Abstract
The number of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) initiating meiotic recombination is elevated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants that are globally defective in forming crossovers and synaptonemal complex (SC), a protein scaffold juxtaposing homologous chromosomes. These mutants thus appear to lack a negative feedback loop that inhibits DSB formation when homologs engage one another. This feedback is predicted to be chromosome autonomous, but this has not been tested. Moreover, what chromosomal process is recognized as “homolog engagement” remains unclear. To address these questions, we evaluated effects of homolog engagement defects restricted to small portions of the genome using karyotypically abnormal yeast strains with a homeologous chromosome V pair, monosomic V, or trisomy XV. We found that homolog-engagement-defective chromosomes incurred more DSBs, concomitant with prolonged retention of the DSB-promoting protein Rec114, while the rest of the genome remained unaffected. SC-deficient, crossover-proficient mutants ecm11 and gmc2 experienced increased DSB numbers diagnostic of homolog engagement defects. These findings support the hypothesis that SC formation provokes DSB protein dissociation, leading in turn to loss of a DSB competent state. Our findings show that DSB number is regulated in a chromosome-autonomous fashion and provide insight into how homeostatic DSB controls respond to aneuploidy during meiosis.
bioRxiv version 2 (September 2020) We added one bioRxiv citation in the discussion section which shows increased breaks in gmc2 and ecm11 mutants. This work was done independently by Keun Kim, Miki Shinohara and colleagues. The pulse gel electrophoresis result shown in Figure 1D has been re-quantified. The conclusion remains that homeologous and monosomic chromosome V generate more DSBs compared to internally controlled chromosome III. One zip3 map included in PCA (Figure 6C) and hierarchical clustering analysis (Figure S5B) has been deleted because this particular map has not yet been published. This change does not affect the conclusion. An additional supplemental table (S5) has been added to show Spo11-oligo datasets used in this study. Figures and preprint have been reformatted.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
↵† Integrated Genomics Operation, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065
We added one bioRxiv citation in the discussion which shows increased breaks in gmc2 and ecm11 mutants. This work was done independently by Keun Kim, Miki Shinohara and colleagues. The pulsed gel electrophoresis result shown in Figure 1D has been re-quantified; the conclusions were unaffected. One zip3 map included in PCA (Figure 6C) and hierarchical clustering analysis (Figure S5B) has been deleted because this map has not yet been published. This change does not affect the conclusion. An additional supplemental table (S5) has been added to show Spo11-oligo datasets used in this study. Figures and preprint have been reformatted.