Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Structural and molecular basis for protein-stimulated ribosomal frameshifting in Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus

View ORCID ProfileChris H. Hill, View ORCID ProfileGeorgia Cook, Sawsan Napthine, Anuja Kibe, View ORCID ProfileKatherine Brown, View ORCID ProfileNeva Caliskan, View ORCID ProfileAndrew E. Firth, View ORCID ProfileStephen C. Graham, View ORCID ProfileIan Brierley
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.11.245068
Chris H. Hill
1Division of Virology, Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. CB2 0QQ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chris H. Hill
Georgia Cook
1Division of Virology, Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. CB2 0QQ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Georgia Cook
Sawsan Napthine
1Division of Virology, Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. CB2 0QQ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anuja Kibe
2Helmholtz Institute for RNA-based Infection Research (HIRI), Josef-Schneider-Straße 2/D15, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katherine Brown
1Division of Virology, Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. CB2 0QQ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Katherine Brown
Neva Caliskan
2Helmholtz Institute for RNA-based Infection Research (HIRI), Josef-Schneider-Straße 2/D15, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
3Medical Faculty, Julius-Maximilians University Würzburg, 97074, Würzburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Neva Caliskan
Andrew E. Firth
1Division of Virology, Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. CB2 0QQ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrew E. Firth
Stephen C. Graham
1Division of Virology, Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. CB2 0QQ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephen C. Graham
Ian Brierley
1Division of Virology, Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. CB2 0QQ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ian Brierley
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The 2A protein of Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV) is required for stimulating programmed −1 ribosomal frameshifting (PRF) during infection. However, the amino acid sequence of TMEV 2A shares only 27% identity with the 2A orthologue from the related cardiovirus encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) for which a structure has been recently determined. Here we present the X-ray crystal structure of TMEV 2A, revealing that, despite the low sequence identity, the overall beta-shell architecture is retained, and the location of previously described mutations on this structure suggests a common RNA binding mode. We determine the minimal stimulatory element in the viral RNA required for 2A binding and show that 2A binds to this element with 1:1 stoichiometry and nanomolar affinity. We also demonstrate a critical role for bases upstream of the originally predicted stem-loop, providing evidence that an alternative pseudoknot-like conformation recently demonstrated for EMCV is a conserved feature of cardiovirus stimulatory elements. We go on to examine frameshifting in infected cells by ribosome profiling and metabolic labelling. We observe PRF efficiencies of up to 85%, highlighting this as the most efficient example of −1 PRF in any natural system thus far characterised. Furthermore, we document a series of ribosomal pauses in and around the site of PRF with potential implications for our understanding of translational control in cardioviruses.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 11, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Structural and molecular basis for protein-stimulated ribosomal frameshifting in Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Structural and molecular basis for protein-stimulated ribosomal frameshifting in Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus
Chris H. Hill, Georgia Cook, Sawsan Napthine, Anuja Kibe, Katherine Brown, Neva Caliskan, Andrew E. Firth, Stephen C. Graham, Ian Brierley
bioRxiv 2020.08.11.245068; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.11.245068
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Structural and molecular basis for protein-stimulated ribosomal frameshifting in Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus
Chris H. Hill, Georgia Cook, Sawsan Napthine, Anuja Kibe, Katherine Brown, Neva Caliskan, Andrew E. Firth, Stephen C. Graham, Ian Brierley
bioRxiv 2020.08.11.245068; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.11.245068

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Molecular Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3514)
  • Biochemistry (7371)
  • Bioengineering (5347)
  • Bioinformatics (20329)
  • Biophysics (10048)
  • Cancer Biology (7781)
  • Cell Biology (11353)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6454)
  • Ecology (9985)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13361)
  • Genetics (9377)
  • Genomics (12616)
  • Immunology (7729)
  • Microbiology (19119)
  • Molecular Biology (7478)
  • Neuroscience (41163)
  • Paleontology (301)
  • Pathology (1235)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2142)
  • Physiology (3183)
  • Plant Biology (6885)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1276)
  • Synthetic Biology (1900)
  • Systems Biology (5329)
  • Zoology (1091)