Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Fold recognition by scoring protein map similarities using the congruence coefficient

View ORCID ProfilePietro Di Lena, Pierre Baldi
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.20.106484
Pietro Di Lena
*Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Bologna, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Pietro Di Lena
  • For correspondence: pietro.dilena@unibo.it
Pierre Baldi
†Department of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697
‡Institute for Genomics and Bioinformatics, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Motivation Protein fold recognition is a key step for template-based modeling approaches to protein structure prediction. Although closely related folds can be easily identified by sequence homology search in sequence databases, fold recognition is notoriously more difficult when it involves the identification of distantly related homologues. Recent progress in residue-residue contact and distance prediction opens up the possibility of improving fold recognition by using structural information contained in predicted distance and contact maps.

Results Here we propose to use the congruence coefficient as a metric of similarity between maps. We prove that this metric has several interesting mathematical properties which allow one to compute in polynomial time its exact mean and variance over all possible (exponentially many) alignments between two symmetric matrices, and assess the statistical significance of similarity between aligned maps. We perform fold recognition tests by recovering predicted target contact/distance maps from the two most recent CASP editions and over 27,000 non-homologous structural templates from the ECOD database. On this large benchmark, we compare fold recognition performances of different alignment tools with their own similarity scores against those obtained using the congruence coefficient. We show that the congruence coefficient overall improves fold recognition over other methods, proving its effectiveness as a general similarity metric for protein map comparison.

Availability The software CCpro is available as part of the Scratch suite http://scratch.proteomics.ics.uci.edu/

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • pietro.dilena{at}unibo.it, pfbaldi{at}ics.uci.edu

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 23, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Fold recognition by scoring protein map similarities using the congruence coefficient
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Fold recognition by scoring protein map similarities using the congruence coefficient
Pietro Di Lena, Pierre Baldi
bioRxiv 2020.05.20.106484; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.20.106484
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Fold recognition by scoring protein map similarities using the congruence coefficient
Pietro Di Lena, Pierre Baldi
bioRxiv 2020.05.20.106484; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.20.106484

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioinformatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3506)
  • Biochemistry (7348)
  • Bioengineering (5324)
  • Bioinformatics (20266)
  • Biophysics (10020)
  • Cancer Biology (7744)
  • Cell Biology (11306)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6437)
  • Ecology (9954)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13325)
  • Genetics (9361)
  • Genomics (12587)
  • Immunology (7702)
  • Microbiology (19027)
  • Molecular Biology (7444)
  • Neuroscience (41049)
  • Paleontology (300)
  • Pathology (1230)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2138)
  • Physiology (3161)
  • Plant Biology (6861)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1273)
  • Synthetic Biology (1897)
  • Systems Biology (5313)
  • Zoology (1089)