Abstract
Classical models of perceptual decision-making assume that subjects use a single, consistent strategy to form decisions, or that strategies evolve slowly over time. Here we present new analyses suggesting that this common view is incorrect. We analyzed data from mouse and human decision-making experiments and found that choice behavior relies on an interplay between multiple interleaved strategies. These strategies, characterized by states in a hidden Markov model, persist for tens to hundreds of trials before switching, and may alternate multiple times within a session. The identified mouse decision-making strategies were highly consistent across individuals and comprised a single “engaged” state, in which decisions relied heavily on the sensory stimulus, and several biased states in which errors frequently occurred. These results provide a powerful alternate explanation for “lapses” often observed in rodent psychophysical experiments, and suggest that standard measures of performance mask the presence of dramatic changes in strategy across trials.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
↵* Z.C.A., N.A.R., A.E.U., A.K.C., A.P. and J.W.P. are members of the IBL.
