Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Effects of sheared chromatin length on ChIP-seq quality and sensitivity

View ORCID ProfileCheryl A. Keller, View ORCID ProfileElisabeth F. Heuston, View ORCID ProfileBelinda Giardine, Maria R. Long, Amber Miller, View ORCID ProfileAlexander Q. Wixom, Stacie M. Anderson, View ORCID ProfileDavid M. Bodine, View ORCID ProfileRoss C. Hardison
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.30.320697
Cheryl A. Keller
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Cheryl A. Keller
  • For correspondence: cak142@psu.edu rch8@psu.edu
Elisabeth F. Heuston
2NHGRI Hematopoiesis Section, Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elisabeth F. Heuston
Belinda Giardine
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Belinda Giardine
Maria R. Long
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amber Miller
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Q. Wixom
3Mayo Clinic, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alexander Q. Wixom
Stacie M. Anderson
4NHGRI Flow Cytometry Core, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M. Bodine
2NHGRI Hematopoiesis Section, Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David M. Bodine
Ross C. Hardison
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ross C. Hardison
  • For correspondence: cak142@psu.edu rch8@psu.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by massively parallel, high throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq) is the method of choice for identifying, on a genome-wide scale, the segments of DNA bound by specific transcription factors (TFs) or in chromatin with particular histone modifications. However, the quality of ChIP-seq datasets vary over a wide range, with a substantial fraction being of intermediate to poor quality. Such experimental variability can lead to many false positives or false negatives, impairing the ability to interpret the data. Thus, it is important to discern and control the factors that contribute to variation in ChIP-seq. In this study, we focus on the sonication step to produce sheared chromatin, a variable controllable by the user and applicable to all ChIP-seq protocols. We systematically varied the amount of shearing of fixed chromatin from a mouse erythroid cell line, carefully measured the distribution of resultant fragment lengths using the Agilent Bioanalzyer 2100, and then immunoprecipitated these batches of chromatin using highly specific antibodies against either TAL1 or CTCF. We found that the level of sonication, which was affected by both the number of sonication cycles, as well as the starting cell number, had a pronounced impact on the quality of resulting ChIP-seq signals. Specifically, over-sonication led to degradation of quality (e.g. increased background and reduction in signal), while the impact of under-sonication of chromatin differed between the two transcription factors, leading to the loss of sites occupied by TAL1 but not those bound by CTCF. We leveraged these findings to produce a set of CTCF ChIP-seq datasets in primary hematopoietic progenitor cells, including several rare cell types. Together, these results suggest that the amount of sonication is a key variable in success of ChIP-seq experiments, and that carefully monitoring the level of chromatin sonication is one way to improve ChIP-seq quality and reproducibility, which in turn facilitates low input ChIP-seq in rare cell types.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 30, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effects of sheared chromatin length on ChIP-seq quality and sensitivity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Effects of sheared chromatin length on ChIP-seq quality and sensitivity
Cheryl A. Keller, Elisabeth F. Heuston, Belinda Giardine, Maria R. Long, Amber Miller, Alexander Q. Wixom, Stacie M. Anderson, David M. Bodine, Ross C. Hardison
bioRxiv 2020.09.30.320697; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.30.320697
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Effects of sheared chromatin length on ChIP-seq quality and sensitivity
Cheryl A. Keller, Elisabeth F. Heuston, Belinda Giardine, Maria R. Long, Amber Miller, Alexander Q. Wixom, Stacie M. Anderson, David M. Bodine, Ross C. Hardison
bioRxiv 2020.09.30.320697; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.30.320697

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genomics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (3598)
  • Biochemistry (7563)
  • Bioengineering (5517)
  • Bioinformatics (20778)
  • Biophysics (10316)
  • Cancer Biology (7973)
  • Cell Biology (11629)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (6602)
  • Ecology (10197)
  • Epidemiology (2065)
  • Evolutionary Biology (13605)
  • Genetics (9537)
  • Genomics (12843)
  • Immunology (7919)
  • Microbiology (19536)
  • Molecular Biology (7653)
  • Neuroscience (42053)
  • Paleontology (307)
  • Pathology (1257)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2199)
  • Physiology (3266)
  • Plant Biology (7036)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1294)
  • Synthetic Biology (1951)
  • Systems Biology (5426)
  • Zoology (1115)