Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Synaptic contributions to cochlear outer hair cell Ca2+ homeostasis

Marcelo J. Moglie, Diego L. Wengier, A. Belén Elgoyhen, Juan D. Goutman
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.02.233205
Marcelo J. Moglie
1Instituto de Investigaciones en Ingeniería Genética y Biología Molecular “Dr. Héctor N. Torres” (INGEBI), C. A. Buenos Aires (1428) Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diego L. Wengier
1Instituto de Investigaciones en Ingeniería Genética y Biología Molecular “Dr. Héctor N. Torres” (INGEBI), C. A. Buenos Aires (1428) Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Belén Elgoyhen
1Instituto de Investigaciones en Ingeniería Genética y Biología Molecular “Dr. Héctor N. Torres” (INGEBI), C. A. Buenos Aires (1428) Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan D. Goutman
1Instituto de Investigaciones en Ingeniería Genética y Biología Molecular “Dr. Héctor N. Torres” (INGEBI), C. A. Buenos Aires (1428) Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jgoutman@gmail.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

For normal cochlear function, outer hair cells (OHCs) require a precise regulation of intracellular Ca2+ levels. Influx of Ca2+ occurs both at the stereocillia tips and through the basolateral membrane. In this latter compartment, two different origins for Ca2+ influx have been poorly explored: voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (VGCC) at synapses with type II afferent neurons, and α9α10 cholinergic nicotinic receptors at synapses with medio-olivochlear complex (MOC) neurons. Using functional imaging, we report that these two Ca2+ entry sites are closely positioned, but present different regulation mechanisms. Ca2+ spread from MOC synapses is contained by cisternal Ca2+-ATPases. Considered a weak drive for transmitter release, we found that VGCC Ca2+ signals are larger than expected and can be potentiated by ryanodine receptors. Finally, we showed that sorcin, a highly expressed gene product in OHCs with reported Ca2+ control function in cardiomyocytes, regulates basal Ca2+ levels and MOC synaptic activity in OHCs.

Introduction

Cochlear OHCs are a unique group of cells with a highly polarized structure, featuring a stereocillia bundle on their apical end, and synaptic connections on the basolateral membrane. One important aspect of OHCs physiology is the precise homeostasis and tight regulation of Ca2+ during normal activity. Within OHCs stereocilia high concentrations of proteinaceous Ca2+ buffers co-exist with large amounts of extrusion pumps, suggesting that mechanisms to quickly clear out Ca2+ increments are highly required (Chen et al., 2012; Dumont et al., 2001; Hackney et al., 2005; Sakaguchi et al., 1998; Yamoah et al., 1998). The main Ca2+ source are mechanotransducer channels located at the tip of stereocillia (Beurg et al., 2009; Fettiplace & Nam, 2018). A layer of mitochondria right below the cuticular plate (where stereocillia insert) plays the important role of restraining any Ca2+ leak into the basolateral compartment of the cell (Beurg et al., 2010; Furness & Hackney, 2006).

Two other important Ca2+ sources in OHCs have been less characterized: the voltage gated L-type Ca2+ channels (VGCC) (Knirsch et al., 2007), and the α9α10 cholinergic nicotinic receptors (Gómez-Casati et al., 2005; Weisstaub et al., 2002). Both VGCC and α9α10 receptors are located at the basolateral membrane of OHCs, at synapses with type II afferent fibers in the case of the former (Saito, 1990), and on the postsynaptic side of synapses with MOC fibers in the latter (Elgoyhen et al., 1994, 2001). Compared to inner hair cells (IHCs), OHCs show smaller Ca2+ currents through VGCC (Beurg et al., 2008; Johnson & Marcotti, 2008; Knirsch et al., 2007; Wong et al., 2013), and also present synaptic ribbons with irregular shapes and fewer vesicles in their vicinity (see for review: Fuchs & Glowatzki, 2015). These contacts have a weak synaptic drive, not suited for sound encoding, but it has been proposed that type II afferents could mediate pain perception (Flores et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2015).

On the other hand, cholinergic MOC synapses onto OHCs are inhibitory and provide the means to modulate mechanosensitivity (Guinan, 1996). Synaptic responses are mediated by the highly Ca2+-permeable α9α10 receptors, coupled to the activation of SK2 (Ca2+-activated K+) channels which ultimately produces inhibition (Fuchs, 1996; Gómez-Casati et al., 2005; Weisstaub et al., 2002). Detailed electron micrographs have shown postsynaptic cisterns within OHCs, closely aligned with presynaptic efferent synaptic contacts (Engström, 1958; Fuchs et al., 2014; Saito, 1980; Smith & Sjöstrand, 1961). This synaptic cistern has been proposed to serve as a Ca2+ store that modulates efferent synaptic responses by mechanisms such as Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR), through ryanodine receptors (RyR) (Evans et al., 2000; Grant et al., 2006; Lioudyno et al., 2004; Sridhar et al., 1997). Since the evidence for the role of RyR is indirect, in the present study we investigated their participation in directly modulating Ca2+ signaling through α9α10 receptors or VGCC. Using an ex-vivo preparation of the cochlea from post-hearing onset mice, and functional Ca2+ imaging, we found that Ca2+ signals from VGCC are unexpectedly large, comparable in size with α9α10 transients, and can be modulated by RyR. On the contrary, Ca2+ transients produced by α9α10 activation were not affected by RyR, and were efficiently contained by cisternal Ca2+-ATPases.

Another regulation factor that was tested in present study is the small Ca2+-binding protein sorcin. Previously shown to control Ca2+-based excitation-contraction coupling in myocytes (Colotti et al., 2014), sorcin was recently identified among the most differentially expressed genes in OHCs (Li et al., 2018; Ranum et al., 2019). Adding sorcin to OHCs cytoplasm produced a strong reduction in the resting Ca2+ concentration, and inhibition of efferent synaptic currents. Thus, the present results shed light into Ca2+ homeostasis in the hair cells involved in sound amplification at the cochlea, and unveil a role for the novel protein sorcin.

Results

Local acetylcholine application evokes a global Ca2+ rise in OHCs

To directly measure Ca2+ influx and spread by activation of α9α10 receptors, the Ca2+-sensitive indicator Fluo-4 was loaded into cells through the patch-clamp electrode. In a first approach, a local application pipette was used to puff acetylcholine (ACh) onto the organ of Corti preparation. Figure 1A presents a series of images taken at the OHCs base, before and after ACh application. The first image in the sequence also shows an array of regions of interest (ROIs) designed to measure fluorescence changes in the cytoplasm as a function of time (%ΔF/F0, unless otherwise indicated). The application of a saturating concentration of ACh (1 mM) produced a global and long lasting elevation of cytoplasmic Ca2+ (images in Fig. 1A and traces of fluorescence intensity as a function of time in Fig. 1B). The mean peak of the ΔF/F0 signal was 311 ± 65 %, with a corresponding electrophysiological response integral of 1.9 ± 0.3 nC (n = 6, Fig. 1C-E). These values were considered as an upper limit of efferent activation, since the saturating concentration of an externally applied agonist would activate receptors distributed throughout the surface of the cell.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

ACh evokes global Ca2+ transients in OHCs. A) Sequence of wide-field microscopy images of an OHC loaded with Fluo-4 and illuminated with 488 nm LED light during ACh 1mM perfusion. Dotted white lines represent the outer margin of the OHC’s fluorescence signal. First image shows ROI design scheme in which the cell’s cytoplasm was divided in 24 radial ROIs (see Methods). Scale bar: 5 μm. B) Black trace corresponds to the whole-cell current recorded during ACh perfusion (Vhold =-100mV) and red trace to the ΔF/F0 signal measured at the ROI depicted in red on panel A. Arrows indicate the time points of images shown on panel A. C-E) Peak current (C), charge (D), and maximal ΔF/ F0 (E) during ACh perfusion. Bar plots are mean ± SEM.

