Abstract
Heart failure is the number one cause of mortality in the world, contributed to by cardiovascular disease. Many diseases of the heart muscle are caused by mutations in genes encoding contractile proteins, including cardiac actin mutations. Zebrafish are an advantageous system for modeling cardiac disease since embryos can develop without a functional heart. However, genome duplication in the teleost lineage creates a unique obstacle by increasing the number of genes involved in heart development. Four actin genes are expressed in the zebrafish heart: acta1b; actc1c; and duplicates of actc1a on chromosome 19 and 20. Here, we characterize the actin genes involved in early zebrafish heart development using in situ hybridization and CRISPR targeting to determine which gene is best to model changes seen in human patients with heart disease. The actc1a and acta1b genes are predominant during embryonic heart development, resulting in severe cardiac phenotypes when targeted with CRISPRs. Targeting these two cardiac genes with CRISPRs simultaneously results in a more severe phenotype than their individual counterparts, with the results suggesting compensation for lost actin genes by other actin paralogues. Given the duplication of the actc1a gene, we recommend acta1b as the best gene for targeted cardiac actin research.
Introduction
Heart failure is the number one cause of death worldwide, with cardiovascular disease being a major contributor1. Cardiomyopathies are called “diseases of the sarcomere” because mutations in genes encoding the proteins of the sarcomere contractile machinery are a main cause of cardiomyopathies, including myosin, troponin, tropomyosin, cardiac myosin binding protein C, and cardiac actin (ACTC)2,3. Recent efforts have targeted some of these proteins for drug development to treat cardiomyopathies4.
Testing drugs with a whole animal system is vital for developing treatments for diseases. We seek to understand how changes in the cardiac actin gene (ACTC) in people lead to different cardiomyopathies. We have studied several ACTC variants at the molecular level5–9; however, our goal is to integrate our molecular knowledge of ACTC biochemical changes with physiological dysfunction in a whole animal by gene editing the cardiac actin gene in the model organism.
The zebrafish is an excellent model for cardiac research10,11: their embryos are transparent with heartbeats detectable at 24 hours post-fertilization (hpf), and they do not require a fully functional heart for viability for the first 5 days post-fertilization (dpf) due to diffusion of oxygen through the tissues; hence, embryonic lethal heart mutations seen in mammals can be studied more readily in zebrafish. In addition, zebrafish are small and easy to maintain, with quick growth, large numbers of progeny, and the genome of the Tübingen (Tü) strain has been completely sequenced.
However, unlike the single a-cardiac actin gene (ACTC) in humans, the zebrafish genome contains four actin genes that are expressed in the heart (zfactc genes): acta1b; actc1c; and duplicates of actcla on chromosome 19 and 20. Cardiac-related effects of mutations in actc1a and acta1b have been studied previously12–14, while we identified and performed preliminary characterization of actc1c15.
Shih et al. (2015) performed transcriptome analysis of actc1a and acta1b in embryonic (96 hpf) and adult (6 month-old) zebrafish hearts, showing higher actalb expression in early development while actc1a is expressed at higher levels during adulthood, suggesting developmental regulation of zfactc genes16. Functional and spatiotemporal characterization of these zfactc genes is needed to assign a cardiac designation with high confidence.
While early expression of actc1a and acta1b has been characterized with in situ hybridization (ISH), this previous work focused primarily on the somites of the tail. The actcla gene was the subject of expression characterization in the somites and included the heart at the 1-4 somites to 7 dpf stages16–18, with acta1b ISH analysis focused on the somites18–20. Our preliminary characterization of actc1c showed expression in the heart and the somites at 36 hpf15. Owing to teleost gene duplication, duplicate actc1a genes located on chromosomes 19 and 20 are identical in sequence up to about 600 bp before the start codon, making designing in situ hybridization probes or CRISPR sgRNA that distinguish between the duplicate genes extremely challenging.
