Abstract
Incidental capture of juvenile bigeye tuna in fish aggregating device (FAD)-associated purse seine fisheries targeting skipjack tuna have contributed significantly to the degradation of bigeye stocks in the Western Tropical Pacific (WTP) Ocean. One way to reduce this incidental catch is to simply limit purse seine fishing effort; however, skipjack tuna stocks are healthy and economically important to many small island nations in the region. Here we assess whether there is sufficient lateral separation of skipjack and bigeye within FAD-associated purse seine fisheries in the WTP to allow limiting bigeye catch while maintaining a robust skipjack fishery. Based on monthly 5°-longitude-by-5°-latitude catch and effort data, FAD-associated bigeye and skipjack catch per unit effort (CPUE) covary tightly throughout the WTP, such that lateral separation between the two species is generally small. There are, however, significant variations in the amount of separation over both space and time. Waters within the Party to the Nauru Agreement exclusive economic zones (EEZs) belonging to Palau, Solomon Islands, and Tuvalu regularly exhibit some of the smallest bigeye-to-skipjack catch ratios, especially during El Niño. In contrast, waters within Kiribati’s Phoenix Islands EEZ regularly exhibit some of the largest bigeye-to-skipjack catch ratios, which are particularly high during La Niña. In general, El Niño lowers bigeye-to-skipjack catch ratios east of 170°E, while La Niña lowers bigeye-to-skipjack catch ratios west of 170°E. These ENSO-driven variations in separability are larger and more widespread than those driven by seasonality, due to larger associated variations in environmental conditions. Sea surface height anomalies may be particularly useful for demarcating the different environments preferred by skipjack and bigeye throughout the WTP. Sea surface temperatures, temperatures at 100 m, and thermocline depths may also help distinguish between the two species’ preferred habitats in many areas. These analyses can help better inform the complex decisions made by both fishers during operations and fisheries managers during creation of effective, dynamic policies to preserve bigeye stocks in the WTP. They also show that climate variability can have substantial effects on the spatial distributions of top pelagic predators and their interactions with one another.