Cholinergic synaptic Ca2+ signals in OHCs

An alternative and more physiological approach to investigate efferent input to OHCs was undertaken by electrically stimulating MOC axons innervating these cells. Figure 2A shows a series of images of an OHC during a typical protocol of MOC fibers stimulation. In contrast to what was observed with ACh external applications, local and brief Ca2+ transients were observed with synaptic activation. Only one Ca2+ entry site was observed in each recorded OHC (n = 6 cells). Representative traces of fluorescence changes at the brightest ROI are shown in the bottom panel of Figure 2B (red traces), whereas the corresponding synaptic currents recorded in the same trials are included in the top panel (black traces). Paired pulses were used instead of single stimuli to increase the otherwise very low release probability (Ballestero et al., 2011; Vattino et al., 2020). Due to frame rate limitations, the imaging signal appears as the ensemble activation in response to both stimuli in a pair. An average of 100 ± 22 stimulation trials were performed per cell (range 60 – 200, n = 6 cells), with a synaptic success rate of 87 ± 3 % (range: 73 – 98 %, n = 6). In turn, Ca2+ signals were detected in 83 ± 5% (range: 64 – 99 %, n = 6) of trials with successful synaptic events. In paired pulse protocols, an average Ca2+ signal of 2.7 ± 0.3 %ΔF/F0 (n = 6 cells) was obtained, whereas the integral of the synaptic currents was 7.4 ± 0.8 pC (n = 6) (Fig. 2C and D). Imaging and electrophysiological responses correlated, as shown in Figure 2E (r = 0.88 in this representative example, range: 0.65 – 0.95, n = 6). This strong correlation indicates that the imaging signal is a good proxy for α9α10 and SK2 synaptic activation, most likely reflecting Ca2+ influx through nicotinic receptors. In order to maximize the Ca2+ driving force, OHCs were transiently voltage-clamped at −100 mV in these experiments (for the duration of the synaptic response, otherwise, at −40 mV. See Methods) such that inward currents were due to the activation of both α9α10 receptors and SK2 channels (K+ equilibrium potential: ∼-82 mV).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2.

Efferent fiber electrical stimulation evokes localized Ca2+ signals in OHCs. A) Sequence of images showing the localized Ca2+ increase in an OHC following efferent fiber stimulation. Scale bar: 5 μm. B) Top, Representative whole-cell current traces during doble-pulse efferent electrical stimulation at 100 Hz (Vh= −100 mV). Black traces represent those trials where an eIPSC was detected after the stimulus artifact (failures, in gray). Bottom, Representative Ca2+ transients taken at the ROI indicated in green on panel A, for the same trials shown on the top panel. Red traces correspond to trials were an IPSC was detected and failures in pink. C-D) Mean charge (C) and ΔF/F0 (D) for successful efferent fiber stimulation trials. Bar plots are mean ± SEM. E) Size of Ca2+ transients as function of charge during efferent stimulation trials in a representative OHC. Black dots represent successful IPSC events with no detectable fluorescence signal.

Synaptic Ca2+ signals during trains of efferent stimuli

One of the most common MOC activation pathways is the result of a feedback loop starting in the afferent pathway and producing steady firing of efferent neurons at rates of up to 200 1/sec (Brown, 1989; Guinan, 2006; Liberman, 1988). Repetitive activation of MOC axons leads to presynaptic facilitation in neurotransmitter release (Ballestero et al., 2011). The postsynaptic consequences of the stimulation in trains are shown as synaptic Ca2+ transients in response to repetitive MOC stimulation at 20, 40 and 80 Hz (300 msec of duration each, Fig. 3). Images included in Figure 3A were taken at the peak of the Ca2+ rise for each train, whereas panel B shows average synaptic currents (top, in black) and the corresponding Ca2+ signals (bottom, in red) taken at the brightest ROI in each cell. Ca2+ levels varied with the frequency of the stimulation train, with average amplitudes at 20, 40 and 80 Hz trains of 5.1 ± 1.1 % ΔF/F0, 9.5 ± 2.2 % ΔF/F0 and 15.6 ± 2.5 % ΔF/F0 (n = 8, p = 0.0001 Friedman’s test, Fig. 3C), respectively. The integral of the ensemble synaptic response across the duration of the train was 23.6 ± 6.2 pC, 43.3 ± 11.0 pC and 64.1 ± 8.8 pC (n = 8, p < 0.0001 Friedman’s test, Fig. 3D).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 3.

Amplitude and spread of efferent Ca2+ transients are dependent upon stimulation frequency. A) Representative images of an OHC at the peak of the fluorescence signal during efferent fiber electrical stimulation at 20 (i), 40 (ii) and 80 (iii) Hz. B) Mean inhibitory current traces (black) recorded during 300 msec efferent fiber electrical stimulation at 20, 40 and 80 Hz (Vh= −100 mV). Red traces show the mean ΔF/F0 at the ROI with the highest fluorescence signal. Peak Ca2+ values (C) and charge (D) for 300 msec stimulation trains at tested frequencies. E) Amplitude of fluorescence signal as a function of charge. Each symbol represent a different stimulation frequency. F) Spread of the Ca2+ signal within each OHC cytoplasmic space (as percentage of area in the imaged plane). Values were taken at the time point where signal peaked. G) Mean whole-cell synaptic response (black) and Ca2+ signals (red) obtained during 3 sec electrical stimulation of efferent fibers at 80 Hz. H) Peak fluorescence amplitude for trains with duration between 0.3 and 3 seconds (at 80Hz). Bar plots are mean ± SEM. Friedman’s Test, * p<0.05.

A close interdependence of synaptic and Ca2+ responses was also noted in the correlation between peak ΔF/F0 and the integral of synaptic currents, elicited by trains at different frequencies (r = 0.88, Fig. 3E). As suggested by the representative images, trains at 20 Hz elicited a localized Ca2+ rise with a measurable spread which accounted for 31 ± 5 % of the area corresponding to the imaged OHC area. At 40 or 80 Hz Ca2+ signals reached a larger part of the cytoplasmic space, with averages values of 48 ± 6 % and 63 ± 5 %, respectively (n = 8, p < 0.0001 Friedman’s test, Fig. 3F).

In order to obtain a better understanding of Ca2+ dynamics during sustained MOC activity, trains of stimuli at 80 Hz were applied for longer periods of time, up to 3 sec (Fig. 3G and H). A sustained Ca2+ load was observed in OHCs, with peak values that did not differ when different train durations were compared (p = 0.57 Friedman’s test). This latter result indicates that mechanisms for controlling Ca2+ entering from efferent sources are highly efficient, preventing a large Ca2+ load even during a 3 sec stimulation. The role of the sub-synaptic cistern in this phenomenon has been suggested in the past (Evans et al., 2000; Lioudyno et al., 2004; Sridhar et al., 1997) and it was evaluated in the following section.

Modulation of efferent Ca2+ by cisterns

One important factor are sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPases (SERCA), responsible for removing free Ca2+ ions from the cytoplasm. To address the role of SERCA in shaping Ca2+ transients, the specific blocker thapsigargin (1 μM) was added to the bath during an OHC recording. In the absence of any stimulation, the basal fluorescence increased when perfusing thapsigargin from a control value of 1396 ± 551 A.U. (arbitrary units) to 1851 ± 502 A. U. (n = 6, p = 0.024 Wilcoxon test) (Fig. 4B inset). This ∼ 30% increase in the basal cytoplasmic concentration of Ca2+ would represent a basal SERCA activity responsible for pumping ions out of the OHC cytoplasm at rest.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 4.

Efferent Ca2+ signals are modulated by cisternal ATPases, but not ryanodine receptors. A) Mean synaptic responses (black) and Ca2+ transients (red) during 300 msec electrical stimulation at 20,40 and 80 Hz before and after perfusion of Thapsigargin. B) Peak of Ca2+ transients (as ΔF), C) Charge of synaptic responses and D) duration of Ca2+ transients (as full width at half maximum, FWHM). Inset: Baseline fluorescence signal before and after perfusion of Thapsigargin. E) Synaptic currents (mean, black) and Ca2+ transients (red) obtained during efferent fibers stimulation (300 msec, 80 Hz), using an intracellular solution containing vehicle (DMSO), RyR blockers (Ryanodine 100 µM and Dantrolene 30 µM) and a RyR agonist (Ryanodine 1 µM). F) Baseline fluorescence for each condition. G) Duration (FWHM) and H) maximal fluorescence signal (as ΔF/F0) for each intracellular solution. Bar plots are mean ± SEM. Wilcoxon signed-rank test, * p<0.05.

