croup height, body length, and thoracic perimeter presented a difference (P < 0.01) among periods that were evaluated with an increase of 23.7, 4.4, 4.2, 23.1 and 11.1% respectively, when we compare 145 and 255 days of gestation (Table 3).

Blood metabolites

Glucose levels decreased (P = 0.01) by approximately 6.9% from 145 to 255 days of gestation and the levels of β-hidroxibutirate increased (P < 0.01) in the same period by 62.9% (Table 5). The urea and nonesterified fatty acids concentration did not differ (P > 0.05) among days of gestation.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 5. Metabolic parameters (mmol/L) of blood samples for Holstein heifers in different days of gestation (n = 11).

Discussion

There is a lack of information about dry matter intake changes of growing heifers during the last trimester of gestation [9]. To our knowledge this is the first study aiming to evaluate digestive parameters in pregnant Holstein heifers. When comparing dry matter intake (kg/day) at three days of gestation evaluated, we observed an increase of approximately 15.5% between 145 and 200 days of gestation (1.3 kg/day). This might be explained by the fact that heifers are still growing (increasing body measurements) and had an average daily gain around 1.0 kg which is not the case of mature cows, which have a reduction in dry matter intake during pregnancy [12, 24, 25]. Similarly, nutrient intake also showed the same pattern as dry matter in this study.

However, we observed that dry matter intake expressed in % body weight was constant at 145 and 200 days of gestation and had a 16.7% decrease at 255 days of gestation, which corresponds to the 37th week of gestation, approximately. This reduction was also reported by Park [26] (25.6%), and Rotta [12] (22.0%) when evaluating dairy cows. However, the reduction of dry matter intake expresses in % body weight, from dairy cows reported was numerically greater than our study with pregnancy heifers. The reduction of dry matter intake might be influenced by increase or decrease in the concentration of hormones such as estrogen and progesterone, respectively [27], as well as the reduction of rumen physical space at the end of gestation [12], which, according to Forbes [28], is the most limiting factor of consumption. This result implies a greater use of feed by the animal.

According to Rotta [12] and Park [26], with advancing gestation the total-tract dry matter, organic matter, crude protein and neutral detergent fiber digestibility, has shown a reduction, which in part can be explained by the increase of passage rate [29]. Nevertheless, in the present study, we observed that apparent total-tract dry matter, organic matter, crude protein and neutral detergent fiber digestibility increased and no difference was observed for the kp in the period of gestation evaluated, which explains the non-reduction of total-tract digestibility.

Studies evaluating digestion kinetics during gestation of cows are scare. In our study the rates of gestation, passage and digestion remained constant, with no differences among the days of gestation, excepted for the neutral detergent fiber kd. Comparing multiparous cows [30,31] observed an increase in the rate of passage during the pregnancy, with decrease nutrient digestibility [32]. However, the pattern observed for pregnant dairy cows was not observed in this study. Factors such as physiological, gastrointestinal, and feed changes should be considered to explain response rates in addition to feed characteristics (particle size) [26] and might have influenced the lack of difference along the days of gestation when these variables were assessed.

Further studies should be performed to better elucidate rumen parameters at late gestation in Holstein heifers, so they may be used as the basis for formulating rations to meet the requirements of this category, since the focus in the studies are based on multiparous lactating cows.

Considering the concentration of metabolites in dairy cows, studies using lactating cows have been carried out and limits of several metabolites have been established [33, 34, 35]. However, according to Briscic [36], reference values for heifers at the end of gestation have not been studied. In this study, values for glucose and urea were similar to those found by Briscic [36]: minimum concentration of 2.8 mmol/L and maximum of 4.0 mmol/L for glucose, and for urea the values were between 1.1 mmol/L and 5.8 mmol/L, thus establishing such values as a reference for heifers during late-gestation.

Values of β-hidroxibutirate in the present study reached 0.44 mmol/L, which are 3 times lower than the values utilized as threshold for ketosis [37]. The values found for nonesterified fatty acids reached 0.34 mmol/L. According to Overton [33], levels above 0.5 mmol/L in the prepartum period indicate a greater probability of developing some metabolic disease. Thus, the heifers in the present study with an average daily gain approximately of 1.0 kg are unlikely to present metabolic problems due to the low levels of β-hidroxibutirate and nonesterified fatty acids.

