Abstract
The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is increasing continuously in the industrial era, posing a threat to the ecological balance on Earth. There are two ways to reduce elevated CO2 concentrations ([CO2]high): reducing human emissions or increasing their absorption by oceans and plants. However, in response to [CO2]high, plants diminish gas exchange and CO2 uptake by closing stomata. Surprisingly, we do not know how plants sense CO2 in their environment, and the basic mechanisms of the plant response to [CO2]high are very poorly understood. Here, we show that mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are plant CO2 receptors. We demonstrate that MPK4, a prominent MAPK that is known to be involved in the stomatal response to [CO2]high1–3, is capable of binding CO2 and is directly activated by a very low increase in [CO2] in vivo and in vitro. Unlike MPK4 activation by infections4, stress and hormones within known MAPK signalling cascades, [CO2]high-induced MPK4 activation is independent of the upstream regulators MKK1 and MKK2. Moreover, once activated, MPK4 is prone to inactivation by bicarbonate. The identification of stress-responsive MPK4 as a CO2 receptor sheds new light on the integration of various environmental signals in guard cells, setting up MPK4 as the main hub regulating CO2 availability for photosynthesis. This result could help to find new ways to increase CO2 uptake by plants.
Introduction
Abscisic acid (ABA) is the best studied regulator of stomatal closure, and for many years, ABA-induced signalling events were thought to direct stomatal closure triggered by [CO2]high. Recent studies, however, have proposed otherwise, suggesting that both pathways work together and that ABA enhances the response to [CO2]high; however, [CO2]high signalling is still active in the absence of ABA and key elements of ABA signalling5. Only the downstream effectors, S-type anion channels, i.e., SLAC1, and some of their regulators are shared by the ABA and CO2 pathways. Thus, except BIG6 and RHC17, the connections of which with core pathways remain unclear, known specific regulators of CO2 signalling in guard cells belong to the MAPK superfamily. Among these proteins, CBC1/28 and HT1 mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinases (MKKKs) are involved in pathways leading to low [CO2]-induced stomatal opening or inhibition of stomatal closure rather than [CO2]high-induced stomatal closure. In contrast, MPK12 and MPK4 are essential upstream mediators of the [CO2]high1,2 pathway promoting SLAC1-mediated stomatal closure via HT13 inactivation.
Because MPK12 orthologues are guard cell-specific kinases found only in Brassicaceae9, we focused on MPK4 to reveal the general mechanisms of [CO2]high sensing in all plants, as silencing of NtMPK4 impaired [CO2]high- and dark-induced stomatal closure by disrupting the activation of slow-type anion channels in Nicotiana tabacum1.
Results
MPK4 is activated by CO2in vivo
No kinase involved in plant CO2 signalling has been shown to be activated by [CO2]high in vivo to date; therefore, we decided to study MPK4 activation in response to [CO2]high in epidermal peels. In line with the reported high activity of the MPK4 promoter in guard cells4, we detected very high MPK4 expression in Arabidopsis epidermal peels using immunoblotting (Fig. 1a).
a, Measurement of MPK4 activity in response to the indicated [CO2]. b, c, Time course of MPK4 activation by darkness (b) and 180 μM HCO3- (c). Strong activation of 85-kDa MPK was identified in response to 7-minute exposure to HCO3- (orange line). Identical molecular mass, appearance time points and intensity changes in the 85-kDa protein band were found for both anti-TEY and anti-MPK4 (Supplementary Fig. 2) antibodies, indicating that dimeric MPK4 is ~85-kDa active MPK. d, MPK4 activation by [CO2]high is independent of MAPK cascades – MKK inhibitors do not abolish MPK4 activation by [CO2]high. Epidermal peels were preincubated with both 50 μM PD98059 and 5 μM U0126 for 1.5 h before addition of the indicated concentration of dissolved CO2. e, MPK response to [CO2]high in ht1-2.
MPK4 activity was studied in an open system: epidermal peels were incubated in stomatal opening buffer in open tubes, ensuring continuous CO2 exchange with ambient air. Then, darkness or specified CO2 concentrations were applied for the indicated time or 15 min, respectively. To gain insight into MPK4 activity and separate it from highly active MPK3, high-resolution electrophoresis was applied, followed by immunodetection of active MPKs with phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204) antibody (anti-phospho-TEY) against the phosphorylated activation loop of MPKs. Protein loading was visualized by both Ponceau S staining and immunoblotting with anti-MPK3, anti-MPK4 and anti-MPK6 antibodies. Representative results from three independent experiments are presented. Error bars represent the standard deviation (SD). *, ** and *** indicate significant differences in MPK4 activity (p<0.05, p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively) compared to the control. The above data were obtained on proteins isolated by phenol-SDS extraction for immediate separation of ATP33 from MPKs to prevent their extracellular activation. In contrast, we were unable to detect the activity of guard cell MPK4 purified under native conditions (Supplementary Fig. 9).
The activity of MPK4 was extremely low compared to that of the highly active MPK3 and MPK6. The lack of MPK4 activation in the control samples indicates the maintenance of stress-free conditions in the experimental system used. We assumed that the method used to study [CO2]high-induced MPK activation should utilize direct analysis of the protein extract without lengthy sample preparation steps at indoor [CO2] under native conditions. Therefore, we rejected the classic in-gel kinase assay following kinase immunoprecipitation.