To determine the role for SERCA in regulating synaptic Ca2+, trains of MOC stimuli were applied before and during the application of thapsigargin (Fig. 4A-D). Peak ΔF values were calculated (Fig. 4B), instead of ΔF/F0, to avoid the artifact effect of a higher basal fluorescence on the estimation of the size of the Ca2+ transients. Synaptic currents integral are shown in Figure 4C. Peak ΔF values for control trains at 20, 40 and 80 Hz were respectively 38.4 ± 8.6 A. U., 73.4 ± 10.5 A. U., and 125.9 ± 21.8 A. U. (n = 5), showing statistical differences between trains as previously indicated for ΔF/F0 measure (p = 0.0085, Friedman’s test). With thapsigargin in the bath, ΔF values grew to 55.8 ± 14.1 A. U., 107.9 ± 24.5 A. U., and 205.7 ± 39.9 A. U. respectively for the 20, 40 and 80 Hz trains (n = 6), showing statistically significant differences for the 80 Hz train compared to control (p = 0.04, Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

The effect of thapsigargin on the duration of the synaptic Ca2+ transients was also analyzed, by measuring the ‘full width at half maximum’ (FWHM) of the signal. In control conditions, FWHM values varied with the stimulation frequency: 485 ± 79 ms at 80 Hz, 344 ± 80 ms at 40 Hz, and 211 ± 45 ms at 20 Hz (n = 5, p = 0.0097, Friedman’s test). In the case of the 20 Hz train, the FWHM of the transient was even shorter than the stimulating train duration (300 ms) due to sporadic synaptic activation. Thapsigargin prolonged Ca2+ transients with average values of 569 ± 62 ms at 80 Hz, 372 ± 39 ms at 40 Hz, and 180 ± 20 ms at 20 Hz (n = 5, p = 0.048 Wilcoxon signed-ranked test for the 80 Hz train compared to control). Taken together, these results indicate that SERCA pumps, and the sub-synaptic cistern, play a significant role in accelerating the removal of Ca2+ entering through efferent synapses, and also in curtailing the peak of the transient.

Since the presence of RyR has been shown both morphologically and functionally at the MOC-OHC synapse (Evans et al., 2000; Grant et al., 2006; Lioudyno et al., 2004), in the following experiments we tested Ca2+ dynamics in the presence of drugs that modulate RyR. To avoid indirect or presynaptic effects, drugs were included in the patch pipette (control experiments included vehicle – DMSO). Low (1 μM) and high (100 μM) concentrations of ryanodine were used to either activate or block RyR. Dantrolene, a specific inhibitor of these receptors, was also used. Interestingly, none of these treatmentshowed any effect on either the amplitude of synaptic Ca2+ transients (Fig. 4E and H, Kruskal-Wallis test) (same for ΔF), duration (estimated as FWHM, Fig. 4E and G, Kruskal-Wallis test) or basal Ca2+ (Fig. 4F, Kruskal-Wallis test). The corresponding values for these experiments are shown in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Values for integral of synaptic currents, amplitude and duration Ca2+ signals during step depolarization of OHCs or MOC stimulation at 20, 40 and 80 Hz trains, in different pharmacological conditions.

Efferent Ca2+ regulation by sorcin

A number of genes related to Ca2+ regulation are highly-expressed in OHCs (compared to IHCs and supporting cells) (Li et al., 2018; Ranum et al., 2019). Sorcin, a gene product related to the regulation of CICR in cardiac myocytes (Farrell et al., 2003), was identified in OHCs both by RNAseq and inmunostaining (Li et al., 2018; Ranum et al., 2019). We evaluated the effect of sorcin on efferent Ca2+ transients, by adding recombinant sorcin (3 μM) to the intracellular pipette solution. The basal Ca2+ concentration in the OHC cytoplasm was higher in the presence of sorcin. In control conditions, basal fluorescence was 1145 ± 112 A. U., whereas with sorcin this value increased to 2091 ± 316 A. U (Fig. 5B, n = 6, p = 0.02 Mann-Whitney U test). Considering that basal fluorescence was partially dependent on the recordings conditions of a given cell, and that sorcin recordings were done in a different set of cells than controls, the possibility that cells with sorcin were more leaky than the controls was evaluated. Basal fluorescence as a function of leak current (within the first 10 minutes of recording) was plotted and grouped in control and sorcin cells (Fig. 5C). Each group was fitted with a line showing that basal fluorescence grew faster in sorcin cells and with a significantly larger slope (F-test, p = 0.0038) within a similar range of leak current values, implicating that sorcin increased resting Ca2+ concentration values per se, and not due to worsened recording conditions.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 5.

Sorcin produced a rise in resting Ca2+ levels and inhibited efferent synaptic currents. A) Mean traces of ensemble synaptic currents (black) and Ca2+ transients (red) in OHCs obtained by 300 msec electrical stimulation of efferent fibers at 20,40 and 80 Hz in control conditions (Ctrl) and with the addition of sorcin to the intracellular solution. Scale bars: 50 pA, 25 A. U. and 200 msec. B) Baseline fluorescence in control conditions and in the presence of sorcin. C) Baseline fluorescence as a function of leak current (Ileak) for each recorded cell during the first 10 minutes of recording. Linear fits were performed separately for control and sorcin groups. D) Peak of Ca2+ signals (ΔF) for different train frequencies and intracellular conditions. E) Integral of synaptic responses (Q) during trains of stimuli for each condition. Bar plots are mean ± SEM. Mann-Whitney test, * p<0.05.

Responses to electrical stimulation in sorcin experiments (Fig. 5) were represented in ΔF, instead of ΔF/F0, to avoid artifact effects due the higher basal fluorescence, as previously indicated. As shown in Figure 5D, the mean amplitude of Ca2+ transients evoked with different stimulation frequencies did not differ in the presence of sorcin (20 Hz trains: control = 55 ± 10 A. U. (n = 8) – sorcin = 54 ± 10 A. U. (n = 6); 40 Hz: control = 105 ± 21 A. U. (n = 8) – sorcin = 100 ± 21 A. U. (n = 6); 80 Hz: control = 169 ± 30 A. U. (n = 8) – sorcin = 164 ± 34 A. U. (n = 6) Mann-Whitney U test). In the presence of sorcin FWHM did not differ from the control (not shown). Interestingly, and despite unchanged Ca2+ signals, a strong reduction in synaptic currents of up to ∼50% was observed with sorcin (Fig. 5E). The integral of these synaptic responses was calculated, obtaining average values with sorcin of 11.1 ± 2.8 pC for the 20 Hz trains, 26.5 ± 4.0 pC for 40 Hz, and 38.4 ± 5.1 pC for 80 Hz trains (control values already mentioned above) (n = 6, p = 0.0293, Mann-Whitney U test for the 80 Hz trains). The reduction of synaptic currents produced by sorcin is most likely due to a reduction in the SK2 component of the response, since: i) at −100 mV both the nicotinic and SK2 components are inward, and ii) α9α10 receptors response seems to be unchanged, according to ΔF values in Figure 5D that are entirely due to the activation of the nicotinic receptors. Thus, even without affecting Ca2+ influx, sorcin produced a reduction in the efferent inhibitory action.

Ca2+ entry through L-type Ca2+ channels

Ca2+ influx through VGCC was investigated applying step depolarizations of OHCs, from a holding potential of −100 mV, up to −30 - +30 mV. Representative Ca2+ transients are shown in Figure 6A, with maximum values that followed the expected bell-shaped dependence on membrane potential, peaking at +10/+20 mV (Fig. 6B).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 6.

Ca2+ transients during VGCC activation in OHCs. A) Representative traces of Ca2+ transients measured at the brightest ROI, for voltage steps between −30 and + 30 mV. B) Normalized maximum for Ca2+ transients in each cell (gray symbols) as a function of voltage. Red trace and marks represent mean ± SEM. C) Sequence of images showing the localized Ca2+ concentration increase in an OHC during 300 msec depolarization to +20 mV. Scale bar: 5 μm. D) Mean trace of the Ca2+ signal (in red) during a step pulse to +20 mV (top panel). E) Average ΔF/F0 for +20 mV steps in OHCs. F) Average distance between locations of afferent (VGCC) and efferent (MOC) Ca2+ signals within each OHC. Bar plots are mean ± SEM. Friedman’s Test, * p<0.05.

