Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Improving laser standards for three-photon microscopy

Deano M. Farinella, Arani Roy, Chao J. Liu, Prakash Kara
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.09.289603
Deano M. Farinella
University of Minnesota, Department of Neuroscience and Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arani Roy
University of Minnesota, Department of Neuroscience and Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chao J. Liu
University of Minnesota, Department of Neuroscience and Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Prakash Kara
University of Minnesota, Department of Neuroscience and Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: pkara@umn.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Significance Three-photon excitation microscopy has double-to-triple the penetration depth in biological tissue over two-photon imaging and thus has the potential to revolutionize the visualization of biological processes in vivo. However, unlike the ‘plug-and-play’ operation and performance of lasers used in two-photon imaging, three-photon microscopy presents new technological challenges that require a closer look at the fidelity of laser pulses.

Aim We implemented state-of-the-art pulse measurements and developed new techniques for examining the performance of lasers used in three-photon microscopy. We then demonstrated how these techniques can be used to provide precise measurements of pulse shape, pulse energy and pulse-to-pulse intensity variability, all of which ultimately impact imaging.

Approach We built inexpensive tools, e.g., a second harmonic generation frequency resolved optical gating (SHG-FROG) device, and a deep-memory diode imaging (DMDI) apparatus, to examine laser pulse fidelity.

Results First, SHG-FROG revealed very large third order dispersion (TOD). This extent of phase distortion prevents the efficient temporal compression of laser pulses to their theoretical limit. Furthermore, TOD cannot be quantified when using a conventional method of obtaining the laser pulse duration, e.g., when using an autocorrelator. Finally, DMDI showed the effectiveness of detecting pulse-to-pulse intensity fluctuations on timescales relevant to three-photon imaging, which were otherwise not captured using conventional instruments and statistics.

Conclusions The distortion of individual laser pulses caused by TOD poses significant challenges to three-photon imaging by preventing effective compression of laser pulses and decreasing the efficiency of nonlinear excitation. Moreover, an acceptably low pulse-to-pulse amplitude variability should not be assumed. Particularly for low repetition rate laser sources used in three-photon microscopy, pulse-to-pulse variability also degrades image quality. If three-photon imaging is to become mainstream, our diagnostics may be used by laser manufacturers to improve system design and by end-users to validate the performance of their current and future imaging systems.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

  • List of Abbreviations

    GDD
    Group delay dispersion
    TOD
    Third order dispersion
    DMDI
    Deep-memory diode imaging
    FTL
    Fourier transform limit
    SHG FROG
    Second harmonic generation frequency resolved optical gating
    FWHM
    Full width at half maximum
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted September 10, 2020.
    Download PDF
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Improving laser standards for three-photon microscopy
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Improving laser standards for three-photon microscopy
    Deano M. Farinella, Arani Roy, Chao J. Liu, Prakash Kara
    bioRxiv 2020.09.09.289603; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.09.289603
    Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Improving laser standards for three-photon microscopy
    Deano M. Farinella, Arani Roy, Chao J. Liu, Prakash Kara
    bioRxiv 2020.09.09.289603; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.09.289603

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Bioengineering
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4222)
    • Biochemistry (9096)
    • Bioengineering (6735)
    • Bioinformatics (23916)
    • Biophysics (12066)
    • Cancer Biology (9484)
    • Cell Biology (13722)
    • Clinical Trials (138)
    • Developmental Biology (7614)
    • Ecology (11645)
    • Epidemiology (2066)
    • Evolutionary Biology (15461)
    • Genetics (10611)
    • Genomics (14281)
    • Immunology (9448)
    • Microbiology (22753)
    • Molecular Biology (9057)
    • Neuroscience (48813)
    • Paleontology (354)
    • Pathology (1478)
    • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2559)
    • Physiology (3818)
    • Plant Biology (8300)
    • Scientific Communication and Education (1467)
    • Synthetic Biology (2285)
    • Systems Biology (6163)
    • Zoology (1296)