MPK4 is activated by as low as 20 μM CO2/HCO3-, reaching the highest activity in 120 μM CO2/HCO3-. Consistent results were obtained when the source of CO2/HCO3- was dissolved CO2 (Fig. 1a) or KHCO3 (Supplementary Fig. 1a-b). As stomatal closing in darkness is a typical physiological response to [CO2]high and is independent of arbitrarily imposed external CO2 concentrations, we traced the effect of darkness on MPK4 activity over time. The result revealed MPK4 activation by darkness at time points from 5 to 20 min (peak at 10-15 min, p<0.001, Fig. 1b) compared to immediate (maximum at 2-5 min) activation by externally provided [CO2]high (Fig. 1c) according to the very rapid stomatal closure in response to [CO2]high10. A decrease in monomeric MPK4 activity was accompanied by strong (p<0.0001) and transitory activation of the ~85-kDa form of MPK4 (Fig. 1c, Supplementary Fig. 2) corresponding to the MPK4 dimer in size according to the multimerization of active MPK4 in response to both CO2 (Galganska et al., in preparation) and H2O211.
Additional experiments showing MPK4 activation by CO2 in epidermal peels. a, Similar to dissolved CO2, an increase in [HCO3-] induces MPK4 activity. b, A study on MPK activity in epidermal peels of mpk3-1 showed that strong immunoblotting signals from MPK3 did not influence the measurement of MPK4 activity. Before administration of the indicated [HCO3-], epidermal peels were incubated at pH 5.7 in open tubes ensuring stabilization of [CO2], which may fluctuate due to CO2 consumption and production by epidermal peels. Then, the indicated [HCO3-] was added for 15 min. Active MPKs were immunodetected with anti-phospho-TEY following SDS-PAGE. Protein loading was assessed by Ponceau S staining and immunoblotting with anti-MPK3, anti-MPK4 and anti-MPK6 antibodies. Data from two biological replicates.
An additional MPK4 band was recognized in response to exposure to 180 μM HCO3-. Due to the double molecular mass compared to monomeric MPK4 and known MPK4 susceptibility to multimerization, we expect that the most likely modification of ~85-kDa MPK4 is covalent dimerization. Protein bands of the same molecular weight, emerging time points and intensity profile were detected using anti-TEY and anti-MPK4 antibodies (Fig. 1c), indicating that dimeric MPK4 is ~85-kDa active MPK. The amounts of proteins were determined by staining with Ponceau S and immunoblotting with anti-MPK4. Representative results from three experiments are presented.
Generally, MAPKs function as a cascade in which MKKK phosphorylates and activates a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MKK), which in turn activates an MPK. Therefore, a lack of [CO2]high-induced MPK4 activation would be expected in plants with blocked upstream MKKs if activation of MPK4 was a part of the secondary response to [CO2]high within the MAPK cascade. Thus, we measured MPK4 activity in epidermal peels pre-treated with MKK inhibitors (PD98059 and U0126; Fig. 1d) and found that the increase in MPK4 activity in response to [CO2]high was still statistically significant, indicating MAPK cascade-independent activation of MPK4. Furthermore, we found that MPK4 activation in response to [CO2]high was intact in ht1-2 (Fig. 1e), supporting previous data3 showing the MPK4 position upstream of HT1.
MPK4 is activated by CO2in vitro
Based on the response of MPK4 to [CO2]high independent of upstream signalling (i), the upstream role of this protein in known CO2 signalling components (ii) and its importance in CO2 signalling (iii), we hypothesized that the role of MPK4 is that of a direct CO2 sensor. Thus, we measured MPK4 activity in response to [CO2]high in vitro.
A CO2 receptor is expected to sense very low [CO2] because guard cells are able to react to slight changes in ambient [CO2], and the dissolved atmospheric [CO2] in the acidic pH of the apoplast is expected to be slightly above 10 μM. Moreover, upon its transport through the cell membrane, CO2 is spontaneously converted to HCO3- at cytoplasmic pH and further consumed by photosynthesis. There is no report clearly showing [CO2] in guard cells. In addition, net CO2 uptake or production from mitochondrial respiration, photorespiration and photosynthetic CO2 fixation remains unclear in guard cells. Typically, the intracellular partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) in photosynthetic cells reaches approximately half the pCO2 concentration in the ambient air, but CO2 is unequally distributed within the cell12.
Based on these assumptions, MPK4 is activated by as low as 5 μM dissolved CO2 (Fig. 2a) or KHCO3 (Supplementary Fig. 3a-b) added to the in vitro phosphorylation mixture. MPK4 activation occurs in just a few seconds (Supplementary Fig. 3c), as shown by an increase in activation loop autophosphorylation. An increase in substrate protein phosphorylation by MPK4 was observed 3 min after CO2 administration (Fig. 2b). To carefully exclude any artefacts, we investigated MPK4 activation in several systems using GST-tagged MPK4 (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Fig. 3c) and tag-free MPK4 (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Fig. 3a) dephosphorylated by FastAP alkaline phosphatase. We used an anti-phospho-TEY antibody (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Fig. 3c) or an in vitro kinase assay using commercial myelin basic protein (MBP) as a standard MPK substrate (Supplementary Fig. 3b,d) or recombinant JAZ12 as a specific and natural substrate of MPK4 (Fig. 2b,c). All of the abovementioned approaches confirmed that [CO2]high promoted MPK4 activation. However, only a low increase in [CO2] influenced MPK4 activity with a constant trend in the in vitro kinase activity assay; the application of 40 μM CO2 or higher yielded variable results (Supplementary Fig. 3d), suggesting that MPK4 activity can be affected by both CO2 forms, namely, free CO2 and HCO3-, with opposite effects. Thus, we measured [CO2]high-induced MPK4 activation in a pH-dependent manner because at low pH, the CO2/HCO3- equilibrium is shifted towards increased free [CO2], whereas at high pH, the equilibrium is shifted towards increased [HCO3-]. An increase in [CO2/HCO3-] clearly activates MPK4 at low pH in contrast to high pH (Fig. 2c), indicating that an increase in [CO2] enhances MPK4 kinase activity and an increase in [HCO3-] reduces MPK4 kinase activity. The negative effect of HCO3- on MPK4 activity was further confirmed in experiments with constant [CO2] and increasing [HCO3-] (Supplementary Fig. 4a) and by direct comparison of [CO2] and [HCO3-] (Supplementary Fig. 4b).