Step depolarizations to +20 mV for 300 msec (same duration of MOC train stimulation in Figs. 3-5) evoked Ca2+ transients with an average peak of 13.3 ± 3.8 % ΔF/F0, that unexpectedly matched in size with those obtained with 40 and 80 Hz trains of MOC stimulation (see Figs. 3C and 6C-E) (n = 8, p > 0.05 Friedman’s test). Moreover, the spread of the fluorescence signal also resembled that observed with 40 and 80 Hz efferent trains (57 ± 7 % of OHC area, p > 0.05 Friedman’s test).

Previous evidence indicates that type II afferents on OHCs are closely positioned with efferent synapses and sub-synaptic cisterns (Fuchs et al., 2014; Saito, 1980, 1990). A functional quantification of this proximity was evaluated by measuring the distance between locations of VGCC and MOC Ca2+ transients within a given cell (Fig. 6C and F). An average value of 3.7 ± 1.1 μm (n = 8) was estimated, ranging from 0.6 to 8.5 μm, with 5/8 cells with values ≤ 2 μm. The possibility of modulation of VGCC Ca2+ signals by cisterns is further investigated in the following section.

Modulation of Ca2+ influx through VGCC by ryanodine and sorcin

Thapsigargin, ryanodine and dantrolene were used to evaluate the role of SERCA pumps and RyR in modulating depolarization evoked Ca2+ transients. Thapsigargin application in the bath did not produce any change in the amplitude of the depolarization evoked Ca2+ signal (Figs. 7A and B) (control ΔF: 68 ± 24 A. U., thapsigargin ΔF: 53 ± 9, n = 5, p = 0.58 Wilcoxon signed-rank test). At 1 μM ryanodine, a concentration that activates RyR, a strong potentiation of the Ca2+ transient was observed, with average peak values of 15.8 ± 3.5 %ΔF/F0, compared to control (vehicle) 4.6 ± 1.6 %ΔF/F0 (n = 10, p < 0.05 Kruskal-Wallis test) (Figs. 7C and D). Neither 100 μM ryanodine nor dantrolene showed any modulatory effect (12.6 ± 6.5 % ΔF/F0 (n = 8), and 13.2 ± 4.7 % (n = 7), respectively; p > 0.05 Kruskal-Wallis test).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 7.

Modulation of afferent Ca2+ influx through VGCC by ryanodine and sorcin. A) Mean traces of the Ca2+ transients obtained with 300 msec depolarization to +20 mV before (top) and during perfusion of Thapsigargin (bottom). B) Average peak Ca2+ level (ΔF) for step depolarizations as in A). C) Mean traces of the Ca2+ transients during with steps to +20 mV, using intracellular solutions containing DMSO or Ryanodine 1 µM. D) Average peak Ca2+ signal (ΔF/F0) for experiments in C), and also with an antagonistic concentration of ryanodine (Ry) (100 μM) and dantrolene (30 μM). Wilcoxon signed-rank test, * p<0.05. E) Mean ΔF traces obtained in OHCs loaded with sorcin protein or control. F) Mean peak fluorescence signal (ΔF) for experimens in E). Bars are mean ± SEM.

Finally, the effect of sorcin on Ca2+ transients produced by VGCC is shown in Figure 7E and F. A strong tendency to a reduction in peak ΔF values was observed (control: 124.0 ± 30.0 A. U., sorcin: 57.0 ± 10.2 A. U. n = 6). However, due to the high variability observed in control experiments (range: 22-200 A. U.) this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.228, Mann-Whitney U test).

Discussion

The present results provide a direct analysis of synaptic Ca2+ dynamics in OHCs during both MOC (efferent) and VGCC (afferent) activation. It also shows evidence for cisternal modulation of amplitude, spread and duration of Ca2+ transients. In addition, this study demonstrates for the first time a functional role for sorcin in OHCs, a Ca2+ binding protein with a well described role in regulating Ca2+ concentration in cardiomyocytes cytoplasm (Farrell et al., 2003).

The amplitude of Ca2+ transients shows a strong dependence on MOC stimulation at frequencies between 20 and 80 Hz (Fig. 3), which might explain the reported changes in MOC inhibitory strength as a function of stimulation rate (Art et al., 1984; Galambos, 1956; Gifford & Guinan, 1987). Significantly, only one Ca2+ hotspot was found per OHC, suggesting that a single MOC fiber could be stimulated at a time, although more are present (Liberman, 1990; Warr, 1992). A single Ca2+ spot was also observed when activating VGCC by step depolarizations, although multiple contacts with type II afferent coexist in one OHC within a close proximity (Fuchs & Glowatzki, 2015). How afferent synapses in OHCs are activated in vivo is still not known, but our experiments show that Ca2+ signals produced by VGCC are unexpectedly high, similar in amplitude to those through α9α10, and can be further potentiated by RyR action.

Ca2+ homeostasis in OHCs and efferent regulation

Several studies report alternative mechanisms that operate in OHCs to handle Ca2+ (Fettiplace & Nam, 2018). Millimolar concentrations of two different buffers are present in the cytoplasm of OHCs: oncomodulin (also known as parvalbumin-β) and calbindin-D28k, with the highest values observed at the base of the cells, where synaptic contacts reside (Hackney et al., 2005; Sakaguchi et al., 1998). In the oncomodulin knock-out mouse, a progressive OHCs loss is observed that leads to cochlear dysfunction (Tong et al., 2016). A similar phenomenon is observed in the knock-out of PMCA2 Ca2+-ATPases (Giacomello et al., 2011), that are responsible for pumping out Ca2+ ions that enter through MET channels even in quiet (Johnson et al., 2011; Tucker & Fettiplace, 1995; Yamoah et al., 1998). These results highlight the importance of Ca2+ handling in maintaining the integrity of OHCs and cochlear function The control of Ca2+ diffusion is further exerted by mechanisms such as Na+-Ca2+ exchangers and mitochondrial uptake, although they both operate on a time scale of hundreds of milliseconds, slower than buffers and PMCA2 pumps (Beurg et al., 2010; Ikeda et al., 1992; Nicholls, 2005). In OHCs, mitochondria are abundantly found in a layer right below the cuticular plate, playing the important role of containing Ca2+ leak into the basolateral compartment of the cell (Beurg et al., 2010; Furness & Hackney, 2006). Similarly, on the basal pole of OHCs, the large cistern located in physical opposition to MOC vesicle releasing sites, would not only operate as a barrier to prevent free diffusion of Ca2+ entering through nicotinic receptors, but has the additional role of a ‘Ca2+ sponge’ that removes free ions out the cytoplasm and shorten synaptic responses (Fig. 4). Taking into account the tight functional coupling between α9α10 and SK2 (Oliver et al., 2000) and the small cytoplasmic space between plasma and cisternal membranes (Fuchs et al., 2014), a relatively small Ca2+ influx would effectively produce synaptic inhibition through SK2 activation. However, since efferent fibers operate best at prolonged MOC activation (Brown, 1989; Robertson & Gummer, 1985), one could propose that cisterns function to control excessive Ca2+ spread and prevent its spill over. Evidence from Figure 4, using train stimulation to MOC fibers, suggests that cisterns are responsible not only for speeding up the decay of efferent Ca 2+ but also limiting its spread. However, taking into account the volume of this small domain and the spread of the Ca2+ transients (Fig. 3F), it is very likely that Ca2+ signals evoked at high frequency MOC stimulation result, at least partially, from Ca2+ that escaped into the cytoplasm. A circumstance that may differ in conditions with more intact intracellular buffers concentrations.

Our results do not provide support for RyR participation during MOC activation within a rather wide range of stimulation strengths, 20 to 80 Hz trains of 300 msec of duration. It is possible though, that RyR are engaged during MOC activation only when a strong preceding hair cell excitation occurred, as suggested previously (Im et al., 2014; Zachary et al., 2018). Whether this phenomenon occurs in vivo remains to be proven, but is supported by the observation that MOC inhibition is potentiated by a preceding auditory stimulation, that could produce the required excitation to hair cells (Kujawa & Liberman, 1999).