Conclusions

Holstein heifers during the last trimester of pregnancy demonstrate an increase in the intake and apparent total-tract digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, and crude protein from 200 days of gestation. Also, there was a reduction of dry matter intake expressed as a percentage of body weight at the end of gestation by 16.7%, reaching 1.49% body weight at 250 days of gestation. The digestion kinetics remained constant. Studies evaluating such factors are scarce in the literature, so further research is still needed to consolidate such results.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Instituto Nacional de Ciências e Tecnologia de Ciência Animal (INCT-CA), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brazil) for financial support.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Beede DK
    Hofmman PC. Feeding management of the dairy heifer from 4 months to calving. In: Beede DK, editor. Large Dairy Herd Management. Champaign: American Dairy Science Association; 2017. p. 431–444.
  2. 2.↵
    Heinrichs AJ, Zanton GI, Lascano GJ, Jones CM. A 100-Year Review: A century of dairy heifer research. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100:10173–10188. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12998.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    Mohd N, Steeneveld W, van Werven T, Mourits MCM, Hogeveen H. First-calving age and first-lactation milk production on Dutch dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2013; 96:981–992. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5741.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    Berends H, van den Borne JJGC, Stockhofe-Zurwieden N, Gilbert MS, Zandstra T, Pellikaan WF, et al. Effects of solid feed level and roughage-to-concentrate ratio on ruminal drinking and passage kinetics of milk replacer, concentrates, and roughage in veal calves. J Dairy Sci. 2015; 98: 5621–5629. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9367.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    Ramirez-Ramirez HA, Castillo Lopez E, Jenkins CJR, Aluthge ND, Anderson C, Fernando SC, et al. Reduced-fat dried distillers grains with solubles reduces the risk for milk fat depression and supports milk production and ruminal fermentation in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2016; 99: 1912–1928. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9712.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    Allen MS, Linton JAV. in Vivo Methods To Measure Digestibility and Digestion Kinetics of Feed Fractions in the Rumen. Simpósio Int Sobre Avanços em Técnicas Pesqu Nutr Ruminantes. 2007; 72–89.
  7. 7.↵
    Gregorini P, Beukes P, Waghorn G, Pacheco D, Hanigan M. Development of an improved representation of rumen digesta outflow in a mechanistic and dynamic model of a dairy cow, Molly. Ecol Modell. 2015; 313:293–306. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.06.042.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    Bannink A, van Lingen HJ, Ellis JL, France J, Dijkstra J. The contribution of mathematical modeling to understanding dynamic aspects of rumen metabolism. Front Microbiol. 2016; 7:1820. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01820.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    NRC. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academic Press; 2001.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Beede DK
    Akers RM. Mammary development in calves and heifers. In: Beede DK, editor. Large Dairy Herd Management. Champaign: American Dairy Science Association; 2017. p. 815–827.
  11. 11.↵
    Bertoni G, Trevisi E. Use of the liver activity index and other metabolic variables in the assessment of metabolic health in dairy herds. Vet Clin North Am - Food Anim Pract. 2013; 29: 413–431. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2013.04.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Rotta PP, Filho SCV, Gionbelli TRS, Costa e Silva LF, Engle TE, Marcondes MI, et al. Effects of day of gestation and feeding regimen in Holstein × Gyr cows: I. Apparent total-tract digestibility, nitrogen balance, and fat deposition. J Dairy Sci. 2015; 98: 3197–3210. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8280.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    Huhtanen P, Brotz PG, Satter LD. Omasal sampling technique for assessing fermentative digestion in the forestomach of dairy cows. J. Anim Sci. 1997; 75:1380–1392. doi: 10.2527/1997.7551380x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Leão MI, De Campos Valadares Filho S, Rennó LN, Gonçalves LC, Cecon PR, Azevedo JAG, et al. Consumos e digestibilidades totais e parciais de matéria seca, matéria orgânica, proteína bruta e extrato etéreo em novilhos submetidos a três níveis de ingestão e duas metodologias de coleta de digestas abomasal e omasal. Rev Bras Zootec. 2004; 33: 1604–1615. doi: 10.1590/s1516-35982004000600028.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    Rotta PP, Valadares Filho SC, Detmann E, Costa e Silva LF, Paulino MF, Marcondes MI, et al. Digesta sampling sites and marker methods for estimation of ruminal outflow in bulls fed different proportions of corn silage or sugarcane. J Anim Sci. 2014; 92:2996–3006. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-7364.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Allen MS, Linton JAV. In vivo methods to measure digestibility and digestion kinetics of feed fractions in the rumen. Simpósio Intern Avanços Técnicas Pesqu Nutr Rumin. 2007; 72–89.
  17. 17.↵
    AOAC International. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. AOAC International, Arlington, VA; 2000.
  18. 18.↵
    AOAC International. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD; 2006.
  19. 19.↵
    Detmann E, Souza MA, Valadares Filho SC, Queiroz AC, Berchielli TT, Saiba EOS, et al. Methods for feed analysis-INCT-Animal Science. Visconde do Rio Branco, BR: Suprema Gráfica; 2012.
  20. 20.↵
    Valente TNP, Detmann E, Queiroz AC, Valadares Filho SC, Gomes DI, Figueiras JF. Evaluation of ruminal degradation profiles of forages using bags made from different textiles. Rev Bras Zootec. Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia; 2011; 40: 2565–2573. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011001100039.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    Van Soest PJ. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. 2nd ed. Ithaca, NY: Comstock Publishing Associates; 1994.
  22. 22.↵
