Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Reclassification of Catabacter hongkongensis as Christensenella hongkongensis comb.nov. based on whole genome analysis

Xiaoying Liu, Jessica L. Sutter, Jacobo de la Cuesta-Zuluaga, Jillian L. Waters, Nicholas D. Youngblut, Ruth E. Ley
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.21.306662
Xiaoying Liu
Department of Microbiome Science, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Max-Planck-Ring 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessica L. Sutter
Department of Microbiome Science, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Max-Planck-Ring 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacobo de la Cuesta-Zuluaga
Department of Microbiome Science, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Max-Planck-Ring 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jillian L. Waters
Department of Microbiome Science, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Max-Planck-Ring 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas D. Youngblut
Department of Microbiome Science, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Max-Planck-Ring 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ruth E. Ley
Department of Microbiome Science, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Max-Planck-Ring 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rley@tuebingen.mpg.de
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The genera Catabacter (family Catabacteraceae) and Christensenella (family Christensenellaceae) are close relatives within the phylum Firmicutes. Members of these genera are strictly anaerobic, non-spore forming, short straight rods with diverse phenotypes. Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA genes suggest that Catabacter splits Christensenella into a polyphyletic clade. In an effort to ensure that family/genus names represent monophyletic clades, we performed a whole-genome based analysis of the genomes available for the cultured representatives of these genera: four species of Christensenella and two strains of Catabacter hongkongensis. A concatenated alignment of 135 shared protein sequences indicates that C. hongkongensis is indeed nested within the Christensenella clade. Based on their evolutionary relationship, we propose the transfer of Catabacter hongkongensis to the new genus as Christensenella hongkongensis comb.nov.

Introduction

Catabacter hongkongensis was first isolated in 2007 from the blood cultures of four patients in Hong Kong and Canada. Based on phylogenetic positioning of 16S rRNA sequences and phenotypic characteristics, it was proposed as a new genus and new family, Catabacteriaceae [1]. The genus Catabacter comprises just one species, with the type strain Catabacter hongkongensis HKU16T. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing surveys, C. hongkongensis has been detected in the blood of patients with diseases such as intestinal obstruction, gastrointestinal malignancy, acute cholecystitis and hypertension, in Europe, North America and Asia [1-5].

In 2012, Morotomi and colleagues isolated a novel bacterium from the stool of a healthy male adult, and based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and physiological data, named it Christensenella minuta DSM 22607T within the novel family Christensenellaceae [6]. In addition to Christensenella minuta DSM 22607T, three other species have been proposed based on additional isolates from human feces: Christensenella massiliensis Marseille-P2438 [7], Christensenella timonensis Marseille-P2437 [8], and Christensenella intestinihominis AF73-05CM02PP [9]. Christensenella intestinihominis AF73-05CM02PP is proposed in a pending patent.

16S rRNA gene sequence identity (%ID) has been used to delineate genus (95 %ID) and species (98.7 %ID) cutoffs [10, 11]. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of C. hongkongensis HKU16T has 96-97 %ID with the 16S rRNA genes of the four species of Christensenella, which places them in the range of sharing a genus using that criterion. In addition to sequence similarity, the 16S rRNA gene-based phylogenetic relationships of these taxa indicate they form a monophyletic clade [12].

Whole genome-based analysis with concatenated protein sequences has recently replaced 16S rRNA-based phylogenetics as a basis for determining the evolutionary history of members of the Bacteria and Archaea [13]. Based on whole genome comparisons, Catabacter and Christensenella were annotated as belonging to the family Christensenellaceae in the order Christensenellales in the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB; R05-RS95 17th July 2020) [14]. Twenty-one genomes within the family Christensenellaceae are included in GTDB R05-RS95 as of 01 August 2020. These include metagenome-assembled genomes and genomes derived from isolates. A formal reclassification of Catabacter as Christensenella would clarify the nomenclature of this taxon.