To determine the zfactc genes necessary for zebrafish heart development and function and which is the best to edit and model human cardiac diseases resulting from ACTC mutations, we studied the spatiotemporal expression of these genes in the heart, employing in situ hybridization in embryos from 24 hpf to 96 hpf and observing the functional consequences of CRISPRs targeting the genes. All three zfactc genes are expressed in the heart at initial stages of heart development; however, the actc1a and acta1b genes are the predominant paralogues expressed during embryonic heart development and result in severe cardiac phenotypes when targeted with CRISPRs. The actc1c gene seems to be a minor player, with its expression occurring primarily in the first 2 dpf. At the same time, CRISPR work targeting actc1c results in a cardiac phenotype, suggesting that this gene plays a role in cardiac development. Targeting two zfactc genes with CRISPRs simultaneously results in a more severe phenotype than their individual counterparts, with the results suggesting compensation for lost zfactc genes by other actin paralogues. Given the gene duplication of the actc1a gene, we suggest that the acta1b gene is the best candidate for cardiac actin research.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
All protocols were carried out according the guidelines stipulated by the Canadian Council for Animal Care and the University of Guelph’s Office of Research Animal Care Committee (Animal Use Protocol license: 4309)
Zebrafish Maintenance
Adult zebrafish (Tübingen strain) were maintained according to guidelines by the Canadian Council on Animal Care and kept on a 12/12-hour light and dark cycle at 28°C. Adults were fed brine shrimp (Hikari Bio-Pure Brine Shrimp) and fish flakes (Omega One) daily in a cycled-water aquatic facility. Embryos were collected from crossing wild-type adult zebrafish and grown at 28°C in zebrafish embryo medium21 for up to 6 days prior to fixation.
In situ hybridization
Zebrafish embryos were staged and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS overnight at 4°C. Cardiac actin probes were cloned into TOPO-plasmids (Thermofisher) for probe synthesis (Table 1). Antisense RNA probes were synthesized from the TOPO construct using SP6 RNA polymerase (Thermofisher).
Primers used to amplify in situ hybridization probes.
In situ hybridizations were carried out as previously described22 using an Intavis In Situ Pro Liquid Handling Robot (Intavis, Koeln) with the exception of the proteinase K digestion and staining reaction steps, which were performed by hand.
CRISPR sgRNA Preparation and Microinjections
CRISPR single guide RNA (sgRNA) was designed for actc1a, actc1c and acta1b using CHOPCHOP (https://chopchop.cbu.uib.no; danRer11/GRCz11)23, selecting the sgRNA that returned the fewest off-target sites (Table 2). Given the extreme identity between the two actc1a genes physically located on chromosomes 19 and 20, one sgRNA was designed that targets both genes.
CRISPR single guide RNA designed to target the zfactc genes.
sgRNA was synthesized using SP6 RNA Polymerase (Thermofisher). Cas9 (1 mg/ml; CP01-200, PNA Bio Inc) and fresh sgRNA (1 ug) was injected into 1-cell zebrafish embryos that were allowed to recover in zebrafish embryo medium at 28°C. Zebrafish embryos were monitored daily for the appearance of phenotypes and imaged using an iPhone 6 camera (8 megapixel, 1080p HD video at 60 fps; Apple Inc.)
High Resolution Melt Curve Analysis Screening and Sequencing
For screening using High Resolution Melt Curves (HRM), genomic DNA was extracted from zebrafish embryos by individually lysing tissue in 10 ul of 0.5 M NaOH at 95°C for 45 mins, followed by neutralization with 0.2 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8). DNA was diluted 1/20 for best amplification results during HRM. The HRM amplicons were designed to be no larger than 200 bp and centered on the CRISPR-Cas9 cut site (Table 3). High Resolution Melt Curves were produced using the saturating dye, EvaGreen (Type-it HRM PCR Kit, Qiagen) and the manufacturers recommended protocol for use. HRM was performed using a StepOne Plus Thermocycler (Thermofisher) and results interpreted using High Resolution Melt Software v3.0.1 (Thermofisher).
Primers employed for high resolution melting analysis of zfactc amplicons.
Embryos that demonstrated melt curves with melting temperature at 50% of the maximum temperature (Melt50) values that differed at least 0.5°C from their un-injected control siblings were sent for sequencing. Positive HRM samples were isolated using a PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and submitted to the University of Guelph, Agriculture and Food Laboratory for Sanger Sequencing. Sequences were analyzed using TIDE24 and Gear-Indigo (https://www.gear-genomics.com) to identify nucleotide changes between un-injected CRISPR control and CRISPR-injected samples.
Heart Rate Acquisition and Analysis
The heart rates of all CRISPR-injected embryos were video-recorded daily from 1-6 dpf using an iPhone 6 camera (8 megapixel, 1080p HD video at 60 fps; Apple Inc.). Captured videos were analyzed with DanioScope software (Noldus) to determine heart rates. Genomic DNA was extracted from these embryos and screened for mutations using HRM as above and hits were sent for Sanger Sequencing. Embryos with mutated sequences had their heart rates graphed in comparison to wild-type controls.
