Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Convolutional neural network for automated mass segmentation in mammography

View ORCID ProfileDina Abdelhafiz, View ORCID ProfileJinbo Bi, View ORCID ProfileReda Ammar, View ORCID ProfileClifford Yang, View ORCID ProfileSheida Nabavi
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.01.406975
Dina Abdelhafiz
1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, 06269, Storrs, CT, USA
2The Informatics Research Institute (IRI), City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications (SRTA-City), Egypt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dina Abdelhafiz
Jinbo Bi
1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, 06269, Storrs, CT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jinbo Bi
Reda Ammar
1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, 06269, Storrs, CT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Reda Ammar
Clifford Yang
3Departments of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Connecticut Health Center, 06030, Farmington, CT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Clifford Yang
Sheida Nabavi
1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, 06269, Storrs, CT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sheida Nabavi
  • For correspondence: sheida.nabavi@uconn.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Automatic segmentation and localization of lesions in mammogram (MG) images are challenging even with employing advanced methods such as deep learning (DL) methods. We developed a new model based on the architecture of the semantic segmentation U-Net model to precisely segment mass lesions in MG images. The proposed end-to-end convolutional neural network (CNN) based model extracts contextual information by combining low-level and high-level features. We trained the proposed model using huge publicly available databases, (CBIS-DDSM, BCDR-01, and INbreast), and a private database from the University of Connecticut Health Center (UCHC).

Results We compared the performance of the proposed model with those of the state-of-the-art DL models including the fully convolutional network (FCN), SegNet, Dilated-Net, original U-Net, and Faster R-CNN models and the conventional region growing (RG) method. The proposed Vanilla U-Net model outperforms the Faster R-CNN model significantly in terms of the runtime and the Intersection over Union metric (IOU). Training with digitized film-based and fully digitized MG images, the proposed Vanilla U-Net model achieves a mean test accuracy of 92.6%. The proposed model achieves a mean Dice coefficient index (DI) of 0.951 and a mean IOU of 0.909 that show how close the output segments are to the corresponding lesions in the ground truth maps. Data augmentation has been very effective in our experiments resulting in an increase in the mean DI and the mean IOU from 0.922 to 0.951 and 0.856 to 0.909, respectively.

Conclusions The proposed Vanilla U-Net based model can be used for precise segmentation of masses in MG images. This is because the segmentation process incorporates more multi-scale spatial context, and captures more local and global context to predict a precise pixel-wise segmentation map of an input full MG image. These detected maps can help radiologists in differentiating benign and malignant lesions depend on the lesion shapes. We show that using transfer learning, introducing augmentation, and modifying the architecture of the original model results in better performance in terms of the mean accuracy, the mean DI, and the mean IOU in detecting mass lesion compared to the other DL and the conventional models.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

  • Abbreviations

    DL
    deep learning
    MG
    mammogram
    CNNs
    convolutional neural networks
    CAD
    computer-aided detection
    ML
    machine learning
    TL
    transfer learning
    RG
    region growing
    SVM
    support vector machine
    DDSM
    digital database for screening mammography
    ROIs
    region of interests
    GTMs
    ground truth maps
    BCDR
    breast cancer digital repository
    BN
    batch normalization
    ReLU
    rectified liner unit
    SFM
    screen-film mammography
    FFDM
    digital mammography
    UCHCDM
    university of Connecticut health center digital mammogram
    E2E
    end-to-end
    CLAHE
    contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization
    AMF
    adaptive median filter
    R-CNN
    region-based convolutional neural network
    YOLO
    you only look once
    RPN
    region proposal network
    AUC
    area under the receiver operating curve
    DI
    dice index
    ACC
    accuracy
    IOU
    intersection over union
    TP
    true positive
    FN
    false negative
    TN
    true negative
    FP
    false positive
    FPR
    false positive rate
    TPR
    true positive rate
    Aug
    augmentation
    FCL
    fully connected layer
    FCN
    fully convolutional network
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted December 02, 2020.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Convolutional neural network for automated mass segmentation in mammography
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Convolutional neural network for automated mass segmentation in mammography
    Dina Abdelhafiz, Jinbo Bi, Reda Ammar, Clifford Yang, Sheida Nabavi
    bioRxiv 2020.12.01.406975; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.01.406975
    Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Convolutional neural network for automated mass segmentation in mammography
    Dina Abdelhafiz, Jinbo Bi, Reda Ammar, Clifford Yang, Sheida Nabavi
    bioRxiv 2020.12.01.406975; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.01.406975

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Bioinformatics
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2434)
    • Biochemistry (4796)
    • Bioengineering (3335)
    • Bioinformatics (14704)
    • Biophysics (6649)
    • Cancer Biology (5180)
    • Cell Biology (7440)
    • Clinical Trials (138)
    • Developmental Biology (4374)
    • Ecology (6890)
    • Epidemiology (2057)
    • Evolutionary Biology (9930)
    • Genetics (7351)
    • Genomics (9542)
    • Immunology (4570)
    • Microbiology (12702)
    • Molecular Biology (4954)
    • Neuroscience (28382)
    • Paleontology (199)
    • Pathology (809)
    • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1394)
    • Physiology (2025)
    • Plant Biology (4516)
    • Scientific Communication and Education (978)
    • Synthetic Biology (1302)
    • Systems Biology (3919)
    • Zoology (729)