Here, we used comparative genomics as a basis for proposing that the genus name Catabacter and the family name Catabacteraceae be removed from the nomenclature. Genome sequences of six cultured isolates belonging to the families Catabacteriaceae and Christensenellaceae and four species from sister clades in GTDB were selected for phylogenomic analysis. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) of the six genomes in the family of Catabacteriaceae and Christensenellaceae were compared. Based on the resulting phylogeny, we recommend that Catabacter hongkongensis be renamed Christensenella hongkongensis comb.nov.

Methods

Phylogeny based on whole genomes

We based this analysis on whole genome sequences of six cultured isolates: Catabacter hongkongensis strains HKU16T and ABBA15k, Christensenella minuta DSM 22607T, Christensenella massiliensis Marseille-P2438, Christensenella timonensis Marseille-P2437, Christensenella intestinihominis AF73-05CM02PP. The general information about genomes in this study is listed in Table 1. In addition, we selected for the outgroup the species Clostridium novyi NT (GenBank accession number: GCA_000014125.1), Clostridium butyricum DSM 10702T (GenBank accession number: GCA_000409755.1), Clostridium thermobutyricum DSM4928T (GenBank accession number: GCA_002050515.1) and Eubacterium limosum ATCC 8486T (GenBank accession number: GCA_000807675.2). Whole genome sequences were obtained from NCBI.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Phenotypic characteristics of the strains of Catabacter and Christensenella based on literature review. Data for the strains are from references [1, 6-9, 30]. +, Positive; -, negative; ND, not determined. The G+C contents and N50, contig numbers, genome size and genome coverages were retrieved from the GTDB records of the strains.

We used Anvi’o v5.2.0 for constructing the whole-genome phylogenomic tree [15]. Briefly, contig databases were created from the genome FASTA files. Prodigal v2.6.3 with default settings [16] was used to identify open reading frames in contigs. Hidden Markov model (HMM) profiles were used to extract the set of single-copy marker genes defined by Campbell et al. [17]. The best HMM hit was selected if a gene was found with multiple copies in a genome. We limited the set of single-copy core genes shared to those present in all analyzed genomes and aligned the concatenated protein sequences using muscle [18].

FastTree 2 [19] was used for constructing approximately-maximum-likelihood phylogenomic tree with the Jones-Taylor-Thornton model [20]. SH-like local support values [21] are shown on the nodes. The phylogenetic tree was visualized by using the online tool iTOL [22].

Average nucleotide identity and phenotype predictions

We used FastANI with default settings [23] to generate a pairwise ANI comparison of the six Christensenella and Catabacter genomes. A heatmap of ANI values was generated and visualized in R [24] with the package ggplot2 [25]. Traitar [26] trait analyzer was used for phenotypic trait prediction based on genome sequences. ABRicate v1.0.1 (https://github.com/tseemann/ABRicate) was used for the detection of genes involved in antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and the annotation was derived from the default NCBI database AMRFinderPlus.

Results

The genome sizes of the six Catabacter and Christensenella species/strains range from 2.5 Mbp to 3.3 Mbp and the G+C content of genomic DNA from 48.53 to 52.07 %. Based on the pairwise comparison of the six genomes in the family of Catabacteriaceae and Christensenellaceae, we observed that the ANI of the two Catabacter hongkongensis strains (HKU16T and ABBA15k) was >98.97 % (Fig. 1), confirming that the two strains belong to the same species. Moreover, the ANI values for the six genomes were between 77.56-83.48 %, which corresponds to the accepted ANI cut-off 94-96 % used to designate the same species [27-29] and <83 % for inter-species ANI values [23]. Christensenella intestinihominis AF73-05CM02PP and C. minuta DSM 22607T showed the highest ANI similarity values (83.48%) between different species.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 1.

Heatmap of ANI values amongst the genomes of Catabacter hongkongensis strains and Christensenella species in this study. Type strains are marked with asterisk.