Results
actc1a and acta1b are the predominant actin paralogues expressed during striated muscle development
To identify which actin paralogues are necessary for heart development, we analyzed the expression of actc1a, acta1b and actc1c with in situ hybridization (ISH) during early stages of embryogenesis (Fig 1). At 24 hpf, all 3 actin genes are expressed in the linear heart tube (Fig 1, A&B; white arrowheads), although actc1c appears to be limited to ventricle cardiomyocytes (Fig 1C)25. actc1a is expressed in the zebrafish heart at all stages examined with the strongest expression observed in the ventricle (Fig 1, A,D,E,J,K,P&O). The continued expression of actc1a throughout embryogenesis suggests actc1a is required for cardiac muscle development.
At 24 hpf, in situ hybridization reveals somite and heart tube-restricted expression of actc1a (A), acta1b (B) and actc1c (C). By 36 hpf, actc1a becomes restricted further to the ventricle (D, E) while acta1b is mainly expressed in the ventricle and faintly in the atrium (F, G). Actc1C demonstrates a ubiquitous expression, with the exception of the heart, by 36 hpf (H, I). At 48 hpf, actc1a (J, K) and acta1b (L, M) share nearly identical expression in the heart and somites with the atrium displaying low expression for both paralogues. By 48 hpf, actc1c expression is only observed in the pectoral fin buds (N, O). Actcla expression becomes restricted to the heart and head muscles at 72 hpf (P, Q). At 72 hpf, acta1b is only expressed in the head muscles and somites with no observable expression in the heart (R, S). By 72 hpf, actc1c is not expressed in the striated muscle of the developing zebrafish embryo (T, U). (white arrowheads = heart expression; v = ventricle, a = atrium; white dotted lines outline ventricle; blue dotted lines outline atrium).
Similar to actc1a, acta1b is also expressed in the heart for significant stages of heart development. acta1b is expressed strongly in the ventricle and weakly in the atrium from 24-48 hpf (Fig 1, B,F,G,L&M). By 72 hpf, acta1b is no longer expressed in the heart and is restricted to the skeletal muscle of the head and trunk (Fig 1, R&S). Unlike actc1a, acta1b is only expressed during the stages of heart morphogenesis and cardiac sarcomere formation, suggesting acta1b may be required for the assembly but not the maintenance of the zebrafish heart muscle.
actc1c expression is not observed in the heart at stages beyond 24 hpf (Fig 1, C,H&I) and ceases expression in skeletal muscle by 48 hpf (Fig 1, N,O,T&U). This lack of cardiac expression after 24 hpf suggests that actc1c is not required throughout heart development but does not rule out the possibility that actc1c may be required for the initial formation of cardiac sarcomeres in the ventricle.
actc1a, acta1b and actc1c are all required for normal heart development and function
We demonstrated that actc1a, acta1b and actc1c are expressed at the earliest stages of heart development at 24 hpf but have different temporal and spatial expression patterns from 36-72 hpf (Fig 1). Since all three paralogues were expressed in the developing linear heart tube, we tested the necessity for each actin gene in heart development by disrupting each paralogue using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.
All CRISPR/Cas9-injected embryos displayed similar cardiac phenotypes ranging from normal to significantly reduced heart rates, and unlooped and minor to severely degenerated hearts. Embryos injected with either acta1b- or actc1c-targeting CRISPR sgRNA displayed pericardial edema when compared to mock-injected and embryos injected with actc1a-targeting CRISPR sgRNA embryos at 72 hpf (Fig 2, A-D; black arrowheads). At 96 hpf, actc1a-CRISPR-injected embryos demonstrated pericardial edema like acta1b or actc1c-injected embryos (Fig 2, C-F).
When compared to mock-injected control embryos (A), embryos injected with actc1a-targeting CRISPR sgRNA (B) displayed only a slight pericardial edema while embryos injected with acta1b-targeting (C) or actc1c- targeting CRISPR sgRNA (D) demonstrated pericardial edema (black arrowheads) and incompletely looped hearts. By 96 hpf, embryos injected with actc1a-targeting CRISPR sgRNA exhibited pericardial (black arrowhead) and yolk sac edema when compared to mock-injected control embryos (E, F).
Although the severity of cardiac phenotypes varied across embryos injected with the same CRISPR sgRNA, we suspect genetic mosaicism produced by CRISPR/Cas9 cutting and non-homologous end joining repair accounts for this variation.
Simultaneous CRISPR/Cas9 against actc1a and acta1b results in more severe cardiac phenotypes
We have shown that actc1a is expressed at all early stages of heart development when compared to either acta1b or actc1c, yet a actc1a-CRISPR-mutant phenotype appears later than the cardiac phenotypes of acta1b or actc1c (Fig 2). Based on these data, we hypothesize that acta1b and possibly actc1c, compensates for the absence of actc1a protein in initial stages of development during acta1b expression up to 72 hpf. To test this hypothesis, we injected embryos with both actc1a- and acta1b- targeting CRISPR sgRNA and compared their heart rates to wild-type and embryos injected with either actc1a- or acta1b-targeting CRISPR sgRNA alone. We would expect double actc1a-acta1b mutants to display heart rates similar to acta1b-CRISPR mutant heart rates at 72 hpf since expression of both predominant cardiac actin genes is absent and acta1b cannot compensate for actc1a.