Ca2+ influx through VGCC and type II afferent activation

Ca2+ currents through VGCC in OHCs are several fold smaller than in IHCs and present a shift to the right in the current-voltage relation (Johnson & Marcotti, 2008; Knirsch et al., 2007; Wong et al., 2013) Accordingly, Ca2+ signals in Figure 6 peaked at +20 mV (−20 mV for IHCs), and their amplitudes are three-fold smaller (13.3 % ΔF/F0, with a 300 ms step) compared to brief depolarizations (20 msec) to sub-maximal potentials (−30 mV) in IHCs (42 % ΔF/F0) (Moglie et al., 2018). Other features of afferent synapses in OHCs further indicate that the synaptic drive is small in these cells when compared to IHCs. Ribbons in active zone areas with type II afferents are small, irregular in shape, and are surrounded by few vesicles (Fuchs & Glowatzki, 2015). However, our results show that Ca2+ transients elicited by VGCC were as large and spread out as α9α10 transients (Figs. 3 and 6). This might indicate that, although smaller than in IHCs, Ca2+ transients through VGCC could be sufficient to evoke glutamate release onto type II afferent fibers. Moreover, these transients were further potentiated by RyR agonistic agents (Fig. 7). Whether RyRs mediating this effect are located in cisterns at synaptic (Grant et al., 2006; Lioudyno et al., 2004), or lateral wall locations (Grant et al., 2006; Ranum et al., 2019) is unknown. However, it suggests that CICR mechanisms can boost synaptic strength in contacts with type II afferents. CICR has been shown to modulate vesicle release and recruitment on afferent synapses of hair cells from frogs and turtles (Castellano-Muñoz et al., 2016; Lelli et al., 2003). Rod photoreceptors synapses are also modulated by this phenomenon, suggesting that CICR is not uncommon in ribbon synapses (Babai et al., 2010; Cadetti et al., 2006). In addition, ATP-induced IP3 mobilization and Ca2+ influx in the apical portion of isolated OHC, could further facilitate the Ca2+ spread down to synaptic sites (Ashmore & Ohmori, 1990; Mammano et al., 1999). This could explain the proposed function of type II neurons in pain sensation (Liu et al., 2015).

According to results in Figs. 4 and 7, SERCA pumps and RyR respond differently to afferent and efferent Ca2+ influx. One important question that arises is if, similarly to that described for immature IHCs (Moglie et al., 2018), OHCs cistern and buffering prevent Ca2+ spill-over from efferent to afferent synapses, particularly during sustained MOC activity. Both functional (Fig. 6E) and structural (Fuchs et al., 2014; Saito, 1990) evidence indicates that the diffusion interval between afferent and efferent synaptic locations is very short. This mechanism could operate in conjunction with VGCC to overcome an apparently weak synaptic drive in OHCs.

Sorcin and Ca2+ regulation in OHCs

Transcriptome analysis has shown that gene products responsible for Ca2+ regulation, such as oncomodulin and sorcin, appear among the most highly represented mRNAs in OHCs (Li et al., 2018; Ranum et al., 2019). The high expression profile of oncomodulin agrees with previous reports showing a high concentration of the protein detected by immuno-EM (Hackney et al., 2005). Initially identified in drug-resistant cells, sorcin was later detected in cardiac myocytes, where it modulates CICR and excitation-contraction coupling in the heart (Colotti et al., 2014; Farrell et al., 2003; Lokuta et al., 1997; Meyers et al., 1995). Sorcin can also interact with, and regulate, other proteins responsible for Ca2+ homeostasis such as the Na+-Ca2+ exchanger (Zamparelli et al., 2010), L-type Ca2+ channels (Fowler et al., 2009; Meyers et al., 1998), and cisternal ATPases (Matsumoto et al., 2005).

The present work shows for the first time a function for sorcin in Ca2+ modulation at the synaptic pole of the OHCs. Thus, the addition of sorcin into the OHCs cytoplasm caused an increase in the resting cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration. One could propose that sorcin interacts with SERCA pumps located in sub-synaptic cisterns, inhibiting its action. However, this contrasts the reported role of sorcin on sarcoplasmic reticulum ATPases in the heart (Matsumoto et al., 2005). Interestingly, sorcin produced a reduction in the size of synaptic currents (calculated as integral, Q) during efferent stimulation (Fig. 5). In the same set of experiments Ca2+ transients were unaffected, implicating that sorcin does not affect α9α10 function, as these receptors are the sole reported Ca2+ source at this synapse. Since the recording conditions used for MOC stimulation experiments (Vh = −100 mV) were designed to maximize the Ca2+ driving force, part of the inward current triggered during synaptic events derives from SK2 channel activation. Thus, it is very likely that the sorcin mediated reduction of synaptic currents size is due to SK2 channels inhibition. One possible scenario is that sorcin operates as a sensor for Ca2+ influx through nicotinic receptors, curbing SK2 function to prevent over-inhibition by the MOC input.

As indicated, sorcin would operate as a ‘brake’ for excessive RyR-mediated Ca2+ spread in cardiomyocytes (Farrell et al., 2003). It was recently suggested that sorcin could have a similar role in regulating Ca2+ originated from lateral walls cisterns of OHCs (Ranum et al., 2019), and thus, sorcin would operate as an electromotility modulator (Dallos et al., 1997; Frolenkov et al., 2000). Although further experiments are needed in order to decipher the role of sorcin in OHCs, the present results indicate a clear role for this novel protein in Ca2+ homeostasis.

Methods

Electrophysiological recordings from OHCs

Euthanasia and tissue extraction were carried out according to approved animal protocols of INGEBI Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Excised apical turns of 12-to 14-day-old mouse cochleas (Balb/c, either sex) were placed into a chamber on the stage of an upright microscope (Olympus BX51WI) and used within 2 hrs. OHCs were visualized on a monitor via a water immersion objective (60x), difference interference contrast optics and a CCD camera (Andor iXon 885). All recordings were performed at room temperature (22–25°C). Due to the short viability of the cochlear preparation and OHCs at this age, only one cell could be recorded per animal.

The cochlear preparation was superfused continuously at 2–3 ml/min with extracellular saline solution of an ionic composition similar to that of the perilymph (in mM): 144 NaCl, 5.8 KCl, 1.3 CaCl2, 0.7 NaH2PO4, 5.6 D-glucose, 10 HEPES buffer, 2 Pyruvate, 3 myo-inositol, pH 7.4. Working solutions containing different drugs were made up in this same saline and delivered through the perfusion system. Recording pipettes were fabricated from 1-mm borosilicate glass (WPI), with tip resistances of 6–8 MΩ. Series resistance errors were not compensated for.

For all experiments, the basic pipette solution was made from a 1.25X stock to reach a final concentration of (in mM): 95 KCl, 40 K-ascorbate, 5 HEPES, 2 pyruvate, 6 MgCl2, 5 Na2ATP, 10 Phosphocreatine-Na2, 0.5 EGTA and 0.4 Ca2+ indicator (Fluo-4), pH 7.2. To avoid variations in OHCs volume during experiments, pressure in the recording system was controlled with a digital manometer and kept within 5-9 cm H20 range.

Heterologous expression and purification of human sorcin was performed as described in Meyers et al. (1995), with minimal adaptations. PET23d-Sorcin-wt was obtained from Dr. Gianni Colotti, was transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) codon plus pLysS. Bacteria were growth in LB containing 5 mM CaCl2 until OD600 = 0.5, when 1 mM isopropylthiogalactoside (IPTG) was added and further incubated for 2 hours. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and washed with Lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM NaCl, pH=7.5), followed by sonication (Sonication buffer: Lysis buffer with 1 mM DTT and antiproteases). Lysate was washed and resuspended in Sonication buffer plus 5mM MgCl2 and 0.2 µg DNAse (Fermentas). Following centrifugation, the supernatant was loaded into a Sep-Pak Accell Plus QMA cartridge (Waters), pre-equilibrated with Sonication buffer. Following a 5-step elution with 50, 150, 250, 400 and 500mM NaCl (2 ml each), SDS-PAGE revealed that most sorcin eluted in the 150 and 250 mM fractions. Samples were pooled in G2 dialysis cassettes (3500 MWCO, Thermo Scientific) and dialyzed twice for 12 hours at 4°C against 1 liter of (106.25 KCl, 6.25 HEPES, 2.5 Pyruvate and 7.5 MgCl2). After dialysis, samples were concentrated using Vivaspin devices (3000 MWCO, Cytiva) and protein concentration was estimated by the Bradford assay.