Investigation of in vitro MPK4 activation by CO2/HCO3- (at pH 7.0). a, b, Similar to dissolved CO2, KHCO3 regulates MPK4 activity. c, MPK4 activation in response to [CO2]high occurs in just a few seconds. d, Very high CO2/HCO3- concentrations can positively or negatively regulate MPK4 activity. The lack of MPK4 activation in response to millimolar CO2/HCO3- concentration is consistent with a previous report2. In a, c, MPK4 activity is shown by immunoblotting with anti-phospho-TEY and MPK4 loading by staining with Ponceau S. In b, d, MPK4 activity was determined by MBP in vitro thiophosphorylation and detected by immunoblotting with anti-TE. MPK4 was stained with CBB, and MBP was stained with Ponceau S. Experiments were carried out using MPK4 purified from bacteria and dephosphorylated by FastAP phosphatase; GST-MPK4 (c), tag-free MPK4 (a-b, d). Representative results from three independent experiments are presented.
Increase in [CO2] enhances MPK4 kinase activity, and increase in [HCO3-] reduces MPK4 kinase activity. a, Elevation of [HCO3-] at constant [CO2] triggers MPK4 inactivation. In vitro thiophosphorylation reactions with different [CO2/HCO3-] in the pH series were allowed exchange with ambient air for 30 min, leading to equalization of [CO2] in all samples so that they differed in only [HCO3-]. Then, MPK4 and ATPγS were added, and in vitro thiophosphorylation reactions were carried out for only 2 min. High pH and concomitant high [HCO3-] led to low MPK4 activity. JAZ12 was thiophosphorylated by dephosphorylated GST-MPK4, and its activity was detected using immunoblotting with anti-TE. JAZ12 and MPK4 bands were stained by Ponceau S. b, MPK4 is activated by 7.5-10 μM CO2 at pH 7.0 but inactivated by 7.5-10 μM HCO3-. Lowering the pH to 6.6 (increase in free [CO2] and decrease in [HCO3-]) leads to reversal of the HCO3--induced MPK4 activity profile to that triggered by dissolved CO2. MBP was used as a substrate of tag-free MPK4, and MPK4 activity was detected by immunoblotting with anti-phospho-MBP. MBP loading was visualized by Ponceau S, and MPK4 loading was visualized by CBB. Representative data from three experiments. Mean ±SD; *, ** and *** indicate p<0.05, p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively.
a, [CO2]high enhances the phosphorylation of the MPK4 kinase activation loop, as shown by immunoblotting using anti-phospho-TEY. The in vitro phosphorylation reaction at pH 7.0 was carried out at 24°C for 1 min upon the addition of the indicated [CO2]. b, Time course of MPK4 activation by HCO3- at pH 6.4 presented as the intensity of JAZ12 thiophosphorylation using immunoblotting with anti-thiophosphate ester antibody (anti-TE). c, pH-dependent MPK4 activity regulation by HCO3-. Thiophosphorylation (24°C, 15 min) of JAZ12 followed by immunoblotting with anti-TE. d, HCO3-/CO2 conversion by βCA4 reverses the pH-dependent MPK4 activation pattern. In vitro phosphorylation reactions with MBP as a substrate were preincubated for 25 min in the presence or absence of βCA4. Then, MPK4 was added and incubated for 25 min. MPK4 activity was detected by immunoblotting with anti-phospho-MBP. Experiments in (a-d) were carried out using MPK4 purified from bacteria and dephosphorylated by FastAP phosphatase GST-MPK4 (b, c) or tag-free MPK4 (a, d). Quantities of substrate proteins (b-d) and MPK4 (a) were visualized by Ponceau S staining. βCA4 and MPK4 in b-d were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (CBB). Representative results from three independent experiments are presented; mean +SD; *, ** and *** indicate p<0.05, p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively.
One could wonder how MPK4 functions in cells, where the pH of the cytoplasm (7.0-7.2) promotes HCO3- formation. MPK4 could be activated in vivo due to the action of carbonic anhydrases (CAs), which were shown to be essential for the CO2 signalling pathway13. As CAs act in both directions to regulate the CO2/HCO3- equilibrium, we added βCA4, one of the two most abundant Arabidopsis CAs13,14, to in vitro phosphorylation reactions. At pH 7.0, βCA4 increased [CO2] and reversed the MPK4 activity profile from MPK4 inactivation to MPK4 activation. Consequently, at pH 6.4, βCA4 increased [HCO3-], leading to MPK4 inactivation instead of activation in the absence of βCA4 (Fig. 2d). These results support the positive role of CO2 and the negative role of HCO3- in MPK4 activation and demonstrate that the CO2/HCO3- equilibrium, not pH, regulates MPK4 activity.
MPK4 binds CO2
The CO2 receptor is expected to bind CO2. We verified that MPK4 efficiently bound 14CO2 (p<0.001) compared to both BSA and the sample devoid of protein (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. 5a). However, it was not possible to precisely determine the KD for the MPK4-14CO2 interaction because the experiments were carried out in an open system with free exchange of diluted 14CO2 with ambient atmosphere (i), 12CO2 was also available for MPK4 (ii), and possible competitive binding of H14CO3- to MPK4 (iii). However, 14CO2 binding by MPK4 at low pH showed two maxima, and the first peak was reached at 10 μM 14CO2/H14CO3- (4.88 μM and 3.76 μM 14CO2 at pH 6.4 and 6.6, respectively; Fig. 3b) when the molar ratio of 14CO2 and MPK4 was approximately 1:1. Importantly, the graphs of 14CO2 binding with increasing [14CO2] in the pH series closely reflect the MPK4 activity graphs under the same conditions (Supplementary Fig. 5b-d). The coincident decrease in both MPK4 activity and 14CO2 binding (in 15-20 μM CO2/HCO3- at pH 6.4 and 6.6) indicates the stronger binding of 14CO2 than that of H14CO3-. Taken together, the above data support the designation of MPK4 as a CO2 receptor.
