Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Testing methods of homeland detection using synthetic data

View ORCID ProfileSøren Wichmann, View ORCID ProfileTaraka Rama
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.03.280826
Søren Wichmann
1Leiden University Centre for Linguistics, Leiden University, Postbus 9515, Leiden, 2300 RA, The Netherlands
2Laboratory for Quantitative Linguistics, Kazan Federal University, Kremlevskaya Street 18, Kazan, 420000, Russia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Søren Wichmann
  • For correspondence: wichmannsoeren@gmail.com
Taraka Rama
3Department of Linguistics, University of North Texas, Discovery Park Room B201, 3940 N Elm St., Suite B201, Denton, TX, 76207, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Taraka Rama
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

There are two families of quantitative methods for inferring geographical homelands of language families: Bayesian phylogeography and the ‘diversity method’. Bayesian methods model how populations may have moved using the backbone of a phylogenetic tree, while the diversity method, which does not need a tree as input, is based on the idea that the geographical area where linguistic diversity is highest likely corresponds to the homeland. No systematic tests of the performances of the different methods in a linguistic context are available, however. Here we carry out performance testing by simulating language families, including branching structures and word lists, along with speaker populations moving in areas drawn from real-world geography. We test five different methods: two versions of BayesTraits; the random walk model of BEAST; our own RevBayes implementations of a fixed rates and a variable rates random walk model; and the diversity method. Each method is tested on the same synthetic family of 20 languages, evolving in 1000 different random geographical locations. The results indicate superiority in the performance of BayesTraits and different levels of performance for the other methods, but overall no radical differences in performance.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12894218

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 03, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Testing methods of homeland detection using synthetic data
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Testing methods of homeland detection using synthetic data
Søren Wichmann, Taraka Rama
bioRxiv 2020.09.03.280826; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.03.280826
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Testing methods of homeland detection using synthetic data
Søren Wichmann, Taraka Rama
bioRxiv 2020.09.03.280826; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.03.280826

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Evolutionary Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4654)
  • Biochemistry (10298)
  • Bioengineering (7614)
  • Bioinformatics (26189)
  • Biophysics (13445)
  • Cancer Biology (10620)
  • Cell Biology (15333)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (8452)
  • Ecology (12754)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (16763)
  • Genetics (11356)
  • Genomics (15400)
  • Immunology (10548)
  • Microbiology (25041)
  • Molecular Biology (10152)
  • Neuroscience (54095)
  • Paleontology (398)
  • Pathology (1655)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2877)
  • Physiology (4314)
  • Plant Biology (9196)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1579)
  • Synthetic Biology (2541)
  • Systems Biology (6752)
  • Zoology (1452)