Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Learning and motor-impulse control in domestic fowl and crows

View ORCID ProfileClaudia A.F. Wascher, Katie Allen, View ORCID ProfileGeorgine Szipl
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.27.357764
Claudia A.F. Wascher
1Behavioural Ecology Research Group, School of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Claudia A.F. Wascher
  • For correspondence: claudia.wascher@gmail.com
Katie Allen
1Behavioural Ecology Research Group, School of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Georgine Szipl
2Konrad Lorenz Forschungsstelle, Core facility, University of Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Georgine Szipl
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Cognitive abilities allow animals to navigate through complex, fluctuating environments. For example, behavioural flexibility, which is the ability of an animal to alter their behaviour in response to a novel stimulus or to modify responses to as familiar stimulus or behavioural inhibition, defined as the ability to control a response in order to choose a conflicting course of action. Behavioural flexibility and inhibitory control are expected to vary between and within species based on socio-ecological factors. In the present study we compared performance of a captive group of eight crows, Corvus corone, and ten domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus, in two cognitive tasks, the cylinder task as a test of motor inhibitory control, and reversal learning as a measure of learning ability and behavioural flexibility. Four crows and nine fowl completed the cylinder task, eight crows completed the reversal learning experiment and nine fowl were tested in the acquisition phase, however three fowl did not complete the reversal phase of the experiment due to time constraints. Crows performed significantly better in the cylinder task compared to domestic fowl. In the reversal learning experiment, species did not significantly differ in the number of trials until learning criterion was reached. In crows, individuals who needed less trials to reach learning criterion in the acquisition phase also needed less trials to reach the criterion in the reversal phase. This relationship was lacking in domestic fowl. Performance in the learning task did not correlate with performance in the cylinder task in domestic fowl. Our results show crows to possess significantly better motor-inhibitory control compared to domestic fowl, which could be indicative of this specific aspect of executive functioning to be lacking in domestic fowl. In contrast learning performance in a reversal learning task did not differ between crows and domestic fowl, indicating similar levels of behavioural flexibility in both species.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 28, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Learning and motor-impulse control in domestic fowl and crows
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Learning and motor-impulse control in domestic fowl and crows
Claudia A.F. Wascher, Katie Allen, Georgine Szipl
bioRxiv 2020.10.27.357764; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.27.357764
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Learning and motor-impulse control in domestic fowl and crows
Claudia A.F. Wascher, Katie Allen, Georgine Szipl
bioRxiv 2020.10.27.357764; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.27.357764

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Animal Behavior and Cognition
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2410)
  • Biochemistry (4763)
  • Bioengineering (3307)
  • Bioinformatics (14600)
  • Biophysics (6598)
  • Cancer Biology (5138)
  • Cell Biology (7387)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4328)
  • Ecology (6834)
  • Epidemiology (2057)
  • Evolutionary Biology (9854)
  • Genetics (7317)
  • Genomics (9478)
  • Immunology (4515)
  • Microbiology (12603)
  • Molecular Biology (4907)
  • Neuroscience (28142)
  • Paleontology (198)
  • Pathology (799)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1373)
  • Physiology (2000)
  • Plant Biology (4458)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (970)
  • Synthetic Biology (1293)
  • Systems Biology (3896)
  • Zoology (719)