Abstract
Quality control of morphometric neuroimaging data is essential to improve reproducibility. Owing to the complexity of neuroimaging data and subsequently the interpretation of their results, visual inspection by trained raters is the most reliable way to perform quality control. Here, we present a protocol for visual quality control of the anatomical accuracy of FreeSurfer parcellations, based on an easy to use open source tool called VisualQC. We comprehensively evaluate its utility in terms of error detection rate and inter-rater reliability on two large multi-site datasets, and discuss site differences in error patterns. This evaluation shows that VisualQC is a practically viable protocol for community adoption.
Competing Interest Statement
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: 1) S. Strother is the Chief Scientific Officer of ADMdx, Inc., which receives NIH funding, and he currently has research grants from Brain Canada, Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), and the Ontario Brain Institute in Canada.
Footnotes
Revised figures for ONDRI dataset