Stock solutions of dantrolene, thapsigargin and ryanodine (both at 1 and 100 μM) were prepared in DMSO and added to the intracellular solution, such that the concentration of DMSO in the pipette solution was 0.5 % v/v in every case. All salts and drugs were acquired from SIGMA except for ryanodine, dantrolene and thapsigargin which were purchased from Tocris.

Efferent synaptic currents were evoked by unipolar electrical stimulation of the MOC efferent axons as described previously (Ballestero et al., 2011; Goutman et al., 2005). Briefly, the electrical stimulus was delivered via a 20 to 80 µm-diameter glass pipette which position was adjusted until postsynaptic currents in OHCs were consistently activated. An electrically isolated constant current source (model DS3, Digitimer) was triggered via the data-acquisition computer to generate pulses of 40 to 220 µA, 1 msec width. Solutions containing acetylcholine (ACh) were applied by a gravity-fed multichannel glass pipette (150 µm tip diameter).

Electrophysiological recordings were performed using a Multiclamp 700B amplifier (Molecular Devices), low-pass filtered at 6 kHz and digitized at 50 kHz via a National Instruments board. Data was acquired using WinWCP (J. Dempster, University of Strathclyde). To maximize Ca2+ driving force during imaging experiments, OHCs were voltage clamped at −100 mV, but only during a brief period of time when stimulation was applied and synaptic responses were recorded (650 msec in paired pulse experiments, and 2 sec in trains). Otherwise, cells were held at −40 mV. Electric shocks to MOC fibers were separated by intervals of 5 sec in paired pulse experiments, and 30 sec for trains. Recordings were analyzed with custom-written routines in IgorPro 6.37 (Wavemetrics). Statistical analysis was performed using Infostat (Universidad Nacional de Córdoba).

Ca2+ Imaging Experiments

Ca2+ indicators were included in the patch-pipettes (at the concentration indicated before) allowing the diffusion into the cells. The preparation was illuminated with a blue LED system (Tolket, Argentina) and images were acquired using an Andor iXon 885 camera controlled through a Till Photonics interface system. The focal plane was set close to the basal pole of OHCs where synapses are found. The signal-to-noise ratio was improved with an on-chip binning of 4×4, giving a resolution of 0.533 µm per pixel with the 60X water immersion objective. The image size was set to 50×50 pixels which allowed an acquisition rate of 140 frames/sec. Image acquisition started 5 min after whole-cell break in to en-sure the proper dialysis of the cell content and lasted up to 45 min. Images were analyzed with custom-written routines in IgorPro 6.37 (Wavemetrics).

A time lapse consisting of 250 images were taken for each experiment. An averaged image in each time lapse was used to determine the edge of the cell by an automatic thresholding algorithm. Within the cell borders, a donut-shaped mask covering the cell’s cytoplasm was defined comprising 40 to 90% of the maximal fluorescence signal. The mask was divided in 24 radial regions of interest (ROIs) with its center set at the maximal intensity pixel of the cell. Fluorescence intensity was measured in every ROI for each time frame. Two criteria were used to determine that a successful synaptic Ca2+ event occurred at a particular ROI: i) a fluorescence peak was identified right after the MOC stimulus, with 2.5x higher amplitude than the standard deviation of the baseline fluorescence; and ii) the area under the curve (fluorescence trace) was larger than 0.11 (A. U. * sec). Finally, those ROIs that exhibited a consistent pattern of activation were selected as hotspots and used for further analysis of the fluorescence signal. Photobleaching was corrected for long acquisition protocols by fitting a line between pre-stimulus baseline and final fluorescence.

To determine the spread of the fluorescence change across the OHC cytoplasm, the response image when the fluorescence signal peaked was normalized to pre-stimulus fluorescence. Then, it was thresholded by fitting a bimodal distribution to the image histogram and the area and center of mass of the resulting mask calculated. Signal spread area was divided by the cell total area for comparison. The center of mass was used to determine the distance between afferent and efferent Ca2+ entry sites.

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2016-2155 to JDG), NIH Grant R01 DC001508 (PAF and ABE).

