Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Deep Neural Network Models of Object Recognition Exhibit Human-Like Limitations when Performing Visual Search Tasks

View ORCID ProfileDavid A. Nicholson, View ORCID ProfileAstrid A. Prinz
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.26.354258
David A. Nicholson
1Emory University. Department of Biology, O. Wayne Rollins Research Center, 1510 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322. E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David A. Nicholson
  • For correspondence: nicholdav@gmail.com nicholdav@gmail.com
Astrid A. Prinz
2Emory University. Department of Biology, O. Wayne Rollins Research Center, 1510 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322. E-mail:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Astrid A. Prinz
  • For correspondence: astrid.prinz@emory.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

To find an object we are looking for, we must recognize it. Prevailing models of visual search neglect recognition, focusing instead on selective attention mechanisms. These models account for performance limitations that participants exhibit when searching highly simplified stimuli often used in laboratory tasks. However, it is unclear how to apply these models to complex natural images of real-world objects. Deep neural networks (DNN) can be applied to any image, and recently have emerged as state-of-the-art models of object recognition in the primate ventral visual pathway. Using these DNN models, we ask whether object recognition explains limitations on performance across visual search tasks. First, we show that DNNs exhibit a hallmark effect seen when participants search simplified stimuli. Further experiments show this effect results from optimizing for object recognition: DNNs trained from randomly-initialized weights do not exhibit the same performance limitations. Next, we test DNN models of object recognition with natural images, using a dataset where each image has a visual search difficulty score, derived from human reaction times. We find DNN accuracy is inversely correlated with visual search difficulty score. Our findings suggest that to a large extent visual search performance is explained by object recognition.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 12, 2021.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Deep Neural Network Models of Object Recognition Exhibit Human-Like Limitations when Performing Visual Search Tasks
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Deep Neural Network Models of Object Recognition Exhibit Human-Like Limitations when Performing Visual Search Tasks
David A. Nicholson, Astrid A. Prinz
bioRxiv 2020.10.26.354258; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.26.354258
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Deep Neural Network Models of Object Recognition Exhibit Human-Like Limitations when Performing Visual Search Tasks
David A. Nicholson, Astrid A. Prinz
bioRxiv 2020.10.26.354258; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.26.354258

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2430)
  • Biochemistry (4791)
  • Bioengineering (3333)
  • Bioinformatics (14684)
  • Biophysics (6640)
  • Cancer Biology (5172)
  • Cell Biology (7429)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4367)
  • Ecology (6874)
  • Epidemiology (2057)
  • Evolutionary Biology (9926)
  • Genetics (7346)
  • Genomics (9533)
  • Immunology (4558)
  • Microbiology (12686)
  • Molecular Biology (4948)
  • Neuroscience (28348)
  • Paleontology (199)
  • Pathology (809)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1392)
  • Physiology (2024)
  • Plant Biology (4504)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (977)
  • Synthetic Biology (1299)
  • Systems Biology (3917)
  • Zoology (726)