Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Natural selection in the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in bats, not humans, created a highly capable human pathogen

Oscar A. MacLean, View ORCID ProfileSpyros Lytras, Steven Weaver, View ORCID ProfileJoshua B. Singer, Maciej F. Boni, View ORCID ProfilePhilippe Lemey, Sergei L. Kosakovsky Pond, View ORCID ProfileDavid L. Robertson
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.28.122366
Oscar A. MacLean
1MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Scotland, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Spyros Lytras
1MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Scotland, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Spyros Lytras
Steven Weaver
2Temple University, Institute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua B. Singer
1MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Scotland, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joshua B. Singer
Maciej F. Boni
3Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philippe Lemey
4Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Philippe Lemey
Sergei L. Kosakovsky Pond
2Temple University, Institute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: david.l.robertson@glasgow.ac.uk spond@temple.edu
David L. Robertson
1MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Scotland, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David L. Robertson
  • For correspondence: david.l.robertson@glasgow.ac.uk spond@temple.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

RNA viruses are proficient at switching host species, and evolving adaptations to exploit the new host’s cells efficiently. Surprisingly, SARS-CoV-2 has apparently required no significant adaptation to humans since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, with no observed selective sweeps since genome sampling began. Here we assess the types of natural selection taking place in Sarbecoviruses in horseshoe bats versus SARS-CoV-2 evolution in humans. While there is moderate evidence of diversifying positive selection in SARS-CoV-2 in humans, it is limited to the early phase of the pandemic, and purifying selection is much weaker in SARS-CoV-2 than in related bat Sarbecoviruses. In contrast, our analysis detects significant positive episodic diversifying selection acting on the bat virus lineage SARS-CoV-2 emerged from, accompanied by an adaptive depletion in CpG composition presumed to be linked to the action of antiviral mechanisms in ancestral hosts. The closest bat virus to SARS-CoV-2, RmYN02 (sharing an ancestor ∼1976), is a recombinant with a structure that includes differential CpG content in Spike; clear evidence of coinfection and evolution in bats without involvement of other species. Collectively our results demonstrate the progenitor of SARS-CoV-2 was capable of near immediate human-human transmission as a consequence of its adaptive evolutionary history in bats, not humans.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • ↵# Joint first authors.

  • We've updated our analysis resulting in both new figures and a re-ordering of existing figures, re-writing of a few sections to reflect the changes, and some movements of text and figures from the main to supplementary sections. The updated analysis involved two additional authors. We've changed the title to better reflect the main conclusion.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 30, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Natural selection in the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in bats, not humans, created a highly capable human pathogen
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Natural selection in the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in bats, not humans, created a highly capable human pathogen
Oscar A. MacLean, Spyros Lytras, Steven Weaver, Joshua B. Singer, Maciej F. Boni, Philippe Lemey, Sergei L. Kosakovsky Pond, David L. Robertson
bioRxiv 2020.05.28.122366; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.28.122366
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Natural selection in the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in bats, not humans, created a highly capable human pathogen
Oscar A. MacLean, Spyros Lytras, Steven Weaver, Joshua B. Singer, Maciej F. Boni, Philippe Lemey, Sergei L. Kosakovsky Pond, David L. Robertson
bioRxiv 2020.05.28.122366; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.28.122366

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Evolutionary Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4095)
  • Biochemistry (8786)
  • Bioengineering (6493)
  • Bioinformatics (23386)
  • Biophysics (11766)
  • Cancer Biology (9167)
  • Cell Biology (13290)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7422)
  • Ecology (11386)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15119)
  • Genetics (10413)
  • Genomics (14024)
  • Immunology (9145)
  • Microbiology (22108)
  • Molecular Biology (8793)
  • Neuroscience (47445)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1423)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2483)
  • Physiology (3711)
  • Plant Biology (8063)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1433)
  • Synthetic Biology (2215)
  • Systems Biology (6021)
  • Zoology (1251)