Competing interests

The authors declare no commercial interest

Acknowledgements

Maryline Beurg for advice on the use of ascorbic acid in the intracellular solution, and Joe Santos-Sacchi on OHCs recordings. Gianni Colotti for kindly sharing the plasmid vector for sorcin production, and J. Dempster for the use of WinWCP. Paul A. Fuchs for comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. ↵
    Art, J. J., Fettiplace, R., & Fuchs, P. A. (1984). Synaptic hyperpolarization and inhibition of turtle cochlear hair cells. The Journal of Physiology, 356(1), 525–550. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015481
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    Ashmore, J. F., & Ohmori, H. (1990). Control of intracellular calcium by ATP in isolated outer hair cells of the guinea-pig cochle. The Journal of Physiology, 428, 109–131.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    Babai, N., Morgans, C. W., & Thoreson, W. B. (2010). Calcium-induced calcium release contributes to synaptic release from mouse rod photoreceptors. Neuroscience, 165(4), 1447–1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.11.032
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Ballestero, J., Zorrilla de San Martín, J., Goutman, J. D., Elgoyhen, A. B., Fuchs, P. A., & Katz, E. (2011). Short-term synaptic plasticity regulates the level of olivocochlear inhibition to auditory hair cells. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(41), 14763–14774. https://doi.org/31/41/14763 [pii] doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6788-10.2011
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Beurg, M., Fettiplace, R., Nam, J., & Ricci, A. J. (2009). Localization of inner hair cell mechanotransducer channels using high-speed calcium imaging. Nature Neuroscience, 12(5), 553–558. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2295
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Beurg, M., Nam, J. H., Chen, Q., & Fettiplace, R. (2010). Calcium balance and mechanotransduction in rat cochlear hair cells. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00019.2010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Beurg, M., Safieddine, S., Roux, I., Bouleau, Y., Petit, C., & Dulon, D. (2008). Calcium- and Otoferlin-Dependent Exocytosis by Immature Outer Hair Cells. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28(8), 1798–1803. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEU-ROSCI.4653-07.2008
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Brown, M. C. (1989). Morphology and response properties of single olivocochlear fibers in the guinea pig. Hearing Research, 40(1–2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(89)90103-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Cadetti, L., Bryson, E. J., Ciccone, C. A., Rabl, K., & Thoreson, W. B. (2006). Calcium-induced calcium release in rod photoreceptor terminals boosts synaptic transmission during maintained depolarization. European Journal of Neuroscience, 23(11), 2983–2990. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04845.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Castellano-Muñoz, M., Schnee, M. E., & Ricci, A. J. (2016). Calcium-induced calcium release supports recruitment of synaptic vesicles in auditory hair cells. Journal of Neurophysiology, 115, 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00559.2015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Chen, Q., Mahendrasingam, S., Tickle, J. A., Hackney, C. M., Furness, D. N., & Fettiplace, R. (2012). The development, distribution and density of the plasma membrane calcium ATPase 2 calcium pump in rat cochlear hair cells. European Journal of Neuroscience, 36(3), 2302–2310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08159.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Colotti, G., Poser, E., Fiorillo, A., Genovese, I., Chiarini, V., & Ilari, A. (2014). Sorcin, a calcium binding protein involved in the multidrug resistance mechanisms in cancer cells. Molecules, 19(9), 13976–13989. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules190913976
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Dallos, P., He, D. Z. Z., Lin, X., Mehta, S., & Evans, B. N. (1997). Acetylcholine, Outer Hair Cell Electromotility, and the Cochlear Amplifier. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17(6), 2212–2226.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Dumont, R. A., Lins, U., Filoteo, A. G., Penniston, J. T., Kachar, B., & Gillespie, P. G. (2001). Plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase isoform 2a is the PMCA of hair bundles. Journal of Neuroscience, 21(14), 5066–5078. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.21-14-05066.2001
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Elgoyhen, A. B., Johnson, D. S., Boulter, J., Vetter, D. E., & Heinemann, S. F. (1994). Alpha 9: an acetylcholine receptor with novel pharmacological properties expressed in rat cochlear hair cells. Cell, 79(4), 705–715. https://doi.org/0092-8674(94)90555-X [pii]
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    Elgoyhen, A. B., Vetter, D. E., Katz, E., Rothlin, C. V, Heinemann, S. F., & Boulter, J. (2001). alpha10: a determinant of nicotinic cholinergic receptor function in mammalian vestibular and cochlear mechanosensory hair cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(6), 3501–3506. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.051622798
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Engström, H. (1958). On the double innervation of the sensory epithelia of the inner ear. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 49(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016485809134734
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Evans, M. G., Lagostena, L., Darbon, P., & Mammano, F. (2000). Cholinergic control of membrane conductance and intra-cellular free Ca2+ in outer hair cells of the guinea pig cochlea. Cell Calcium, 28(3), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1054/ceca.2000.0145S0143-4160(00)90145-3 [pii]
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    Farrell, E. F., Antaramian, A., Rueda, A. A., Gómez, A. M., & Valdivia, H. H. (2003). Sorcin Inhibits Calcium Release and Modulates Excitation-Contraction Coupling in the Heart. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278(36), 34660–34666. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M305931200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Fettiplace, R., & Nam, J.-H. (2018). Tonotopy in calcium homeostasis and vulnerability of cochlear hair cells. Hearing Research, xxxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HEARES.2018.11.002
  21. ↵
    Flores, E. N., Duggan, A., Madathany, T., Hogan, A. K., Márquez, F. G., Kumar, G., Seal, R. P., Edwards, R. H., Liberman, M. C., & García-Añoveros, J. (2015). A non-canonical pathway from cochlea to brain signals tissue-damaging noise. Current Biology, 25(5), 606–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Fowler, M. R., Colotti, G., Chiancone, E., Higuchi, Y., Seidler, T., & Smith, G. L. (2009). Complex modulation of L-type Ca2+ current inactivation by sorcin in isolated rabbit cardiomyocytes. Pflugers Archiv European Journal of Physiology, 457(5), 1049–1060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-008-0575-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Frolenkov, G. I., Mammano, F., Belyantseva, I. A., Coling, D., & Kachar, B. (2000). Two distinct Ca(2+)-dependent signaling pathways regulate the motor output of cochlear outer hair cells. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20(16), 5940–5948. https://doi.org/20/16/5940 [pii]
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Fuchs, P. A. (1996). Synaptic transmission at vertebrate hair cells. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 6(4), 514–519. https://doi.org/S0959-4388(96)80058-4 [pii]
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    Fuchs, P. A., & Glowatzki, E. (2015). Synaptic studies inform the functional diversity of cochlear afferents. Hearing Research, 330, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.007
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    Fuchs, P. A., Lehar, M., & Hiel, H. (2014). Ultrastructure of cisternal synapses on outer hair cells of the mouse cochlea. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 522(3), 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23478
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Furness, D. N., & Hackney, C. M. (2006). The structure and composition of the stereociliary bundle of vertebrate hair cells. In Springer Handbook of Auditory Research. Vertebrate hair cells. Springer US.
  28. ↵
    Galambos, R. (1956). Suppression of auditory nerve activity by stimulation of efferent fibers to cochlea. Journal of Neuro-physiology, 19(5), 424–437.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    Giacomello, M., de Mario, A., Lopreiato, R., Primerano, S., Campeol, M., Brini, M., & Carafoli, E. (2011). Mutations in PMCA2 and hereditary deafness: A molecular analysis of the pump defect. Cell Calcium, 50(6), 569–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2011.09.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    Gifford, M. L., & Guinan, J. J. (1987). Effects of electrical stimulation of medial olivocochlear neurons on ipsilateral and contralateral cochlear responses. Hearing Research, 29(2–3), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(87)90166-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    Gómez-Casati, M. E., Fuchs, P. A., Elgoyhen, A. B., & Katz, E. (2005). Biophysical and pharmacological characterization of nicotinic cholinergic receptors in rat cochlear inner hair cells. The Journal of Physiology, 566(Pt 1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2005.087155
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    Goutman, J. D., Fuchs, P. A., & Glowatzki, E. (2005). Facilitating efferent inhibition of inner hair cells in the cochlea of the neonatal rat. The Journal of Physiology, 566(Pt 1), 49–59. https://doi.org/jphysiol.2005.087460 [pii] doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2005.087460
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    Grant, L., Slapnick, S., Kennedy, H. J., & Hackney, C. M. (2006). Ryanodine receptor localisation in the mammalian cochlea: an ultrastructural study. Hearing Research, 219(1–2), 101–109. https://doi.org/S0378-5955(06)00156-0 [pii] doi:10.1016/j.heares.2006.06.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    1. R. R. F. and
    2. A. N. P. Peter Dallos
    Guinan, J. J. (1996). Physiology of Olivocochlear Efferents. In R. R. F. and A. N. P. Peter Dallos (Ed.), The Cochlea(Vol. 8). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
  35. ↵
    Guinan, J. J. (2006). Olivocochlear Efferents : Anatomy, Physiology, Function, and the Measurement of Efferent Effects in Humans. Ear & Hearing, 27(6), 589–607.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    Hackney, C. M., Mahendrasingam, S., Penn, A., & Fettiplace, R. (2005). The Concentrations of Calcium Buffering Proteins in Mammalian Cochlear Hair Cells. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(34), 7867–7875. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEU-ROSCI.1196-05.2005
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Ikeda, K., Saito, Y., Nishiyama, A., & Takasaka, T. (1992). Na+-Ca2+ exchange in the isolated cochlear outer hair cells of the guinea-pig studied by fluorescence image microscopy. European Journal of Physiology, 420 (5–6), 493–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00374624
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    Im, G. J., Moskowitz, H. S., Lehar, M., Hiel, H., & Fuchs, P. A. (2014). Synaptic Calcium Regulation in Hair Cells of the Chicken Basilar Papilla. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(50), 16688–16697. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2615-14.2014
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Johnson, S. L., Beurg, M., Marcotti, W., & Fettiplace, R. (2011). Prestin-driven cochlear amplification is not limited by the outer hair cell membrane time constant. Neuron, 70(6), 1143–1154. https://doi.org/S0896-6273(11)00399-0 [pii] doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.04.024
