Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Sample preparation and imaging conditions affect mEos3.2 photophysics in fission yeast cells

View ORCID ProfileMengyuan Sun, View ORCID ProfileKevin Hu, View ORCID ProfileJoerg Bewersdorf, View ORCID ProfileThomas D. Pollard
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.28.119735
Mengyuan Sun
1Departments of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, PO Box 208103, New Haven, CT 06520-8103 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mengyuan Sun
Kevin Hu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kevin Hu
Joerg Bewersdorf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joerg Bewersdorf
Thomas D. Pollard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Thomas D. Pollard
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Photoconvertible fluorescent proteins (PCFPs) are widely used in super-resolution microscopy and studies of cellular dynamics. However, our understanding of their photophysics is still limited, hampering their quantitative application. For example, we do not know the optimal sample preparation methods or imaging conditions to count protein molecules fused to PCFPs by single-molecule localization microscopy in live and fixed cells. We also do not know how the behavior of PCFPs in live cells compares with fixed cells. Therefore, we investigated how formaldehyde fixation influences the photophysical properties of the popular green-to-red PCFP mEos3.2 in fission yeast cells under a wide range of imaging conditions. We estimated photophysical parameters by fitting a 3-state model of photoconversion and photobleaching to the time course of fluorescence signal per yeast cell expressing mEos3.2. We discovered that formaldehyde fixation makes the fluorescence signal, photoconversion rate and photobleaching rate of mEos3.2 sensitive to the buffer conditions by permeabilizing the yeast cell membrane. Under some imaging conditions, the time-integrated mEos3.2 signal per yeast cell is similar in live cells and fixed cells imaged in buffer at pH 8.5 with 1 mM DTT, indicating that light chemical fixation does not destroy mEos3.2 molecules. We also discovered that some red-state mEos3.2 molecules entered an intermediate dark state that is converted back to the red fluorescent state by 561-nm illumination. Our findings provide a guide to compare quantitatively conditions for imaging and counting of mEos3.2-tagged molecules in yeast cells. Our imaging assay and mathematical model are easy to implement and provide a simple quantitative approach to measure the time-integrated signal and the photoconversion and photobleaching rates of fluorescent proteins in cells.

STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Making quantitative measurements with single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) has been impeded by limited understanding of the photophysics of the fluorophores, which is very sensitive to the sample preparation and imaging conditions. We characterized the photophysics of the green-to-red photoconvertible fluorescent protein mEos3.2, which is widely used in SMLM. We combined quantitative fluorescence microscopy and mathematical modeling to measure the fluorescence signal and rate constants for photoconversion and photobleaching of mEos3.2 in live and fixed cells under a wide range of illumination intensities. Our findings provide a guide to compare conditions for imaging and counting mEos3.2-tagged proteins in cells. The presented approach is generally applicable to characterize other fluorescent proteins or dyes in cells.

Competing Interest Statement

JB discloses a significant financial interest in Bruker Corp. and Hamamatsu Photonics.

Footnotes

  • Fig. 6 and S3 updated. Fig. S4 and S5 added. Discussion updated.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 10, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sample preparation and imaging conditions affect mEos3.2 photophysics in fission yeast cells
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Sample preparation and imaging conditions affect mEos3.2 photophysics in fission yeast cells
Mengyuan Sun, Kevin Hu, Joerg Bewersdorf, Thomas D. Pollard
bioRxiv 2020.05.28.119735; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.28.119735
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Sample preparation and imaging conditions affect mEos3.2 photophysics in fission yeast cells
Mengyuan Sun, Kevin Hu, Joerg Bewersdorf, Thomas D. Pollard
bioRxiv 2020.05.28.119735; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.28.119735

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Biophysics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4087)
  • Biochemistry (8763)
  • Bioengineering (6479)
  • Bioinformatics (23341)
  • Biophysics (11750)
  • Cancer Biology (9149)
  • Cell Biology (13251)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7417)
  • Ecology (11369)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15087)
  • Genetics (10399)
  • Genomics (14009)
  • Immunology (9121)
  • Microbiology (22040)
  • Molecular Biology (8779)
  • Neuroscience (47368)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1420)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2482)
  • Physiology (3704)
  • Plant Biology (8050)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1431)
  • Synthetic Biology (2208)
  • Systems Biology (6016)
  • Zoology (1249)