Increase in MPK4 activity is correlated with enhanced CO2 binding. a, Scheme of gel filtration-based CO2 binding assay. b, Graphs of CO2 binding at 10-30 μM CO2/HCO3- in individual pH series from the graph shown in Fig. 3b; data normalization was based on values of no-protein controls from each experiment; mean ±SD, n=3 experiments. c, MPK4 activity under the conditions applied for the CO2 binding assay shown in b. Dephosphorylated MBP was used as a substrate of dephosphorylated tag-free MPK4; FastAP-fast alkaline phosphatase. The intensity of MBP phosphorylation was detected by immunoblotting with anti-phospho-MBP. The amount of MBP was determined by Ponceau S, and the amount of MPK4 was determined by CBB. Mean ± SD, n=3 experiments. d, Example original images of immunoblotting and protein staining used to calculate data for graphs presented in c.
a, 14CO2 (10 μM H14CO3- incubated at pH 6.4) is effectively coeluted from a size-exclusion chromatography column with MPK4 in contrast to BSA or a no-protein control (NPC). The experimental design is illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 5a. b, Efficiency of CO2 binding at increasing [14CO2] in a pH series. Charts of individual pH series, including error bars, are shown in Supplementary Fig. 5b. c, MPK4 autophosphorylation prevents effective CO2 binding. MPK4 preincubated with ATP for 2 min is not able to bind CO2 in contrast to both reactions containing ATP without a preincubation step or ATP-free reactions. d, MPK4 with only T201 of TEY phosphorylated is still able to bind CO2 in the absence of ATP, in contrast to MPK4 with double TEY phosphorylation. In c-d, MPK4 incubation with 15 μM H14CO3- was carried out for 10 min at pH 7.0. Plotted values of disintegrations per minute (DPM) after normalization based on background radioactivity in individual experiments. Mean ±SD; n=3; *** indicates p<0.001.
Active MPK4 is prone to inactivation by HCO3-
To obtain further insight into the opposing effects of HCO3- and CO2 on MPK activity, we measured the [CO2]high-induced activation of several MPKs at pH 7.0 (Fig. 4a-b). It turned out that the higher MPK activity was under control conditions, the stronger the HCO3--induced inactivation of MPKs, and MPKs with low basal kinase activity (MPK12, MPK20, and HvMPK4) were activated in response to [CO2]high without the effect of kinase inactivation. Because MPK activity depends on the phosphorylation of conserved TEY or TDY motif in the kinase activation loop, we investigated the impact of TEY phosphorylation on MPK4 activity regulation by both CO2 and HCO3- using MPK4 versions with modified TEY motif (Fig. 4c-e).
a, Highly active MPKs are downregulated by HCO3- in contrast to MPKs with low kinase activity. The MPK4 homologue from barley was included in this analysis due to the quickest response of barley stomata to darkness among the studied species34. For more details, see Supplementary Fig. 10. GST-MPK fusion proteins for in vitro phosphorylation were purified from bacteria. b, A summary of the data presented in a. c, Mutations presented in d alter the MPK4 response to [CO2]high. d, Schematic representation of generated mutations mimicking phosphorylated or unphosphorylable amino acids in the kinase activation loop (red) and the following valine (blue) in MPK4. e, Increasing the CO2/HCO3- ratio by lowering the pH from 7.0 (shown in c) to 6.6 disables the inhibition of active versions of MPK4 by HCO3- and indicates that T201 is responsible for this effect. f, WT MPK4 inactivation by 10 μM HCO3- is promoted by MPK4 phosphorylation. Preincubation with either HCO3- or ATP was carried out for 10 min (24°C). Dephosphorylated MBP was used as an MPK4 substrate during in vitro phosphorylation (30 min, 30°C), followed by immunoblotting with anti-phospho-MBP. In a, c, e, kinase activity was measured by in vitro MBP thiophosphorylation (15 min, 24°C) detected by immunoblotting using anti-TE. Dephosphorylated kinases were used in all assays to exclude any effects of phosphorylated amino acids other than the TEY motif. Loading of MPKs was visualized by CBB, while MBP was visualized by Ponceau S. Representative results from three independent experiments are presented. Mean ±SD; *, ** and *** indicate p<0.05, p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively.
[CO2]high-induced TEY phosphorylation is not inhibited by HCO3- at pH ≥7, unlike the decrease in MPK4 activity, defined as substrate phosphorylation intensity. TEY and MBP phosphorylation is shown by immunoblotting with anti-phospho-TEY and anti-phospho-MBP, respectively. Both analyses were carried out from one set of in vitro phosphorylation reactions. The amounts of dephosphorylated MBP and dephosphorylated MPK4 on the nitrocellulose membrane were specified by Ponceau S staining. Representative images from three experiments.
Proposed working model of the MPK4 response to [CO2/HCO3-]high.
MPK4 influences stomatal development. a, Stomata of WT Arabidopsis. b-d, Enlarged and elongated stomata in mpk4-2 leaves. Scale bars 20 μm. As reported for stomata of an N. tabacum line with silenced NtMPK41, mpk4-2 stomata display a much wider range of length than WT stomata.
