Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

A crocodylian-style cloaca in a non-avialan dinosaur

View ORCID ProfilePhil R. Bell, View ORCID ProfileMichael Pittman, View ORCID ProfileThomas G. Kaye, View ORCID ProfileChristophe Hendrickx
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.11.335398
Phil R. Bell
1School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia; email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Phil R. Bell
  • For correspondence: pbell23@une.edu.au pbell23@une.edu.au
Michael Pittman
2Vertebrate Palaeontology Laboratory, Division of Earth and Planetary Science, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China; email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael Pittman
  • For correspondence: pbell23@une.edu.au mpittman@hku.hk
Thomas G. Kaye
3Foundation for Scientific Advancement, Sierra Vista, Arizona, USA; email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Thomas G. Kaye
  • For correspondence: tom@tomkaye.com
Christophe Hendrickx
4Unidad Ejecutora Lillo, CONICET-Fundación Miguel Lillo, Miguel Lillo 251, San Miguel de Tucumán 4000, Tucumán, Argentina; email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christophe Hendrickx
  • For correspondence: christophendrickx@gmail.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Our knowledge of the reproductive biology of dinosaurs covers a range of aspects, from brooding behaviour to nesting style and the timing of sexual maturity. Yet, the basic anatomy and function of the cloaca in non-avialan dinosaurs remains unknown. Here, we describe the outer morphology of the only known non-avialan dinosaur cloaca, preserved in an exceptional specimen of the early-diverging ceratopsian dinosaur Psittacosaurus. We clarify the position of the cloaca with respect to the ischia and caudal vertebrae and document the scales immediately adjacent to the abdomen and tail. We find that the cloaca is from a near-sexually mature subadult individual and is most similar to the cloaca of crocodylians, to the exclusion of lepidosaurians and birds. However, the sex of SMF R 4970 could not be determined as the cloaca and the rest of the specimen does not yield any sexually dimorphic information. This study highlights the ongoing role of exceptional specimens in providing rare soft tissues that help to bridge longstanding gaps in our knowledge of the basic biology of dinosaurs and other extinct reptiles.

Introduction

The reproductive biology of extinct non-avialan dinosaurs is rarely interpreted from the fossil record. To date, exceptionally well-preserved remains and the extant phylogenetic bracket (EPB; [1]) have clarified details including their brooding behaviour, nesting style and timing of sexual maturity [2-7]. However, the anatomy and function of the cloaca has continued to remain elusive. In archosaurian and lepidosaurian reptiles, the cloaca forms the common opening of the digestive and urogenital tract and consists of a series of chambers—the coprodeum, urodeum, and proctodeum—separated by muscular sphincters, and which terminates in the vent [8-10]. As a result, it serves as the passage for digestive and urinary wastes, transmission of the male copulatory organ, and the passage of eggs or live young in addition to a variety of less obvious functions such as salt and temperature regulation [11]. Nearly 70 years ago, Alfred Romer predicted that the cloaca in extinct archosaurs was positioned within the proximal tail region where haemal arches are absent [1]. Here, we provide confirmation of Romer’s original prediction based on an exquisitely-preserved specimen of an early-diverging ceratopsian dinosaur, Psittacosaurus sp., discovered from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Group of northeastern China [12]. This specimen, known for its exquisite coloured epidermal structures and elongate caudal monofilaments [12-14], preserves for the first time the outer morphology of the cloaca in a non-avialan dinosaur.

Results

Age of the individual

The right femur of Senckenberg Museum Frankfurt (SMF) R 4970 is ∼140mm long. This is similar to the femoral lengths of P. lujiatunensis Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology (IVPP) V12617 (138mm) and V18344 (145mm), Liaoning Paleontological Museum (LPM) R00128 (135mm) and R00138 (144mm) and Peking University Vertebrate Paleontology (PKUVP) V1053 (149mm) and V1056 (135mm) which belong to ∼6-7 year old subadults (see Table 1 and Fig. 5 of Erickson et al. [15] and Supplementary Table S2 of Zhao et al. [16]). This age is just shy of sexual maturity and at the beginning of the exponential growth phase (see Table 1 and Fig. 5 of Erickson et al. [15] and Supplementary Table S2 of Zhao et al. [16]). The femoral length of SMF R 4970 is therefore the closest match to a nearly sexually mature subadult (see Table 1 and Fig. 5 of Erickson et al. [15] and Supplementary Table S2 of Zhao et al. [16]). Thus, the configuration and morphology of the cloaca in SMF R 4970 and its surrounding osteological correlates had not yet reached its most developed form or full sexual maturity.

