Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

The Nature of Espeletia Species

Yam M. Pineda, Andrés J. Cortés, Santiago Madriñán, View ORCID ProfileIván Jiménez
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.29.318865
Yam M. Pineda
1Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrés J. Cortés
2Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (Agrosavia) - CI La Selva, Rionegro, Colombia
3Departamento de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Medellín, Medellín, Colombia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Santiago Madriñán
1Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
4Jardín Botánico de Cartagena “Guillermo Piñeres”, Turbaco, Colombia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Iván Jiménez
5Center for Conservation and Sustainable Development, Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Iván Jiménez
  • For correspondence: Ivan.Jimenez@mobot.org
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Species are often regarded as basic units of study in biology, following the presumption that they are real and discrete natural entities. But several biologists wonder if species are arbitrary divisions that do not correspond to discrete natural groups of organisms. Two issues must be addressed to solve this controversy, but few studies seem to do so. The first is whether organisms form sympatric and synchronic groups that are distinct in terms of phenotypes and genome-wide allele frequencies, often called “good species.” Alternatives to “good species” include “cryptic species,” syngameons and, more generally, cases in which phenotypes and genome-wide allele frequencies reflect contrasting evolutionary histories. The second issue is the degree to which species taxa (i.e., taxonomic classification at the species level) reflect natural groups of organisms or constitute arbitrary divisions of biological diversity. Here, we empirically addressed both issues by studying plants of the Andean genus Espeletia (Asteraceae). We collected a geographically dense sample of 538 specimens from the paramo de Sumapaz, in the Cordillera Oriental of Colombia. Additionally, we examined 165 herbarium specimens previously collected by other researchers in this region, or from taxa known to occur there. We tested for the existence of phenotypic groups using normal mixture models and data on 13 quantitative characters. Among 307 specimens with all 13 measurements, we found six distinct phenotypic groups in sympatry. We also tested for the existence of groups defined by genome-wide allele frequencies, using ancestry models and data on 2,098 single nucleotide polymorphisms. Among 77 specimens with complete genomic data, we found three groups in sympatry, with high levels of admixture. Concordance between groups defined by phenotype and genome-wide allele frequencies was low, suggesting that phenotypes and genome-wide allele frequencies reflect contrasting evolutionary histories. Moreover, the high levels of admixture suggest that Espeletia plants form a syngameon in the paramo de Sumapaz. To determine the extent to which species taxa corresponded to phenotypic and genomic groups, we used data on 12 phenotypic characters to assign 307 specimens to species taxa, according to descriptions of species taxa in the most recent monograph of Espeletia. This sample included 27 specimens cited in the monograph. Remarkably, only one out of 307 specimens in our sample fell inside any of the phenotypic ranges reported in the monograph for the species taxa known to occur in the paramo de Sumapaz. These results show that species taxa in Espeletia are delineations of largely empty phenotypic space that miss biological diversity.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 01, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Nature of Espeletia Species
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The Nature of Espeletia Species
Yam M. Pineda, Andrés J. Cortés, Santiago Madriñán, Iván Jiménez
bioRxiv 2020.09.29.318865; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.29.318865
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The Nature of Espeletia Species
Yam M. Pineda, Andrés J. Cortés, Santiago Madriñán, Iván Jiménez
bioRxiv 2020.09.29.318865; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.29.318865

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Evolutionary Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4229)
  • Biochemistry (9118)
  • Bioengineering (6754)
  • Bioinformatics (23950)
  • Biophysics (12103)
  • Cancer Biology (9500)
  • Cell Biology (13746)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7618)
  • Ecology (11666)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15479)
  • Genetics (10621)
  • Genomics (14298)
  • Immunology (9469)
  • Microbiology (22808)
  • Molecular Biology (9083)
  • Neuroscience (48900)
  • Paleontology (355)
  • Pathology (1479)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2566)
  • Physiology (3828)
  • Plant Biology (8320)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1467)
  • Synthetic Biology (2294)
  • Systems Biology (6172)
  • Zoology (1297)