Inactive One-STrEP-Tag-MPK4 was specifically purified from Arabidopsis epidermal peels under native conditions. Anti-phospho-TEY antibody and MBP in vitro phosphorylation experiments failed to detect the activity of guard cell One-STrEP-Tag-MPK4 in contrast to One-STrEP-Tag-MPK4 from Arabidopsis total leaf (TL) extracts or T87 cultured cells. We used a powerful method for specific purification of One-STrEP-tagged plant proteins under native conditions within several minutes35,36. In contrast to high-yield One-STrEP-Tag-MPK4 purification from epidermal peels, we were not able to detect One-STrEP-Tag-MPK4 activity by in vitro MBP phosphorylation. Based on the membrane-associated localization of barley MPK4 (Supplementary Fig. 10b), we hypothesize that MPK4 activatable by [CO2]high is connected to the cell membrane. In addition, the use of phenol-SDS extraction (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. 1), which increases membrane protein solubilization and decreases protein interactions, underlies the successful detection of MPK4 activity.
a, Alignment (using ClustalX 2.1) of amino acid sequences of Arabidopsis MPK4 and its two barley homologues. The response of barley stomata to darkness is the quickest among the studied species34. It may be speculated that this results from the presence of two specialized MPK4 homologues in barley guard cells. The protein encoded by the BAJ95789 locus shares lower identity (82%) with Arabidopsis MPK4 than the MPK encoded by BAJ97968 (83%). Moreover, the polypeptide encoded by BAJ95789 does not contain the TEY motif (in a black frame); therefore, the barley MPK encoded in the BAJ97968 locus was included in the comparative analysis of [CO2]high-induced MPK activity in Fig. 4a, and the expression in barley protoplasts is presented in b. b, Barley MPK4-YFP in barley mesophyll protoplasts is localized in the proximity of the cell membrane, in contrast to Arabidopsis MPK4-YFP, which was predominantly dispersed in the cytoplasm and nucleus in both the Arabidopsis mesophyll and Arabidopsis guard cell protoplasts. Bar, 2.5 μm.
Mutants mimicking MPK4 with phosphorylated Y203 of TEY (MPK4T201E/Y203E, MPK4T201E/V204E and MPK4T201E/Y203E/V204E), reflecting full MPK4 activity, could not be further activated by [CO2]high, whereas unphosphorylated MPK4 (MPK4T201A/Y203F) and MPK4 with only T201 phosphorylated (MPK4T201E) were still prone to [CO2]high-induced activation (Fig. 4c). Thus, [CO2]high not only promotes TEY phosphorylation (Fig. 2a) but also acts as an additional activity enhancer of inactive or incompletely activated MPK4.
All the mutants tested were negatively regulated by HCO3- at pH 7.0 (~85% HCO3- and ~15% CO2) (Fig. 4c). Lowering the pH to 6.6 (~62% HCO3- and ~38% CO2) eliminated HCO3--induced inactivation of all MPK4 forms with phosphorylated Y203 (Fig. 4e). This result is consistent with the decrease in 14CO2/H14CO3- binding in the concentration range of 15-20 μM at pH 6.6 (Fig. 3b) and further supports lower binding of HCO3- than of CO2 by MPK4. Importantly, T201 phosphorylation (MPK4T201E, MPK4T201E/Y203F), in contrast to unphosphorylated T201 (MPK4T201A/Y203F), enhances MPK4 susceptibility to inhibition by HCO3- (Fig. 4e).
The effects of TEY phosphorylation on HCO3--triggered inhibition of MPK4 were further confirmed using WT MPK4. MPK4 preincubated with ATP (autophosphorylated on TEY) before CO2 addition is prone to strong HCO3--induced inactivation, in contrast to preincubation of MPK4 with CO2 before ATP application or administration of both ATP and CO2 at the same time (Fig. 4f). This indicates competition between CO2 and HCO3-. The effect of HCO3- becomes noticeable at high [HCO3-] or at pH ≥7 (high [HCO3-]/[CO2] ratio) only when the TEY of MPK4 is already phosphorylated. Accordingly, HCO3- does not influence [CO2]high-induced TEY phosphorylation; in contrast to the decrease in MPK4 activity observed as MBP or JAZ12 phosphorylation at pH ≥7, [CO2]high-induced TEY phosphorylation is not inhibited by HCO3- (Supplementary Fig. 6).
As studies on kinase activity can be conducted only in the presence of ATP, we employed a 14CO2 binding assay to further investigate the role of ATP in CO2 sensing by MPK4. MPK4 preincubation with ATP impaired 14CO2 binding 3-fold compared to that observed when both 14CO2 and ATP were added at the same time or when 14CO2 preincubation was conducted before ATP delivery (Fig. 3c). However, ATP does not influence the 14CO2 binding of MPK4 mutants mimicking phosphorylated TEY (MPK4T201E/Y203E, MPK4T201E/Y203E/V204E). In contrast, ATP diminished (3-fold) 14CO2/H14CO3- binding by MPK4T201E (Fig. 3d), indicating that the transition from pTEY to pTEpY is crucial for ATP-dependent 14CO2/H14CO3- binding. Moreover, the weakened CO2 binding by MPK4T201A/Y203F supports the importance of TEY for CO2 recognition.
The lack of CO2 binding under high ATP availability may underlie the mechanism for elimination of fluctuations in endogenous [CO2], because when ATP availability increases, [CO2] increases locally due to the proximity of mitochondria. Interestingly, MPK4 inactivation is strongest at concentrations of dissolved atmospheric CO2 and at very high [CO2]. Physiologically, such a strong HCO3--induced inhibitory effect on activated MPK4 seems to be a very effective autoregulatory mechanism, in which the CO2 sensor is inactivated during a long-term increase in [CO2] (mainly HCO3- at the pH of the cytoplasm). This may also be an important mechanism of cross-talk between CO2 and stress signalling, as different adverse conditions activate MPK4, leading to modification of the plant response to CO2 during stress (Supplementary Fig. 7).
