Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Climbing up and down binding landscapes: a high-throughput study of mutational effects in homologous protein-protein complexes

Michael Heyne, Jason Shirian, Itay Cohen, View ORCID ProfileYoav Peleg, View ORCID ProfileEvette S. Radisky, View ORCID ProfileNiv Papo, View ORCID ProfileJulia M. Shifman
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.338756
Michael Heyne
1Department of Biological Chemistry, The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
2Avram and Stella Goldstein-Goren Department of Biotechnology Engineering and the National Institute of Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason Shirian
1Department of Biological Chemistry, The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Itay Cohen
2Avram and Stella Goldstein-Goren Department of Biotechnology Engineering and the National Institute of Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoav Peleg
3Life Sciences Core Facilities (LSCF) Structural Proteomics Unit (SPU), Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yoav Peleg
Evette S. Radisky
4Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Evette S. Radisky
Niv Papo
2Avram and Stella Goldstein-Goren Department of Biotechnology Engineering and the National Institute of Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Niv Papo
  • For correspondence: jshifman@mail.huji.ac.il papo@bgu.ac.il
Julia M. Shifman
1Department of Biological Chemistry, The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Julia M. Shifman
  • For correspondence: jshifman@mail.huji.ac.il papo@bgu.ac.il
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Each protein-protein interaction (PPI) has evolved to possess binding affinity that is compatible with its cellular function. As such, cognate enzyme/inhibitor interactions frequently exhibit very high binding affinities, while structurally similar non-cognate PPIs possess substantially weaker binding affinities. To understand how slight differences in sequence and structure could lead to drastic changes in PPI binding free energy (ΔΔGbind), we study three homologous PPIs that span nine orders of magnitude in binding affinity and involve a serine protease interacting with an inhibitor BPTI. Using state-of-the-art methodology that combines protein randomization and affinity sorting coupled to next-generation sequencing and data normalization, we report quantitative binding landscapes consisting of ΔΔGbind values for the three PPIs, gleaned from tens of thousands of single and double mutations in the BPTI binding interface. We demonstrate that the three homologous PPIs possess drastically different binding landscapes and lie at different points in respect to the landscape maximum. Furthermore, the three PPIs demonstrate distinct patterns of coupling energies between two simultaneous mutations that depend not only on positions involved but also on the nature of the mutation. Interestingly, we find that in all three PPIs positive epistasis is frequently observed at hot-spot positions where mutations lead to loss of high affinity, while conversely negative epistasis is observed at cold-spot positions, where mutations lead to affinity enhancement. The new insights on PPI evolution revealed in this study will be invaluable in understanding evolution of other biological complexes and can greatly facilitate design of novel high-affinity protein inhibitors.

Significance Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) have evolved to display binding affinities that can support their function. As such, cognate and non-cognate PPIs could be highly similar structurally but exhibit huge differences in binding affinities. To understand this phenomenon, we studied the effect of tens of thousands of single and double mutations on binding affinity of three homologous protease-inhibitor complexes. We show that binding landscapes of the three complexes are strikingly different and depend on the PPI evolutionary optimality. We observe different patterns of couplings between mutations for the three PPIs with negative and positive epistasis appearing most frequently at hot-spot and cold-spot positions, respectively. The evolutionary trends observed here are likely to be universal to all biological complexes in the cell.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 14, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Climbing up and down binding landscapes: a high-throughput study of mutational effects in homologous protein-protein complexes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Climbing up and down binding landscapes: a high-throughput study of mutational effects in homologous protein-protein complexes
Michael Heyne, Jason Shirian, Itay Cohen, Yoav Peleg, Evette S. Radisky, Niv Papo, Julia M. Shifman
bioRxiv 2020.10.14.338756; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.338756
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Climbing up and down binding landscapes: a high-throughput study of mutational effects in homologous protein-protein complexes
Michael Heyne, Jason Shirian, Itay Cohen, Yoav Peleg, Evette S. Radisky, Niv Papo, Julia M. Shifman
bioRxiv 2020.10.14.338756; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.338756

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Biophysics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4239)
  • Biochemistry (9170)
  • Bioengineering (6804)
  • Bioinformatics (24062)
  • Biophysics (12154)
  • Cancer Biology (9564)
  • Cell Biology (13824)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7656)
  • Ecology (11736)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15540)
  • Genetics (10670)
  • Genomics (14358)
  • Immunology (9509)
  • Microbiology (22901)
  • Molecular Biology (9129)
  • Neuroscience (49107)
  • Paleontology (357)
  • Pathology (1487)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2581)
  • Physiology (3851)
  • Plant Biology (8351)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1473)
  • Synthetic Biology (2301)
  • Systems Biology (6205)
  • Zoology (1302)