Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Quantifying the wave resistance of a swimmer

View ORCID ProfileThomas A. J. Dickson, View ORCID ProfileDominic Taunton, View ORCID ProfileJoe Banks, View ORCID ProfileDominic Hudson, View ORCID ProfileStephen Turnock
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.22.164236
Thomas A. J. Dickson
University of Southampton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Thomas A. J. Dickson
  • For correspondence: tajd1v19@soton.ac.uk
Dominic Taunton
University of Southampton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dominic Taunton
Joe Banks
University of Southampton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joe Banks
Dominic Hudson
University of Southampton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dominic Hudson
Stephen Turnock
University of Southampton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephen Turnock
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Quantifying the wave resistance of a swimmer as a function of depth assists in identifying the optimum depth for the glide phases of competition. Previous experiments have inferred how immersed depth influences the drag acting on a swimmer [1], but have not directly quantified the magnitude of wave resistance. This research experimentally validates the use of thin-ship theory for quantifying the wave resistance of a realistic swimmer geometry. The drag and wave pattern of a female swimmer mannequin were experimentally measured over a range of depths from 0.05m to 1.00m at a speed of 2.50 m/s. Numerical simulations agree with experiment to confirm that there were negligible reductions in wave resistance below a depth of 0.40m. Larger swimming pool dimensions are shown to be significant at reducing wave resistance at speeds above 2.0 m/s and depths below 0.40m. Truncating the swimmer’s body at the upper thigh increases the wave resistance at speeds below 2.0m/s but is not significant at higher speeds, indicating that the upper body is the main contributor to the wave system. Numerical experiments indicate that rotating the shoulders towards the surface is more influential than the feet, demonstrating the impact of the upper body on wave resistance.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 23, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Quantifying the wave resistance of a swimmer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Quantifying the wave resistance of a swimmer
Thomas A. J. Dickson, Dominic Taunton, Joe Banks, Dominic Hudson, Stephen Turnock
bioRxiv 2020.06.22.164236; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.22.164236
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Quantifying the wave resistance of a swimmer
Thomas A. J. Dickson, Dominic Taunton, Joe Banks, Dominic Hudson, Stephen Turnock
bioRxiv 2020.06.22.164236; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.22.164236

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioengineering
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3704)
  • Biochemistry (7834)
  • Bioengineering (5708)
  • Bioinformatics (21364)
  • Biophysics (10614)
  • Cancer Biology (8218)
  • Cell Biology (11989)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6792)
  • Ecology (10432)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13919)
  • Genetics (9736)
  • Genomics (13118)
  • Immunology (8182)
  • Microbiology (20090)
  • Molecular Biology (7886)
  • Neuroscience (43205)
  • Paleontology (321)
  • Pathology (1285)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2270)
  • Physiology (3367)
  • Plant Biology (7263)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1317)
  • Synthetic Biology (2012)
  • Systems Biology (5552)
  • Zoology (1135)