In general, our findings are important for the regulation of plant growth and development by CO2, as MPK4 regulates cytokinesis15 and photosynthesis16. The best summary of this is a picture of the highly enlarged stomata (Supplementary Fig. 8) of extremely dwarfed mpk4 plants4,16, supporting previous results from tobacco plants with silenced NtMPK41.
The broad importance of the presented results could be considered because MAPKs are conserved enzymes in all eukaryotes. In human lungs, MAPKs are activated by SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-217,18 and other causative agents of pneumonia19–23 to trigger the production of proinflammatory cytokines. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) inhibits MAPK signalling19 and thus protects against severe lung diseases caused by lipopolysaccharide20,21, bleomycin19, and cigarette smoke22 and particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) exposure23. However, ACE2 is bound by SARS-CoV-224,25, leading to cytokine storms and a severe course of pneumonia and resulting in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pulmonary fibrosis. Therefore, the inhibition of active MAPKs could be a strategy to prevent the acute course of COVID-19. Based on the inactivation of active plant MPKs by CO2 described herein, we encourage researchers to study the inhibitory effect of CO2 on human MAPKs because both synthetic MAPK inhibitors26 and ten-minute inhalation of 5% CO227 protect against lipopolysaccharide-induced lung injury in mice. In addition, tobacco smoke has been suggested recently to be a protective factor against the development of COVID-19 symptoms. Importantly, CO2 is a natural and safe gas in the lungs, and short-term CO2 inhalation is beneficial for the respiratory, nervous28–30 and circulatory31,32 systems.
Methods
General considerations
All protein purifications, handling of purified proteins and experiments using extracted proteins were carried out in empty rooms (max. 2 persons/40 m2) with open windows providing fresh air. During the heating season, no research was conducted on windless days or when the PM10 concentration in air exceeded 30 μg m-3. The breath was not directed towards the open tubes and pipette tips. Ice was not used due to the reduction in CO2 solubility with increasing temperature and because of ice production from high-pH water in our laboratory. All solutions were prepared using acidified (pH 4.8-5.2) CO2-free water in rooms with fresh air. Solutions were stored frozen, or the pH was adjusted immediately before use. MPK purification or modification (e.g., dephosphorylation or protease digestion) was followed by protein desalting using Amicon Ultra filters (Millipore, Billerica, MA) to remove HCO3- and other salts and buffers.
Solutions containing the indicated CO2 or HCO3- concentrations were prepared from freshly dissolved 100 mM KHCO3- or CO2-saturated water. The CO2 concentration in CO2-saturated water was calculated based on the temperature of the CO2 solution and atmospheric pressure. Water carbonation was conducted in a different room from the other experiments.
All in vitro experiments were carried out in atmospheric [CO2]; thus, some extent of atmospheric CO2 was dissolved in the control reactions. We considered applying a CO2-free atmosphere, but that could lead to increased release of CO2 from [CO2]high reactions. The use of atmospheric CO2 partially limited CO2 loss from [CO2]high reactions. Moreover, we maximally reduced the number of reactions prepared simultaneously to limit CO2 loss from [CO2]high reactions.
Plant growth
Arabidopsis WT Columbia-0 ecotype plants; mutant lines ht1-237, mpk4-2 (SALK_056245), mpk3-1 (SALK_151594), and mkk1 mkk2; and a line expressing One-STrEP-tag-MPK4 were grown on soil in a GIR 96 growth chamber (Conviron, Winnipeg, Canada) at 22°C and 60–70% humidity under a 16-h light (100 μmol m-2 s-1)/8-h dark photoperiod.
Preparation and treatment of epidermal peels
For 20 preparations, 300-350 rosette leaves (~45 g) excised from 3-week-old Arabidopsis plants were blended in 1,400 ml of demineralised water for 1.5 min. For 2 preparations from 5-week-old mpk4-2 or mkk1 mkk2 plants, 160-200 shoots were blended in 600 ml of demineralised water for 2 min. Epidermal peels were then collected on 100-μm Sefar Nitex mesh (Sefar AG, Heiden, Switzerland), washed three times with stomatal opening solution (20 mM MES-KOH (pH 5.7), 10 mM KCl, 50 μM CaCl2) and incubated in open tubes in 10 ml of stomatal opening solution for 3 h in a GIR 96 growth chamber. Under the indicated treatment, epidermal peels were retained on Sefar Nitex mesh and frozen in liquid nitrogen.
Protein extraction from epidermal peels
Frozen epidermal peels (1.5 ml) were ground in a mortar upon the addition of 1.1 g of sucrose, 80 μl of 1.5 M Tris (pH 8.0), 80 μl of 20% SDS, 80 μl of β-mercaptoethanol and 4 ml of phenol equilibrated with 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). The lysate was vortexed for 30 s, incubated for 3 min at RT and centrifuged (1 min, 500 x g, 4°C). The upper organic phase was transferred to 9 ml of isopropanol with 100 mM ammonium acetate. Proteins were precipitated at −20°C for 24 h and centrifuged (12,000 x g, 15 min, 4°C). The pellet was washed with 14 ml of methanol and then with 12 ml of ethanol and dried in air for 20 min at RT. Proteins were dissolved in 200 μl of Laemmli sample buffer with cOmplete EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) for 15 min at RT.