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    Johnson, S. L., & Marcotti, W. (2008). Biophysical properties of CaV1.3 calcium channels in gerbil inner hair cells. The Journal of Physiology, 586(4), 1029–1042. https://doi.org/jphysiol.2007.145219 [pii] doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2007.145219
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    Knirsch, M., Brandt, N., Braig, C., Kuhn, S., Hirt, B., Münkner, S., Knipper, M., & Engel, J. (2007). Persistence of Ca(v)1.3 Ca2+ channels in mature outer hair cells supports outer hair cell afferent signaling. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(24), 6442–6451. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5364-06.2007
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    Kujawa, S. G., & Liberman, M. C. (1999). Long-term sound conditioning enhances cochlear sensitivity. Journal of Neuro-physiology, 82(2), 863–873. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1999.82.2.863
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    Lelli, A., Perin, P., Martini, M., Ciubotaru, C. D., Prigioni, I., Valli, P., Rossi, M. L., & Mammano, F. (2003). Presynaptic calcium stores modulate afferent release in vestibular hair cells. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(17), 6894–6903. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.23-17-06894.2003
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Li, Y., Liu, H., Giffen, K. P., Chen, L., Beisel, K. W., & He, D. Z. Z. (2018). Transcriptomes of cochlear inner and outer hair cells from adult mice. Scientific Data, 5, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.199
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    Liberman, M. C. (1988). Physiology of cochlear efferent and afferent neurons: Direct comparisons in the same animal. Hearing Research, 34(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(88)90105-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    Liberman, M. C. (1990). Effects of chronic cochlear de-efferentation on auditory-nerve response. Hearing Research, 49(1–3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(90)90105-X
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    Lioudyno, M. I., Hiel, H., Kong, J., Katz, E., Waldman, E., Parameshwaran-Iyer, S., Glowatzki, E., & Fuchs, P. A. (2004). A “synaptoplasmic cistern” mediates rapid inhibition of cochlear hair cells. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24(49), 11160–11164. https://doi.org/24/49/11160 [pii] doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3674-04.2004
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    Liu, C., Glowatzki, E., & Fuchs, P. A. (2015). Unmyelinated type II afferent neurons report cochlear damage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(47), 14723–14727. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515228112
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    Lokuta, A. J., Meyers, M. B., Sander, P. R., Fishman, G. I., & Valdivia, H. H. (1997). Modulation of cardiac ryanodine receptors by Sorcin. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272(40), 25333–25338. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.40.25333
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    Mammano, F., Frolenkov, G. I., Lagostena, L., Belyantseva, I. A., Kurc, M., Dodane, V., Colavita, A., & Kachar, B. (1999). ATP-induced Ca2+ release in cochlear outer hair cells: Localization of an inositol triphosphate-gated Ca2+ store to the base of the sensory hair bundle. Journal of Neuroscience, 19(16), 6918–6929. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.19-16-06918.1999
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    Matsumoto, T., Hisamatsu, Y., Ohkusa, T., Inoue, N., Sato, T., Suzuki, S., Ikeda, Y., & Matsuzaki, M. (2005). Sorcin interacts with sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase and modulates excitation-contraction coupling in the heart. Basic Research in Cardiology, 100(3), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-005-0518-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    Meyers, M. B., Puri, T. S., Chien, A. J., Gao, T., Hsu, P. H., Hosey, M. M., & Fishman, G. I. (1998). Sorcin associates with the pore-forming subunit of voltage-dependent L-type Ca2+ channels. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 273(30), 18930–18935. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.30.18930
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    Meyers, M. B., Zamparelli, C., Verzili, D., Dicker, A. P., Blanck, T. J. J., & Chiancone, E. (1995). Calcium-dependent translocation of sorcin to membranes: functional relevance in contractile tissue. FEBS Letters, 357(3), 230–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(94)01338-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. ↵
    Moglie, M. J., Fuchs, P. A., Elgoyhen, A. B., & Goutman, J. D. (2018). Compartmentalization of antagonistic Ca2+ signals in developing cochlear hair cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(9), E2095–E2104. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719077115
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    Nicholls, D. G. (2005). Mitochondria and calcium signaling. Cell Calcium, 38, 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2005.06.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. ↵
    Oliver, D., Klocker, N., Schuck, J., Baukrowitz, T., Ruppersberg, J. P., & Fakler, B. (2000). Gating of Ca2+-activated K+ channels controls fast inhibitory synaptic transmission at auditory outer hair cells. Neuron, 26(3), 595–601. https://doi.org/S0896-6273(00)81197-6 [pii]
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. ↵
    Ranum, P. T., Goodwin, A. T., Yoshimura, H., Kolbe, D. L., Walls, W. D., Koh, J. Y., He, D. Z. Z., & Smith, R. J. H. (2019). Insights into the Biology of Hearing and Deafness Revealed by Single-Cell RNA Sequencing. Cell Reports, 26(11), 3160-3171.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.02.053
    OpenUrl
  58. ↵
    Robertson, D., & Gummer, M. (1985). Physiological and morphological characterization of efferent neurones in the guinea pig cochlea. Hearing Research, 20, 63–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. ↵
    Saito, K. (1980). Fine structure of the sensory epithelium of the guinea pig organ of corti: afferent and efferent synapses of hair cells. Journal of Ultrasructure Research, 71(2), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5320(80)90108-2
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    Saito, K. (1990). Freeze-Fracture Organization of Hair Cell Synapses in the Sensory Epithelium of Guinea Pig Organ of Corti. Journal of Electron Microscopy Technique, 15, 173–186.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. ↵
    Sakaguchi, N., Henzl, M. T., Thalmann, I., Thalmann, R., & Schulte, B. A. (1998). Oncomodulin is expressed exclusively by outer hair cells in the organ of Corti. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 46(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/002215549804600105
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. ↵
    Smith, C. A., & Sjöstrand, F. S. (1961). Structure of the nerve endings on the external hair cells of the guinea pig cochlea as studied by serial sections. Journal of Ultrasructure Research, 5(6), 523–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5320(61)80025-7
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    Sridhar, T. S., Brown, M. C., & Sewell, W. F. (1997). Unique Postsynaptic Signaling at the Hair Cell Efferent Synapse Permits Calcium to Evoke Changes on Two Time Scales. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17(1), 428–437.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    Tong, B., Hornak, A. J., Maison, S. F., Ohlemiller, K. K., Liberman, M. C., & Simmons, D. D. (2016). Oncomodulin, an EF-hand Ca2+ buffer, is critical for maintaining cochlear function in mice. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(5), 1631–1635. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3311-15.2016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    Tucker, T., & Fettiplace, R. (1995). Confocal Imaging of Calcium Microdomains and Calcium Extrusion in Turtle Hair Cells. Neuron, 15(6), 1323–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(95)90011-X
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    Vattino, L. G., Wedemeyer, C., Elgoyhen, A. B., & Katz, E. (2020). Functional Postnatal Maturation of the Medial Olivo-cochlear Efferent –Outer Hair Cell Synapse. The Journal of Neuroscience, 40(25), 4842–4857.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. ↵
    1. D. B. Webster,
    2. A. N. Popper, &
    3. R. R. Fay
    Warr, W. B. (1992). Organization of the olivocochlear efferent system in mammals. In D. B. Webster, A. N. Popper, & R. R. Fay (Eds.), The Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neuroanatomy. Springer-Verlag.
  68. ↵
    Weisstaub, N., Vetter, D. E., Elgoyhen, A. B., & Katz, E. (2002). The alpha9alpha10 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is permeable to and is modulated by divalent cations. Hearing Research, 167(1–2), 122–135. https://doi.org/S0378595502003805 [pii]
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  69. ↵
    Wong, A. B., Jing, Z., Rutherford, M. A., Frank, T., Strenzke, N., Moser, T., Rutherford, M. A., Frank, T., Strenzke, N., & Moser, T. (2013). Concurrent maturation of inner hair cell synaptic Ca2+ influx and auditory nerve spontaneous activity around hearing onset in mice. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(26), 10661–10666. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEU-ROSCI.1215-13.2013
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    Yamoah, E. N., Lumpkin, E. A., Dumont, R. A., Smith, P. J. S., Hudspeth, A. J., & Gillespie, P. G. (1998). Plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase extrudes Ca2+ from hair cell stereocilia. Journal of Neuroscience, 18(2), 610–624. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-02-00610.1998
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. ↵
    Zachary, S., Nowak, N., Vyas, P., Bonanni, L., & Fuchs, P. A. (2018). Voltage-gated calcium influx modifies cholinergic inhibition of inner hair cells in the immature rat cochlea. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(25), 5677–5687. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0230-18.2018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    Zamparelli, C., Macquaide, N., Colotti, G., Verzili, D., Seidler, T., Smith, G. L., & Chiancone, E. (2010). Activation of the cardiac Na+-Ca2+ exchanger by sorcin via the interaction of the respective Ca2+-binding domains. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 49(1), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.03.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 02, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Synaptic contributions to cochlear outer hair cell Ca2+ homeostasis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Synaptic contributions to cochlear outer hair cell Ca2+ homeostasis
Marcelo J. Moglie, Diego L. Wengier, A. Belén Elgoyhen, Juan D. Goutman
bioRxiv 2020.08.02.233205; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.02.233205
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Synaptic contributions to cochlear outer hair cell Ca2+ homeostasis
Marcelo J. Moglie, Diego L. Wengier, A. Belén Elgoyhen, Juan D. Goutman
bioRxiv 2020.08.02.233205; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.02.233205

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2548)
  • Biochemistry (5000)
  • Bioengineering (3507)
  • Bioinformatics (15301)
  • Biophysics (6946)
  • Cancer Biology (5436)
  • Cell Biology (7788)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4565)
  • Ecology (7192)
  • Epidemiology (2059)
  • Evolutionary Biology (10270)
  • Genetics (7543)
  • Genomics (9846)
  • Immunology (4909)
  • Microbiology (13336)
  • Molecular Biology (5173)
  • Neuroscience (29625)
  • Paleontology (203)
  • Pathology (842)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1471)
  • Physiology (2156)
  • Plant Biology (4794)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1018)
  • Synthetic Biology (1343)
  • Systems Biology (4028)
  • Zoology (773)