Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Comparison between instrumental variable and mediation-based methods for reconstructing causal gene networks in yeast

Adriaan-Alexander Ludl, View ORCID ProfileTom Michoel
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.13.337501
Adriaan-Alexander Ludl
Computational Biology Unit, Department of Informatics, University of Bergen, PO Box 7803, 5020 Bergen, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom Michoel
Computational Biology Unit, Department of Informatics, University of Bergen, PO Box 7803, 5020 Bergen, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tom Michoel
  • For correspondence: tom.michoel@uib.no
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Causal gene networks model the flow of information within a cell. Reconstructing causal networks from omics data is challenging because correlation does not imply causation. When genomics and transcriptomics data from a segregating population are combined, genomic variants can be used to orient the direction of causality between gene expression traits. Instrumental variable methods use a local expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) as a randomized instrument for a gene’s expression level, and assign target genes based on distal eQTL associations. Mediation-based methods additionally require that distal eQTL associations are mediated by the source gene. A detailed comparison between these methods has not yet been conducted, due to the lack of a standardized implementation of different methods, the limited sample size of most multi-omics datasets, and the absence of ground-truth networks for most organisms. Here we used Findr, a software package providing uniform implementations of instrumental variable, mediation, and coexpression-based methods, a recent dataset of 1,012 segregants from a cross between two budding yeast strains, and the YEASTRACT database of known transcriptional interactions to compare causal gene network inference methods. We found that causal inference methods result in a significant overlap with the ground-truth, whereas coexpression did not perform better than random. A subsampling analysis revealed that the performance of mediation saturates at large sample sizes, due to a loss of sensitivity when residual correlations become significant. Instrumental variable methods on the other hand contain false positive predictions, due to genomic linkage between eQTL instruments. Instrumental variable and mediation-based methods also have complementary roles for identifying causal genes underlying transcriptional hotspots. Instrumental variable methods correctly predicted STB5 targets for a hotspot centred on the transcription factor STB5, whereas mediation failed due to Stb5p auto-regulating its own expression. Mediation suggests a new candidate gene, DNM1, for a hotspot on Chr XII, whereas instrumental variable methods could not distinguish between multiple genes located within the hotspot. In conclusion, causal inference from genomics and transcriptomics data is a powerful approach for reconstructing causal gene networks, which could be further improved by the development of methods to control for residual correlations in mediation analyses and genomic linkage and pleiotropic effects from transcriptional hotspots in instrumental variable analyses.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • Minor revision of Section 4.2.

  • https://github.com/michoel-lab/FindrCausalNetworkInferenceOnYeast

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 10, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison between instrumental variable and mediation-based methods for reconstructing causal gene networks in yeast
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Comparison between instrumental variable and mediation-based methods for reconstructing causal gene networks in yeast
Adriaan-Alexander Ludl, Tom Michoel
bioRxiv 2020.10.13.337501; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.13.337501
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Comparison between instrumental variable and mediation-based methods for reconstructing causal gene networks in yeast
Adriaan-Alexander Ludl, Tom Michoel
bioRxiv 2020.10.13.337501; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.13.337501

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Bioinformatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4222)
  • Biochemistry (9095)
  • Bioengineering (6733)
  • Bioinformatics (23916)
  • Biophysics (12066)
  • Cancer Biology (9484)
  • Cell Biology (13720)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7614)
  • Ecology (11644)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15459)
  • Genetics (10610)
  • Genomics (14281)
  • Immunology (9447)
  • Microbiology (22749)
  • Molecular Biology (9056)
  • Neuroscience (48811)
  • Paleontology (354)
  • Pathology (1478)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2558)
  • Physiology (3817)
  • Plant Biology (8299)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1466)
  • Synthetic Biology (2285)
  • Systems Biology (6163)
  • Zoology (1295)