Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Opposing signatures of neural excitability and sensory input in initial cortical responses differentially predict intensity perception

View ORCID ProfileT. Stephani, A. Hodapp, View ORCID ProfileM. Jamshidi Idaji, View ORCID ProfileA. Villringer, View ORCID ProfileV. V. Nikulin
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.27.401430
T. Stephani
1Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany, 04103
2International Max Planck Research School NeuroCom, Leipzig, Germany, 04103
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T. Stephani
  • For correspondence: stephani@cbs.mpg.de nikulin@cbs.mpg.de
A. Hodapp
1Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany, 04103
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Jamshidi Idaji
1Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany, 04103
2International Max Planck Research School NeuroCom, Leipzig, Germany, 04103
4Machine Learning Group, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 10587
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Jamshidi Idaji
A. Villringer
1Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany, 04103
3Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 10117
5Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, 04103
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Villringer
V. V. Nikulin
1Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany, 04103
6Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation, 101000
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for V. V. Nikulin
  • For correspondence: stephani@cbs.mpg.de nikulin@cbs.mpg.de
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Perception of sensory information is determined by stimulus features (e.g., intensity) and instantaneous neural states (e.g., excitability). Commonly, it is assumed that both are reflected similarly in evoked brain potentials, that is, higher evoked activity leads to a stronger percept of a stimulus. We tested this assumption in a somatosensory discrimination task in humans, simultaneously assessing (i) single-trial excitatory post-synaptic currents inferred from short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP), (ii) pre-stimulus alpha oscillations (8-13 Hz), and (iii) peripheral nerve measures. Fluctuations of neural excitability shaped the perceived stimulus intensity already during the very first cortical response (at ∼20 ms) yet demonstrating opposite neural signatures as compared to the effect of presented stimulus intensity. We reconcile this discrepancy via a common framework based on modulations of electro-chemical membrane gradients linking neural states and responses, which calls for reconsidering conventional interpretations of brain potential magnitudes in stimulus intensity encoding.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 27, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Opposing signatures of neural excitability and sensory input in initial cortical responses differentially predict intensity perception
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Opposing signatures of neural excitability and sensory input in initial cortical responses differentially predict intensity perception
T. Stephani, A. Hodapp, M. Jamshidi Idaji, A. Villringer, V. V. Nikulin
bioRxiv 2020.11.27.401430; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.27.401430
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Opposing signatures of neural excitability and sensory input in initial cortical responses differentially predict intensity perception
T. Stephani, A. Hodapp, M. Jamshidi Idaji, A. Villringer, V. V. Nikulin
bioRxiv 2020.11.27.401430; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.27.401430

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2505)
  • Biochemistry (4951)
  • Bioengineering (3452)
  • Bioinformatics (15127)
  • Biophysics (6854)
  • Cancer Biology (5357)
  • Cell Biology (7681)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4502)
  • Ecology (7110)
  • Epidemiology (2059)
  • Evolutionary Biology (10178)
  • Genetics (7491)
  • Genomics (9750)
  • Immunology (4801)
  • Microbiology (13131)
  • Molecular Biology (5109)
  • Neuroscience (29289)
  • Paleontology (203)
  • Pathology (832)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1454)
  • Physiology (2116)
  • Plant Biology (4714)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1002)
  • Synthetic Biology (1332)
  • Systems Biology (3993)
  • Zoology (766)