We identified 135 protein-encoding single-copy core genes present in the genomes of Christensenella, Catabacter and the outgroup taxa. We used these 135 genes in a concatenated alignment resulting in a total of 51,813 aligned amino acid sites. In the resulting phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2), the Catabacter and Christensenella species and strains formed a monophyletic clade with high bootstrap support, indicating a shared common ancestor. The species C. timonensis Marseille-P2437 is basal and forms a sister clade to the rest of the taxa in the phylogeny. The two strains of Catabacter hongkongensis (HKU16T and ABBA15k) are, as expected based on their high ANI, on the same branch of the phylogeny. The Catabacter branch is a sister taxon to the remaining Christensenella species (C. minuta DSM 22607T, C. massiliensis Marseille-P2438, C. intestinihominis AF73-05CM02PP).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Fig. 2.

Phylogeny reconstructed by approximately-maximum-likelihood showing the position of Catabacter relative to Christensenella based on 135 concatenated core protein sequences with 51,813 aligned amino acid sites. All the nodes are strongly supported with SH-like support values of 1. Type strains are marked with asterisk. Clostridium and Eubacterium are used for the outgroup. The tree is rooted by Eubacterium limosum ATCC 8486. Scale bar indicates 0.01 amino acid substitutions per site.

The position of Catabacter (and its family Catabacteriaceae) nested within the Christensenella clade splits the Christensenellaceae family and genus, such that neither are monophyletic. For the family and genus names to represent monophyletic groups the renaming of Catabacter hongkongensis to Christensenella hongkongensis would be required. As a consequence, the genus name Catabacter and Catabacteriaceae should be removed from the nomenclature.

The cultured strains of the species of Catabacter (C. hongkongensis HKU16T and ABBA15k) and Christensenella (C. minuta DSM 22607T, C. massiliensis Marseille-P2438, C. timonensis Marseille-P2437, C. intestinihominis AF73-05CM02PP) have been shown to be strictly anaerobic and non-spore forming rods with varied motility, Gram stain reaction and the catalase reaction [1, 6-9]. The different phenotypic characteristics of the species compared in this study is summarized in Table 1. Catabacter hongkongensis HKU16T and ABBA15k strains are reported to be Gram-positive, while the four species of Christensenella are reported either Gram-positive or Gram-negative. Morotomi and colleagues reported that C. minuta DSM 22607T is Gram-negative [6], while another group reports C. minuta stains consistently as Gram-positive [30], which is consistent with our observations [12]. The Gram-variable reaction might be due to the age of the culture for staining [31]. However, based on the phenotype predictions of the included genomes by using Traitar trait analyzer, all of the strains in those two genera are predicted to produce a cell wall that would be consistent with a Gram-positive reaction.

C. hongkongensis strains (HKU16T, HKU17, CA1, CA2) and most clinical derived isolates are reported to be motile and resistant to cefotaxime [1, 2, 5, 32] except for C. hongkongensis ABBA15k, which was isolated in 2016 from the blood of a patient with a fever in Sweden [33]. Strain ABBA15k showed 100% 16S rRNA gene identity with Catabacter hongkongensis HKU16T. However, the genome of C. hongkongensis ABBA15k is smaller than C. hongkongensis HKU16T, and the genes coding for chemotaxin (cheA) and flagellar assembly (flhA and MotA) were not present in the genome of C. hongkongensis ABBA15k [33]. The tetracycline resistance gene tet was detected in the genome of C. hongkongensis HKU16T, but no resistance genes were detected in the genome of C. hongkongensis ABBA15k [33].

