Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Symbiont-mediated fly survival is independent of defensive symbiont genotype in the Drosophila melanogaster-Spiroplasma-wasp interaction

View ORCID ProfileJordan E. Jones, View ORCID ProfileGregory D. D. Hurst
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.05.154906
Jordan E. Jones
aInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jordan E. Jones
  • For correspondence: Jordan.Jones@liverpool.ac.uk
Gregory D. D. Hurst
aInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gregory D. D. Hurst
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

When a parasite attacks an insect, the outcome is commonly modulated by the presence of defensive heritable symbionts residing within the insect host. Previous studies noted markedly different strengths of Spiroplasma-mediated fly survival following attack by the same strain of wasp. One difference between the two studies was the strain of Spiroplasma used. We therefore performed a common garden laboratory experiment to assess whether Spiroplasma-mediated protection depends upon the strain of Spiroplasma. We perform this analysis using the two strains of male-killing Spiroplasma used previously, and examined response to challenge by two strains of Leptopilina boulardi and two strains of Leptopilina heterotoma wasp. We found no evidence Spiroplasma strain affected fly survival following wasp attack. In contrast, analysis of the overall level of protection, including the fecundity of survivors of wasp attack, did indicate the two Spiroplasma strains tested varied in protective efficiency against three of the four wasp strains tested. These data highlight the sensitivity of symbiont-mediated protection phenotypes to laboratory conditions, and the importance of common garden comparison. Our results also indicate that Spiroplasma strains can vary in protective capacity in Drosophila, but these differences may exist in the relative performance of survivors of wasp attack, rather than in survival of attack per se.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 Jordan.Jones{at}liverpool.ac.uk

  • ↵2 G.Hurst{at}liverpool.ac.uk

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 06, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Symbiont-mediated fly survival is independent of defensive symbiont genotype in the Drosophila melanogaster-Spiroplasma-wasp interaction
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Symbiont-mediated fly survival is independent of defensive symbiont genotype in the Drosophila melanogaster-Spiroplasma-wasp interaction
Jordan E. Jones, Gregory D. D. Hurst
bioRxiv 2020.07.05.154906; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.05.154906
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Symbiont-mediated fly survival is independent of defensive symbiont genotype in the Drosophila melanogaster-Spiroplasma-wasp interaction
Jordan E. Jones, Gregory D. D. Hurst
bioRxiv 2020.07.05.154906; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.05.154906

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Evolutionary Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2548)
  • Biochemistry (4995)
  • Bioengineering (3503)
  • Bioinformatics (15291)
  • Biophysics (6934)
  • Cancer Biology (5432)
  • Cell Biology (7783)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4564)
  • Ecology (7186)
  • Epidemiology (2059)
  • Evolutionary Biology (10264)
  • Genetics (7542)
  • Genomics (9835)
  • Immunology (4905)
  • Microbiology (13311)
  • Molecular Biology (5170)
  • Neuroscience (29607)
  • Paleontology (203)
  • Pathology (842)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1471)
  • Physiology (2155)
  • Plant Biology (4788)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1016)
  • Synthetic Biology (1343)
  • Systems Biology (4025)
  • Zoology (773)