The cloaca and its surrounding scales and bones

Immediately posterior to the ischiadic symphysis is the fleshy aperture (or vent) of the cloaca (Figs. 1, 2). Since SMF R 4970 is preserved lying on its back, both the left and right sides of the cloaca are visible, although the right side is better exposed (Fig. 1). The vent itself is longitudinally oriented (∼2 cm long) and surrounded on either side by darkly pigmented tissue. This appears to lie flush with the ventral parts of the abdomen and tail (i.e. it does not form a cloacal protuberance). The darker cloaca is clearly differentiated, from the lighter-coloured surrounding integument (Fig. 2).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1. Cloacal region of the ceratopsian dinosaur Psittacosaurus under Laser-Stimulated Fluorescence (LSF).

The cloaca soft tissue is the blackish mottled ovoid area preserved in the region between the ischia and the third haemal arch in specimen SMF R 4970 from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Group of northeastern China. Scale is 4cm. Life reconstruction with green box showing the position of the LSF image. Image Credit: Julius T. Csotonyi (image used with permission).

  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2. Close up of the cloaca of Psittacosaurus sp. SMF R 4970.

A. The right side of the longitudinally presented vent is better exposed. The outer morphology of the cloaca is darkly pigmented compared to adjacent areas of the ventrum. Scale bar is 2cm. B. Interpretative drawing of the cloacal region showing the integument in red shading and the details of the cloaca in pink line colour. Haemal arches (ha) marked in lime green and left and right ischia coloured in dark green and blue, respectively. Scale bar is 1 cm.

The darkly-pigmented tissue surrounding the vent is wrinkled, the creases of which are parallel and radiate from the vent in a posterolateral direction (∼3 cm long) towards the ventral tip of the third haemal arch (Fig. 2). Unlike the other haemal arches, the third haemal arch, which articulates with the posteroventral corner of the 7th caudal vertebra, is subvertical and strongly bowed (anteriorly concave) (Fig. 1). In contrast, the remaining haemal arches are all straight and strongly posteroventrally oriented (Fig. 1). The first and second haemal arches are also peculiar in being roughly half the length of the third arch, although the first arch appears to be broken into two adjacent lengths (Fig. 1). The scales covering the darkly pigmented tissue surrounding the vent are also distinct from those on the abdomen and tail: scales surrounding the vent are relatively large, roughly lenticular (Embedded Image length = 3.4 mm), the long axes of which are oriented parallel to the surrounding wrinkles (Figs. 1, 2). Further along the tail, the ventral integument consists of distinct vertical bands (arranged transversely in life) of typically rounded-quadrangular scales, which range from 1.7 to 3.3 mm in height (Fig. 1). The same transverse banding of quadrangular scales also occurs on the abdomen, anterior to the ischiadic symphysis (Fig. 1).

Discussion

Cloaca anatomy and biological implications

The Psittacosaurus specimen SMF R 4970 is unique among non-avialan dinosaurs in preserving the outer morphology of the cloaca, including the vent. SMF R 4970 demonstrates unequivocally that the genitals were housed internally in Psittacosaurus and likely in all other non-avialan dinosaurs, as in all known animals with a cloaca. For comparison with the cloaca of SMF R 4970, a representative sample of snakes, lizards, birds, and crocodylians were observed in the collections of the University of New England’s Natural History Museum. The internal anatomy of the cloaca in lepidosaurians, crocodylians, and birds differs substantially and is accompanied by modifications to the external appearance of the vent. The vent in living sauropsids can be divided into three main types [17]: transversely opening (snakes and lizards), longitudinally opening (crocodylians), or round/square (birds). The integumentary covering across these three types differs accordingly. In snakes, the transverse vent is covered by one or two cloacal scales that are modifications of the broad ventral scales present elsewhere on the underbelly. The condition in lizards is highly variable but the vent is always transverse and accompanied by a variable number of cloacal scales that may or may not differ from the surrounding scales. Among birds, the area immediately surrounding the cloaca is naked, bearing neither scales nor feathers. In crocodylians, the longitudinal vent is surrounded by elliptical-to-polygonal scales that radiate and increase in size from the vent itself. This rosette arrangement of cloacal scales is distinct from the transverse rows of comparatively large quadrangular scales that extend along the ventral surfaces of the abdomen and tail. Thus, the gross morphology of the vent in Psittacosaurus, which combines a longitudinally opening vent with a rosette pattern of cloacal scales and transverse rows of quadrangular ventral scales, most closely matches that of crocodylians.

