Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Antagonistic Co-contraction Can Minimise Muscular Effort in Systems with Uncertainty

View ORCID ProfileAnne D. Koelewijn, Antonie J. van den Bogert
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.07.191197
Anne D. Koelewijn
1Machine Learning and Data Analytics (MaD) Lab, Faculty of Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
2Parker-Hannifin Laboratory for Human Motion and Control, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anne D. Koelewijn
  • For correspondence: anne.koelewijn@fau.de
Antonie J. van den Bogert
2Parker-Hannifin Laboratory for Human Motion and Control, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Muscular co-contraction is often seen in human movement, but can currently not be predicted in simulations where muscle activation or metabolic energy is minimised. Here, we intend to show that minimal-effort optimisations can predict co-contraction in systems with random uncertainty. Secondly, we aim to show that this is because of mechanical muscle properties and time delay. We used a model of a one-degree-of-freedom arm, actuated by two identical antagonistic muscles, and solved optimal control problems to find the controller that minimised muscular effort while remaining upright in the presence of noise with different levels. Tasks were defined by bound-ing the maximum deviation from the upright position, representing different levels of difficulty. We found that a controller with co-contraction required less effort than purely reactive control. Furthermore, co-contraction was optimal even without ac-tivation dynamics, since nonzero activation still allowed for faster force generation. Co-contraction is especially optimal for difficult tasks, represented by a small maxi-mum deviation, or in systems with high uncertainty. The ability of models to predict co-contraction from effort or energy minimization has important clinical and sports applications. If co-contraction is undesirable, one should aim to remove the cause of co-contraction rather than the co-contraction itself.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 08, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Antagonistic Co-contraction Can Minimise Muscular Effort in Systems with Uncertainty
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Antagonistic Co-contraction Can Minimise Muscular Effort in Systems with Uncertainty
Anne D. Koelewijn, Antonie J. van den Bogert
bioRxiv 2020.07.07.191197; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.07.191197
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Antagonistic Co-contraction Can Minimise Muscular Effort in Systems with Uncertainty
Anne D. Koelewijn, Antonie J. van den Bogert
bioRxiv 2020.07.07.191197; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.07.191197

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioengineering
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3597)
  • Biochemistry (7563)
  • Bioengineering (5517)
  • Bioinformatics (20777)
  • Biophysics (10316)
  • Cancer Biology (7973)
  • Cell Biology (11629)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6602)
  • Ecology (10197)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13605)
  • Genetics (9537)
  • Genomics (12842)
  • Immunology (7919)
  • Microbiology (19536)
  • Molecular Biology (7653)
  • Neuroscience (42050)
  • Paleontology (307)
  • Pathology (1257)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2199)
  • Physiology (3266)
  • Plant Biology (7036)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1294)
  • Synthetic Biology (1951)
  • Systems Biology (5426)
  • Zoology (1115)