Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Capacity sharing between concurrent movement plans in the frontal eye field during the planning of sequential saccades

View ORCID ProfileDebaleena Basu, View ORCID ProfileNaveen Sendhilnathan, View ORCID ProfileAditya Murthy
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.04.411454
Debaleena Basu
1Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka 560012, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Debaleena Basu
  • For correspondence: basu.debaleena@gmail.com
Naveen Sendhilnathan
2Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University in the City of New York, NY 10027, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Naveen Sendhilnathan
Aditya Murthy
1Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka 560012, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Aditya Murthy
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Summary

A ramp to threshold activity of frontal Eye Field (FEF) movement-related neurons best explains the reaction time of single saccades. How such activity is modulated by a concurrent saccade plan is not known. Borrowing from psychological theories of capacity sharing that are designed to explain the concurrent planning of two decisions, we show that processing bottlenecks are brought about by decreasing the growth rate and increasing the threshold of saccade-related activity. Further, rate perturbation affects both saccade plans, indicating a capacity-sharing mechanism of processing bottlenecks, where both the saccade plans compete for processing capacity. To understand how capacity sharing was neurally instantiated, we designed a model in which movement fields that instantiate two saccade plans, mutually inhibit each other. In addition to predicting the greater reaction times for both saccades and changes in growth rate and threshold activity observed experimentally, we observed a greater separation of the two neural trajectories in neural state space, which was verified experimentally. Finally, we show that in contrast to movement related neurons, visual activity in FEF neurons are not affected by the presence of multiple saccade targets, indicating that inhibition amongst movement-related neurons instantiates capacity sharing. Taken together, we show how psychology-inspired models of capacity sharing can be mapped onto neural responses to understand the control of rapid saccade sequences.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 06, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Capacity sharing between concurrent movement plans in the frontal eye field during the planning of sequential saccades
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Capacity sharing between concurrent movement plans in the frontal eye field during the planning of sequential saccades
Debaleena Basu, Naveen Sendhilnathan, Aditya Murthy
bioRxiv 2020.12.04.411454; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.04.411454
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Capacity sharing between concurrent movement plans in the frontal eye field during the planning of sequential saccades
Debaleena Basu, Naveen Sendhilnathan, Aditya Murthy
bioRxiv 2020.12.04.411454; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.04.411454

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2646)
  • Biochemistry (5259)
  • Bioengineering (3671)
  • Bioinformatics (15788)
  • Biophysics (7247)
  • Cancer Biology (5624)
  • Cell Biology (8088)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4763)
  • Ecology (7510)
  • Epidemiology (2059)
  • Evolutionary Biology (10571)
  • Genetics (7727)
  • Genomics (10125)
  • Immunology (5187)
  • Microbiology (13896)
  • Molecular Biology (5383)
  • Neuroscience (30754)
  • Paleontology (215)
  • Pathology (876)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1524)
  • Physiology (2253)
  • Plant Biology (5017)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1040)
  • Synthetic Biology (1384)
  • Systems Biology (4145)
  • Zoology (812)