The position of the vent is also distinctive in Psittacosaurus. Romer [1] remarked that the cloaca opens immediately posterior to the distal ischia in all reptiles; however, it may be supported by an ossified hypoischium that projects posteriorly from the ischial symphysis in some lizards (see [18] and references therein). In many lizards, the vent is typically positioned just posterior to the joint between the first and second caudal vertebrae and is never further than the third caudal vertebra [18]. Birds on the other hand have highly modified tails that terminate in a pygostyle (e.g. [19]) and therefore do not provide a suitable analogue for comparisons. Matching Romer’s [1] prediction, the vent, in Psittacosaurus, opens just posterior to the distal ischia and in line with the joint between the fifth and sixth caudal vertebrae.

The crocodilian-like vent of Psittacosaurus implies that, unlike lizards and later-diverging birds, Psittacosaurus probably had a muscular, unpaired, and ventrally-positioned copulatory organ (e.g. [20]) and a ureter that was decoupled from the copulatory organ [9]. Some birds possess a single copulatory organ, but the majority of species lack a phallus entirely [21]. Like crocodylians, birds still use internal fertilisation, which is the presumed method in Psittacosaurus. Crocodylians and some early-diverging crown birds (e.g., Rhea, tinamous) have a ureter that opens into the coprodeum, whereas in later-diverging crown birds, the ureter empties into the urodeum [9]. The presumably paired oviducts in Psittacosaurus [22] would have opened into the urodeum as well.

Despite the remarkable preservation of SMF R 4970, it was not possible to determine its sex. Although histological examination was not available, SMF R 4970 was not gravid, and therefore unlikely to have been producing medullary bone [23]. There is no evidence of a recognisable sexually dimorphic cloacal structure in SMF R 4970. A cloacal protuberance temporarily develops in some birds during the breeding period, but its utility as a dimorphic structure is undermined by its presence in both males and females in some species [24]. In crocodylians, sex determination is entirely dependent on the inspection of the genitalia and has no relationship to the external morphology of the cloaca/vent [25, 26]. Internally, a reduced first (and second) haemal arch—as in SMF R 4970—has been suggested to identify female dinosaurs based on the alleged condition in modern crocodylians [1, 27]. However, this hypothesis has no statistical support [28]. The enlarged third haemal arch was likely the origin for muscles responsible for closing the cloaca (m. transversus medianus [17]). Anterior haemal arches are commonly abbreviated in dinosaurs and seem to be an ancestral feature based on rare early dinosaur fossils preserving this portion of the tail (e.g. Chilesaurus, Eoraptor, and Tawa). Their presence in modern crocodylians suggests they might even be ancestral to archosaurs pending further fossil tail discoveries. Thus, the only known record of a non-avialan dinosaur cloaca has a crocodylian-style and does not show external sexually dimorphic structures that can determine the sex of SMF R 4970.

Methods

SMF R 4970 was photographed using Laser-Stimulated Fluorescence (LSF) performed using an updated version of the methodology proposed by Kaye et al. [29] and refined in Wang et al. [30]. Only a brief description of the method is provided here. A 405 nm violet near-UV laser diode was used to fluoresce the specimen following standard laser safety protocol. Long exposure images were taken with a Nikon D810 DSLR camera fitted with a 425 nm long-pass blocking filter and controlled from a laptop using digiCamControl. Image post-processing (equalization, saturation and colour balance) was performed uniformly across the entire field of view in Photoshop CS6. As soft tissue details in SMF R 4970 are best visible under LSF, the observations made using this technique and the resulting digital images formed the basis for our descriptions. All measurements were taken using digital images uploaded and calibrated in ImageJ v1.52q or Photoshop CS6. Comparative anatomy involved a representative sample of snakes, lizards, birds and crocodylians, which were observed in the collections of the University of New England’s Natural History Museum (Armidale, Australia). Computed tomography (CT) scans of a subadult male Crocodylus porosus scanned and acquired by Klinkhamer et al. [31] were visualised using Dragonfly 2020.1 (www.theobjects.com).