One-STrEP-tag affinity purification
The coding sequences of the One-STrEP-tag fusion proteins under the control of the Arabidopsis UBQ10 promoter and NOS terminator35,36, cloned in the binary vector pART2738, were stably expressed in Arabidopsis Col-0 plants following Agrobacterium tumefaciens (strain GV3101)-mediated transformation. Epidermal peels from 10 g of rosette leaves were ground in liquid nitrogen, resuspended in 3 ml of extraction buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 200 mM NaCl, 100 mM NaF, 10 mM EDTA, 0.4% Triton X-100, 3 mM DTT, 3.2 mM Na3VO4, cOmplete EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche, Mannheim, Germany)) and filtered on Sefar Nitex mesh (Sefar AG, Heiden, Switzerland). After centrifugation (13,000 x g, 4 min, 4°C), the supernatant was loaded onto Bio-Spin® chromatography columns (Bio-Rad) containing 50 μl of Strep-Tactin Superflow high-capacity resin (IBA, Goettingen, Germany). After six washing steps (100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl), proteins were eluted with 400 μl of 5 mM desthiobiotin (IBA, Goettingen, Germany) in washing solution, concentrated with Amicon Ultra 10K filters (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), aliquoted and stored at −80°C.
High-resolution electrophoresis
Tris-glycine SDS-PAGE was carried out in a discontinuous buffer system with a 5% stacking gel (pH 6.8) and 9% resolving gel (pH 8.8). A total of 30-50 μg of total protein was loaded per lane of the gel (26 cm length, 14 cm width and 1 mm thickness). A step voltage reduction of 10 V every 10 min from 180 V to 140 V was applied during protein concentration in the stacking gel. In the resolving gel, electrophoresis was conducted at a constant current of 12 mA/gel (max. 180 V) for 16 h at room temperature.
Immunoblotting
Denatured proteins separated on an 8-11.5% SDS-PAGE gel were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked for 60 min in 5% skimmed milk in TBST (20 mM Tris, 0.8% NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20) or 7% BSA in TBST and incubated at room temperature for 1 h with anti-MPK3, anti-MPK4, anti-MPK6 (1:500, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany), anti-thiophosphate ester (anti-TE, ab92570, 1:5,000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-phospho-MBP (13-104, 1:200, Merck) or phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204) antibody (anti-phospho-TEY, #9101, 1:200, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). Membranes were washed 3 times for 5 min with TBST and incubated for 1 h with the appropriate secondary antibody – goat anti-rabbit (1:20,000, Agrisera, Vännäs, Sweden) or goat anti-mouse (1:160,000 Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Detection was performed with ECL (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
In vitro MPK activity measurement
Due to the tendency of active MPK4 to aggregate11, MPK4 was diluted to working concentration in CO2-free water containing 2.5 mM DTT and, when indicated, 1 mg/ml BSA (0.4 mg ml-1 in in vitro reaction) as an antiaggregatory factor39. One-STrEP-tagged kinases purified from Arabidopsis epidermal peels or 0.2-1 μg of kinases overexpressed in bacteria was incubated (25 min at 30°C or as indicated) with 2.5 μg of MBP (Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA) or 0.5 μg of another substrate protein, as indicated, in buffer containing 40 mM MOPS (pH 7.0 or as indicated), 0.5 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 20 mM MgCl2, 200 μM ATP and Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Tablets, EDTA Free (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). When protein thiophosphorylation was detected by immunoblotting with anti-TE40, reactions were performed in buffer containing 40 mM MOPS (pH 7.0 or as indicated), 0.5 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 20 mM MgCl2, 1 ATP-γ-S (adenosine-5’-O-(3-thiotriphosphate), BIOLOG Life Science Institute, Bremen, Germany) and Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Tablets, EDTA Free (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). After thiophosphorylation, 2.5 mM p-nitrobenzyl mesylate (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was added, and the samples were further incubated for 25 min at room temperature. Then, proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and subjected to immunoblotting with anti-TE, anti-phospho-MBP or anti-phospho-TEY.
CO2 binding assay
Four micrograms of MPKs was incubated for 10 min at 24°C in 100 μl of binding reaction containing 100 mM MOPS (pH 6.4-7.0 as indicated), 5 mM EGTA, 20 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 200 μM ATP (optional), cOmplete EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and the indicated concentration of [14C] KHCO3 (50-60 mCi mmol -1). Then, the samples were vortexed for 30 s and loaded onto 2 ml of Sephadex G-25 coarse (Pharmacia) in Bio-Spin® chromatography columns and washed with 240 μl of washing buffer containing 20 mM MES (pH 6.4-7.0 according to the pH of the binding reaction), 2% BSA, 20 mM MgCl2, 2 mM DTT, and 50 mM NaCl. Then, proteins were eluted using washing buffer. Two 100-μl fractions were collected in 50 μl of 1.5 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and 1 ml of Ultima Gold LLT scintillation cocktail (Perkin Elmer). Radioactivity was measured using a liquid scintillation analyser (Packard).
Barley mesophyll protoplast transformation
Twenty 6- to 7-day-old barley leaves were sliced crosswise to obtain scraps with minimal thickness. Sliced material was incubated in 60 ml of enzyme solution (0.615 M mannitol, 1.5% Cellulase Onozuka R10 (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany), 0.3% Macerozyme R10 from Rhizopus sp. (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany), 1% BSA, 10 mM MES; pH 5.7) for 3 h at 28°C. After slow cooling (20 min at 4°C), the suspension was gently swirled to facilitate protoplast release and filtered through 100-μm Sefar Nitex mesh. Subsequent stages were carried out on ice or at 4°C. Protoplasts were centrifuged at 250 x g for 4 min and washed twice with 0.615 M mannitol. Protoplasts (2×105) resuspended in 0.615 M mannitol were added to 40 μg of individual plasmids in 0.615 M mannitol in a final volume of 110 μl. Electroporation was carried out using Gene Pulser Xcell (Bio-Rad) in 4-mm electroporation cuvettes (Bio-Rad) with the following setting: a single pulse at 150 V with an 8-ms pulse duration. Immediately, 1 ml of ice-cold 0.615 M mannitol was added, and protoplasts were transferred to 2-ml tubes. The protoplasts were allowed to sediment for 20 min at room temperature before resuspension in incubation solution (0.615 M mannitol (pH 5.9), 10 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgSO4, 1 mM KNO3, 100 μM KH2PO4, 10 μM KI, 1 μM CuSO4). Protein localization was documented after overnight incubation at 21 °C.
Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplast transformation
The epidermis from the underside of 6-7 rosette leaves (from 4-5-week-old plants) was peeled away using Scotch Magic Tape 3M adhered to both sides of the leaf41. Leaves were incubated in Petri dishes with 10 ml of enzyme solution (1.2% Cellulase Onozuka R10, 0.4% Macerozyme R10, 0.4 M mannitol, 20 mM KCl, 20 mM MES; pH 5.7) for 90 min at room temperature with gentle rotation (20 rpm on a platform shaker). Protoplasts were then diluted (1:1) with ice-cold W5 solution (154 mM NaCl, 125 mM CaCl2, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM MES; pH 5.7), centrifuged (3 min, 100 x g, 4°C) and washed twice with 30 ml of ice-cold W5 solution. After the last wash, protoplasts were allowed to sediment on ice for 30 min and resuspended in MMg solution (0.4 M mannitol, 15 mM MgCl2, 4 mM MES; pH 5.7) to obtain a concentration of 2×104 cells ml-1. For transfection42, 100 μl of protoplasts were transferred to wells of U96 Microwell plates (Thermo Scientific Nunc), mixed (700 rpm) with 5 μg of plasmids (in 10 μl) and 110 μl of PEG solution (40% PEG 4,000, 200 mM mannitol, 100 mM CaCl2), and incubated for 5 min (with 10 s of mixing at intervals of 50 s) at room temperature. Then, 200 μl of W5 solution was added and mixed (800 rpm for 10 s). Protoplasts were centrifuged at 100 x g for 1 min and washed 4 times with W5 solution (200 μl of solution from the wells was removed, and 200 μl of fresh W5 was added, mixed for 10 s at 800 rpm and centrifuged at 100 x g for 1 min). Protoplasts were incubated in a growing chamber for 12-16 h.
Arabidopsis guard cell protoplast transformation
Epidermises from the undersides of 12 rosette leaves (from 4- to 5-week-old plants) were incubated in Petri dishes with 10 ml of enzyme solution (1.8% Cellulase Onozuka R10, 0.8% Macerozyme R10, 0.4 M mannitol, 20 mM KCl, 20 mM MES; pH 5.7) at room temperature with gentle rotation (20 rpm on a platform shaker) until all mesophyll and most pavement cells peeled off. Guard cells bound to the Scotch Magic Tape were transferred to a fresh portion of enzyme solution and digested for 30-45 min. Protoplasts were then centrifuged (5 min, 450 x g) and washed with 30 ml of MMg. Finally, MMg was added to obtain 1×105 cells ml-1. All subsequent steps were carried out as described for mesophyll protoplasts, with modified centrifugation steps (300 x g, 2 min). Guard cell protoplasts were incubated in modified W1 solution (0.5 M mannitol, 15 mM KCl, 50 μM CaCl2 and 10 mM MES-Tris; pH 6.15) in a growing chamber for 12-16 h.
Protein localization
Arabidopsis guard cell or mesophyll protoplasts and barley mesophyll protoplasts were transfected with plasmids encoding proteins fused to EYFP (pSAT4A-EYFP-N1 vector43). After transfection, protoplasts were transferred to black 96-well black glass-bottom plates (SensoPlate, Greiner Bio-One) and incubated overnight in a growth chamber. Protein localization was documented with a Nikon A1Rsi confocal system with the following settings: dichroic mirror, 457/514; A1-DU4 4 detector unit; filter, 540/30. An argon ion laser (514 nm, laser power: 0.8) was used for excitation of EYFP.
Plasmid construction
All plasmids used were modified such that SfiI restriction sites (arranged as in the pUNI51 vector, GenBank accession AY260846) were placed into their polylinkers. pUNI51 clones containing coding sequences of MPK2 (U10062), MPK4 (U09192), MPK6 (U15193), MPK12 (U82548) and MPK20 (U13519) were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (Columbus, OH, USA). Other coding sequences were amplified from Arabidopsis or barley cDNAs and cloned in pUNI51. Plasmids encoding GST-fusion proteins were constructed in pGEX-6P-1 (MPK4, MPK4 mutants) or by loxP/Cre-based recombination of pHB2-GST and pUNI51 plasmids44 (other MPKs).
Statistical analysis
The presented statistically significant differences in results from at least three experiments (means ± standard deviations) were based on one-way or factorial ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post hoc comparison.
ImageJ software45 was employed for densitometric analysis of immunoblotting bands. Kinase activities were calculated in terms of protein amounts. For data normalization, the sum of all kinase activity measurements throughout the experiment was taken as 1. Then, for clarity, the value of the control was taken as 1.
Author Contributions
HG and ŁG: Conceptualization, funding acquisition, experiment execution, data analysis, and writing.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Mirosława Dabert and Wiesława Jarmuszkiewicz for logistic and mentoring support, Adam Augustyniak and Michał Kopa for technical assistance and Dawid Bielewicz, Tomasz Bieluszewski, Koh Iba and Yuelin Zhang for providing seeds. This work was supported by the National Science Center, Poland (UMO-2011/01/D/NZ3/02068 to ŁG and UMO-2015/19/D/NZ3/00479 to HG).