Screening for AMR genes of the genomes with ABRicate in this study showed that the tet gene was also present in the genomes of Christensenella minuta DSM 22607T, Christensenella massiliensis Marseille-P2438, Christensenella timonensis Marseille-P2437 and Catabacter hongkongensis HKU16T but not in Christensenella intestinihominis AF73-05CM02PP and Catabacter hongkongensis ABBA15k. A Streptomycin resistance gene (aadE) was also detected in the genome of Christensenella massiliensis Marseille-P2438. The detailed information about AMR genes is listed in Table 2. Christensenella intestinihominis AF73-05CM02PP and Catabacter hongkongensis HKU16T were predicted to be motile by Traitar. However, Christensenella intestinihominis AF73-05CM02PP was classified as non-motile in the original phenotypic characterization [9], which might be attributable to the growth conditions used. It is also possible that the genome of the strain may not contain all genes required for flagellar formation.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

Antimicrobial resistance genes (AMR) detected for the genomes of Catabacter hongkongensis strains and Christensenella species. Coverage refers to the proportion of the gene in the reference gene sequence.

In conclusion, both Catabacter and Christensenella genera include species and strains that are strictly anaerobic, non-spore forming, short straight rods and have diverse phenotypes regarding motility, Gram-staining and antibiotic resistance. The genus Catabacter was proposed earlier, however, only one species exists within in genus and the family Catabacteriaceae, while four species have been proposed for the genus Christensenella and the family Christensenellaceae. Based on previously reported pairwise 16S rRNA gene sequence identities and our genome-based phylogenomic analysis, we propose that the genus Catabacter and the family Catabactericaeae be removed from the nomenclature and that the species Catabacter hongkongensis be renamed Christensenella hongkongensis comb.nov.

Description of Christensenella hongkongensis comb.nov

The description of Christensenella hongkongensis is identical to that proposed for Catabacter hongkongensis [1].

