Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Computational modelling unveils how epiblast remodelling and positioning rely on trophectoderm morphogenesis during mouse implantation

Joel Dokmegang, Moi Hoon Yap, Liangxiu Han, Matteo Cavaliere, René Doursat
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.08.140269
Joel Dokmegang
1Centre for Advanced Computational Science (CfACS), Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jdokmegang@gmail.com
Moi Hoon Yap
1Centre for Advanced Computational Science (CfACS), Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liangxiu Han
1Centre for Advanced Computational Science (CfACS), Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matteo Cavaliere
1Centre for Advanced Computational Science (CfACS), Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
René Doursat
2Complex Systems Institute, Paris Ile-de-France (ISC-PIF), National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Understanding the processes by which the mammalian embryo implants in the maternal uterus is a long-standing challenge in embryology. New insights into this morphogenetic event could be of great importance in helping, for example, to reduce human infertility. During implantation the blastocyst, composed of epiblast and trophectoderm, undergoes significant remodelling from an oval ball to an egg cylinder. A main feature of this transformation is symmetry breaking and reshaping of the epiblast into a “cup”. Based on previous studies, we hypothesise that this event is the result of mechanical constraints originating from the trophectoderm, which is also significantly transformed during this process. In order to investigate this hypothesis we propose MG#, an original computational model of biomechanics able to reproduce key cell shape changes and tissue level behaviours in silico. With this model, we simulate epiblast and trophectoderm morphogenesis during implantation. First, our results uphold experimental findings that repulsion at the apical surface of the epiblast is sufficient to drive lumenogenesis. Then, we provide new theoretical evidence that trophectoderm morphogenesis indeed dictates the cup shape of the epiblast and fosters its movement towards the uterine tissue. Together, these results offer mechanical insights into mouse implantation and highlight the usefulness of agent-based modelling methods in the study of embryogenesis.

Author summary Computational modelling is increasingly used in the context of biological development. Here we propose a novel agent-based model of biological cell and tissue mechanics to investigate important morphological changes during mouse embryo implantation. Our model is able to replicate key biological cell shape changes and tissue-level behaviour. Simulating mouse implantation with this model, we bring theoretical support to previous experimental observations that lumenogenesis in the epiblast is driven by repulsion, and provide theoretical evidence that changes in epiblast shape during implantation are regulated by trophectoderm development.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • ↵* joel.dokmegang-kassap{at}stu.mmu.ac.uk, rene.doursat{at}iscpif.fr

  • Corrected authour names.

  • https://github.com/guijoe/MGSharpCore

  • https://github.com/guijoe/MGSharpViewer

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 02, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Computational modelling unveils how epiblast remodelling and positioning rely on trophectoderm morphogenesis during mouse implantation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Computational modelling unveils how epiblast remodelling and positioning rely on trophectoderm morphogenesis during mouse implantation
Joel Dokmegang, Moi Hoon Yap, Liangxiu Han, Matteo Cavaliere, René Doursat
bioRxiv 2020.06.08.140269; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.08.140269
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Computational modelling unveils how epiblast remodelling and positioning rely on trophectoderm morphogenesis during mouse implantation
Joel Dokmegang, Moi Hoon Yap, Liangxiu Han, Matteo Cavaliere, René Doursat
bioRxiv 2020.06.08.140269; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.08.140269

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Developmental Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2414)
  • Biochemistry (4773)
  • Bioengineering (3319)
  • Bioinformatics (14626)
  • Biophysics (6616)
  • Cancer Biology (5156)
  • Cell Biology (7402)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4340)
  • Ecology (6858)
  • Epidemiology (2057)
  • Evolutionary Biology (9876)
  • Genetics (7328)
  • Genomics (9496)
  • Immunology (4533)
  • Microbiology (12627)
  • Molecular Biology (4918)
  • Neuroscience (28205)
  • Paleontology (198)
  • Pathology (802)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1380)
  • Physiology (2011)
  • Plant Biology (4473)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (974)
  • Synthetic Biology (1295)
  • Systems Biology (3903)
  • Zoology (722)