Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Decontamination of Common Healthcare Facility Surfaces Contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 using Peracetic Acid Dry Fogging

Todd Cutts, Samantha Kasloff, David Safronetz, Jay Krishnan
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.04.412585
Todd Cutts
National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samantha Kasloff
National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Safronetz
National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jay Krishnan
National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jay.krishnan@canada.ca
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The SARS-Cov-2 pandemic has highlighted the urgent need for safe and effective surface decontamination methods, particularly in healthcare settings.

Methods The effectiveness of peracetic acid (PAA) dry fogging in decontaminating common healthcare setting surfaces was evaluated after experimentally contaminating nine surfaces (stainless steel, latex painted wood, unsealed hardwood, melamine countertop, vinyl flooring, clear plastic, faux leather, computer keyboard button and smartphone touch screen) with more than 106 TCID50 of SARS-CoV-2.

Results When fumigated with PAA dry fog for an hour, no infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus was recovered from experimentally inoculated coupons of representing nine different surface types. In contrast, high titer recovery of infectious virus was demonstrated for corresponding untreated drying controls of the same materials.

Conclusion Standard surface decontaminating processes, including sprays and wipes, are laborious and often cannot completely decontaminate sensitive electronic equipment. The ease of use, low cost and overall effectiveness of a PAA dry fogging suggest it should be considered for decontaminating settings, particularly intensive care units where severely ill SARS-CoV-2 patients are cared for.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 07, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Decontamination of Common Healthcare Facility Surfaces Contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 using Peracetic Acid Dry Fogging
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Decontamination of Common Healthcare Facility Surfaces Contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 using Peracetic Acid Dry Fogging
Todd Cutts, Samantha Kasloff, David Safronetz, Jay Krishnan
bioRxiv 2020.12.04.412585; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.04.412585
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Decontamination of Common Healthcare Facility Surfaces Contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 using Peracetic Acid Dry Fogging
Todd Cutts, Samantha Kasloff, David Safronetz, Jay Krishnan
bioRxiv 2020.12.04.412585; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.04.412585

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Microbiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (4230)
  • Biochemistry (9123)
  • Bioengineering (6766)
  • Bioinformatics (23969)
  • Biophysics (12109)
  • Cancer Biology (9510)
  • Cell Biology (13753)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (7623)
  • Ecology (11674)
  • Epidemiology (2066)
  • Evolutionary Biology (15492)
  • Genetics (10632)
  • Genomics (14310)
  • Immunology (9473)
  • Microbiology (22822)
  • Molecular Biology (9086)
  • Neuroscience (48920)
  • Paleontology (355)
  • Pathology (1480)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (2566)
  • Physiology (3841)
  • Plant Biology (8322)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1468)
  • Synthetic Biology (2295)
  • Systems Biology (6180)
  • Zoology (1299)