The type strain is HKU16T (= DSM 18959T = JCM 17853T = CCUG 54229T).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Max Planck Society.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Lau SK, McNabb A, Woo GK, Hoang L, Fung AM et al. Catabacter hongkongensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from blood cultures of patients from Hong Kong and Canada. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45(2):395–401.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Lau SK, Fan RY, Lo HW, Ng RH, Wong SS et al. High mortality associated with Catabacter hongkongensis bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol 2012;50(7):2239–2243.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.
    Elsendoorn A, Robert R, Culos A, Roblot F, Burucoa C. Catabacter hongkongensis Bacteremia with fatal septic shock. Emerg Infect Dis 2011;17(7):1330–1331.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.
    Torri A, Delbianco F, Baccarini FD, Fusari M, Bertini S et al. First report of sepsis due to Catabacter hongkongensis in an Italian patient. New Microbes New Infect. 2016;9:54–55.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    Choi YJ, Won EJ, Kim SH, Shin MG, Shin JH et al. First Case Report of Bacteremia Due to Catabacter hongkongensis in a Korean Patient. Ann Lab Med 2017;37(1):84–87.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    Morotomi M, Nagai F, Watanabe Y. Description of Christensenella minuta gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from human faeces, which forms a distinct branch in the order Clostridiales, and proposal of Christensenellaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012;62(Pt 1):144–149.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Ndongo S, Khelaifia S, Fournier PE, Raoult D. Christensenella massiliensis, a new bacterial species isolated from the human gut. New Microbes New Infect. 2016;12:69–70.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    Ndongo S, Dubourg G, Khelaifia S, Fournier PE, Raoult D. Christensenella timonensis, a new bacterial species isolated from the human gut. New Microbes New Infect. 2016;13:32–33.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    Zou Y, Xue W, Lv M, Xiao L, Li X et al., inventors. Christensenella intestinihominis and application thereof. US20190282633A1. 2019 Sep 19.
  10. 10.↵
    Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. Taxonomic Note: A Place for DNA-DNA Reassociation and 16S rRNA Sequence Analysis in the Present Species Definition in Bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1994;44(4):846–849.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    Stackebrandt E, Ebers J. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today 2006;33:152–155.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    Waters JL, Ley RE. The human gut bacteria Christensenellaceae are widespread, heritable, and associated with health. BMC Biol 2019;17(1):83.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    Lang JM, Darling AE, Eisen JA. Phylogeny of Bacterial and Archaeal Genomes Using Conserved Genes: Supertrees and Supermatrices. PLOS ONE 2013;8(4):e62510.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil P-A, Rinke C, Mussig AJ et al. A complete domain-to-species taxonomy for Bacteria and Archaea. Nature Biotechnology 2020.
  15. 15.↵
    Eren AM, Esen Ö C, Quince C, Vineis JH, Morrison HG et al. Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ‘omics data. PeerJ 2015;3:e1319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Hyatt D, Chen G-L, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010;11(1):119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Campbell JH, O’Donoghue P, Campbell AG, Schwientek P, Sczyrba A et al. UGA is an additional glycine codon in uncultured SR1 bacteria from the human microbiota. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2013;110(14):5540–5545.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Edgar RC. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 2004;5(1):113.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments. PLOS ONE 2010;5(3):e9490.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci 1992;8(3):275–282.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Posada D
    Guindon S, Delsuc F, Dufayard J-F, Gascuel O. Estimating Maximum Likelihood Phylogenies with PhyML. In: Posada D (editor). Bioinformatics for DNA Sequence Analysis. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2009. pp. 113–137.
  22. 22.↵
    Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44(W1):W242–W245.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nature Communications 2018;9(1):5114.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2017.
  25. 25.↵
    Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis: Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated; 2009.
  26. 26.↵
    Weimann A, Mooren K, Frank J, Pope PB, Bremges A et al. From Genomes to Phenotypes: Traitar, the Microbial Trait Analyzer. mSystems 2016;1(6).
  27. 27.↵
    Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102(7):2567–2572.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.
    Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007;57(Pt 1):81–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009;106(45):19126–19131.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    Alonso BL, Irigoyen von Sierakowski A, Sáez Nieto JA, Rosel AB. First report of human infection by Christensenella minuta, a gram-negative, strickly anaerobic rod that inhabits the human intestine. Anaerobe 2017;44:124–125.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    Rand KH, Tillan M. Errors in interpretation of Gram stains from positive blood cultures. Am J Clin Pathol 2006;126(5):686–690.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    Ryu J, Kim Y, Lee J, Cho SY, Park TS et al. A Case of Catabacter hongkongensis and Alistipes indistinctus Isolated from Blood Cultures of a Patient with Acute Appendicitis. lmo 2019;9(3):177–180.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    Kaden R, Thelander M, Engstrand L, Herrmann B. First case of human bacteraemia by Catabacter hongkongensis in Scandinavia. New Microbes New Infect. 2016;15:6–8.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 21, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reclassification of Catabacter hongkongensis as Christensenella hongkongensis comb.nov. based on whole genome analysis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Reclassification of Catabacter hongkongensis as Christensenella hongkongensis comb.nov. based on whole genome analysis
Xiaoying Liu, Jessica L. Sutter, Jacobo de la Cuesta-Zuluaga, Jillian L. Waters, Nicholas D. Youngblut, Ruth E. Ley
bioRxiv 2020.09.21.306662; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.21.306662
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Reclassification of Catabacter hongkongensis as Christensenella hongkongensis comb.nov. based on whole genome analysis
Xiaoying Liu, Jessica L. Sutter, Jacobo de la Cuesta-Zuluaga, Jillian L. Waters, Nicholas D. Youngblut, Ruth E. Ley
bioRxiv 2020.09.21.306662; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.21.306662

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Microbiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4684)
  • Biochemistry (10361)
  • Bioengineering (7682)
  • Bioinformatics (26340)
  • Biophysics (13534)
  • Cancer Biology (10692)
  • Cell Biology (15445)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (8501)
  • Ecology (12824)
  • Epidemiology (2067)
  • Evolutionary Biology (16867)
  • Genetics (11401)
  • Genomics (15484)
  • Immunology (10619)
  • Microbiology (25224)
  • Molecular Biology (10225)
  • Neuroscience (54481)
  • Paleontology (402)
  • Pathology (1669)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2897)
  • Physiology (4345)
  • Plant Biology (9252)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1586)
  • Synthetic Biology (2558)
  • Systems Biology (6781)
  • Zoology (1466)