Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Do substrate roughness and gap distance impact gap-bridging strategies in arboreal chameleons

View ORCID ProfileAllison M. Luger, View ORCID ProfileVermeylen Vincent, View ORCID ProfileHerrel Anthony, View ORCID ProfileAdriaens Dominique
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.21.260596
Allison M. Luger
1Ghent University, Evolutionary Morphology of Vertebrates – Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Allison M. Luger
  • For correspondence: Allison.Luger@UGent.be
Vermeylen Vincent
1Ghent University, Evolutionary Morphology of Vertebrates – Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vermeylen Vincent
Herrel Anthony
2C.N.R.S./M.N.H.N. Département Adaptations du Vivant, Bâtiment d’Anatomie Comparée – Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Herrel Anthony
Adriaens Dominique
1Ghent University, Evolutionary Morphology of Vertebrates – Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Adriaens Dominique
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Chameleons are well-equipped for an arboreal lifestyle, having ‘zygodactylous’ hands and feet as well as a fully prehensile tail. However, to what degree tail use is preferred over autopod prehension has been largely neglected. Using an indoor experimental set-up, where chameleons had to cross gaps of varying distances, we tested the effect of substrate diameter and roughness on tail use in Chamaeleo calyptratus. Our results show that when crossing greater distances, C. calyptratus is more likely to use its tail for additional stability. The animals were able to cross greater distances (up to 1 75 times the shoulder-hip length) on perches with a rougher surface. We saw that depending on the distance of the gap, chameleons would change how they use their prehensile tails when crossing. With shorter gaps the tails either do not touch, or only touch the perch without coiling around it. With larger distances the tails are fully coiled around the perch, and with the largest distances additionally they reposition the hind legs, shifting them towards the end of the perch. Males were able to cross relatively greater distances than females, likely due to their larger size and strength.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • Cite as: Luger, A.M., Vermeylen, V., Herrel, A. and Adriaens, D. (2020) Do substrate roughness and gap distance impact gap-bridging strategies in arboreal chameleons? bioRxiv, 2020.08.21.260596, ver. 3 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI Zoology. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.21.260596

  • This article has been peer-reviewed and recommended by Peer Community in Zoology doi: https://doi.org/10.24072/pci.zool.100005

  • Version 3 of this preprint has been peer-reviewed and recommended by Peer Community In Zoology (https://doi.org/10.24072/pci.zool.100005)

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 07, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Do substrate roughness and gap distance impact gap-bridging strategies in arboreal chameleons
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Do substrate roughness and gap distance impact gap-bridging strategies in arboreal chameleons
Allison M. Luger, Vermeylen Vincent, Herrel Anthony, Adriaens Dominique
bioRxiv 2020.08.21.260596; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.21.260596
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Do substrate roughness and gap distance impact gap-bridging strategies in arboreal chameleons
Allison M. Luger, Vermeylen Vincent, Herrel Anthony, Adriaens Dominique
bioRxiv 2020.08.21.260596; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.21.260596

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Animal Behavior and Cognition
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4095)
  • Biochemistry (8784)
  • Bioengineering (6490)
  • Bioinformatics (23378)
  • Biophysics (11763)
  • Cancer Biology (9165)
  • Cell Biology (13269)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7420)
  • Ecology (11380)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15111)
  • Genetics (10408)
  • Genomics (14017)
  • Immunology (9135)
  • Microbiology (22087)
  • Molecular Biology (8792)
  • Neuroscience (47419)
  • Paleontology (350)
  • Pathology (1422)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2483)
  • Physiology (3710)
  • Plant Biology (8060)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1433)
  • Synthetic Biology (2213)
  • Systems Biology (6020)
  • Zoology (1251)