    Faichney GJ. The use of markers to partition digestion within the gastrointestinal tract of ruminants. In: Digestion and metabolism in the ruminant. Proc. IV Int. Symposium Ruminanl and Physiology. Sydney, Australia. 1975; p.277–291.
  23. 23.↵
    France J, Siddons RC. Determination of digesta flow by continuous marker infusion. J Theoriog Biol. 1986; 121:105–120. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5193(86)80031-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    Shonka BN, Tao S, Dahl GE, Spurlock DM. Genetic regulation of prepartum dry matter intake in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 2015; 98: 8195–8200. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9675
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    Salin S, Vanhatalo A, Elo K, Taponen J, Boston RC, Kokkonen T. Effects of dietary energy allowance and decline in dry matter intake during the dry period on responses to glucose and insulin in transition dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100: 5266–5280. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11871.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    Park AF, Shirley JE, Titgemeyer EC, DeFrain JM, Cochran RC, Wickersham EE, et al. Characterization of ruminal dynamics in Holstein dairy cows during the periparturient period. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2011; 95: 571–582. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01085.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Ingvartsen KL, Andersen JB. Integration of metabolism and intake regulation: A review focusing on periparturient animals. J Dairy Sci. 2000; 83: 1573–1597. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75029-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Forbes JM. The physical relationships of the abdominal organs in the pregnant ewe. J Agric Sci. 1968; 70:171–177. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600011023.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    Beharka A, Cochran B, Harmon D, Avery T. The influence of stage of pregnancy on digestion characteristics of beef cows. Kansas State Univ. Prog. Rep. 1988; 539:13–15.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    Stanley TA, Cochran RC, Vanzant ES, Harmon DL, Corah LR. Periparturient changes in intake, ruminal capacity, and digestive characteristics in beef cows consuming alfalfa hay. J Anim Sci. 1993; 71:788–795. doi: 10.2527/1993.713788x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    Reynolds CK, Dürst B, Lupoli B, Humphries DJ, Beever DE. Visceral tissue mass and rumen volume in dairy cows during the transition from late gestation to early lactation. J Dairy Sci. 2004;87: 961–971. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73240-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    Tyrrell HF, Moe PW. Effect of intake on digestive efficiency. J Dairy Sci. 1975; 58:1151–1163. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(75)84694-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. 33.↵
    Overton TR, McArt JAA, Nydam DV. A 100-Year Review: Metabolic health indicators and management of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100: 10398–10417. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13054.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    Ospina PA, Nydam DV, Stokol T, Overton TR. Associations of elevated nonesterified fatty acids and β-hydroxybutyrate concentrations with early lactation reproductive performance and milk production in transition dairy cattle in the northeastern United States. J Dairy Sci. 2010; 93: 1596–1603. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2852.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    Cozzi G, Ravarotto L, Gottardo F, Stefani AL, Contiero B, Moro L, et al. Short communication: reference values for blood parameters in Holstein dairy cows: Effects of parity, stage of lactation, and season of production. J Dairy Sci. 2011; 94:3895–3901. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3687.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    Brscic M, Cozzi G, Lora I, Stefani AL, Contiero B, Ravarotto L, et al. Short communication: Reference limits for blood analytes in Holstein late-pregnant heifers and dry cows: Effects of parity, days relative to calving, and season. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98: 7886–7892. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9345.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. 37.↵
    Duffield TF, Lissemore KD, McBride BW, Leslie KE. Impact of hyperketonemia in early lactation dairy cows on health and production. J Dairy Sci. 2009; 92:571–580. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1507.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 20, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Digestive parameters during gestation of Holstein heifers
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Digestive parameters during gestation of Holstein heifers
Jéssica Marcela Vieira Pereira, Marcos Inácio Marcondes, Sebastião de Campos Valadares Filho, Joel Caton, Anna Luiza Lacerda Sguizzato, Alex Lopes Silva, Julia Travassos da Silva, Valber Carlos Lima Moraes, Lucas Faria Gomes, Polyana Pizzi Rotta
bioRxiv 2020.04.20.050773; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.20.050773
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Digestive parameters during gestation of Holstein heifers
Jéssica Marcela Vieira Pereira, Marcos Inácio Marcondes, Sebastião de Campos Valadares Filho, Joel Caton, Anna Luiza Lacerda Sguizzato, Alex Lopes Silva, Julia Travassos da Silva, Valber Carlos Lima Moraes, Lucas Faria Gomes, Polyana Pizzi Rotta
bioRxiv 2020.04.20.050773; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.20.050773

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Physiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2416)
  • Biochemistry (4774)
  • Bioengineering (3319)
  • Bioinformatics (14626)
  • Biophysics (6617)
  • Cancer Biology (5156)
  • Cell Biology (7402)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4340)
  • Ecology (6858)
  • Epidemiology (2057)
  • Evolutionary Biology (9876)
  • Genetics (7328)
  • Genomics (9496)
  • Immunology (4534)
  • Microbiology (12631)
  • Molecular Biology (4919)
  • Neuroscience (28206)
  • Paleontology (198)
  • Pathology (802)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1380)
  • Physiology (2012)
  • Plant Biology (4473)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (974)
  • Synthetic Biology (1295)
  • Systems Biology (3903)
  • Zoology (722)