Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Functional assessment of the “two-hit” model for neurodevelopmental defects in Drosophila and X. laevis

Lucilla Pizzo, View ORCID ProfileMicaela Lasser, View ORCID ProfileTanzeen Yusuff, View ORCID ProfileMatthew Jensen, View ORCID ProfilePhoebe Ingraham, View ORCID ProfileEmily Huber, View ORCID ProfileMayanglambam Dhruba Singh, View ORCID ProfileConnor Monahan, Janani Iyer, Inshya Desai, View ORCID ProfileSiddharth Karthikeyan, Dagny J. Gould, View ORCID ProfileSneha Yennawar, View ORCID ProfileAlexis T Weiner, Arjun Krishnan, Melissa Rolls, Laura Anne Lowery, View ORCID ProfileSanthosh Girirajan
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.14.295923
Lucilla Pizzo
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Micaela Lasser
2Department of Biology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Micaela Lasser
Tanzeen Yusuff
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tanzeen Yusuff
Matthew Jensen
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matthew Jensen
Phoebe Ingraham
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Phoebe Ingraham
Emily Huber
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Emily Huber
Mayanglambam Dhruba Singh
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mayanglambam Dhruba Singh
Connor Monahan
2Department of Biology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Connor Monahan
Janani Iyer
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Inshya Desai
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Siddharth Karthikeyan
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Siddharth Karthikeyan
Dagny J. Gould
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sneha Yennawar
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sneha Yennawar
Alexis T Weiner
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alexis T Weiner
Arjun Krishnan
4Department of Computational Mathematics, Science and Engineering, Michigan State, University, East Lansing, MI, USA
5Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melissa Rolls
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Anne Lowery
6Department of Medicine, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Santhosh Girirajan
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA
3Department of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Santhosh Girirajan
  • For correspondence: sxg47@psu.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

We previously identified a deletion on chromosome 16p12.1 that is mostly inherited and associated with multiple neurodevelopmental outcomes, where severely affected probands carried an excess of rare pathogenic variants compared to mildly affected carrier parents. We hypothesized that the 16p12.1 deletion sensitizes the genome for disease, while “second hits” in the genetic background modulate the phenotypic trajectory. To test this model, we examined how neurodevelopmental defects conferred by knockdown of individual 16p12.1 homologs are modulated by simultaneous knockdown of homologs of “second hit” genes in Drosophila melanogaster and Xenopus laevis. We observed that knockdown of 16p12.1 homologs affect multiple phenotypic domains, leading to delayed developmental timing, seizure susceptibility, brain alterations, abnormal dendrite and axonal morphology, and cellular proliferation defects. In contrast to genes within the 16p11.2 deletion, which has higher de novo occurrence, 16p12.1 homologs additively interacted and were less connected to each other in a human brain-specific interaction network, suggesting that interactions with second-hit genes confer higher impact towards neurodevelopmental phenotypes. Assessment of 358 pairwise interactions in Drosophila between 16p12.1 homologs and 76 homologs of patient-specific “second-hit” genes (such as ARID1B and CACNA1A), genes within neurodevelopmental pathways (such as PTEN and UBE3A), and transcriptomic targets (such as DSCAM and TRRAP) identified both additive (47%) and epistatic (53%) effects. In 11 out of 15 families, homologs of patient-specific “second-hits” showed distinct patterns of interactions, enhancing or suppressing the phenotypic effects of one or many 16p12.1 homologs. In fact, homologs of SETD5 synergistically interacted with homologs of MOSMO in both Drosophila and X. laevis, leading to modified cellular and brain phenotypes, as well as axon outgrowth defects that were not observed with knockdown of either individual homolog. Our results suggest that several 16p12.1 genes sensitize the genome towards neurodevelopmental defects, and complex interactions with “second-hit” genes determine the ultimate phenotypic manifestation.

Author Summary Copy-number variants, or deletions and duplications in the genome, are associated with multiple neurodevelopmental disorders. The developmental delay-associated 16p12.1 deletion is mostly inherited, and severely affected children carry an excess of “second-hits” variants compared to mildly affected carrier parents, suggesting that additional variants modulate the clinical manifestation. We studied this “two-hit” model using Drosophila and Xenopus laevis, and systematically tested how homologs of “second-hit” genes modulate neurodevelopmental defects observed for 16p12.1 homologs. We observed that 16p12.1 homologs independently led to multiple neurodevelopmental features and additively interacted with each other, suggesting that interactions with “second-hit” homologs could have a higher impact towards neurodevelopmental defects than interactions between 16p12.1 homologs. We tested 358 pairwise interactions of 16p12.1 homologs with “second-hit” homologs and genes within conserved neurodevelopmental pathways, and identified interacting homologs in 11 out of 15 families studied, which modified neurodevelopmental defects of individual or multiple 16p12.1 homologs through complex interactions. Interestingly, we observed that SETD5 homologs interacted with homologs of MOSMO, which modified cellular and brain defects, and conferred neuronal phenotypes not observed with knockdown of individual homologs. We propose that the 16p12.1 deletion sensitizes the genome to multiple neurodevelopmental defects, and complex interactions with “second-hit” genes determine the final manifestation.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 14, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Functional assessment of the “two-hit” model for neurodevelopmental defects in Drosophila and X. laevis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Functional assessment of the “two-hit” model for neurodevelopmental defects in Drosophila and X. laevis
Lucilla Pizzo, Micaela Lasser, Tanzeen Yusuff, Matthew Jensen, Phoebe Ingraham, Emily Huber, Mayanglambam Dhruba Singh, Connor Monahan, Janani Iyer, Inshya Desai, Siddharth Karthikeyan, Dagny J. Gould, Sneha Yennawar, Alexis T Weiner, Arjun Krishnan, Melissa Rolls, Laura Anne Lowery, Santhosh Girirajan
bioRxiv 2020.09.14.295923; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.14.295923
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Functional assessment of the “two-hit” model for neurodevelopmental defects in Drosophila and X. laevis
Lucilla Pizzo, Micaela Lasser, Tanzeen Yusuff, Matthew Jensen, Phoebe Ingraham, Emily Huber, Mayanglambam Dhruba Singh, Connor Monahan, Janani Iyer, Inshya Desai, Siddharth Karthikeyan, Dagny J. Gould, Sneha Yennawar, Alexis T Weiner, Arjun Krishnan, Melissa Rolls, Laura Anne Lowery, Santhosh Girirajan
bioRxiv 2020.09.14.295923; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.14.295923

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genomics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2536)
  • Biochemistry (4983)
  • Bioengineering (3487)
  • Bioinformatics (15242)
  • Biophysics (6914)
  • Cancer Biology (5404)
  • Cell Biology (7756)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4543)
  • Ecology (7162)
  • Epidemiology (2059)
  • Evolutionary Biology (10240)
  • Genetics (7522)
  • Genomics (9802)
  • Immunology (4869)
  • Microbiology (13250)
  • Molecular Biology (5151)
  • Neuroscience (29496)
  • Paleontology (203)
  • Pathology (838)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1468)
  • Physiology (2143)
  • Plant Biology (4759)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1013)
  • Synthetic Biology (1339)
  • Systems Biology (4015)
  • Zoology (770)