At 48 and 72 hpf, the double actc1a-acta1b-targeting CRISPR sgRNA-injected embryos did not display significantly different heart rates when compared to wild-type, actc1a- or acta1b- targeting CRISPR sgRNA-injected embryos (Fig 3). However, by 96 hpf, the average heart rates of actc1a-acta1b-targeting CRISPR sgRNA-injected embryos were significantly lower than the heart rates observed with wild-type embryos. The difference between wild-type and zfactc-targeting CRISPR sgRNA-injected embryo heart rates continues to increase as embryogenesis progresses, suggesting that the hearts of embryos injected with zfactc-targeting CRISPR sgRNA do not continue proper development.
The heart rates of wild-type and genotype-confirmed embryos injected with cardiac actin-targeting CRISPR sgRNA were recorded daily from 2-5 days. Individual (circles) and average (lines) heart rates are displayed for each genotype at every age. With the exception of 72 hpf, embryos injected with cardiac actin-targeting CRISPR sgRNA demonstrate a lower average heart rate when compared to control wild-type embryos. By 96 hpf, the heart rate of the double actc1a-acta1b-targeting CRISPR sgRNA-injected embryos have significantly lower heart rates than embryos injected with either actc1a- or acta1b-targeting CRISPR sgRNA. (genotype confirmed: wild-type, n=2; actc1a/acta1b, n=3; actc1a, n=6, acta1b, n=6).
Discussion
Zebrafish are an excellent system for modeling human cardiac disease and dissecting the mechanisms behind disease progression and treatment. However, a genome duplication event unique to the teleost lineage can complicate specific gene targeting studies due to genetic compensation. Zebrafish cardiac actin genes are no exception to this complication with 4 identified genes (actc1a (chromosome 19 and 20), acta1b and actc1c) contributing to heart development. Based on in situ expression (Fig 1), and previous data16, actc1a has continuous transcription in the heart throughout development; however, actc1a is present as two identical genes on chromosomes 19 and 20. Sequencing of these regions reveals extreme sequence identity between the two occurrences of actc1a, so modifying and analyzing one actc1a isoform is very challenging without modifying one isoform first to differentiate the two.
acta1b is expressed in both chambers during the initial stages of heart development that include formation of the cardiac sarcomeres and heart looping. Additionally, there is only one acta1b gene, making targeting and analysis of human cardiac mutations more efficient and feasible than actc1a (19/20). actc1c demonstrated a very brief expression profile in the zebrafish heart, suggesting it is not as necessary for heart development as the other zfactc genes.
When we combine the expression profiles with the phenotypes of CRISPR-targeted zfactc genes, acta1b is required for normal heart development. When acta1b was targeted by CRISPR, cardiac phenotypes manifested early and became progressively worse over time (Fig 2 and 3). Targeting actc1a (19/20) with CRISPR resulted in phenotypes that appeared later than acta1b but followed a similar phenotype progression. The phenotypic delay with actc1a targeting suggests that acta1b and/or actc1c compensate for the lack of functional actc1a. We also considered that one wild-type isoform of actc1c (19 or 20) could still be expressed in these CRISPR mutants. However, due to the identical sequences of the two actc1a genes, we would hypothesize that we achieved a minimum threshold for completely modifying both actc1a genes within CRISPR-injected embryos. Simultaneously targeting acta1b and actc1a with CRISPR/Cas9 resulted in significantly worse heart phenotypes than targeting either single gene (Fig 3), supporting a compensation model by cardiac actin paralogues.
Taken together, our data suggests acta1b is the best zebrafish cardiac actin gene for modeling human heart diseases resulting from mutations in the cardiac actin gene. acta1b mutants demonstrated minimal compensation by other zfactc gene early in embryogenesis; ideal conditions for characterizing the phenotype and disease mechanism of a specific human actin mutation.
This work provides a foundation to model human actin mutations in zebrafish. Future work will focus on introducing human cardiac actin mutations into acta1b and characterizing the disease as well as exploring methods of treatment. Additionally, determining the changes in cardiac actin paralogue expression in response to single actin knockouts would further dissect the actin gene compensation hypothesis.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by a Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada Grant-in-Aid to JFD (G-18-0020424).