Acknowledgements

We thank Rainer Brocke, Olaf Vogel, and Gerald Mayr (SMF) for specimen access, J. Holley (UNE) for access to comparative collections, and T. Frauenfelder (UNE) for assistance with Dragonfly 2020. P.R.B. was supported by an Australian Research Council Discover Early Career Research Award (project ID: DE170101325). M.P. and T.G.K. are supported by a RAE Improvement Fund of the Faculty of Science, The University of Hong Kong (HKU) and HKU MOOC course Dinosaur Ecosystems. C.H. is supported by the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina (Beca Pos-doctoral Legajo 181417).

References

  1. 1.↵
    Romer, A.S. (1956). Osteology of the reptiles, (Chicago: University of Chicago).
  2. 2.↵
    Norell, M.A., Clark, J.M., Chiappe, L.M., and Dashzeveg, D. (1995). A nesting dinosaur. Nature 378.
  3. 3.
    Erickson, G.M., Curry-Rogers, K., Varricchio, D.J., Norell, M.A., and Xu, X. (2007). Growth patterns in brooding dinosaurs reveals the timing of sexual maturity in non-avian dinosaurs and genesis of the avian condition. Biology Letters 3, 558–561.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.
    O’Connor, J.K., Zheng, X., Wang, X., Wang, Y., and Zhou, Z. (2014). Ovarian follicles shed new light on dinosaur reproduction during the transition towards birds. National Science Review 1, 15–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.
    Reisz, R.R., Evans, D.C., Roberts, E.M., Sues, H.D., and Yates, A.M. (2012). Oldest known dinosaurian nesting site and reproductive biology of the Early Jurassic sauropodomorph Massospondylus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 2428–2433.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.
    Tanaka, K., Zelenitsky, D.K., and Therrien, F. (2015). Eggshell porosity provides insight on evolution of nesting in dinosaurs. PLOS ONE 10, e0142829.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    Tanaka, K., Zelenitsky, D.K., Therrien, F., and Kobayashi, Y. (2018). Nest substrate reflects incubation style in extant archosaurs with implications for dinosaur nesting habits. Scientific Reports 8, 1–10.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    Gabe, M., and Saint Girons, H. (1965). Contribution a la morphologie comparée du cloaque et des glandes épidermoïdes de la region cloacale chez les lépidosauriens. Mémoires du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sér. A –Zoologie 33, 149–292.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    Oliveira, C.A., Silva, R.M., Santos, M.M., and Mahecha, G.A.B. (2004). Location of the ureteral openings in the cloacas of tinamous, some ratite birds, and crocodilians: a primitive character. Journal of Morphology 260, 234–246.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Kuchel, L.J., and Franklin, C.E. (2000). Morphology of the cloaca in the estuarine crocodile, Crocodylus porosus, and its plastic response to salinity. Journal of Morphology 245, 168–176.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Hoffman, T.C., Walsberg, G.E., and DeNardo, D.F. (2007). Cloacal evaporation: an important and previously undescribed mechanism for avian thermoregulation. Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 741–749.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Mayr, G., Peters, S., Plodowski, G., and Vogel, O. (2002). Bristle-like integumentary structures at the tail of the horned dinosaur Psittacosaurus. Naturwissenschaften 89, 361–365.
    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.
    Vinther, J., Nicholls, R., Lautenschlager, S., Pittman, M., Kaye, T.G., Rayfield, E., Mayr, G., and Cuthill, I.C. (2016). 3D camouflage in an ornithischian dinosaur. Current Biology 26, P2456–2462.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    Mayr, G., Pittman, M., Saitta, E., Kaye, T.G., and Vinther, J. (2016). Structure and homology of Psittacosaurus tail bristles. Palaeontology 59, 793–802.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    Erickson, G.M., Makovicky, P.J., Inouye, B.D., Zhou, C.F., and Gao, K.Q. (2009). A life table for Psittacosaurus lujiatunensis: initial insights into ornithischian dinosaur population biology. Anatomical Record 292, 1514–1521.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Zhao, Q., Benton, M.J., Sullivan, C., Sander, P.M., and Xu, X. (2013). Histology and postural change during the growth of the ceratopsian dinosaur Psittacosaurus lujiatunensis. Nature Communications 4, 1–8.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    Gadow, H. (1887). Remarks on the cloaca and on the copulatory organs of the Amniota. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 178, 5–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    Blob, R.W. (1998). Evaluation of vent position from lizard skeletons for estimation of snout: vent length and body mass. Copeia, 792–801.
