Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Single-trial neural dynamics influence auditory category learning

View ORCID ProfileKelsey Mankel, View ORCID ProfilePhilip I. Pavlik Jr., View ORCID ProfileGavin M. Bidelman
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.10.420091
Kelsey Mankel
1School of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kelsey Mankel
  • For correspondence: kmankel@memphis.edu
Philip I. Pavlik Jr.
2Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Philip I. Pavlik Jr.
Gavin M. Bidelman
1School of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gavin M. Bidelman
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Percepts are naturally grouped into meaningful categories to process continuous stimulus variations in the environment. Theories of category acquisition have existed for decades, but how they arise in the brain due to learning is not well understood. Here, advanced computational modeling techniques borrowed from educational data mining and cognitive psychology were used to trace the development of auditory categories within a short-term training session. Nonmusicians were rapidly trained for 20 min on musical interval identification (i.e., minor and major 3rd interval dyads) while their brain activity was recorded via EEG. Categorization performance and neural responses were then assessed for the trained (3rds) and novel untrained (major/minor 6ths) continua. Computational modeling was used to predict behavioral identification responses and whether the inclusion of single-trial features of the neural data could predict successful learning performance. Model results revealed meaningful brain-behavior relationships in auditory category learning detectible on the single-trial level; smaller P2 amplitudes were associated with a greater probability of correct interval categorization after learning. These findings highlight the nuanced dynamics of brain-behavior coupling that help explain the temporal emergence of auditory categorical learning in the brain.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Footnotes

  • ↵a) Electronic mail: kmankel{at}memphis.edu

  • ↵b) Also at: Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA

  • ↵c) Also at: University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Memphis, TN

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 11, 2020.
Download PDF
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Single-trial neural dynamics influence auditory category learning
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Single-trial neural dynamics influence auditory category learning
Kelsey Mankel, Philip I. Pavlik Jr., Gavin M. Bidelman
bioRxiv 2020.12.10.420091; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.10.420091
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Single-trial neural dynamics influence auditory category learning
Kelsey Mankel, Philip I. Pavlik Jr., Gavin M. Bidelman
bioRxiv 2020.12.10.420091; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.10.420091

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neuroscience
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (2518)
  • Biochemistry (4968)
  • Bioengineering (3473)
  • Bioinformatics (15185)
  • Biophysics (6886)
  • Cancer Biology (5380)
  • Cell Biology (7718)
  • Clinical Trials (138)
  • Developmental Biology (4521)
  • Ecology (7135)
  • Epidemiology (2059)
  • Evolutionary Biology (10211)
  • Genetics (7504)
  • Genomics (9774)
  • Immunology (4826)
  • Microbiology (13186)
  • Molecular Biology (5130)
  • Neuroscience (29370)
  • Paleontology (203)
  • Pathology (836)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (1461)
  • Physiology (2131)
  • Plant Biology (4738)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (1008)
  • Synthetic Biology (1337)
  • Systems Biology (4003)
  • Zoology (768)