  19. 19.↵
    Felice, R.N., and O’Connor, P.M. (2014). Ecology and caudal skeletal morphology in birds: the convergent evolution of pygostyle shape in underwater foraging taxa. PLoS One 9, e89737.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Sanger, T.J., Gredler, M.L., and Cohn, M.J. (2015). Resurrecting embryos of the tuatara, Sphenodon punctatus, to resolve vertebrate phallus evolution. Biology Letters 11, 20150694.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. A.S. King and
    2. J. McLelland
    King, A.S. (1981). Phallus. In Form and function in birds, A.S. King and J. McLelland, eds. (London: Academic Press), pp. 107–147.
  22. 22.↵
    Sato, T., Cheng, Y.N., Wu, X.C., Zelenitsky, D.K., and Hsiao, Y.F. (2005). A pair of shelled eggs inside a female dinosaur. Science 308, 375–375.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Bailleul, A.M., O’Connor, J., Zhang, S., Li, Z., Wang, Q., Lamanna, M.C., Zhu, X., and Zhou, Z. (2019). An Early Cretaceous enantiornithine (Aves) preserving an unlaid egg and probable medullary bone. Nature Communications, 1275
  24. 24.↵
    Briskie, J.V. (1998). Avian genitalia. Auk 115, 826–828.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    Brazaitis, P.J. (1968). The determination of sex in living crocodilians. Herpetological Journal 4, 54–58.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    Webb, G.J., Manolis, S.C., and Sack, G.C. (1984). Cloacal sexual of hatchling crocodiles. Wildlife Research, 11, 201–202.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    Larson, P. (1994). Tyrannosaurus sex. The Paleontological Society Special Publications 7, 139–156.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    Erickson, G.M., Lappin, A.K., and Larson, P. (2005). Androgynous rex–the utility of chevrons for determining the sex of crocodilians and non-avian dinosaurs. Zoology 108, 277–286.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    Kaye, T.G., Falk, A.R., Pittman, M., Sereno, P.C., Martin, L.D., Burnham, D.A., Gong, E.P., Xu, X., and Wang, Y. (2015). Laser-stimulated fluorescence in paleontology. PLOS ONE 10, e0125923.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    Wang, X.L., Pittman, M., Zheng, X.T., Kaye, T.G., Falk, A.R., Hartman, S.A., and Xu, X. (2017). Basal paravian functional anatomy illuminated by high-detail body outline. Nature Communications 8, 14576.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    Klinkhamer, A.J., Wilhite, D.R., White, M.A., and Wroe, S. (2017). Digital dissection and three-dimensional interactive models of limb musculature in the Australian estuarine crocodile (Crocodylus porosus). PLOS ONE 12, e0175079.
    OpenUrl
View Abstract
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 12, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A crocodylian-style cloaca in a non-avialan dinosaur
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A crocodylian-style cloaca in a non-avialan dinosaur
Phil R. Bell, Michael Pittman, Thomas G. Kaye, Christophe Hendrickx
bioRxiv 2020.10.11.335398; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.11.335398
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A crocodylian-style cloaca in a non-avialan dinosaur
Phil R. Bell, Michael Pittman, Thomas G. Kaye, Christophe Hendrickx
bioRxiv 2020.10.11.335398; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.11.335398

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Paleontology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2408)
  • Biochemistry (4756)
  • Bioengineering (3294)
  • Bioinformatics (14573)
  • Biophysics (6586)
  • Cancer Biology (5125)
  • Cell Biology (7365)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4308)
  • Ecology (6817)
  • Epidemiology (2057)
  • Evolutionary Biology (9836)
  • Genetics (7305)
  • Genomics (9463)
  • Immunology (4502)
  • Microbiology (12580)
  • Molecular Biology (4897)
  • Neuroscience (28074)
  • Paleontology (198)
  • Pathology (796)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1372)
  • Physiology (1993)
  • Plant Biology (4447)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (965)
  • Synthetic Biology (1293)
  • Systems Biology (3889)
  • Zoology (716)